Slashdot Mirror


Central Anti-Virus For Small Business?

rduke15 writes "I'm trying to find a centrally managed anti-virus solution for a small business network, which has around 20 Windows XP machines with a Linux server. It is too big to manage each client manually. However, there is no no full-time IT person on site, and no Windows Active Directory server — just Linux with Samba. And the current solution with Symantec Endpoint Protection seems too expensive, and too complex for such a simple need. On the Linux server side, email is handled by amavisd and ClamAV. But the WinXP clients still need a real-time anti-virus for the USB disks they may bring to work, or stuff they download from their personal webmail or other sites. I'm wondering what others may be using in similar situations, and how satisfied they are with it."

67 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. We use Nod32 by Mark19960 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It works well, you just need a windows server/workstation to push it to clients and for clients to get updates from.
    It's also not very resource hungry.

    I think 30 seats was around $1000

    1. Re:We use Nod32 by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh, Linux bro. On all the workstations. That's what you were supposed to say.

      Sheesh. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to boot back into my XP partition so that I may run all of my expensive, legitimate software.

    2. Re:We use Nod32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would have to agree with this recommendation.

      I've been installing NOD32 at several sites recently. The Business version of their antivirus/antispyware package does include a Management Console feature.

      You'll end up paying about $39/seat for a 2 year subscription.

      Also, NOD32 just won a Consumer Reports award this year.

    3. Re:We use Nod32 by FRiC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know about other people, but around where I work, the joke is that whichever computer has Nod32 installed, it also has tons of viruses installed. Nod32 never seems to work in real life, eventhough it consistently scores high in reviews and have lots of recommendations.

      (We use avira.)

    4. Re:We use Nod32 by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hear and find the same thing true with AVG. :) People bring me malware infested machines, so I uninstall AVG and install Avast Home (Free), which takes care of the problems, and protects them in the future.

          I'd highly recommend Avast. It does have a management tool which is what the article is seeking (avast! Distributed Network Manager). The server is free, but it requires a paid version of their software to use with it. Bulk pricing information is here: http://www.avast.com/eng/pricelist-avast-professional.html

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:We use Nod32 by LodCrappo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      a couple years ago i worked at a company the used NOD32 and they were often bringing infected machines in to the IT dept despite the software being updated and supposedly working. now I work at a company that used symantec, and they were often bringing infected machines in to the IT dept despite the software being updated and supposedly working. One of my current coworkers used to work at place where they used Panda. They were often bringing infected machines in to the IT dept despite the software being updated and supposedly working.

      WTF?

      --
      -Lod
    6. Re:We use Nod32 by jetole · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have had to install AV for company and part of my task was figuring out which one was the most effective. Take a look at http://www.av-comparatives.org/ which is an excellent comparison site for AV products. Avira enterprise always came out on top. They have a enterprise client with centralized management etc etc and it works well. Of coarse I personally dislike windows a ton but it's part of the job. If you want a centrally managed AV solutions keep clamav on the mail server, install clam through squid for web access and disable the cdrom and usb disks in windows. Thats the best you can probably do since just about everything in the windows world costs an arm and a leg.

    7. Re:We use Nod32 by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Same issue here with Symantec. I used to get angry but now I just consider it job security. Plus they gave me these really nice pills to calm me down. Oooh a unicorn!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    8. Re:We use Nod32 by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would help if he gave us the actual age of the machines in question. Working PC repair and builds I've had a chance to try just about all of them, and I recommend Avast! if it is an older machine that is very short on resources(256Mb) and Comodo on anything newer.

      IMHO Comodo has a little friendlier interface and is a little more paranoid than Avast!, which means the first week you will get a few more false positives. But with an AV I'd much rather have it a little too paranoid than not paranoid enough.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:We use Nod32 by rdnetto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can confirm this. Back when I ran AVG, I thought my system was clean and only downloaded Avast to see what it was like. I was pretty surprised to see how many viruses it found! AVG appears to work, but it doesn't come close to Avast.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    10. Re:We use Nod32 by Sabriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I find Avast itself (Home/Pro) very nice, and reccommend it, my experience early this year with its central management tool was that it was very powerful but a severe pain in the backside to install and administer. Probably fantastic for hardcore sysadmins, but like wrestling with a greased tiger for this little grasshopper. It seriously needs some wizard-fu.

