Would this allow for more complex satellite design, knowing that in-orbit maintenance is available?
Could NASA charge commercial industries and other governments for maintenance service of their satellites? If so, would this be a feasible source of moderate funding?
Will companies wanting to send up satellites now have to sit through the "extended warranty" sales pitch too?
Seconded as another Rhode Islander, who grew up in the town where/while he was mayor. If there's a bigger example of name recognition trumping incompetence at governing...well, it's Patrick Kennedy, but Linc comes in a close second.
Something that accepts.STL format (which most CAD type programs let you output now) and G Code (pretty much the standard for CNC machines) as well as their own XYZ format is hardly locked into "proprietary formats." Do you have to use their software? To do the actual printing, sure. But it looks like you can do the design in a number of other tools as well, as long as you can output the aforementioned.STL or G Code.
Buying filament from them? Sure, possibly a pain. But then, for the vast majority of printers nowadays, you "have to" buy the ink cartridge from the company. And since it's in a cartridge, it's presumably easier to load - one of the most common complaints I've seen for products like Makerbot is that loading the filament is tricky and you often have to fiddle and do numerous test prints to get it right.
Is that solution going to be best for a high-volume printer? Absolutely not. For a hobbyist who wants to print maybe a dozen things every few months? Should be fine.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad MS has reversed course on all those items. They were bad decisions for the consumer. Ultimately though, it's coming in at a $500 price point. That's going to be it's single biggest hurdle when it's put on shelves (physical or virtual) next to its competitors.
Maybe we could program them to scour the internet for comments that take a completely unrelated tangent to the original article, for the purposes of expounding on whatever irrelevant social agenda/issue the commentator has stuck up his behind? And then it could automatically delete them.
If you can purchase illegal drugs, the odds are that you can purchase an illegal firearm. And I don't doubt that videos and how-to guides would begin circulating on the internet for people to find, the same way that you can find bomb-making instructions today. That said, you're absolutely right about the number of incidents - while mass shootings are horrible, they're also a statistical anomaly. To use the standard "how unlikely" comparison - 543 people have died in US mass shootings since 1982. The US averages about 90 lightning strikes per year. So over those 30 years, that's 2700 lightning deaths. So you're about 5 times more likely to get killed by lightning.
1) Can you develop such a complex system that works in the practical world (ie, it's cost effective and reliable)?
2) Can you develop a system in such a way that it can't be removed or bypassed?
The gun is a fairly simple machine. I can't think of a way to prevent the removal of such a complex system. And if the argument is going to be "it'll be legally mandated that all guns have this," you run into the same problem that gun control laws run into right now. Criminals - especially those who are planning on committing multiple murders and probably killing themselves in the process - really don't give a crap about following the law.
Or you make a museum showcasing Tesla and his dedication, make it fun and interesting, and you snag the interest of hundreds of young kids every year, of whom dozens may become researchers themselves.
As important as dollars are to research, so are minds.
Agreed. Even if you want to say that they need the storage network-available and in a RAID, you could buy an entry level commercial NAS for under a thousand dollars plus the cost of drives. So even with say, 6 drives, you're still looking at sub 3 grand for 10TB of usable storage, and that's assuming you probably paid too much for the drives. I would be that cost wise, that is about the equivalent maybe five to ten hours of a government lawyer's time, to say nothing of the investigators, etc, etc.
Obviously, you need to RTFA, and perhaps do some examination of your own thought process. 1) The glasses are not a recording device. The only reason they maintained images was because they were damaged, and new images did not arrive to fill the buffer. 2) Anyone who attempts to rip someone's "recording device" off their head only to find out that it is SCREWED INTO THEIR SKULL is an idiot if they don't realize after that fact that this is not the same situation as some guy with a digital camera. You could make the analogy that while pets are banned from many places, service animals are welcome. 3) Destryoing someone's documentation about their medical device is spiteful and childish at best, and legally questionable at worst. 4) One would not attempt to hide their identity while taking a perfectly legal action in accordance with company policy. 5) Obviously, the gentleman was angry enough to want to go to the top of the food chain (no pun intended). So even if this McDonald's was in France, the corporate HQ is in the US. So yes, attempting to get the corporate information from a US/English Language page makes perfect sense, rather than going to a "french-language" website where he can perhaps try to talk to the manager of that particular store.
