Slashdot Mirror


Stuck Knob Causes Serious Window Damage To Atlantis

FTL writes "While in orbit a metal knob floated between a window and the dashboard of Atlantis. Once back on Earth, the shuttle contracted, wedging the knob firmly in place and damaging the window. Initial attempts to free the knob have failed and engineers may need six months to disassemble that section of the orbiter. Given that the shuttle program will probably end next year anyway, such a delay might mean scrapping Atlantis early rather than repairing it. Efforts to remove the knob using less invasive techniques continue."

50 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. The Inanimate Carbon Knob! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article neglects to mention the extreme disappointment of John M. Grunsfeld who spent the majority of Mission STS-125 photographing a strange phenomenon he could witness through his window but could not detect on radar. A large knob-shaped object would move about above the atmosphere with an almost supernatural fluidity and change of speeds relative to the Earth. He neglected to mention it to his crewmates hoping that he had stumbled upon either the first contact with alien life or observed a new phenomenon he dubbed in his journal "Grunsfeld's Effect." Unfortunately the engineers at NASA have immortalized his name by calling the stuck debris "Grunsfeld's Knob" or "Grunsfeld's God." The engineers have also started referring to being duped as "being grunsfelded." Example: "I called up to order some of those damn Video Professor instructional DVDs and ended up with 8 of the stupid things. Man did I get Grunsfelded!"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Inanimate Carbon Knob! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

      James Grundsfeld (previously known as James May).

      Did he have a sex change?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or is that only an outer protective layer? I know I've seen pictures of the pitting that micrometeors and paint flecks have caused on the Shuttles while in orbit, I just assumed they were made to be easily replaced.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by pz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or is that only an outer protective layer? I know I've seen pictures of the pitting that micrometeors and paint flecks have caused on the Shuttles while in orbit, I just assumed they were made to be easily replaced.

      The article isn't wholly clear, but implies that there are three layers of glass, only the outer one gets replaced. The inner ones have never been replaced on any shuttle. The innermost one is the most important for retaining the internal pressure, and is the one that has sustained damage.

      And to be clear, if you read the article, it's obvious that the engineers working on this are SERIOUS and have thought of just about anything that slashdot readers have come up with. Drill/cut? Too high risk because of (a) vibrations transmitted to the window and microgrinding of the knob against the window and (b) metallic dust it will generate. Pressurize orbiter? Yep. For some reason, they think they can only get it to +3 PSI. Might help. Apply cold to the knob to shrink it? Yep. They tried dry ice. Didn't work. (My guess is that they'll try liquid nitrogen, too at some point.) They're planning on trying dry ice and pressurization at the same time. Apply downward pressure to the dash with a crobar? Probably very risky because of unknown damage it might cause to dash.

      Once the knob is out, they'll make visual inspection of the remaining surface, including taking microscopic moldings to assess the damage. The pane is tempered, so scratches are a big problem, as they can lead to spontaneous, catastrophic failure.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    2. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by seyyah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or is that only an outer protective layer? .... I just assumed they were made to be easily replaced.

      No, sadly, the knob's outer, protective layer can not be easily replaced (cf circumcision).

    3. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I for one am completely comfortable with calling in a local contractor and installing some new money-saving vinyl windows which will be the only thing between me and seventeen thousand mile per hour wind.

    4. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by pz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excellent and informed analysis. However, I think it is unlikely that "metal" knob could scratch glass. See the Moh hardness scale.

      Hmm. You're saying you know what the knob is made of, and what the surface treatment of that material is? If, for example, it's aluminum with an anodization (as it looks to be in the photo), it may well scratch the glass. Scratching isn't the only issue, though, as if sufficient pressure has been applied, localized microscopic deformation might have occurred as well. If the compression layer of the tempered glass has been breached, the glass will fail. If it has been damaged beyond the stated engineering guidelines, as described in the article, the window will need to be replaced. The close up image in the article shows what appears to be damage to the glass at two points where the glass contacts the knob.