    11. Re:We use Nod32 by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AV is inherently a flawed idea... As you've found out, not every AV picks up every *known* piece of malware, and none of them will pick up new malware that has only just been developed (and people are developing new stuff all the time)...

      Take some of the files that avast found and upload them to virustotal.com, and see just how many other AV products don't find it... You will also find that there is plenty of other malware out there which avast won't find... Anything that's missed by both avast and avg could potentially still be sitting on your machine.

      Also, malware authors don't just sit still, malware is big business and the people writing it are constantly looking for new ways to avoid detection, and that often involves specifically targeting the most popular types of AV in order to find effective ways to bypass them. AV by it's very nature will always be one step behind the authors of malware... AV will always just be a low hanging fruit exercise, it will never be able to get anything...
      The only place i use AV is on my email server, not because i'm especially concerned about the actual malware itself, but because malware detection works as another method to remove some unwanted junk mail.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:We use Nod32 by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      heuristics won't help either, malware authors will have pirate copies of all the latest av products and will tweak their malware until the heuristics no longer detect it before they start deploying it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:We use Nod32 by chapstercni · · Score: 2, Informative

      A minor point but.... AVG free scans for viruses only. No Malware/Spyware/Etc is scanned/blocked.

      I am curious if the malware infested machines people brought to you were running the free version, or the full version of AVG.

      I have for years installed and recommended AVG free for viruses, and other software to be used for malware/spyware/etc. I am on the Avast site now, checking out the software- I'll see if I like it. Thanks for the heads up on it.

    14. Re:We use Nod32 by paradxum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do an aweful lot of consulting for small businesses. And I use Kaspersky Business Space security.

      nod32 and kaspersky have similar performance impact (much less than most... including symantec and mcafee) and similar success rates at catching viruses (again, much better than symantec and mcafee)

      Both nod32 and kaspersky have administrative consoles that manage the network via a server (think policies, update distribution.)

      Why do I generally recommend kaspersky.... it's a couple hundred dollars cheaper....

      One little hint. If you run a linux server, most admin servers run only on windows (using msde sql server junk.) Not a big deal if you just load up vmware/xen/whatever. A small windows partition solves this problem without jumping though huge hoops.

      Oh, and the stay-away froms....... avg, ca (never catches stuff), symantec (tends to hose up the system) .... this is just from a tech that has fixed a couple hundred computers with those installed.

    15. Re:We use Nod32 by DEmmons · · Score: 3, Informative

      we switched from AVG to Avast! also - our tiny nonprofit pretty much only considered the free options. I'm the only IT guy on staff and i'd been spending way too much time manually cleaning stuff that got through AVG using tools like Runalyzer and Spybot S&D. I don't remember any viruses getting through Avast! so far, and people bring in infected USB disks all the time (we're in the Philippines). Of course, we switched all workstations to Linux not terribly long after that except for the finance pc that needs to have Quickbooks and MS Office.

      the only negative things I can say about Avast! are that the 'virus database has been updated' speech clip is annoying and almost gave my mother-in-law a heart attack once, and that it does make a noticeable impact on the performance on old machines (we actually still have pentium 3 boxes in use with 192mb ram). for a free product it does quite a good job.

    16. Re:We use Nod32 by bflong · · Score: 4, Informative

      We did something close to this, actually. We run Linux on all our workstations (with NFS shared home directorys). Then we run VirtualBox with immutable hard drive images. Every time Windows is closed, all the changes made to the system are thrown out. All documents are stored on the server. When new software or updates are needed, the administrator can run the VM with a changeable disk.

      Now we're almost completely weaned off of Windows. The VM's are hardly ever used.

