Slashdot Mirror


Boxee vs. Zinc vs. Hulu

For those with a Windows PC and some time for TV, DeviceGuru writes "Which is the best Internet media streaming application for a media-center PC? Boxee, Zinc, or the new Hulu Desktop? A post at DeviceGuru.com reviews these three media streaming platforms and draws some interesting conclusions. Key pros and cons are tabulated and numerous screenshots are included. Interestingly, despite lots of Boxee hype, Zinc already has a number of valuable features that Boxee is scrambling to add to its next version, due out in the fall. On the other hand, Boxee boasts far more third-party content-access applications support."

73 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. None of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since stupid rights managements mean they're only usable in one country.

    1. Re:None of them by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed that they aren't too useful for me, but Boxee does torrents and runs on Linux, so it's really my only choice of the three.

    2. Re:None of them by RyoShin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why isn't there some company in another country trying to do the same thing? Won't be as much American TV, obviously, but surely there are European companies trying to make a European(-country) version of Boxee/Hulu/Zinc.

    3. Re:None of them by daybot · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use Hulu from the UK through the Witopia VPN service. Such services totally break IP-based location checking systems.

    4. Re:None of them by Blade · · Score: 1

      I tried a couple of VPN solutions, they did work but performance was terrible.

    5. Re:None of them by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      As an American with taste, I'm not interested in american TV.

      i actually find that the BBC and stuff made in Australia are far better and less "stupefied" than the crap we get here.

      Seriously, the Us population Must be drooling morons if you base it on what is poplar on our TV networks.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:None of them by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      There's good stuff everywhere. Despite the fact that most of the stuff on Hulu is garbage, I still find plenty of good, fun stuff to watch. You needn't be so condescending. It's not like Britain and Australia and everywhere else doesn't have garbage TV, too.

      Now, if there were a way to get BBC stuff via a Hulu-like service, I would be in hog heaven. But there's always Netflix, and for those series I really love, buying the DVDs. We have the complete Red Dwarf, Jeeves and Wooster, Monty Python, Fawlty Towers, Planet Earth, The Future Is Wild, and some others.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:None of them by fedcb22 · · Score: 1

      Depends where you are. I found myself a nice VPS on the US east coast for $7 a month with unmetered bandwidth. I manage to get 150KB/s to it from South Africa, combining this with FoxyProxy allows me to watch YouTube videos and the like faster than through my normal connection.

    8. Re:None of them by protologix · · Score: 1

      Just wandering, (if you've seen any) what do you think of Canadian comedy and TV? As one of the very few people in Southern Ontario who actually knows what the term "Americanization" means, I'd like to hear the opinion of say Corner Gas of someone with taste living in the middle of the Televised hellhole. Its bad enough that a good 95% of what I get up here is Americanized, I'd like to know if what little distinction remains is actually good or if I'm just holding on to the last bit of non mainstream American TV here and convincing myself its good.

    9. Re:None of them by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1
    10. Re:None of them by musicalwoods · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since stupid rights managements mean they're only usable in one country.

      Uhm, Boxee has the BBC iPlayer for use in the UK, is actively trying to get Canadian content, and has many "Apps" that are location agnostic.

  2. Zinc by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't Zinc just proved to cause loss of smell in people? Then I guess you wouldn't be able to tell if it stinks or not!

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  3. Fixed by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "For those US residents with a Windows PC and some time for TV"

    There, fixed.

    As a non-US resident, Mininova is still the best bang for the buck to me.

    1. Re:Fixed by azior · · Score: 2, Informative

      slashdot focuses mainly on the us, but i'd like to see statistics of their userbase... i wouldn't be surprised that alot of users are from other countries, as google would seem to indicate: http://www.google.com/trends?q=slashdot.org

    2. Re:Fixed by NoMoreFood · · Score: 1

      Unusual behavior. I follow the link you sent and if I continuously click 'Search Trends' on slashdot.org (as you provided), I see a noticeably larger spike randomly appear in 2007 Q4. Maybe a graphic rendering issue? Can anyone reproduce this?

