Slashdot Mirror
Central Anti-Virus For Small Business?
rduke15 writes "I'm trying to find a centrally managed anti-virus solution for a small business network, which has around 20 Windows XP machines with a Linux server. It is too big to manage each client manually. However, there is no no full-time IT person on site, and no Windows Active Directory server — just Linux with Samba. And the current solution with Symantec Endpoint Protection seems too expensive, and too complex for such a simple need. On the Linux server side, email is handled by amavisd and ClamAV. But the WinXP clients still need a real-time anti-virus for the USB disks they may bring to work, or stuff they download from their personal webmail or other sites. I'm wondering what others may be using in similar situations, and how satisfied they are with it."
It works well, you just need a windows server/workstation to push it to clients and for clients to get updates from.
It's also not very resource hungry.
I think 30 seats was around $1000
Kaspersky Enterprise Space Security is comprised of components for the protection of Linux and Windows workstations, file servers and mail systems.
Samba File Servers are also fully supported!
More Information -- http://usa.kaspersky.com/products_services/business/open_space_enterprise.php
Im security admin for a fortune 500, posting anonymous coward. Ill tell you what not to use. Don't use Panda. We have it at a european subsidiary, and I have never seen anything so crap. Never.
Now for the advice - Use something you recognise and trial it do death, antivirus detection rates are not so important as product robustness, and console usability. It's no use having something with a 99% detection rate if the 1% it doesnt detect are things like virut and conficker, and the product falls over every time you look at it. Coporate antivirus arent so much about detecting 100% of virus as reliably reporting the viruses they have found, and robustly maintaining communications with the management console so you can deploy updates.
These days no antivirus is really very good, I came to the conclusion a while ago that AV is an obsolete technology. The malware writers are just taking the piss, and Windows can never be virus free.
Antivirus suits are the last line of defense. Not the first!
The first is the user and sensible usage policies. When people can download and execute arbitrary software and plug in USB sticks at random, you have bigger problems than the choice of your AV.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I "administer" our small business IT infrastructure (well, it's just 10 computers) and our solution was to assess who needs internet access. As it turned out, the boss and the secretary need web, email and access to the accounting software on the remote side of a VPN, and the other guys don't because they use only internal documents. But they do need Windows because we use Windows-only software (SolidWorks and MasterCAM). So I've setup a fast Linux box that's on the internet, that provides web and email access through NX servers and clients (that is, the clients run on the linux box and display on the Windows workstations). USB ports are also disabled on all Windows boxes, and people who really want to see what's in a USB key have to plug it on the Linux box and have the content checked before it's transfered to a Samba share for Windows consumption. Same thing for CDs. None of the Windows boxes ever see the internet.
None of our Windows boxes are patched, updated or fitted with antivirus software, and we're doing just fine. The Windows boxes are super-fast as a result too.
But that's *our* solution. Your mileage may vary, but I think you should make a reasonable assessment of workers' need for internet access. You may be surprised how few actually need it to do their work (IM isn't a valid reason) and you may be able to rearrange your infrastructure to make it very easy and manageable like ours.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash