Slashdot Mirror


Rod Beckstrom Named New ICANN CEO

netczar writes "Former US cybersecurity chief Rod Beckstrom has been selected as the new ICANN president and CEO. The decision was publicly announced during ICANN's 35th meeting in Sydney, Australia on Friday. Beckstrom will be replacing Dr. Paul Twomey, who had been serving this position since March 2003 and announced his resignation earlier this year. Beckstrom recently made headlines for his sudden resignation from his post at NCSC, criticizing the lack of funding from the NSA and its move to try to 'rule over' the NCSC." Reader darthcamaro notes a story which quotes Beckstrom as saying, "The system on [the] whole is healthy, but also strained, and part of the strains are natural and part of the democratic process. The process may be noisy, but a stable Internet is what has come out of ICANN. This is massively complex — wouldn't run well top-down. We would not reach the same balance of decisions to propagate through the network. All of us are humbled by the process. No one is in control, so everyone is in control."

26 comments

  1. ICANN the trademark policeman by karl.auerbach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope he recognizes that ICANN is supposed to make sure that the domain system works and that ICANN is not to be a policeman doing trademark enforcement for the intellectual property protection industry or enforcing various governments' views about what is acceptable use of the net.

    1. Re:ICANN the trademark policeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It can be VERY profitable to be a policeman whose arbitrary and unchallenged decisions enrich friends and shutter enemies.

      Especially when they retire.

      Then, unpopular decisions can be traded for stock options, gift packages, high compensation advisory roles, etc.

      Much more profitable than, say, writing a book about spiders and starfish and management style.

    2. Re:ICANN the trademark policeman by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's a bit off-topic, but doesn't Rod Beckstrom sound like a cheesy porn name?

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:ICANN the trademark policeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      intellectual property protection RACKET

      There...fixed that for you

  2. A lot of poetry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The system on [the] whole is healthy, but also strained, and part of the strains are natural and part of the democratic process. The process may be noisy, but a stable Internet is what has come out of ICANN. This is massively complex â" wouldn't run well top-down. We would not reach the same balance of decisions to propagate through the network. All of us are humbled by the process. No one is in control, so everyone is in control."

    He wins the rhetoric award.

  3. Thank you ICANN by winkydink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The process may be noisy, but a stable Internet is what has come out of ICANN.

    Oh yeah. I mean, where would we be without ICANN? All of that wealth created by domain tasting & cybersquatting would never have been created.

    Thank you ICANN. Thank you.

    s/Thank/Fuck/g

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  4. No Kidding by typosquatting · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No one is in control, so everyone is in control.

    At least the first part is true. If you watch ICANN for any length of time you realize that there are so many diametrically opposed contingencies that they have a hard time agreeing to or implementing anything of significance.

    1. Re:No Kidding by typosquatting · · Score: 1

      My bad - constituencies, not contingencies. Long day...

  5. Stable? by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If by stable, you mean strangled, then he's right. ICANN's only functional purpose is to maintain the status quo. It's stated purpose is to hand out IP addresses, protocol number assignment, and manage the DNS. And towards that end, it's been a complete cock-up, and has only survived because it's burrowed its way into the infrastructure like a parasite and can't be easily removed now. Oh, ICANN, how you've screwed up... let us count the ways;

    They've massively extended the number of TLDs to the point that most people don't even know what they all are, and plan on making the number go from "barely comprehensible" to "infinite" soon. They've thrown the RFCs right out the window when it comes to domain naming convention, and have turned domain name management into a mangled corporate turf war that costs us billions of dollars in litigation globally every year, and despite the fact that it has repeatedly pledged to serve the international community, it remains based in, and under the complete control of, the United States. And the changing of the guards -- they're replacing the existing president, Paul Twomey, a man who was very international and worked with goverments all over the world, and was exceptionally well-educated and cultured (for a CEO) with Rod Beckstrom, who's lifetime achievements have been... creating a wiki, selling off a risk management company, and authoring a book on some whack management style about starfish, spiders, and Al Queta. His education got as far as... you guessed it.. he's an MBA. So they're replacing a cultured world-wise man with some delusional middle-management type who doesn't know much about international anything.

    This institution is crap on a stick, and it's set to be salted to perfection with the tears of billions of consumers who will be forced to watch the internet steam along, captained by a man who been hand-picked by the US Government to be a total patsy. We are sooo f--ked.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Stable? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Patsy?
      I think you mean, shill, tool, puppet, etc.

    2. Re:Stable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the better reason for others to stand up and say NO to ICANN.