      It's a simple problem that many of us have faced in one situation or another where something small has managed to get wedged where it shouldn't, and requires extraction. The difference here is that there are serious, and potentially highly costly, either in dollars or in human life, or both, potential ramifications to performing the extraction badly.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are easy to replace FOR A SPACE SHIP.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why not spray a sealant around the surrounding materials, lay in an extraction nozzle attached to a pump, pour a mold around it then use a chemical to dissolve the metal, at least the edges of the metal, enough to remove it? No vibrations, no pressure, no crazy coolant or heating solutions. You can pick a site to work on that is least risk, such as the area in contact with the glass (assuming the glass isn't affected by the chemicals dissolving the metal).

    7. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Other ideas that probably won't work:
      -- Thaw out one of the aliens from Hangar 18 to spit on the knob and dissolve it.
      -- Beam the knob out of there using NASA's experimental teleportation device.
      -- Eliminate the space between the atoms in the knob, causing it to shrink to the size of an amoeba.
      -- Use the sun's gravity to travel back in time to before the knob got stuck.
      -- WD40.
      -- Have the holographic doctor reach through the windshield and poke the knob out.
      -- Talk to the knob. Teach it Phenomenology.
      -- Wait until the knob's warranty expires, then it will fall to pieces on its own.
       

    8. Re:Aren't the windshields replaced all the time? by pz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cutting would obviously be done by hand, or with a very slow speed reciprocating saw, which produce minimal vibration. They'd probably encase the whole thing in epoxy first to further reduce vibration.

      Movement of the knob against the glass, no matter how slow, is potentially going to grind the glass away. Encasing the knob in epoxy isn't going to help unless the epoxy is also adhering to the glass to prevent relative motion between the knob and glass. And, in that case, there's the difficulty of removing the epoxy afterward. Could be done, but probably not a very good approach, and certainly not without risk.

      If scratches can lead to "spontaneous catastrophic failure" in the window material then obviously there is zero risk because the window must have a strong scratch-proof covering, probably a thin layer of plexiglas or similar. Otherwise trivial incidents over the course of the shuttle's working life would pose an unacceptable risk--anything breaking loose on re-entry, in particular, could scratch the surface if it was not heavily protected.

      The article (you did read the article before spouting off, right?) does not describe any coating that I saw. It does, however, describe the minimum acceptable damage to the outer stressed layer of the glass. Recall this is thermally stressed (aka Pyrex) glass, and if the outer compression layer is breached, it can, and does, lead to spontaneous catastrophic failure. That's why there are guidelines as to how deep a scratch is acceptable. Also recall that the compression layer is not one atomic layer, such that the glass can sustain some damage before failing. Note that this would still be true if there were any sort of plastic coating as well -- there would still be some limit of acceptable damage before risk of failure is too high.

      More importantly, if the choice is a) scrap the shuttle early for sure or b) risk having to scrap it due to damage done during knob removal, the choice is so obvious that only a NASA engineer could get it wrong.

      [snip]

      Personally, I'm wondering why engineers rather than machinists are working on this problem. Engineers don't have the appropriate hands-on skills to deal with it. Machinists do.

      Did you learn somewhere that there are no machinists working on the problem? Do you know engineers working at NASA, so you have the experience to make blanket statements about their ability like that? It just so happens that I do know engineers at NASA, and at some of their subcontractors. One can argue whether they are absolutely the very best in the world or not, but they are certainly world-class, and a damned sight better than any run-of-the-mill engineers around. Listen, these aren't stupid people. It is rocket science, and rocket science is hard. If you have never been to Johnson, I highly recommend it. And you can bet that if you or I had an idea after cogitating for 2 minutes about the extraction problem, someone who's job depends on it, who likely has a degree in aero-astro from MIT, who realizes the potential ramifications of screwing up, and who has spent many hours thinking about it non-stop, has already come up with it. Like asking a machinist for his thoughts.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  3. finally, a use for a dremel tool by cats-paw · · Score: 2, Funny

    they can borrow mine. I never use it.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:finally, a use for a dremel tool by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 5, Funny

      they can borrow mine. I never use it.