      --
      Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
    17. Re:We use Nod32 by adisakp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AV is inherently a flawed idea... As you've found out, not every AV picks up every *known* piece of malware, and none of them will pick up new malware that has only just been developed (and people are developing new stuff all the time)...

      That's one reason why application whitelisting would work better. Only allow "good" known apps with a valid signature or saved CRC of some sort are allowed to execute. Any unknown apps either get canned, or request the user's permission to run -- these unknown apps can be added to the whitelist by the user.

      Of course, you still have to worry about security flaws in the "good" apps allowing remote execution / etc so then you'd want to combine the whitelisting with some sort of sandboxing / limiting privileges on apps.

    18. Re:We use Nod32 by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work for an NGO in the Philippines as well. Similar situation as you - we're a Linux shop almost entirely now, spanning about a hundred machines or so and growing. People complained for the first few weeks, then got over it. Financially we drag in 8 or 9 digits a year (in Peso), though given our customers are in a situation where they need food, right the hell now, we tend not to have a whole lot left over for the IT budget. I'm ok with this. However! And you should take note. Whenever we use commercial software (to appease our accountants and graphic artists) we still PAY for it like everyone else. If a desirable piece of (free) software says 'for home use only' then we suck it up and pay for the commercial version, or we don't use it.

      I presume you are a registered NGO with an SEC number and such. This means you are also incorporated, have a board of directors, by-laws, etc., viewed legally as a corporation. Someone spent a lot of money to get those credentials, so shake the tree a bit.

      Read the fine print sir, free versions of Avast and AVG should not be installed on corporate machines. Even in the Philippines. Why would you be doing this? Tell your boss to skip a lunch or two at the Peninsula and eat at Starbucks instead so you can get some extra cash for your basic tool set. You may need to phrase this with your boss a little more creatively though :-)

  2. We use Avast Corporate by BabaChazz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least, we do at the school. That's a 50-station network, and amounts to about $10 a year per station after the educational discount. $20/year per station without, but you get cut rates for longer terms. I'm quite happy with Avast. At the business (20 stations, no AD when it was installed aeons ago) we used Trend Micro ServerProtect, which is no longer supported. That one was $800/25 stations flat fee and is still being updated. Neither one of those needs an AD server for its console, though they are both Windows based.

  3. NOD32 Antivirus and NOS32 Remote Administrator by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do it without the server, and install NOD32 antivirus on the clients, with NOD32 Remote Administrator to manage them. We put this system in recently and it's very very effective. Synchronized our antivirus product and definitions quickly, and reported infections that had slipped past the unmanaged installation on one machine (it hadn't been updated for a while...). No, you don't have to install it on a Windows Server OS (although we did).

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:NOD32 Antivirus and NOS32 Remote Administrator by RudeIota · · Score: 3, Informative

      NOD32 works fantastically well, although the licenses are comparatively more expensive when compared to some of the competition that's in the 'same league' (Eg. Kaspersky)

      I haven't used the remote administrator to manage NOD32 clients (We don't have enough here), but after scanning thousands of PCs, I can vouch for the quality of NOD32. It's anecdotal, but I concur with many of the online results which show NOD32 has near-perfect detection rates and very low false positives. We keep trying different scanners, but NOD32 seems to do the best job.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    2. Re:NOD32 Antivirus and NOS32 Remote Administrator by RudeIota · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suggesting: don"t use MS Windows.

      Yes, and don't venture into the outer world either... You'll obtain the swine consumption.

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  4. Re:the problem is the OS by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's sexual harassment. And no, it doesn't matter if you work in the fashion industry.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Sophos by nevhan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both my university and workplace (of similar size to yours) use Sophos. They provide a number of centralised management tools, centralised update servers etc. Check them out, www.sophos.com.au.

  6. Re:I'm guessing here, but... by profplump · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those are all great things. But A) they won't actually stop people from bringing viruses into the office. They might *help*, but you'll still need an A/V client from time to time and B) those things are not going to happen reliably someplace that doesn't even have a full-time IT guy.

  7. Kaspersky - Support for Windows & Linux by Swampcritter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kaspersky Enterprise Space Security is comprised of components for the protection of Linux and Windows workstations, file servers and mail systems.