He'd already been served his food - if the restaurant wanted him to leave, their best course of action would have been to wait a few minutes and let him finish up. It certainly would have caused less hassle and embarrassment to everyone.
Get back to us when you find a way not just to make everyone play nice, but to make everyone WANT to play nice. Until that happens, Utopia will remain a dream.
Actually, it was originally called soccer by the British. In the 1860s, there were a number of sports called "football," and so they acquired different names/nicknames. So for example, rugby was generally referred to as Rugby Football. During that time, what is now modern soccer/football was the result of a number of teams getting together and unifying all their varying rules, which they then called "Association Football."
Now, the nickname of the time was to call rugby "Rugger." Because of this, "Association Football" acquired the nickname of "Assoccer." Which was rapidly replaced with "Soccer."
As to your class statement, it's not nearly that simple. Both rugby and soccer were originally upper class sports in their organized form. Soccer caught on with the lower economic classes more so than rugby, and it was at this time, nearly 20 years later, that the formal name "Association Football" went a different direction and became simply "football" to your blue collar Brits.
There is actually a British saying, “Soccer is a gentleman’s game played by ruffians and Rugby is a ruffian’s game played by gentlemen.” That said, your statement about it being called football because it was played on foot rather than mounted is strictly correct, it just doesn't apply to the particular evolution of the modern sport.
I like to think that "in God's image" refers not to the physical. I'm going to borrow a bit from Neitzche here.
Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators the creator seeks--those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest.
Don't worry, some of us who believe in some sort of God also believe that we have brains and logic for a reason. And that any human attempt to simplify something as complex as a true divinity is ultimately going to be speaking in paraphrase and vast approximation. Heck, some of us even understand that the Bible is not necessarily literal truth in all instances, but rather a way of teaching religious and moral truths!:)
In the end though, I agree. There's too many planets and celestial bodies out there, period, for life of some sort not to have developed elsewhere. Will it be discovered in my lifetime? Maybe, maybe not.
I am one of the people who has downloaded pretty much every Dresden and Codex Alera book from some sort of pirating website.
Why?
Because I bought every single one of those books as a physical book. Most of them in hardcover, too. To me, I've already paid my dues, so to speak - the pirating is simply the easiest way for me to convert the format of something I already own. If publishers offered a code in the physical book to get the ebook for free, or cheap, or something similar, then I would likely have done that.
I may be the minority in this, but knowing my friends and those who have done the same thing, I'd guess from anecdotal evidence that we're at least a substantial plurality.
As a consequence I believe they cannot be trusted with firearms and therefore ought to lose that privilege (i.e. their gun license).
This always gets me. It is not a "privilege" to carry firearms any more than it is a "privilege" to speak freely, be free from unreasonable search and seizure, be tried by a jury of your peers, etc. If you don't like that fact, then feel free to attempt to get a constitutional amendment to get rid of it. But until then, it's just as much a part of the US Bill of Rights as freedom of speech, religion, and so on.
The author complains about various things. He may have a point with some of them, but some are just ridiculous.
For example, he mentions how it takes X amount of time to boot up his laptop, but his phone starts "instantly." I am 100% sure that his phone does not start up instantly from a reboot. Rather, his phone is simply on the vast majority of the time.
The more complex the application, the longer it takes to prepare to run. I know numerous applications on both IOS and Android that deliver a splash screen while they load up. Many of these are games or similarly graphic intensive applications (comparative to other more "utility" focused apps). Or if they do not have a splash screen, they deliver no useful function while the data is loading. Ever started up google maps or something similar, and seen your position sitting there on a completely blank field for five or ten seconds?
While I agree that perhaps splash screens/load times should be more streamlined as a whole, this "zero load time" environment that he purports to enjoy with phones and tablets simply does not exist.
I know it's mostly off-topic, but
"Google Chariman"
"where advertisers will more money"
"And as for more Android smartphones released more recently"
etc, etc. And that's just what I caught at a glance.