    3. Re:Fixed by nsebban · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet, those big corporations keep wondering how they could make those silly non-american people pay for their content.

      --
      ____
      nico
      Nico-Live
    4. Re:Fixed by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Don't feel singled out. By and large they're making the american people pay for their content too.

  4. For some it doesn't matter by paziek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For some it doesn't matter. For example, if u are on linux, then it boils down to Boxee and... Boxee. (Assuming that crappy table in "conclusions" switched OS Support columns)
    If you are outside US, then again, it limits your choice.
    So, this might be relevant, but only for people living in US and using Windows.

    Also, there are Linux only solutions, like for example MythTV, can't say about selection of videos there thou... I guess its small.

    1. Re:For some it doesn't matter by __aajbyc7391 · · Score: 2, Informative

      (sorry guys: OSes now corrected in the table)

    2. Re:For some it doesn't matter by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I ran MythTV for 5 years. It works decently if you record a lot of stuff from
      > TV but it doesn't work very well as a general media player because MythVideo
      > has (or had) no organization functionality. For example it can't group videos
      > by the TV series name and such, or provide series and episode information.

            MythVideo is basically a file manager. If you want to impose some sort of
      organization on your media files, just do it. What MythVideo won't handle is
      MULTIPLE ways of organizing your media files based on different keys and sort
      of dynamic metadata searches.

            I'm not sure if XBMC/Boxee has this either.

            MythVideo also quite handily supports TV and Movie metadata. It's not as
      slick or automated as XBMC but it's certainly there. Although it's more
      accessable to simple hacks. This can easily make MythVideo a much more
      usable interface.

            As far as local content goes, Boxee looks "prettier" for about 5 minutes.

            It's the web based stuff where MythTV really falls down. The plugins here
      are either nonexistent, crude or abandoned.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:For some it doesn't matter by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mythtv rocks for Tv recording, it utterly sucks for movies and videos. The really silly use of a DB for them makes it a PITA to add videos as you have to then go in and rescan.. BLAH.

      Honestly the Videos, photos and music sections on MythTV needs to be ripped out and changed to something faster and better. XBMC kicks it's butt hard for those aspects.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:For some it doesn't matter by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Those features may require a bit of digging to get too. That's problematic itself.

      OTOH, my cinema genres are accessable even in the Browse mode because I set them up myself.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:For some it doesn't matter by wozzinator · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I'm on Linux and I think Hulu is the best of them. The only thing I don't like about it is that fullscreen is choppy on my Intel VGA chipset.

      --
      BSD is for people who love Unix, Linux is for people who hate Microsoft.
    6. Re:For some it doesn't matter by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Actually that "silly" db makes it remarkably easy to go in and "fix things".

      The problem with MythTV not being automated is a matter of MythTV not being
      automated. The choice of the storage mechanism really doesn't enter into it.
      They just chose to implement a cumbersome manual update process that doesn't
      scale up very well.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:For some it doesn't matter by Orphaze · · Score: 1

      You can use MythVideo as a simple file manager with no DB functionality. IE, there is no need to "scan in" new files.

  5. WMC plugins? by WiglyWorm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are these stand alone apps or WMC plugins? I have a windows vista (I know, I know, but I've had a ton of issues getting mythbuntu to work and work well) box running the Media Browser plugin, and it's a really awesome set up. It automatically adds my new media to its library (this is a basic WMC feature), it pulls movie posters, cast information, and all relevant metadata from IMDB... it's just all in all fantastic. I'm not looking to add another standalone program to my HTPC box, but I would be fine with adding hulu TV if it was a plugin and worked without stepping on the toes of Media Browser. The hulu site says it's optimized for WMC, but seems to indicate it is a standalone program. Does anyone have experience with it?