      Even better if you can stand up and replace them with a better system that everyone can switch to painlessly. (not likely)
      ICANN do not deserve any of the power they have anymore, they have become too greedy.

    3. Re:Stable? by rs79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I address the troll issue here: http://rs79.vrx.net/opinions/internet/domains/shills/

      Paul Twomey for 8 years collected nearly a million dollars a year from ICANN and in ten years they've never made any new tlds to speak of. They do not have an elected board like they were supposed to and there is no viting membership in the legal sense, in ICANN - another guiding principle that was supposed to have been done but never was and still isn't. Let's be clear that ICANN was to create new TLDS, not to debate whether they should be created, the governments mandate was to do this as its primary function. It was also to study the trademark problem but lets not loose sight of the fact there are laws that protect trademark holders.

      I met Paul Twomey at the beginning of his tenure. He's a professional politician and in my opinion his job has been to see there are no new tlds and no voting membership and a continuence of self perpetuating board.

      The rest of that nicely written rant I agree with.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    4. Re:Stable? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression ARIN handled IP block assignments, not ICANN. Is that not right?

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    5. Re:Stable? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody sane want ICANN to create more top level domains? Other than a new country forming and requiring a TLD, the only point of new TLDs is to make some illegitimate businesses profit due to consumer confusion, and line the pockets of registrars. .Info? .Museum? .Biz? They're all useless.

      Like Congress, the best we can hope for is that ICANN stagnates while doing nothing but pointless arguments. It's better than anything they would actually DO.

    6. Re:Stable? by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IANA (which is the technical devision of ICANN) assigns ip addresses to ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, LACNIC, and AfriNIC.

      Those in turn assign IP addresses wsithin the assigned region. I believe the same system is used for handing out Autonomous System numbers.

      Anyway, it is worth noting, that the IANA is the only technical part of ICANN. It publishes the DNS root zone file, as well as other information.

      The rest of ICANN (the overwhelming majority of it) does little more than set policy for the domain name system, and in a horribly inefficient fashion.

      It should be dissolved (corporate charter revoked), with two new organizations being formed under the umbrella of the Internet Society (ISOC).

      ISOC already has the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) and IESG (internet Engineering Steering Group), both under the oversight of the IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC).

      A new organization named "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority" (IANA) (being completely separate from the existing one, but performing the same tasks) should be formed, and be placed under the oversight of the IAOC.

      The other new organization under the umbrella of the ISOC, would be the "Internet Naming Policy Commitee" (INPG). This would be a cut down version of the ICANN policy forming components. It is not clear to me if it should be under the oversight of the IAOC, or some other group.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    7. Re:Stable? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " Why would anybody sane want ICANN to create more top level domains? Other than a new country forming and requiring a TLD, the only point of new TLDs is to make some illegitimate businesses profit due to consumer confusion, and line the pockets of registrars. .Info? .Museum? .Biz? They're all useless."

      Meh. If you don't want them don't use them. We have a long way to go to add new top level domains till we even get close to catching up to the 160 the cctld guys added after icann was formed that all came ip and the world didn't end.

      Some folks like things like bit.ly and is.gd and... the world hasn't ended.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    8. Re:Stable? by digitalunity · · Score: 1

      Thats about the most informative thing I've read on slashdot this month. Thanks.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  6. Ambitious man by mac1235 · · Score: 1

    Well, he has more actual power now.

  7. Huh? by karl.auerbach · · Score: 1

    I may fault ICANN on many things, but I don't find myself agreeing with your characterizations of ICANN.

    First off, ICANN has been glacial with regard to new top level domains - on average about one per year. That is a long way short of "barely comprehensible" and certainly not even close to "infinite soon".

    As for following name conventions - ICANN has been very closely following the hostname conventions and the internationalized name rules established by the IETF. Perhaps the only thing that ICANN has done that differs is that ICANN has been questioning whether single letter top level domains ought to be allocated.

    As for Beckstrom - he is unknown to me, but I do fear that his "no central point of control" point may carry him too far into believing that institutions such as ICANN don't need someone firmly in charge and willing to say "no" to expansion and mission creep.

    1. Re:Huh? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " First off, ICANN has been glacial with regard to new top level domains - on average about one per year. That is a long way short of "barely comprehensible" and certainly not even close to "infinite soon". "

      Hi Karl;
      Tell us the story again when you were the only board member elected to the ICANN board and they had these secret "executive" meetings without you and your prime goal there irc was to look at the books to see where they spending all those millions. And how you had to sue them they'd let you be able to see the books.

      Imagine a world where directors of a corporation wern't allowed to see the company books. Enron anyone?