    Samba File Servers are also fully supported!

    More Information -- http://usa.kaspersky.com/products_services/business/open_space_enterprise.php

    1. Re:Kaspersky - Support for Windows & Linux by swb311 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've been using the Kaspersky Enterprise Space Security suite for around 3 months and I'm very impressed. It's much better than the McAfee total protection plus we were using originally, and functions flawlessly with Windows workstations, Windows servers, terminal servers, linux servers, mobile devices, etc. However it's exchange anti-spam product sucks. balls.

  8. Re:ClamWin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    From clamwin.com website:

    Please note that ClamWin Free Antivirus does not include an on-access real-time scanner. You need to manually scan a file in order to detect a virus or spyware.

    This assumes that the users remember to scan everything before they run.
    (I personally do the clamwin thing for my personal machine, haven't found anything yet)

  9. Ill tell you what *not* to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Im security admin for a fortune 500, posting anonymous coward. Ill tell you what not to use. Don't use Panda. We have it at a european subsidiary, and I have never seen anything so crap. Never.
    Now for the advice - Use something you recognise and trial it do death, antivirus detection rates are not so important as product robustness, and console usability. It's no use having something with a 99% detection rate if the 1% it doesnt detect are things like virut and conficker, and the product falls over every time you look at it. Coporate antivirus arent so much about detecting 100% of virus as reliably reporting the viruses they have found, and robustly maintaining communications with the management console so you can deploy updates.
    These days no antivirus is really very good, I came to the conclusion a while ago that AV is an obsolete technology. The malware writers are just taking the piss, and Windows can never be virus free.

    1. Re:Ill tell you what *not* to use by wgoodman · · Score: 2, Informative

      fair enough.. as much is i hated symantec 11, after they finally released several bug fixes and it was able to at least run without crashing a machine, it was quite good as far as disallowing removable drives on a per workstation basis, and reporting anything that was found on any machine. (it was also good about re- hijacking a homepage after a user went to a questionable site that changed the homepage to farmsex.com or what not. a simple "your homepage was highjacked" page was FAR better than the support calls i'd get at 2am about a horse doing something to a midget.)

      just saying..

  10. Re:ClamWin by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Terrible detection rate. Sorry, but when an AV suit finds about 2/3 of the threats, you can just as well go without one.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Start with sensible policies. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Antivirus suits are the last line of defense. Not the first!

    The first is the user and sensible usage policies. When people can download and execute arbitrary software and plug in USB sticks at random, you have bigger problems than the choice of your AV.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Start with sensible policies. by GF678 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The first is the user and sensible usage policies. When people can download and execute arbitrary software and plug in USB sticks at random, you have bigger problems than the choice of your AV.

      So what would you recommend?

      I don't disagree with you; smart and sensible policies are the best defense. But then again, I service schools, and schools have kids and parents (and teachers) who aren't going to follow the rules, so AV is still necessary. I can't lock down the USB ports (physically or otherwise); I'd have a rebellion on my hands.

      BTW - I'm an engineer by trade, just acting as an IT jockey in the meantime, so I don't know all the best tricks of the trade yet. But it'd be helpful to know. :)

    2. Re:Start with sensible policies. by atraintocry · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't used it since I'm in an office but since you mention a school, I hear good things about Windows SteadyState. Maybe for library computers or other kiosk-style machines.

    3. Re:Start with sensible policies. by mlts · · Score: 4, Informative

      For a school setting, (and this is IMHO, so take it for what its worth), I highly recommend these tried and true protection mechanisms for a lab:

      1: DeepFreeze with the enterprise console to allow updating when the lab is closed to the public or students.
      2: Physical case locks.
      3: BIOS set to disallow booting from anything but the hard disk, and each box set with a different password (the list kept somewhere safe)
      4: An enterprise version of Norton Endpoint Protection configured to delete hacking tools (so someone can't load a popular serial number recovery program and have the organization's volume license keys to Office and other utilities.)
      5: 1-2 cameras on the lab.

