Tennesee Man Charged In "Virtual Pornography" Case
mcgrew writes "CNN reports that 'A Tennessee man is facing charges of aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor for what authorities say are three pictures — none of them featuring an actual child's body. Instead, according to testimony presented at Michael Wayne Campbell's preliminary hearing in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on Wednesday, the photos feature the faces of three young girls placed on the nude bodies of adult females, CNN affiliate WDEF reported.'"
RIP Michael Jackson!
"Engineering. Where the noble, semi-skilled laborers execute the vision of those who think and dream." -Sheldon
The question is: what kind of a "thing"?
He professed to love children -- in the conventional sense -- just as many other people do. And he was weird. But people put those two things together, and think "he was doing weird things with children", which does not necessarily follow, at all. If you have real evidence that he was a child molester, then bring it forth. Otherwise, you are doing nothing but pretending that your suspicions are fact.
Even if you didn't like his plastic surgery addiction and kiddie fondling
and that implies that he did actually fondle kids.
No kiddie fondling was ever proven.
He settled out of court. Big difference.
Can't you give him a break in death?
Yeah because now that hes dead.. kiddle fondling doesn't seem so bad.
Lets forgive Saddam Hussein too.
It's quite possible that he did molest those children, but it's also quite obvious that he's still a child himself.
Being subjected to the abuse of his father and the warped reality which comes with fame and stardom will do that. You can't have a look at his face and his Peter Pan complexes without knowing that he has problems other than loving children too much.
Children tend to be sexually curious and M.J. is no exception.
Now that he's dead he's no longer able to face his accuser (namely you).
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
I like how this story comes up right after MJ's death.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
They didn't tell you how to post. They just pointed out that the manner of the posting they replied to was annoying. If you take that as an annoying order you will discard, so be it. But it was a statement of their preference. That you hear, understand, and contradict it indicates you are an ass (unless you have some other reason to post that way, but since you didn't share we can assume not).
Learn to love Alaska
"Innocent until proven guilty" only applies to trials of people by the state. When a citizen accuses another it's "preponderance of evidence". Which way do you think evidence preponderates, did he or did he not fondle young boys?
For me, at least, his multiple settlements out of court costing him tens of millions of dollars in total is preponderance enough.