While I can see a larger business being able to support the personnel to have such an experienced/skilled in-house development team, the fact is that for most small and mid sized businesses such a setup just isn't worthwhile.
One of my previous jobs was the systems/network administrator for a 65 person company. The yearly IT budget for software licensing, hardware, etc was about $150k. The software we bought met the needs of the company admirably, with only a little bit of customization required. Myself and one of the other IT staff were reasonably skilled as DBAs and could customize reports from our databases (a mix of Oracle, MSSQL, and MySQL), and the other guy was decent at wrapping the GUI around those queries. There's just no way that the $150,000 of our yearly budget could be stretched into hiring programmers to make custom software for us. Nor was there a need to do so - our needs were small enough - and to be frank, generic enough - that existing enterprise software just plain did what we needed with a minimum of hassle. The benefit as compared to the cost of creating a development team just didn't make sense looking at the ROI. In fact, there was no ROI at all.
That said, I can see companies with unique needs and larger companies with more complex business processes needing a better solution. For them, it may well become worthwhile to consider custom solutions for more of their tricky items.
Actually, the way most religions see it, YOU are the only one who makes a decision on whether or not you go to Hell or the equivalent. That's why in Catholic/Christian dogma, sincere confession and remorse (even at the last moment) means you end up in purgatory rather than Hell. God will always try to come in and say hi - it's up to you whether or not you slam the door in his face.
Really, most genuine religions have similar philosophical statements at one point or another. And yes, I realize I said "genuine religion." I'll defer to the pornography definition for those who want to debate that point - I may not be able to define it, but I know it when I see it.
All that said, WBC are a bunch of idiots. Some of them really mean well, I'm sure, many others are just hateful people having their hatred verified by a bunch of like minded jerks.
Usually, panel rotation systems are finicky and require a fair amount of maintenance. Plus, they consume power, thus directly affecting the net gain. Depending on the specifics, it may be that this arrangement is more efficient. As for the additional panels, you can see my response above too.
Somehow I doubt that the American Museum of Natural History missed that, after reviewing him for a rather prestigious award for someone his age. There's most probably something we can't see from the picture alone, or the discrepancy was accounted for in the math.
Slashdot Mirror
Would this allow for more complex satellite design, knowing that in-orbit maintenance is available? Could NASA charge commercial industries and other governments for maintenance service of their satellites? If so, would this be a feasible source of moderate funding? Will companies wanting to send up satellites now have to sit through the "extended warranty" sales pitch too?
Seconded as another Rhode Islander, who grew up in the town where/while he was mayor. If there's a bigger example of name recognition trumping incompetence at governing...well, it's Patrick Kennedy, but Linc comes in a close second.
Something that accepts .STL format (which most CAD type programs let you output now) and G Code (pretty much the standard for CNC machines) as well as their own XYZ format is hardly locked into "proprietary formats." Do you have to use their software? To do the actual printing, sure. But it looks like you can do the design in a number of other tools as well, as long as you can output the aforementioned .STL or G Code.
Buying filament from them? Sure, possibly a pain. But then, for the vast majority of printers nowadays, you "have to" buy the ink cartridge from the company. And since it's in a cartridge, it's presumably easier to load - one of the most common complaints I've seen for products like Makerbot is that loading the filament is tricky and you often have to fiddle and do numerous test prints to get it right.
Is that solution going to be best for a high-volume printer? Absolutely not. For a hobbyist who wants to print maybe a dozen things every few months? Should be fine.
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad MS has reversed course on all those items. They were bad decisions for the consumer. Ultimately though, it's coming in at a $500 price point. That's going to be it's single biggest hurdle when it's put on shelves (physical or virtual) next to its competitors.
Maybe we could program them to scour the internet for comments that take a completely unrelated tangent to the original article, for the purposes of expounding on whatever irrelevant social agenda/issue the commentator has stuck up his behind? And then it could automatically delete them.
Putin his money where his mouth is.
If you can purchase illegal drugs, the odds are that you can purchase an illegal firearm. And I don't doubt that videos and how-to guides would begin circulating on the internet for people to find, the same way that you can find bomb-making instructions today. That said, you're absolutely right about the number of incidents - while mass shootings are horrible, they're also a statistical anomaly. To use the standard "how unlikely" comparison - 543 people have died in US mass shootings since 1982. The US averages about 90 lightning strikes per year. So over those 30 years, that's 2700 lightning deaths. So you're about 5 times more likely to get killed by lightning.
