Middle-School Strip Search Ruled Unconstitutional
yuna49 writes "The US Supreme Court today ruled 8-1 that the strip search of a 13-year-old girl by officials in an Arizona middle school was unconstitutional. However, by a vote of 7-2, the Court also ruled that the individual school officials could not be held personally liable. A suit for damages against the school district itself is still going forward. We discussed this case at length back in March when the Court decided to hear the case on appeal."
Yes, I guess it will be easier to get a look at girls' chests in countries with flimsy constitutional protections.
Yeah, I want you around my kids.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
There, fixed that for ya.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Because now we know that we can store torrents and pirated files in children's underpants (aka UnderWarez) that cannot, constitutionally, be searched by their school administrations.
I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
Well, unlike your argument/hypothetical situation, a 13 year old can hold (their) water.
No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
As Justice Stevens said, "it does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights of some magnitude." But it took Justice Thomas to get to the heart of it, when he said, "Whadda ya mean, no one took pictures?"
Rule #1 of parenting is never leave your kids alone with someone until after they agree to tell you their name.
The police department has the same rule about giving recruits guns.
Fucking fascists.
The enemies of Democracy are
as it is now as a parent I would press sex offense charges in both cases, sue the pants off the school district...
Then you're no better than they are! Two wrongs don't make a right; just because they saw your daughter's unmentionables doesn't mean you get to see theirs...