    1. Re:WMC plugins? by Excelcior · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hulu Desktop is nothing more than a dedicated browser for the Hulu website. It gives you a flashier interface, smoother video playback, and [in my experience] better buffering. It's entirely Flash-based.
      That having been said, I've switched over to it exclusively for my Hulu viewing. One less program running (IE) is a huge benefit on my less-than-stellar Celeron when playing full-screen video.
      It does not, however, display your media library, or in any other way act like a Media Center application.

      Cheers!

      --
      A small comparison of interest:
      Windows: Public School. Mac: Private School. Linux: Homeschool. Assembly: Unschool.
    2. Re:WMC plugins? by mozzis · · Score: 1

      In my experience, Zinc doesn't get in the way of WMC at all. I used Link Studio from Greenbutton.org to create a link to Zinc under More Programs, so I can even launch it with the remote from within MCE. FWIW Zinc also has a launcher for MCE in it, haven't tried it though.

      --
      This is not a self-referential sig.
    3. Re:WMC plugins? by john83 · · Score: 1

      The hulu site says it's optimized for WMC, but seems to indicate it is a standalone program. Does anyone have experience with it?

      I used it while I was in the US. I found it didn't buffer nearly enough, and eventually gave up on it entirely. That was on a windows box with all the bandwidth a university provides.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    4. Re:WMC plugins? by djtachyon · · Score: 5, Informative
      Exactly! .. To me this is a bogus article and story. If you are going to compare something, at least try to stay in the same genre of software/services. Oh, and maybe add a few more of the well qualified choices. Hey let me give it a try!

      Media Center Software:
      • Boxee/XBMC
      • Windows Media Center
      • Media Portal (I'm using now, may switch to Boxee 4 Windows)
      • Zinc
      • Beyond TV
      • MythTV
      • SageTV
      • Freevo
      • GeexBox
      • VDR
      • Cyberlink PowerCinema
      • Nero Home
      • WinDVD Media Center
      • xHub
      • Media Central
      • Centerstage
      • The list goes on and on...

      Streaming Content Services:

      • Netflix
      • Hulu
      • CBS
      • BBC
      • CNN
      • Comedy Central
      • YouTube
      • etc..etc..etc..

      so .. apples to apples next time?

      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    5. Re:WMC plugins? by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Y'see this? Y'see this?!?! This is why we can't have anything nice!!!!!

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
  6. Plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I prefer Plex over all of those. Surprised it was not included.

    1. Re:Plex by mozzis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe because Plex is Mac-only.

      --
      This is not a self-referential sig.
  7. No mention of local media support by neotokyo · · Score: 1

    I tend to agree that the "social" aspect of boxee is a bit in the way in the main interface, but what the reviewer didn't mention is whether zinc or hulu do anything with local media. From the zinc website it seems like it too can scan local media like boxee, what I would have liked in the review is some coverage over how well each one worked. In my experience, boxee does a really good job at this and includes a built-in interface for correcting the mistakes (aka Wrong Video link). I do agree that boxee could use a global search, however, I'm quite happy with boxee having just converted away from a mythtv setup.

    1. Re:No mention of local media support by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Why did you convert away? Add a menu entry to mythtv that launches boxee (literally 3 lines in an xml file) and that way when boxee crashes (which it does, its alpha) you're back to mythtv, and you can still watch live tv. That's my current setup (in the midst of a painful 8.04 -> 8.10 -> 9.04 upgrade since boxee abandoned Ubuntu LTS [grr..]).

    2. Re:No mention of local media support by neotokyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Other than the livetv part, there isn't much to love in mythtv. Mythvideo is *horrible*. It doesn't have much in the way of automatically finding and acquiring metadata around your local media. The navigation menu assumes one big flat folder with everything in it. While it does work with directory trees, you end up having to click through that to get the video. Boxee really shines here -- it separates TV series from movies, and for tv shows, groups them according to season. This was exactly what I wanted. When you add new media, in myth you have to go an select scan from the setup screen while boxee is always watching for new media and it just shows up under the recently added section.