1) Can you develop such a complex system that works in the practical world (ie, it's cost effective and reliable)?
2) Can you develop a system in such a way that it can't be removed or bypassed?
The gun is a fairly simple machine. I can't think of a way to prevent the removal of such a complex system. And if the argument is going to be "it'll be legally mandated that all guns have this," you run into the same problem that gun control laws run into right now. Criminals - especially those who are planning on committing multiple murders and probably killing themselves in the process - really don't give a crap about following the law.
As important as dollars are to research, so are minds.
To clarify: Agreed that the storage issue sounds odd. Dunno about the rest of your conclusions. :)
Agreed. Even if you want to say that they need the storage network-available and in a RAID, you could buy an entry level commercial NAS for under a thousand dollars plus the cost of drives. So even with say, 6 drives, you're still looking at sub 3 grand for 10TB of usable storage, and that's assuming you probably paid too much for the drives. I would be that cost wise, that is about the equivalent maybe five to ten hours of a government lawyer's time, to say nothing of the investigators, etc, etc.
Obviously, you need to RTFA, and perhaps do some examination of your own thought process.
1) The glasses are not a recording device. The only reason they maintained images was because they were damaged, and new images did not arrive to fill the buffer.
2) Anyone who attempts to rip someone's "recording device" off their head only to find out that it is SCREWED INTO THEIR SKULL is an idiot if they don't realize after that fact that this is not the same situation as some guy with a digital camera. You could make the analogy that while pets are banned from many places, service animals are welcome.
3) Destryoing someone's documentation about their medical device is spiteful and childish at best, and legally questionable at worst.
4) One would not attempt to hide their identity while taking a perfectly legal action in accordance with company policy.
5) Obviously, the gentleman was angry enough to want to go to the top of the food chain (no pun intended). So even if this McDonald's was in France, the corporate HQ is in the US. So yes, attempting to get the corporate information from a US/English Language page makes perfect sense, rather than going to a "french-language" website where he can perhaps try to talk to the manager of that particular store.
He'd already been served his food - if the restaurant wanted him to leave, their best course of action would have been to wait a few minutes and let him finish up. It certainly would have caused less hassle and embarrassment to everyone.
Get back to us when you find a way not just to make everyone play nice, but to make everyone WANT to play nice. Until that happens, Utopia will remain a dream.
Actually, it was originally called soccer by the British. In the 1860s, there were a number of sports called "football," and so they acquired different names/nicknames. So for example, rugby was generally referred to as Rugby Football. During that time, what is now modern soccer/football was the result of a number of teams getting together and unifying all their varying rules, which they then called "Association Football."
Now, the nickname of the time was to call rugby "Rugger." Because of this, "Association Football" acquired the nickname of "Assoccer." Which was rapidly replaced with "Soccer."
As to your class statement, it's not nearly that simple. Both rugby and soccer were originally upper class sports in their organized form. Soccer caught on with the lower economic classes more so than rugby, and it was at this time, nearly 20 years later, that the formal name "Association Football" went a different direction and became simply "football" to your blue collar Brits.
There is actually a British saying, “Soccer is a gentleman’s game played by ruffians and Rugby is a ruffian’s game played by gentlemen.” That said, your statement about it being called football because it was played on foot rather than mounted is strictly correct, it just doesn't apply to the particular evolution of the modern sport.
I like to think that "in God's image" refers not to the physical. I'm going to borrow a bit from Neitzche here.
:)
Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators the creator seeks--those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest.
Don't worry, some of us who believe in some sort of God also believe that we have brains and logic for a reason. And that any human attempt to simplify something as complex as a true divinity is ultimately going to be speaking in paraphrase and vast approximation. Heck, some of us even understand that the Bible is not necessarily literal truth in all instances, but rather a way of teaching religious and moral truths!
In the end though, I agree. There's too many planets and celestial bodies out there, period, for life of some sort not to have developed elsewhere. Will it be discovered in my lifetime? Maybe, maybe not.