      I read your comment before reading your title and assumed you meant your knob.

      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    2. Re:finally, a use for a dremel tool by maharg · · Score: 2, Funny

      belly lol.. me too ;o)

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  4. missed opportunity by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Title suggestion: "Shuttle has a Wedgie"
       

  5. Well, it works with dogs... by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Throw a bucket of cold water on it and the knob should slip right out.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Well, it works with dogs... by multipartmixed · · Score: 3, Funny

      How did you get a knob stuck in a dog?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  6. since the shuttle programming is so old by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    and is underfunded and ending soon anyways, give atlantis the same proper ghetto treatment a contemporary of its time would receive, like 25 year old plymouth horizon: plastic sheeting and duct tape

    also knock out a back tail light and finger daub "wash me" in the cosmic dust on its hood

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Well... by locoztx · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's knobody's fault. Sorry.

  8. Re:physics by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    why not just put it in a vacuum chamber, warm it up, and slide it on out?

    What, you mean like they discussed in the article? They even came up with a better idea: instead of heating up the whole vessel, just freeze the knob with dry ice!

    The options relating to the application of dry ice to shrink the knob have already been attempted, and failed. However, the same method, along with a pressurization of the Crew Module, may be enough to free the knob from its lodged position.

    The only problem is the amount of pressurization that can be conducted in the OPF is far less than the pressure that played a part in allowing the knob to become embedded in the first place.

    Pressurize crew module and dry ice on knob to TBD (To Be Determined) pressure. Pro's: Could allow for uniform structural deflection to increase gap between pressure pane and dashboard; enough to free up the knob non-destructively. Less potential for inducing further damage to the pane.

    **UPDATE: The above option was selected on Thursday as the opening process for an attempt to remove the knob. The cabin will be pressurized to 3 psid, before an engineer will apply dry ice to the knob. This option is not deemed to be a likely solution, but more so the opening option that avoids additional damage to the window.**

    Although it's lengthy, you should try reading the article next time. The guys at NASA are pretty clever.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  9. Listen to the radio ads by Chelloveck · · Score: 4, Funny

    They need to call one of those chip-and-crack auto glass replacement people that I hear on the radio all the time. They come out to your workplace to do the job, and best of all, you only pay the insurance deductible!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  10. Been there done that by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know how they feel: Toyota's quoting me $400 to fix a loose sun visor because they have to take the entire @&%#! side of the car apart to get to it.
       

    1. Re:Been there done that by tinkerghost · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know how they feel: Toyota's quoting me $400 to fix a loose sun visor because they have to take the entire @&%#! side of the car apart to get to it.

      Try replacing a heater core in a modern car - usually the entire dash assembly has to be removed to get it out. Figure out how much a factory shop is going to charge you for that.

      Better than the Chevy 2.8L transverse V6 I suppose. The section of the shop manual for replacing spark plugs starts with: "Unbolt the dogbone and engine mounts and rotate the engine forward". Yes, to replace the sparkplugs you're supposed to unbolt the fucking engine from the car.

      If car mfg's come up with this crap - think how much more convoluted your average rocket jockey is going to be when he comes up with something that's only supposed to be replaced once every 2 to 3 vehicles.

  11. Dissolve it by rally2xs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Acid.

    1. Re:Dissolve it by CarpetShark · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you think dissolving the space shuttle is overkill?

    2. Re:Dissolve it by Anonymous+Struct · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look, do you want the knob back or not?

  12. Re:physics by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guys at NASA are pretty clever.

    Oh come on - it's not like they're rocket scientists or anything! :) :) :)

  13. Re:physics by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    FAO any other Monday morning quarterbacks, armchair rocket scientists, and other self-appointed experts and "why don't they just" merchants out there who never seem to consider that the people working on the thing might actually have thought about what they are doing, quoth TFA:

    "Induced damage of the knob being wedged between the glass and the dashboard closeout panel structure, or from removal of the knob could result in unacceptable damage.