      While the alpha does crash every now and then (the 0.12 has improved a lot for me) what I'm struggling with is the need for the fglrx -- the LTS fglrx support on my ati 9500 pro was horrible (freeze the screen, took 5 reboots to get stable from power on) -- I'm currently on 9.04 with xorg from 8.10 and that's been working out quite well now.

    3. Re:No mention of local media support by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Boxee falls down here even harder unless you are using
      the Browse view in which case you are using it in the same way
      that you would be using MythVideo. Separating movies from show
      and then throwing them in a big pile isn't really an improvement.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:No mention of local media support by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Yes, but MythTV NEVER crashes. It is ROCK solid (on my hardware anyhow). I love boxee for all the reasons you mentioned, but with one click of the remote, I can relaunch it from my MythTV main menu (which is the main use myth gets now :) )

    5. Re:No mention of local media support by neotokyo · · Score: 1

      Not sure why it fails for you, but I have a fully populated Movie and TV browsing in Boxee -- I never use Browse because everything is in either Movie or TV. You may want to look at the boxee forums on media naming conventions to ensure it can classify your local media correctly.

    6. Re:No mention of local media support by neotokyo · · Score: 1

      That's a very fair point on stability. Boxee certainly could use something that can restart it when it crashes; mythtv frontend makes a nice place to do that.

    7. Re:No mention of local media support by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Although it IS overkill for just a remote control launcher.. but I DO use it for live tv viewing and recording some OTA HD series.

  8. MythTV by Dan667 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why settle for a bunch of DRM streaming that they will pull the run out from under you at any time. Most of the content is available to be recorded or you can rent. Either it will not have commercials or MythTV will automatically skip them. You get to pick what happens.

    1. Re:MythTV by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      How do you use MythTV without breaking the law and without having a tuner/etc in your computer? All of these sites do that quite well.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:MythTV by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Well of course you have a tuner in your computer.

      Or you could "break the law" I suppose and buy your own content.

      That would be an interesting lawsuit. One wonders if the judge would
      throw it out as soon as he saw it.

      "You see your honor, we want to punish this fellow because he bought
      a bunch of our stuff and didn't use it in exactly the way we wanted it."

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:MythTV by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      How do you use MythTV without breaking the law and without having a tuner/etc in your computer? All of these sites do that quite well.

      For over-the-area channels, you can get an hdhomerun and stream the raw transport stream via ethernet. Plays well with MythTV.

    4. Re:MythTV by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you think you are breaking the law watching content you record you are a victim of propaganda.

    5. Re:MythTV by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Why settle for a bunch of DRM streaming that they will pull the run out from under you at any time. Most of the content is available to be recorded or you can rent. Either it will not have commercials or MythTV will automatically skip them. You get to pick what happens.

      The big thing is: any content you want, whenever you want, free and legal. While Cable's network OnDemand feature combats this, it's less comprehensive than Hulu.

      It has a large catalog of older stuff that I cannot find (or easily find) on current Cable / Fios to record. If I'm suddenly in the mood to watch a mini-marathon of "Buck Rogers," "The A-Team" or SciFi's "The Invisible Man" I can just hop onto Hulu and view it legally. If I want to rent, then I'd have to rely on Netflix (since the Blockbusters near me don't have that stuff) and thus have to wait 2-3 days to watch it. At which point, maybe the urge has passed or I don't have the free time anymore.

      It also saves some hassle on recording. Instead of waiting for the channel to air my favorite episode of "Stargate SG-1" (Window of Opportunity) so I can record it, I can watch it now. Or with a standard DVR I can record 2 shows at once, but sometimes there's a 3rd or 4th show on at the same time and they don't repeat later or might not be available on Fios OnDemand. At which point I hope onto Hulu and legally watch that 3rd or 4th show. Sure I can get another DVR or setup a MythTv box to handle the OtA content but that's more money and work than I'd like, when the content is available, free, and legal.