      DeepFreeze isn't a silver bullet, but it at least makes people take an effort to bypass, even if they have administrative rights. The best advantage of this setup is that you can give users admin access to install whatever chat programs they use during a session, then a reboot cleans all their crap off.

    4. Re:Start with sensible policies. by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, true. However, there is one flaw in that argument, which is one that I used all the time: corner office syndrome. People who have "rank" and are things like "President of such-and-such" seem to think they are immune to policy. We had one who signed (I was a witness) the official PC and computer use policy agreement, where it said that not following directives would result in penalties, up to and including termination of employment. He was the President of the company and answered literally to only two people. Guess what? The dude didn't care, and did what he wanted all the time. We ended up wiping and restoring his data almost monthly. Policies are worthless unless they can be applied to everyone, regardless of rank, equally. My opinion: the guy should have been fired. Reality: every 6 months we bought him a brand new laptop (he controlled the purse-strings too). Brilliant.

    5. Re:Start with sensible policies. by fostware · · Score: 3, Informative

      First line of defence?

      Group policy (Software restriction policy) disallowing execution of code from anything but the windows (excl %temp%) and program files directory. Including dvd drives.

      Closest kids get is embedding applications within Word, or debug modes of VS.

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
  12. It depends by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I "administer" our small business IT infrastructure (well, it's just 10 computers) and our solution was to assess who needs internet access. As it turned out, the boss and the secretary need web, email and access to the accounting software on the remote side of a VPN, and the other guys don't because they use only internal documents. But they do need Windows because we use Windows-only software (SolidWorks and MasterCAM). So I've setup a fast Linux box that's on the internet, that provides web and email access through NX servers and clients (that is, the clients run on the linux box and display on the Windows workstations). USB ports are also disabled on all Windows boxes, and people who really want to see what's in a USB key have to plug it on the Linux box and have the content checked before it's transfered to a Samba share for Windows consumption. Same thing for CDs. None of the Windows boxes ever see the internet.

    None of our Windows boxes are patched, updated or fitted with antivirus software, and we're doing just fine. The Windows boxes are super-fast as a result too.

    But that's *our* solution. Your mileage may vary, but I think you should make a reasonable assessment of workers' need for internet access. You may be surprised how few actually need it to do their work (IM isn't a valid reason) and you may be able to rearrange your infrastructure to make it very easy and manageable like ours.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:It depends by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      nobody aside from the boss and secretary need email?

      Well, I didn't count myself in :) We're a small firearms manufacture, so the boss and the secretary need email to answer customers, and the boss needs the web to check on the competition (he's not into porn at all, not the type). The secretary doesn't need the web, but I left it for her because she sometimes has no work for hours and she doesn't really like to read. She also does the accounting, so she needs her distributed accounting software client. As for the other guys, they work mostly at the workbench, mounting the guns. They need PCs to consult technical documents such as plans, steel compositions or art drawings, and they also need them to work with 3D models of parts, to feed the milling machine. None of these computers need to be on the internet, they are just glorified document viewers and machining tools.

      As I said, every situation is different. In a software development outfit, the sort of solution we have here wouldn't work at all, but for us it works. The OP says he manages a "small business network": for all I know, it could be a printing shop, or a garage, not necessarily all white collars. That's why I mentioned what we implemented here at my company.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:It depends by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (he's not into porn at all, not the type)

      So, your company runs Eunuchs?

  13. One proposal by freedom_india · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) You need an anti-virus solution in the Linux box. Assuming that is your only gateway to the external internet, putting up a anti-virus enabled firewall and stopping unwanted protocols is enough to filter out most stuff.
    2) Disable USB and DVD drives on every PC. Physically. Period.
    Its cheap and fast.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:One proposal by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Usability != USB Drives.
      In most of the corporates i have worked for, my USB ports have been disabled and my DVD drive missing.
      I didn't feel least constricted, if that is what you mean.
      If i needed a software, i had to follow the stupid process, but i did not miss a USB drive or a DVD drive for work.
      Minimalist physical configurations leave you less worrying about issues.
      You are probably too young and inexperienced in the corporate world. That's why you seem to equate USB with PSU.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  14. Re:AVG by wgoodman · · Score: 2, Informative

    In migrating from AVG free to AVG corp, the push never worked and we had to end up manually uninstalling on every workstation before we could push the corp version and have it actually work properly.. if we tried to push the newer version over the free version, it just disabled any sort up updates and made things worse

    yes, free should never have been installed in a corp environment, but that's how it was when i was hired.. licensing was the least of my problems by far.

