Slashdot Mirror


Blu-ray Adoption Soft, More Still Own HD DVD

MojoKid writes "A new study by Harris Interactive notes that currently, one in ten Americans (10%) own an HD DVD player, while just 7% own a Blu-ray player. Crazy, right? More Americans own HD DVD right now than the 'winning' format, Blu-ray. If you think about it, that statistic isn't that shocking. When HD DVD was around, it was far and away the 'budget' format for high-def. The players were cheaper, the films were cheaper. In other words, it was a format more ready to thrive in a down economy. Blu-ray was always viewed as a niche format for those absorbed in A/V, not the common man's format. The survey also found that on average, consumers purchased approximately six standard format DVDs in the last six months, compared with one in HD DVD format."

10 of 685 comments (clear)

  1. Blu-Ray needs piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    People are just waiting for the BD-R disc's to come down in price, $15 for 1 disc is too much, blu-ray needs piracy to succeed.

  2. Re:But... by agentgonzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...does this statistic take into account PlayStations, laptops, and other electronics which include Blu-ray players?

    Did you even RTFA? http://hothardware.com/newsimages/Item10047/blu-ray-adoption.png

  3. Re:Flawed interpretation of the study by Nukenbar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think that both Xbox HD-DVD drives will change the numbers too much.

  4. Re:I always maintained blue ray was moot by shoemilk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, the winner of the HD DVD BluRay format war is has and always will be "None of the above"

  5. Re:I always maintained blue ray was moot by Chatsubo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's amazing. Sony are so bad at format wars that, even when they win, they lose.

    --
    > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
  6. Re:I always maintained blue ray was moot by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's amazing. Sony are so bad at format wars that, even when they win, they lose.

    A curious game where the only winning move is not to buy Sony.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  7. Re:No Surprise by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    And why would you compare it to DVD vs VHS or CD vs tape? Unlike those comparisons, Blu-ray is not a transformational technology relative to DVD. DVDs don't wear out, and an upscaling DVD player produces output that - viewed on a cheap HDTV - isn't that far behind Blu-ray quality for the majority of viewers who are more interested in watching something entertaining than in wanking over the specification of their AV suite.

    Yes, yes, I know, Blu-ray is far superior, and if we'd only just buy a $2000 HDTV, adamantium plated HDMI cables, and view it while standing on our heads and licking a irate gecko, we'd see that the quality is obviously better than DVD.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  8. Re:I always maintained blue ray was moot by jambox · · Score: 4, Funny

    What? It was camper than a row of pink tents.

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  9. Re:No Surprise by Wisconsingod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why are you having people spend money they don't need to?

    Gold plated HDMI Cables are just fine.

  10. Re:I always maintained blue ray was moot by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The definition was so good that I could see the seperations around the actors and knew exactly when they were in front of a green screen and not on set.

    Big deal. I could detect when Doctor Who used Color Separation Overlay, and i didn't need more than a partially snowy NTSC screen to do it.