I am one of the people who has downloaded pretty much every Dresden and Codex Alera book from some sort of pirating website. Why? Because I bought every single one of those books as a physical book. Most of them in hardcover, too. To me, I've already paid my dues, so to speak - the pirating is simply the easiest way for me to convert the format of something I already own. If publishers offered a code in the physical book to get the ebook for free, or cheap, or something similar, then I would likely have done that. I may be the minority in this, but knowing my friends and those who have done the same thing, I'd guess from anecdotal evidence that we're at least a substantial plurality.
As a consequence I believe they cannot be trusted with firearms and therefore ought to lose that privilege (i.e. their gun license).
This always gets me. It is not a "privilege" to carry firearms any more than it is a "privilege" to speak freely, be free from unreasonable search and seizure, be tried by a jury of your peers, etc. If you don't like that fact, then feel free to attempt to get a constitutional amendment to get rid of it. But until then, it's just as much a part of the US Bill of Rights as freedom of speech, religion, and so on.
The author complains about various things. He may have a point with some of them, but some are just ridiculous. For example, he mentions how it takes X amount of time to boot up his laptop, but his phone starts "instantly." I am 100% sure that his phone does not start up instantly from a reboot. Rather, his phone is simply on the vast majority of the time. The more complex the application, the longer it takes to prepare to run. I know numerous applications on both IOS and Android that deliver a splash screen while they load up. Many of these are games or similarly graphic intensive applications (comparative to other more "utility" focused apps). Or if they do not have a splash screen, they deliver no useful function while the data is loading. Ever started up google maps or something similar, and seen your position sitting there on a completely blank field for five or ten seconds? While I agree that perhaps splash screens/load times should be more streamlined as a whole, this "zero load time" environment that he purports to enjoy with phones and tablets simply does not exist.
I know it's mostly off-topic, but
"Google Chariman"
"where advertisers will more money"
"And as for more Android smartphones released more recently"
etc, etc. And that's just what I caught at a glance.
One of my previous jobs was the systems/network administrator for a 65 person company. The yearly IT budget for software licensing, hardware, etc was about $150k. The software we bought met the needs of the company admirably, with only a little bit of customization required. Myself and one of the other IT staff were reasonably skilled as DBAs and could customize reports from our databases (a mix of Oracle, MSSQL, and MySQL), and the other guy was decent at wrapping the GUI around those queries. There's just no way that the $150,000 of our yearly budget could be stretched into hiring programmers to make custom software for us. Nor was there a need to do so - our needs were small enough - and to be frank, generic enough - that existing enterprise software just plain did what we needed with a minimum of hassle. The benefit as compared to the cost of creating a development team just didn't make sense looking at the ROI. In fact, there was no ROI at all.
That said, I can see companies with unique needs and larger companies with more complex business processes needing a better solution. For them, it may well become worthwhile to consider custom solutions for more of their tricky items.
Actually, the way most religions see it, YOU are the only one who makes a decision on whether or not you go to Hell or the equivalent. That's why in Catholic/Christian dogma, sincere confession and remorse (even at the last moment) means you end up in purgatory rather than Hell. God will always try to come in and say hi - it's up to you whether or not you slam the door in his face. Really, most genuine religions have similar philosophical statements at one point or another. And yes, I realize I said "genuine religion." I'll defer to the pornography definition for those who want to debate that point - I may not be able to define it, but I know it when I see it. All that said, WBC are a bunch of idiots. Some of them really mean well, I'm sure, many others are just hateful people having their hatred verified by a bunch of like minded jerks.
You either need an invite from an existing member, or you get lucky during one of their open membership drives.
Probably not worth a whole lot once it gets close enough to Earth to destroy it (destroy Earth, that is). :)
Usually, panel rotation systems are finicky and require a fair amount of maintenance. Plus, they consume power, thus directly affecting the net gain. Depending on the specifics, it may be that this arrangement is more efficient. As for the additional panels, you can see my response above too.
Somehow I doubt that the American Museum of Natural History missed that, after reviewing him for a rather prestigious award for someone his age. There's most probably something we can't see from the picture alone, or the discrepancy was accounted for in the math.