      Postel articulated a set of functional criteria from 96-1999. Both core and the others had their own ideas about how to implement them but didn't differ on any thing major. Instead, ISOC in making a "deal with the devil" caved in to big business/IP special interests and gave ICANN to them. It's now, (as it was originally!) captured by old white dudes that aren't INTERNET people.

      Magaziner told he he was going to settle the debate between the gtld-mou and free-market poeple, and hindsight says "why not give half each" - give CORE 100 tlds to play with and take 100 from the other alternative root zones. Worst case if one fails miserably the other can pick up the pieces. Worst case, plan C, NSI could run it all if we're not capable. Which I doubt.

      ICANN was formed to make a procedure to create new tlds. A decade ago. In the meantime cctlds pop up all over the place with no years long studies about "stability" or "trademark polity" and the net doesn't crash and the world doesn't die. The "experimental" tlds added at marina del rey in 2000 are a joke and who ever thought "we'll see what happens" means "ten years". Come on people. Hello?

      If in the ICANN formation meeting at Harvard they'd said "we'll let the TM guys stall this process 10 years. And by then you still won't be able to be a member, you still won't be able to vote. Process will not be transparent and you have two layers of government bureaucracy to get through: the US federal government - the secretary of commerce can do anything he wants to the root zone - and governments of the world, who have a cabal like group called "the GAC" that has absolute veto power and meets in secret and it's government people only.

      Plus it costs $80M a year to run, and consumes 75 cents of each domain you buy or renew and is going steadily up. The CEO for $1M a year roughly for 8 years to run this mess and salaries alone for this old boys network is a huge figure.

      ICANN has become the very thing ORSC and BWG warned about, and Hans Klein from CSPR summed it up best:

      "Regulatory Capture
      ICANN suffers from regulatory capture, mostly to the benefit of US-based corporations.
      To cite the main episodes:
      Capture of International Forum on the White Paper (IFWP) (1998): The process by which the Internet community was to design ICANN was captured by powerful industry and technical stakeholders. They boycotted public meetings and successfully proposed their own secretly-written bylaws for ICANN.
      Capture of ICANN Board (2002): The same industry and technical interests eliminated user representation on the board. (This remains the case today.)
      Capture of the Internet Society (2002): In 2002 ISOC revised its bylaws to ensure that the society would be governed by its largest corporate members. This has led to two derivative acts of capture:
      o Capture of .ORG registry. This registry is now managed by ISOC.
      o Capture of ICANNs At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC). Nearly 60% of certified user-related organizations in ICANN are chapters of ISOC.
      Capture of .COM by Network Solutions. This US corporation has extended its very profitable control of the most popular domain name

      You really think this is something that "work" if even "roughly" ?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
  8. A person widely known and well-respected by and a frequent contributer to the Slashdot community wins an important position on the ruling body of the internet and all you can do is bitch?

    What's that? Oh. Not Ray Beckerman? Never mind.

    Steve

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  9. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    They could put a inanimate carbon rod in charge of ICANN and it couldn't do much worse than the current trajectory. ICANN is dead set on unleashing possibly one of the worst ideas in the history of the internet - gTLDs for sale - and nobody is doing shit to stop it. If you thought ICANN was a tremendous waste of space, resources, and human lives, just wait till you see what they won't do for you next year when the real shit hits the fan (and the new CEO starts raking in even more money).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  10. Sorry but by xednieht · · Score: 1

    Using the "NSA" and "democratic process" in the same article is blasphemy. I don't mind being watched, but in a real democracy transparency goes both ways. As such I won't hold my breath for ICANN't.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  11. Corporate dominance is unavoidable by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    I've been reading a number of other posts in this thread about how ICANN is a failure because it operates primarily in the interests of American corporations.

    The thing to understand, however, is that everyone is raped by American corporations. Absolutely everyone. It is inevitable, and totally unavoidable. They chip away, tirelessly, day and night, and eventually they get in and dominate things, and because they are so relentless, there is nothing that anyone can do to stop it.

    So get rid of ICANN if you want; create a new oversight group, and put it under the jurisdiction of whichever government you want. It doesn't matter how you do it; within six months, the new organisation will again be routinely sodomised by American corporations.

    The Internet rightfully should never have been allowed to become commercial in the first place; it should have remained under the jurisdiction of the universities, the scientists, and the intellectuals, where it belongs.

    Corporations, and the insects who run them, are a scourge, that needs to be violently rendered extinct.

    1. Re:Corporate dominance is unavoidable by zemkai · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity... what would you replace them with? And how would they be governed?