Slashdot Mirror
"Definitive Evidence" For Ancient Lake On Mars
TheSync writes "Eurekalert reports on 'definitive evidence' for an ancient water lake on Mars. A UC Boulder research team has discovered evidence of a shoreline on Mars of a 3 billion year-old lake 80 square miles in area and 1,500 feet deep (roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain). Images came from the HiRISE instrument on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Water carved a 30-mile-long canyon that opened up into a valley and forming a large delta during a time when Mars is generally believed to have been cold and dry. The lack of additional, lower shorelines, shows that the lake dried up very quickly. Of particular interest are the deltas adjacent to the lake. On Earth, deltas rapidly bury organic carbon and other biomarkers of life, making the Martian lake bed and delta a prime target for future searches for past life on the planet."
403 Permission Denied You do not have permission for this request /_articles/03-08-2004/images/Crinoid%20Martian%20Fossil.jpg
Yes that does look suspiciously like a shrimp....
I argue because it's the internet....and I can.
403 Permission Denied
And a thorough job they did...
Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
So knowing how on Earth water and life are so intrinsically associated, this seems like the perfect spot to send a future rover mission. In the past we got some inconclusive results from biochemical analysis of the soil in more arid zones of the red planet. Perhaps on this spot we can be more lucky?
Also, the proof of early existence of liquid water on the planet also hints at a denser atmosphere and warmer temperatures on those times. This is very promising!
Um, no. Read this http://drydredgers.org/martian_crinoid.htm to see the photo.
Seriously, wouldn't it be neat if there was new evidence of water on Mars based on hi res pictures and someone would actually link to said pictures? That would be neat-o.
Don't get me wrong, Defrosting Spots Over Polygonal Ground sounds interesting and all, but...
Here you go, on the NASA site since 2003:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003/nov/HQ_03364_MGS_delta.html
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
Definitive (adj.): supplying or being a final or conclusive settlement.
Which proves beyond doubt that of which it is evidential.
As opposed to ye olde ordinarey evidence which merely contributes to the probability that something is likely.
I used to get excited about all of these Mars jazz... when I was a kid; after every other Popsci mag I used to read blathered about new evidence for life/water/robots on Mars, I started getting tired of it. Years later, they're still blathering about it; frankly, I'm tired of it. Come back when you splash land a rover into a giant pool of water which is then eaten by Mars sharks, then I'll be more enthushtaotiblastic.
"Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
So where is the evidence that the lake was made of water? could be any liquid really... epic fail
Why are we still putting quotes around 'definitive evidence' ?
Because "proof" doesn't sound as self-important as "definitive evidence", silly! Don't you know that scientists need to use longer words and phrases than the rest of us to be taken seriously?
I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
Oh, you mean, "Standard Units" for scientists or countries that don't use the imperial system.
Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
All of the original Big-8 schools without a "state" in their names reverse their initials. Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma are CU, MU, NU, and OU respectively. There is no UC Boulder. It is CU Boulder.
I believe they were talking about volume, though they didn't specify.
Champlain is 30% larger than this lake by volume, but this lake is about 80% the size of Champlain by volume. Using the second figure, with a bit of hyperbole you can say "roughly equivalent". They like to do that kind of crap when describing stuff on Mars and other earth-ish sized solar and planetary satellites.
Not the most accurate description, but it gives a rough idea of volume at least.
Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
Here you go
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
"It's called Colorado University, not the University of Colorado, so it would be kind of dumb to flip the acronym. "
Almost as dumb as correcting people about things you have no knowledge of and are, as it happens, wrong about. The University of Colorado goes by CU. Colorado State University goes by CSU. "Colorado University" doesn't go by anything, because it only exists in your head.
there. The reason is because Mars CAN be terriformed by plummitting a a few ammonia based asteroids from further out as well as a couple of ice based asteroids. It obviously would not occur overnight, but, once vasmir occurs, I would not be surprised to see us sending exploratory missions to locate resources on these asteroids. BUT, once life is discovered there, the west will not proceed with that (though I suspect more than a few other countries would push for it regardless of the life).
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Ignoring the large glaring errors, let's look at the practicality of the situation:
If NASA had proof of intellegent life on MArs, they would get a blank check to get there.
I is in NASAs best interest to NOT have a cover-up.
It's also in the governments best interest not to ahve a cover up.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on