  15. Re:the problem is the OS by LodCrappo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd love to be able to use osx on our network, but there are some serious roadblocks. #1 is the price of the workstations. when you need 300 bog standard desktops on a tight budget, your options from apple are... lacking to say the least. #2 is compatibility. entourage is very weak as an exchange client in a business environment. OWA on non-IE browsers is not great either. CAD and ERP software is limited. #3 is the cost of (re)training employees. with windows you get the benefit of your users having the same system at home/previous job/etc. even very simple differences in the ui require real support resources. some people just don't get it, no matter what "it" is.

    also, while i am a fan of osx and use it personally, i don't put any faith in the "macs are more secure" arguments. every security analysis I've seen shows that macs are actually easier to exploit (probably will improve in 10.6). maybe the small installed base just isn't worth the effort to malware creators (yet), but if you use security as justification for switching to the PHB, I think you're setting yourself up to look really bad.

    --
    -Lod
  16. Re:ClamWin by RudeIota · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Moonsecure is an AV based on clamwin: it actually employs a real-time scanner. clamwin offers no active protection, so it is pretty much useless for most user scenarios.

    In all honesty, I've given both Moonsecure and clamwin many chances over the past couple of years. I don't want to admit it, but I feel as though I've been largely disappointed with the detection rates, the interface and the speed of both AVs. I've used them mostly in a 'workbench' setting though, scanning client drives outside of the system. In comparison to the other (commercial) scanners I use regularly, I've not been impressed.

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  17. mcafee by fearlezz · · Score: 3, Informative

    In my personal experience, I found mcafee asap (mcafeeasap.com) the easiest to use in such a small business. This software has "agents" which report their status back to the mcafeeasap.com website, from which the administrator can monitor all pcs.

    This idea is great for small companies. The implementation however had a few problems:
    - Over time, I've installed all "agents" at least twice. They just stop working for no reason at random moments
    - Some agents 'do' have a reason to stop: they think the license has expired, while it's definitely not.
    - And mcafee is bloated + it uses mshtml for every single dialog and even for invisible actions like downloading updates. This eats cpu power.

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
  18. Re:AVG by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see you already placed the biggest point I could make out there. It does it also if the old version is too old or isn't a networked version.

    I actually had the same problem at a site with a laptop that somehow slipped through the cracks and didn't get updated to the latest version of AVG. In my case, it was a corporate version (network edition, but it was severely outdated) and I had to manually uninstall before being able to install the new client. I think the laptop ended up on a shelf in one of the partners closet so while we thought he was working with it periodically which should have already updated it if it was on the network. When we ended up seeing a version 7 in the management console after it hit the network fir the first time in over a year, and we were one 8.5, our eyes lit up.

    I'm not sure I would consider a one time walk around in order to set things up as a big negative. Especially when the case is as you mentioned. All future pushes should work pretty well. I went from 8 to 8.5 buy upgrading the console machine first and then pushing it our to everyone else. Well, everything but the one laptop I mentioned earlier.

  19. Re:the obvious solution.. on /. by bryhhh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm assuming from your post that you aren't running AV? That's how I read it anyway, as you don't include an AV solution (which is what this post is all about)

    Security Lesson #1: Usability, Secure, Cheap - pick any two.

    Anyone can put up a solution that provides two of these, however I think the solution you have put together provides only one.... Cheap!

    Working from a VM? Not usable - at least not for typical office workers. No AV protection? Insecure

    Allow me to elaborate on insecure...