    "Consequences of unacceptable damage to the glass pane: Replacing the pressure pane would result in a significant impact to ground schedule (potential 6+ month impact). Requires de-configuring dashboard structure and instrumentation to remove window assembly for refurbishment. Windshield pressure pane removal has never been performed at KSC.

    "Knob removal must be performed carefully; exhausting all risk free options first, then attempting more intrusive (higher risk) options, if others fail."

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  14. Re:Blow it up by Jherico · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to mention that a structure designed to take that differential in a zero gravity environment might not respond the same way to it under 1 gravity.

    --

    Jherico

    What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

  15. Re:physics by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Knobs do not belong in vacuum cleaners. And once it warms up, there's no pulling it out of anything. There was one bad evening I did get my knob suck it something. Don't mix up lube and super glue.

  16. Stuck knob by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this condition lasts for more than 4 hours, call a doctor.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  17. Re:physics by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to do tech support at Honeywell. Had real rocket scientists there. Called them my brilliant idiots.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  18. You know you should go to bed, when... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you read that as "Stuck Know Causes Serious Windows Damage To Atlantis", and think "How the hell do they know what OS they were using on that sunken island?"

    I just know realized, that even my question does not make any sense...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  19. This reminds me of my dashboard ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why any car is made with other than LED lights (perhaps cold-cathode is good enough, or for some reason that I don't know even better) rather than little incandescent bulbs is beyond me. "Here's an important part we know will fail, that's about 18" from the driver. Let's make it very, very difficult to remove, so when the important dashlights fail, he'll need to pay someone with more tools a lot of money to fix the 10-cent lightbulb."

    Headlights, the same way, at least the ones on a) a 1998 Subaru Outback and b) a 2003 (?) Mazda Protege5. I have no yet had the courage to well investigate on my current car, but since it's also a Subaru, I bet it will lead to much cursing. Ooh, how I hate those little bendy-pins, straight of our Rube Goldberg, and the awkward angles / hand positioning needed to do a repair that's to be easily expected.

    And it's not even a space shuttle!

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:This reminds me of my dashboard ... by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have found the that the main difference between a $20K car and a $50K car is that the $0.20 parts get replaced with $0.50 parts. Not shaving every possible penny on every possible part seems to help a lot quality-wise. I just wish I could buy the $21K car with just those parts upgrades!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:This reminds me of my dashboard ... by tomthegeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      The radio that came with my 99 Grand Am has an incandescent bulb to light up the display. No way to easily replace it, in order to fix it I had to pull the whole radio apart. Tell me that's not planned obsolescence. Oh and if I ever find the guy that designed the headlights I'm going to kick him square in the nuts.

  20. Re:physics by laddiebuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone else earlier suggested, why not dissolve it? There are acids with high enough electronegativity differences to dissolve just about anything. If the acid were brushed on to the a sufficiently narrow part of the knot, and all collected as it dripped down, it would in time etch that part of the metal away enough to break it and hence dislodge the knob. Of course, it would have to be secured first so it doesn't collapse when it shouldn't. But that seems less invasive if more time-consuming. However, it needn't even be so expensive -- the acid can after all simply be re-circulated. No matter how time-consuming, though, it's simple enough that there's not much overhead -- so it could be done in weeks instead of 6 months.

    And yes, I don't see this option discussed anywhere in the article. Several other options with immediately visible flaws are discussed and rejected, but this isn't.

  21. Re:physics by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah this was my thought too as soon as I read "dry ice". Just freeze it and smack it. I'm sure the reason why not is because the fragments will only cause more damage once in space.

    Try this, for educational purposes:

    Drop a piece of aluminum or steel into a bucket of liquid nitrogen. Now take it out and drop it on the ground from a height of 6 feet, or hit it with a hammer. Notice it not shattering.

    The first time I dropped a 10 pound block of aluminum while taking it out of a nitrogen bucket I expected it to shatter, too. Then I realized I thought that because of hollywood.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  22. How about reheating the orbiter to expand it again by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... the engineers working on this ... have thought of just about anything ... Drill/cut? ... Pressurize orbiter? ... Apply cold to the knob to shrink it?