      The DRM doesn't bother me, and neither does the 15/30/60 second commercial every 10-15minutes. However it's free, legal, and offers a LOT of content that I like

    6. Re:MythTV by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The same goes for CD or DVD rips.

      This is just stupid nonsense FUD intended to make open systems look unecessarily bad.

      I suppose I could just buy all of the stuff I have on DVD as iTunes files but
      I would end up paying more, would be highly restricted in terms of what devices
      I can play back on and I would have a lot narrower selection of videos to choose
      from.

      iTunes looks cool as long as you don't pay any attention to Amazon or Tivo.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:MythTV by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      All great until they no longer have it on their site or they decide that they are not making enough money and pull the plug. Then what are you going to do? Mythtv can still have it on a terabyte disk recorded legally (and you do know Mythtv can have as many tuners as you like right? half a dozen, no problem).

    8. Re:MythTV by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      All great until they no longer have it on their site or they decide that they are not making enough money and pull the plug. Then what are you going to do? Mythtv can still have it on a terabyte disk recorded legally (and you do know Mythtv can have as many tuners as you like right? half a dozen, no problem).

      Fine, when they start pulling the content I care about or pull Hulu all-together then I'll worry. When things change, I'll change with them.

      But MythTv still doesn't solve everything. As I said, recording isn't they best option if you want something dated or something you didn't think of recording. And renting is something a hassle, as in my case the rental places near me have very poor TV selections, and Netflix requires waiting at least 2 days.

      Yes I'm aware of MythTv's abilities. But it still comes down to me needing to buy or build the rig, configure it, etc. And it still doesn't let me watch Buck Rogers since nobody airs that show anymore.

      For now I'd rather throw an old laptop onto my HDTV and watch the occasional old show on Hulu that way. Between my DVR and Fios OnDemand I don't normally need rely on Hulu for recent / new shows.

    9. Re:MythTV by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      MythTV (or even Boxee) allows you to decide what remains online. For
      Hulu, Buck Rogers is perhaps not the best example because it's about the
      cheapest thing out there. OTOH, Alien Nation doesn't seem to be online
      (the series, not the movies). So just in the first section you've got a
      relatively recent series that doesn't seem to be available.

                The DRM problem ultimately leads to usability issues relative to
      more sophisticated playback methods. Little things like bookmarks,
      random seeking and instant replay that are mundane on PVRs and DVD
      players end up lost in the bargain.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:MythTV by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Where did I say I had recorded anything, or that recording anything was illegal?

      Reread my message again keeping in mind that those are requirements and not veiled slams on -anything-.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    11. Re:MythTV by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Some of us *don't* care about breaking STUPID laws.

    12. Re:MythTV by ericrost · · Score: 1

      Why not just have both? Aren't more options better? I have an entry in my MythTV main menu that launches boxee. See, we can all play nice. I can have the stuff I care about on local disk. I can stream what's available as its convenient. Either way it means I haven't paid a cable/satellite/content company a dime in over two years :).

  9. For my money, its Zinc (oops, its free) by mozzis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have really been liking Zinc - very smooth operation, plus it looks so cool. Since I can use Zinc to access Hulu (and it does a pretty good job of runing Hulu - maximizing when it can, letting me pause and skip and so forth with the remote) and so many other sources, I see no need for Hulu Desktop. My Media Center bliss is nearly complete... If only it would aggregate Justin TV (a nice source which could really use a UI makeover)

    --
    This is not a self-referential sig.
  10. Screw them ALL! by DarkSarin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since none of them support OS X unless you have an Intel processor, I'm ticked at them all. XBMC DOES, but so far I can't get it to stream Netflix OR Hulu (there are ways, but they require you to have another computer and to purchase Playon...FAIL).

    Look, I'm not going to shell out hundreds of dollars just to have a media center computer. I happen to have some older hardware that is suitable for the task. PPC support makes sense because I think a fair number of people are walking the same path. So until Boxee gets off their collective butts and decides to support PPC, I'll pass.