    Fair enough, you 'reset' your virtual machines when shit happens, but what about when a virus sends out spam from one of your IPs and gets your blacklisted? What about when a virus/trojan/whatever leaks confidential business information? and how do you know if things get nasty if you aren't running AV?

    The viruses you need to worry about, are the ones you probably wouldn't detect without AV protection, as these are the ones most likely to do your business harm.

  20. Re:the problem is the OS by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats like saying a house needs to be demolished because theyd like a new door

    More like "soon their house will be demolished, better not invest in a new door now".

    Within 2 years they probably have to migrate to Vista or Win7 anyway, they also need to buy and maintain AV software, why not invest in something else instead? Or at least look at alternatives and do the maths.

  21. Trend Micro by clam0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For our little business of around ~35 people, we use Trend Micro OfficeScan. You need to check out what it costs, but I can tell you it works well here. To uninstall/configure the program on each client there's a central password and every noticed virus gets e-mailed to the sysadmin. The program is very stable too, and doesn't noticeably slow the system down.

    1. Re:Trend Micro by InterBigs · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second that. I've managed a 150 computer network with OfficeScan and it worked terrific. Also it offers a lot of insight in what users are liabilities and whom are not :)

  22. Trend OfficeScan by Lcf34 · · Score: 2, Informative

    After having managed three major products in the past years (EPO + McAfee, Trend OfficeScan, SEP, on various directories ranging from 120 to 6000 boxes) I would definitely vote for Trend.

  23. Never McAfee by dltaylor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    McAfee is horrendously insidious. Should you ever want to use a different product, it is damn near impossible to remove. After the IT guy at a job spent 7 hours trying to get rid of it (he did, mostly) when they switched to Kaspersky, I spent another three with regedit and a few Cygwin tools hunting down the rest. I think I got it all, since Outlook has finally quit trying to use it.

    Avoid it like the plague.

  24. AV-Comparatives Corporate Report by Ralish · · Score: 4, Informative

    AV-Comparatives recently released their May 2009 Corporate AV Report, which sounds like it may be right up your alley.

    It's fairly large, but reviews a large number of AV products with a corporate focus, contains lots of screenshots, and even grades them on their appropriateness for Small, Medium and Large networks. Sounds like it would definitely be worth a look in your case.

  25. comodo if you don't have the budget by Verunks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since my company doesn't have the budget, I have tried to find something free but I failed, in the end I installed comodo av which is free, it can't be remotely managed, but it's far better than clamav, I've scheduled an automatic scan at 1pm during launch break, and it does automatic updates too, if you need to administer it remotely just install vnc on each client, 20 aren't that much

  26. Get a proper AD server by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...then use group policies to push out AV updates automatically & lock down the desktops remotely and automatically. Samba is a half-cut replacement for a proper Windows Server when it comes to Windows workstations (sorry samba guys; samba is good, but ultimately lags far behind what it's trying to imitate)

    Windows XP is only really so vulnerable to viruses because normally it runs in "everything as root" mode; which, if you had a proper Windows server you could change in seconds (not that you couldn't do this manually, but with AD it's automatic network-wide).

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Get a proper AD server by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because workgroup mode sucks for any kind of centralized support.

      Of course it does, but Samba works very well as a PDC

      centralized usernames/passwords

      Works fine with Samba on Linux

      - Have easy central printer queues

      Can also be done with Samba, but what's the point? All printers are TCP/IP network printers. I never quite understood why people would use print servers for network printers. (Except maybe in huge environments and/or with special printers having a high cost per page)

      - Have easy central file shares with easy to apply security

      Samba again...

      - Install WSUS on the server. It's a free addon. Poof! Microsoft patch management!

      As far as I know, that is not very different from automatic updates. But I may be wrong.

      - Group Policy (install/update software, apply software settings, lock down security on all systems, etc.)

      This definitely seems to be the main reason for Win. server. Application installs and configuration is a pain on 20 machines when you cannot just batch copy directories to the remote machines. I have been wondering for a while if the benefit would be worth the cost of an additional server + the time to learn using it correctly. I don't consider replacing Linux with a Win server, because Linux is just too good and easy to manage for firewall/email/rsync backups/cron jobs/bash and perl script/etc.

