Slashdot Mirror


The State of Iran's Ongoing Netwar

An anonymous reader writes "Following disputed elections in Iran, opposition groups and activists have turned conventional protests into a major threat to the ruling government. The low-intensity protest movement is rapidly becoming the first true netwar of the 21st century. Opposition protesters have shown that within a few hours or less, the information technologies that are the mainstay of modern society can become its weapons, as well. This article examines the current situation in Iran and the part played by new media technologies and strategies, showing how far the theory and practice of netwar has advanced since the concept first emerged in the late nineties."

13 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Fark by RetroGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hardly any time to post. Spending most of my time on Fark

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - -
    I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    1. Re:Fark by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      Offtopic?

      Threads on Fark have reached over 20K posts. People are setting up proxy servers to allow outgoing Twitter messages (bypassing Iranian firewall filters), with several people giving out do-it-yourself proxy kits. There is an active Go Green campaign and protests planned in many cities. Posting of relevant Twitter messages to keep everyone informed.

      Somewhat on the forefront of the Netwar I would think.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
  2. 2nd net war by jimbolauski · · Score: 5, Informative

    I the 1st net war of the 21st century was between Russia and Georgia. If you recall Russia executed ddos attacks on Georgia to stop communications during their invasion.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  3. Re:Freedom for Iran! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can you please post what we can do in order to help the Iranians throw over their dictatorship?

    If you have the bandwidth (with a verizon fios account for example), run a proxy server that gives unlimited access to IP addresses from within Iran.
    Here's How.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  4. ProxyBox, Proxies and how you can help. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not long after the first requests for proxies went out, went out the requests for "So how do I configure this again?".

    So I created ProxyBox [mirror] to help people get stuff setup quickly. It has squid (listening on a multitude of ports), tor, & ziproxy. It was quick and dirty (and the file size shows). Not to mention I'm just a Mechanical Engineer, not a security expert. This was meant for the fark crowd and not for the slashdot, I'm sure everyone here is more than capable of setting up some proxies.

    Austin Heap has been distributing the Proxies to Iranians on the inside via twitter and such. (Twitter) his biggest problem right now is ssh servers inside of Iran to make sure that proxies work. Supposedly he's also been able to set up VPNs on fast connections. But work is slow because the internet is slow and he's down to 1-2 SSH boxes ATM.

    They've already started blocking ports 80,81, 3128 & 8080. And starting to send fake RESETs on TCP connections (Comcast anyone?).

    How you can help:
    Well I'd like some help making ProxyBox a ton smaller. If DSL can get a full GUI in 50MB, there's no reason ProxyBox should be 400MB. I'd also like to turn it into a LiveCD or LiveUSB so it can be set up by anyone not just with VirtualBox. (jjarvis98 at gmail.com)

    Tor is being used quite extensively. Some people have setup exit nodes and had their connections filled with people hitting nothing more than twitter, facebook & youtube. Set up an exit node or bridge if nothing else.

    Supposedly UDP and ping still work fine. So some people are looking into TCP over UDP or I was also thinking about Ping Tunnel (Tcp over Ping)

    #irantech on irc.freenode.net is a bit unorganized but it's working for now.

  5. Re:Freedom for Iran! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

    DO NOT USE HIS ACTUAL DOMAIN.
    http://blog.austinheap.com.nyud.net:8080/

    He's been getting DDoS'd from IRAN and other sources long before people posted his web page on slashdot.

    This site also has a bit cleaner information. http://iran.sharearchy.com.nyud.net:8080

    I imagine the worst problem right now (and I've seen it first hand), is people that think they're helping but don't forward the ports, so they e-mail people the IP and it takes time to verify that what they setup is/was useless.

  6. Re:Freedom for Iraq! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Iran is a considerably different place than Iraq was under Hussein. Under Hussein, Iraq was effectively a one-man dictatorship. Iran's governing structures are considerably more complex. Khamenei is the effective ruler of Iran, but there's considerable interplay with other high-level bodies, in particular the Guardian Council and the Assembly of Experts. There's a lot more jostling and scheming for influence than we are often aware. While, on the face of it, this may look like the beginnings of a revolution, I'm wagering it's more likely a coupe by former president Rafsanjani, who has close ties with Mousavi, and who is likely looking to unseat Khamenei and install himself as the Supreme Leader.

    This is the saddest part of all of this. There are plenty of reasons for the Iranian people, or at least the middle and upper classes, to loathe Ahmadinejad, but if these proto-revolutionaries think they're fighting to take back Iran from the Ayatollahs, they're sadly mistaken. Mousavi is very much a loyal servant of the current regime, with many connections with the Guardian Council, certainly more than Ahmadinejad.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Re:Freedom for Iran! by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Offer to arm the Iranian insurgency. The bad guys are already armed.

    While some aspects of the US have appeal to some elements of the Iranian opposition, the US government is not exactly the most trusted institution among Iranians, and there is a serious risk that any visible connection between the US government and the Iranian opposition would do much to discredit that opposition among Iranians.

    The situation would be somewhat different if, with the backing of its mass membership, the Iranian opposition were seeking the involvement of the US.

  8. Re:Freedom for Iraq! by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You must have missed the part where several Grand Ayatollahs have come out against the election results, and only 1 is backing it. And where part of the demands of the dissidents is that Khamenei - who first blessed, then condemned, then blessed again the results - be removed. In fact, there is substantial talk about the fact that Khamenei clearly does not have Allah's voice if he is changing his position; once he blessed it, he really should have stuck with that. The double reversal greatly harms his reputation, both inside and outside of Iran.

    I even tossed together a wiki page about the stances of the various Marjas. And L-rd have mercy, I'd love to have help editing it. There's a lot of things to try to filter, and most of those official pages are in languages I unfortunately cannot read.

    This isn't a simple "nothing will change" situation anymore. Even Mousavi is likely to be temporary now, considering he was only allowed to run because Khamenei approved him.

  9. Low-intensity? by chrylis · · Score: 4, Informative

    These protests are only low-intensity if you count that the protesters aren't starting violence. There have been literally millions of protesters in each of several cities--and these are the ones who are coming out despite the very real threat of attack from paramilitary forces.

  10. Re:Listen... by DnemoniX · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm thinking that you in fact have a very low understanding of Iranian politics. Otherwise you would know that the Iranian President only wields so much of the power. The real seat of power rests with the Supreme Leader, for now this is Ayatollah Khamenei. Mousavi isn't a moderate as far as such terms may apply but he is way closer to the center than Ahmadinejad. The likely successor of Ayatollah Khamenei, if the revolution succeeds, would be Ayatollah Montazeri. Who is pro-Democracy, pro-Human Rights and one of the biggest proponents of women and civil rights for ALL Iranians, including much-maligned minorities like the Baha'is. In fact he goes further than the protections afforded to them under Sharia. He would be the one calling the shots.

  11. Re:any story about this that doesn't mention Fark. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Informative

    Email me@austinheap.com, he's compiling an unpublished list of proxies that Iranians can ask for when they contact him. He's in one of the best positions to make sure the proxies get to the people who need them.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  12. Re:any story about this that doesn't mention Fark. by blhack · · Score: 5, Informative

    that email address is getting flooded. join #irantech on freenode and ask for the current one.

    Austin is on there right now.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.