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    1. Re:Screw them ALL! by macaddict · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since none of them support OS X unless you have an Intel processor

      Hulu does. I'm running Hulu Desktop on a G5.

    2. Re:Screw them ALL! by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      I'm running virtual box on ubuntu with a windows 7 VM and I am watching them that way....of course my desktop is pretty Beefy

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    3. Re:Screw them ALL! by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1

      I run Boxee on a 3 year old Mac Mini, though it's Intel-based, and it works just fine. If you feel like hiring someone to update the code that's necessary for decoding everything on PPC, then feel free. I'm sure they'd be happy to help you out once you provide the resources to get someone "off of his/her non-collective butt". But, once you start wanting to view HD content that's heavily compressed, good luck using that old PPC system without massive stuttering.

  11. Apple TV for me by sjvn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice overview Rick.

    For myself, I'm still finding that Apple TV and iTunes are the best combo. The new Apple TV firmware upgrade 2.4--http://practical-tech.com/entertainment/apple-tv-2-4-well-worth-the-download/--in particular has really made the Apple TV more useful than ever. Apple doesn't whisper a word of it, but the code's really been cleaned up and the result is a much more efficient media box.

    The list of my problems with that combo--starting with the simple fact that it's proprietary as proprietary can be--is longer than my arm. Still, for me it's the best choice.

    Steven

    1. Re:Apple TV for me by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      AppleTV is a strong offering. I had considered it in setting up my own HTPC. Especially considering it can be hacked to run Boxee, also. So what is missing within AppleTV can be supplemented by Boxee. The main thing I felt was absent within AppleTV was support for viewing local content stored in a variety of formats (DIVX for example).

      I also had an idle AMD XP3200-based mobo system laying around, so I just went with that and a Ubuntu OS. The persistent advantage of AppleTV over the linux route is you get a nicely integrated remote device that works across the AppleTV and Boxee interfaces. With the BYO Ubuntu approach, you have to figure out your own remote which for most people is a wireless mouse or keyboard. Not as elegant as the AppleTV remote, for sure.

      Oh, and the other strength of AppleTV is the form factor. No fan, and small, so it fits well in an entertainment center. In my system, I've basically got a bare motherboard sitting on a shelf with a full-sized power supply and other components.

      Seth

    2. Re:Apple TV for me by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The Apple remote is a joke with too few buttons to be really useful or usable.

      Even if I were running MacOS on my Macs I would still replace it in favor
      of a less pretentious remote control.

      Beyond that stupid remote, the ATV a very nice form factor. Although it is a little
      underpowered. It doesn't have enough CPU or GPU to handle the larger h264 files.

      Something like a popcorn hour is more future proof.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Apple TV for me by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Hack the apple TV to run XBMC. all done.

      it even plays the 720p local video files on my NAS perfectly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Apple TV for me by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Try using the Boxee remote app on an iPod Touch or iPhone. Then come back here and tell us that the AppleTV remote has too few buttons.

      Because there are no physical buttons on the Boxee Remote, you have to look at the handset to make every single navigational click. Then you have to look at the tv screen to verify the navigation through the interface. To preserve battery power, you have to sleep your iPhone, and when it wakes up, you have to go through the process of re-launching the Boxee remote app and it connecting to your server, etc. No dis on Boxee, because if you are running Boxee on an AppleTV, then you can use that remote. I'm running it on a BYO Ubuntu system and I wish I had a normal remote control.

      Seth

  12. Let me summarize what you are saying by n2art2 · · Score: 1

    Let me summarize what you are saying, "I don't know why new software isn't supported on a computer and OS that is 3-4 years old. Good thing I have something older that works. Until these new software makers decide to support my old hardware, I won't be able to use them."