      - Login scripts (and have install or apply updates to any updates to programs that don't do updates via WSUS and Group Policy, e.g. Firefox, Java, etc.)

      Works with Samba

      Sorry but I felt there were some misconceptions about Samba which were worth correcting.

  27. Re:AVG by thijsh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MANAGEMENT SUMMARY: AVG will cost more in workhours and years of your life than it will ever save you! USE WITH CAUTION!

    AVG network is a huge mistake I made as an admin... Sure the cost is low, the central management is OK, and the virusscanner was pretty decent... Only with newer versions you get these free bonus PITA's:
    - Bloat like the Linkscanner that 'enhances' your webbrowser by making it slower or freeze and crash
    - Firewall that will sometimes lock for no reason at all (making me have to go to the server to reset it since remote management is made impossible)
    - Updates that automatically f**k the PC, there was one well known AVG-update-crash that you'll probably remember but beside that there have been numerous other updates that have a success rate of installing of less than 50%, so you'll have to fix half the PC's manually.
    - Updates that will turn the real-time-protection off automatically and not turn it on again (WTF, is this a 'pro' version used in networks and on servers?)

    In the end, if you configure AVG to *only* install the AV part (only thing Grisoft is somewhat good at), and stay as far away from the crappy firewall and other bloat you'll save yourself a lot of trouble (and headache).

  28. Re:the problem is the OS by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OSX is supposedly getting exchange support, on the other hand is Apple really the problem?

    We have a similar situation where i work, exchange doesn't interoperate with the increasing number of linux and mac workstations... The problem is exchange not interoperating with anything else (as well as having a whole host of other problems and hidden costs), which is why it's being replaced.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  29. Re:ClamWin by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've not found any other AV to really be much better, i've seen machines installed with up to date mcafee which are spamming the users with ads... went through the box manually to find what was doing it and uploaded the binaries to virustotal.com, less than 10% of the av engines detected it even tho the programs hooks itself into ie and displays unwanted popup ads constantly (for typical spamvertised things like penis enlargement pills etc)

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  30. Perl by Krneki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perl scripting is the answer. Install a free anti-virus, and setup a script checking. Check the anti-virus files and registry entry. You can get all the information you need, program virus version, database version, and use a central server to store the logs. Using scripts you can force anti-virus updates and restart. I have a lot of experience with Trend Micro and all the anti-virus parts are daily checked with Perl scripts (during the night), to make sure the clients behave.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  31. Re:I'm guessing here, but... by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about users who get hit by drive by infections on websites that should be trustworthy (because the sites got owned, or malware is delivered through third party ads)?
    What about users who open pdf files or msoffice documents containing exploit code and malware?
    What about users who simply insert media infected with autorun malware?
    How about malware emails coming from trusted senders (either because those people are infected themselves, or because the mails are spoofed)

    There are plenty of infection vectors which don't involve users doing things they're not supposed to be doing.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  32. Re:We use AVG by minvaren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    AVG was lightweight until version 8.5. Now the footprint is as bad as McAfee or Symantec (around 100MB of memory used by each).

    --
    Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
  33. Managed Service... by Harassed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a look at the Trend WorryFree managed service. Doesn't need a central server on-site and you still get a centrally managed solution.

  34. Virtualization? by 2obvious4u · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this a good reason to use virtualization?

    Step 1: Have a centralized, protected, backed up file server.
    Step 2: Create a standard clean OS and application installation image.
    Step 3: Daily or weekly flash back to the clean installation (since all user data will be on the file server see step 1 - if its not they'll learn very quickly)
    Step 4: Profit.

    1. Re:Virtualization? by sexconker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all users need (or should have) the same software.
      Not all users have the same preferences for the software they have.

      You need 1 image per user. (Not an issue space-wise, but an issue maintenance-wise whenever someone wants something changed, there are updates to the OS/apps, etc.)