    How about tying a string to the knob (so it doesn't get away), reheating the orbiter, and pressurizing it - recreating the situation (except for zero G) that let it float in in the first place?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  23. Re:pressure by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's something you didn't try, and it was reading the fucking article.

    <Slaps Head> Of course! The answer is in the article. Phone NASA and tell them to read it.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  24. New Eternal Question. by Sebilrazen · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many rocket scientists does it take to get a stuck knob unstuck?

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
  25. Re:NASA forgot low tech approaches? by lgw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, why didn't those rocket scientists think of using a magnet to clean up aluminum dust - what losers!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  26. Re:NASA forgot low tech approaches? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Magnets for aluminum. Sure.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  27. Re:Scrap it! by beckett · · Score: 3, Informative

    pencils contain graphite. graphite conducts electricity. graphite powder is generated when you rub it up against paper to write stuff. graphite powder gets everywhere in microgravity, including behind control panels, into switches, and sensitive electrical components.

    i'm glad you're not in charge of so much of a paperclip at NASA.

  28. Re:Scrap it! by Suzuran · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is an urban legend. It's entirely false. The poster knows this and is trolling. PS: I own one of the pens in question.

  29. I'm know I'm not smarter than nasa, but... by DragonTHC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why can't they put postive pressure inside the orbiter and pop it out?

    but a better question perhaps, is why the hell is there junk rolling around inside the space shuttle?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  30. Re:Scrap it! by geekprime · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope sorry p51d007

    Fisher developed the pen at their own expense NASA only had to buy the pens, at the same price the general public could I might add.

    You know, just a little research would keep you from looking quite so stupid.
    As a personal note you might try not being an ass, just for fun.

    re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Pen
    NASA never approached Paul Fisher to develop a pen, nor did Fisher receive any government funding for the pen's development. Fisher invented it independently, and then asked NASA to try it. After the introduction of the AG7 Space Pen, both the American and Soviet (later Russian) space agencies adopted it. Previously both the Russian and American astronauts used grease pencils and plastic slates

  31. Re:physics by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, since everyone else is throwing in their idea, here's mine.

    How about a very low-speed, low pressure diamond wire-saw?

    For example: SXJ-2 Precision Endless Wire Saw - 840 mm long, 0.35 mm dia. Diamond Loop Wire (that's a continuous loop - they'd need to cut it, and re-attach it after wrapping it around the knob).

    They could feed the flexible saw wire around around the knob and adjust the cutting pressure to keep it as safe as they want to be. If it's just a wire coated in diamond dust or the like, it will cut very slowly and precisely.

    Note: If it works, please send me the cut pieces :)

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  32. Re:physics by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

    In my case it was soaking the steel in liquid nitrogen for 15 minutes, then hitting it with a whopping big hammer with a knife edge at the end of a three foot long pendulum that had swung through 120 degrees or so. With most steels a 10mm cross section won't even break all of the way through under such treatment. Those that do are usually rubbish in any sort of cold weather.
    The "Hollywood style" liquid nitrogen brittleness is best seen with some plastics and rubbers - there is a glass transition temperature below which the material is very brittle. You can do the rick of smashing a rubber dog toy into fragments with a hammer after soaking it in liquid nitrogen for a few minutes. Polyethylene as in cling wrap doesn't do this (which is dissappointing. Anything with a lot of water (eg. a banana) will of course freeze and smash just like ice. An important safety tip is to wait some time before placing the frozen banana in your mouth or it will burn your tongue (my classmate that did that now works in an explosives factory but is still intact last I heard).

  33. Re:physics by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Informative
    If the acid were brushed on to the a sufficiently narrow part of the knot, and all collected as it dripped down

    We've used a similar technique in one of our workshops, but there's no need to brush and collect - you use an inert sponge and/or capillary tube to circulate the etchant. Likewise, you don't need to use acids which produce potentially corrosive fumes and aerosols. A solution of copper sulphate and sodium chloride will do the job nicely with less risk.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."