    --
    Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
  13. Boxee front end, rtorrent backend by dcherryholmes · · Score: 1

    I had been using rtorrent, pytvshows, screen, and rtgui to manage media downloads on my mythbox. I've since switched over to boxee, although it's running on top of the same mythbuntu install I was using before, and could easily revert back to. I don't really use the streaming apps boxee includes, not do I need to use its torrent capabilities since my own system is more robust. Boxee won me over simply because the interface looks slicker, it grabs cover art and show information automatically, gives one-click access to the apple trailer if available, grabs subtitles with a click, and my downloaded shows are automatically in my media library without having to manually rebuild the database every time I add something.... all things mythtv does not do. If and when mythtv adds these things, I would probably switch back.

  14. PC or Platform by houghi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The summery first talks about the PC and then about a platform. Which is it?

    For the PC I prefer MPlayer-plugin with Firefox. As a platform I use my Linux hosting and as a player I use http://www.gdd.ro/gddflvplayer.html

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  15. Re:Enough is enough by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

    Urgh... Why do people insist on using some overhyped, bloated services that only work in US? My favorite applications of this type are those that can be open neatly in an FF tab, without taking up half of my RAM and which reside in countries where **AA is just a funky notion those crazy Americans keep babbling about.

    Because those of us in the US that want to watch US tv show content legally have to either go to the web site, or use one of the aforementioned programs? Besides, Hulu's desktop app is basically a shell around their Flash content, the overhead is nothing above and beyond the Flash CPU overhead itself. Oh, and Zinc is available as a Firefox plugin, and can be opened neatly in a FF tab.

  16. Re:Enough is enough by geegel · · Score: 1

    Because those of us in the US that want to watch US tv show content legally have to either go to the web site, or use one of the aforementioned programs? Besides, Hulu's desktop app is basically a shell around their Flash content, the overhead is nothing above and beyond the Flash CPU overhead itself. Oh, and Zinc is available as a Firefox plugin, and can be opened neatly in a FF tab.

    Erm... technically speaking, watching streamed content of any kind is not illegal. It may be a whole array of other things, but illegal... no way. The burden lies with those that upload the content. Otherwise you would see a lot of YouTube users sued to smithereens. As for the "bloated" aspect, I must concede this point. Every time I see one of these interfaces my mind jumps straight to Vuze, but I admit that others with similar look might be less of a memory hog. I haven't tested any of them, so yes I admit I could be wrong.

    --
    right...
  17. Re:Was that really necessary? by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dude, it is "Vietnam II". Accept it and move on. You can't win a religious war unless you are willing to go full genocide. Sorry, that is just the way it is. You DO realize the Shia and Sunni have been killing themselves for ...what? 800 years now? They have been killing each other for longer than the USA has been a country, and you think you can stop that?

    The ONLY way Saddam was able to keep those three groups in line was by digging mass graves and putting anyone who looked at him funny in them. You could stay there for 100 years, blowing cash that we don't have like a hooker with a stolen CC and racking up dead Americans and Iraqs and in the end? They'll just keep on coming. And five minutes after you finally accept it is "Vietnam II" and pull out the Shia and Sunni will go right back to killing each other as they have for centuries. It was and is nothing but a waste of American lives and money. Where have we seen this before? Oh yeah, Vietnam. Except in Vietnam we actually had a better chance of winning than we do now. Give it up already.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  18. Re:Too bad, Untermensch! by jrade · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot!

    --

    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at Sig.setCleverSig(Sig.java:42)
  19. i for one by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    I for one want more of a "youtube" experience so far as the tech goes- I want to be able to see the services on my archos and ps3 and whatever other media device supports flash and streaming media rather than having to install a PC application in order to view it- I want to sit on my couch or in a hotspot watching not in front of the computer since there are already a ton of options if I wanted to sit in front of the computer

  20. Re:Was that really necessary? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Which is an odd thing to say as things are getting better steadily and have been for a few years now (even before Obama stepped it). But other than that, yes, it's exactly like Vietnam. *yawn*

    Where's the offtopic mod when we need it? Or a mod for "preaching to the choir to karma whore"?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!