Slashdot Mirror


China Starts/Stops Blocking Google

shekared was one of a number of readers to write in to tell a similar story. He says "I'm an American currently living and working in Chongqing, China. As of 9am (UTC +8) China began blocking google.com, gmail.com, google analytics and many if not most other google sites other than google.cn. Internet speed for connections outside the mainland have in general have come to a crawl. Surprisingly this has yet to pick up major coverage in the press. Using an open proxy or VPN for connection to hosts outside of the mainland continues to allow access to google, as does connecting directly to a google.com IP address. As of 6pm (UTC +8) access to gmail and google.com have returned to normal."

7 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Local Laws by LordKazan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".

    No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.

    Your rock, go back under it.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  2. Re:Local Laws by fiordhraoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sure, they CAN do as they please. That doesn't mean they're going to make correct/good decisions.

    Saying that something is okay as long as it's not covered by existing international law is saying "do anything you want as long as the rest of us haven't thought of it yet." Indeed, international law barely exists - at core it's nothing more than the various treaties and agreements between states. It tends to have very little to do with individuals. There is no international Congress that can pass a law that affects all nations - don't even get me started on the UN (or as I've taken to calling it lately, the League of United Nations).

    If China wanted to execute all couples who had more than two children, they could do so. It wouldn't be against any international law. Does that make it right? Does that mean humanitarian organizations should back off and shut up? Hell no.

    Being a sovereign nation gives you the ABILITY (not the right) to do as you wish in many circumstances. It sure as hell doesn't give a "Mandate of Heaven" that says all your decisions will be correct and good for people.

    Sure, censoring Google may seem like a small thing, but compare it to the censorship that still exists regarding things like the Tiananmen square massacre - or as it's euphemized in China, the "June 4th incident." It's still a completely forbidden topic in media and print. That's the kind of BS that overarching censorship can lead to.

  3. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The sad part is that few care enough about Democracy, Liberty, and Freedom (add Western Liberal Tradition Value here) to pay higher prices for non-Chinese (or other Slave State) products. Of course, many care enough to endure hardship and risk life and limb in Iraq and Afghanistan to promote those same values (as they genuinely believe). Strange, isn't it?

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  4. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It also said that connecting to the google.com IP address worked, which implies that the failure was in DNS. I've had my ISP's DNS cache occasionally fail to return results, or return an invalid cached result a few times. Doing it for a site as big as Google is embarrassing, but not unheard of.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Local Laws by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?

    Yes, him as an American, or me as a Brit. Or you as a... whatever you are. Us, collectively, as people with subjective ethical systems. Being aware of certain types of behaviour[1] allows us to make judgements on whether these countries are, collectively, following an ethical system we regard as compatible with our own. If they are not, then we have the option of not visiting them, not doing business with them or (in extreme cases) supporting rebellions in these countries. Making ethical decisions is a large part of what being human entails. If you are not comfortable with it, then pick a mass media outlet to make these determinations for you; it's easier than thinking.

    [1] In this case, it sounds like someone just messed up with a DNS cache configuration, rather than doing anything malicious, but let's talk hypotheticals for a bit.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish people would stop lumping democracy in with liberty and freedom. Liberty and freedom are goals, democracy is a tool for obtaining that goal. It is not universally useful. By elevating democracy to a goal in and of itself, you harm the causes of liberty and freedom.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. Re:Local Laws by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China is a sovereign nation and can do as it pleases within its own borders as long as no international laws are broken;
    Trade restriction. And EU is bringing that up to UN. Just like America did recently about CHina restricting EXPORTS of Steel making minerals. China is cheating all the way to the bank, and the west either needs to crack down on China, or better yet, SLOWLY raise similar barriers. For example, slowly drop the dollar and Euro against the Yuan on imports. That will encourage China to free their money. Likewise, if China does not drop their trade barriers like they agreed to do by 2002, then we should slowly and methodically raise ours.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.