Slashdot Mirror


Senators Want To Punish Nokia, Siemens Over Iran

fast66 writes "After hearing about Nokia-Siemens sale of Internet-monitoring software to Iran, US Senators Schumer and Graham want to bar them from receiving federal contracts. They planned the action after hearing about a joint venture of Nokia Corp. of Finland and Siemens AG of Germany that sold a sophisticated Internet-monitoring system to Iran in 2008. According to Nextgov.com, Schumer and Graham's bill would require the Obama administration to identify foreign companies that export sensitive technology to Iran and ban them from bidding on federal contracts, or renew expiring ones, unless they first stop exports to Iran."

8 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Because Cisco would never do such a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is bullshit (forgive linking to a press release, but Nokia Siemens Networks doesn't even make equipment as described).

    It looks like Nokia Siemens sold exactly the things which the USA forced them to include in their system and nothing more. Most of the legal interception requirements have been driven by the US in the first place.

  2. Re:Because Cisco would never do such a thing by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Informative

    About as stupid as these senators apparently. I mean really....

    Siemens, not bidding on federal contracts?

    Bwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaahaaaaaaaaahahhaahhahahaa

    uh huh mmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    my side hurts now. Maybe these senators don't realize, but either directly or indirectly, you'd be hard pressed to find a federal contract that didn't support Siemens somehow. They're a $120 billion a year company making a gazillion little gadgets most senators never heard of, used in everthing from bulldozers to fire alarms.

    This is all political bullshit.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  3. Heaven forbid by kalpaha · · Score: 4, Informative

    How dare they sell equipment to implement legally required (and specified by ETSI and 3GPP standards) capabilies for the mobile networks: http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/global/Press/Press+releases/news-archive/Provision+of+Lawful+Intercept+capability+in+Iran.htm

  4. Re:Because Cisco would never do such a thing by Alphager · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this is also because Nokia sold more than net limiting technology. Apparently they also sold devices which pick up the EMR's emitted by cell phones which allowed police to home in on any person who has a phone on their person - especially to those who are making calls/texting/transmitting data. To my knowledge such technology is not in use in China (currently).

    This is bog-standard technology implemented in any modern network. It's used by 911-operators to home in on your location if you are unable to speak (or cut off) and used by police to follow suspects (in addition to a GPS-Tracker in the car). There's nothing specialy made for repressive regimes; it's just technology which also may be used to suppress people.

  5. THIS IS THE ONLY RELEVANT POST SO FAR by da_matta · · Score: 5, Informative

    As stated in the linked article:
    - It's a piece of standard 3GPP (=GSM) equipment for lawful intercept, i.e. to allow law enforcement to wiretap calls (according guidelines set by local law).
    - It only handles voice calls and does not allow internet traffic monitoring, let alone deep packet inspection.
    - The equipment is compliant with EU and UN export regulations

    Also, it's much less of a privacy threat than the mechanisms currently in place in US, UK (and I'm sure EU).

  6. Re:Because Cisco would never do such a thing by Unipuma · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the EU is doing its work, and fining companies who abuse their monopoly.
    http://www.sortedsites.info/general-stuff/eu-fine-telefonica.htm
    (Which, in case you were wondering is an European company)
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=aasUT7jU_bd8
    (Also European)

    It doesn't matter what country your company is from, if you abuse the rules, they go after you. They might even go after all those bank bailouts:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/dealAtoms/idUS391610202420090605

  7. Re:First uncensored post by bigtomrodney · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US has an embargo on Iran and Nokia Siemens broke it.

    Nokia Siemens is a joint venture with its headquarters in Finland. The two contributing companies are Nokia, who were founded and are headed in Finland and Siemens were founded and are headed in Germany. The United States of America set an embargo on the country and yet all others are expected to follow - this is what's wrong with the American outlook.

    I'm just glad I've been able to buy Cuban cigars legally in my country all along.

    --
    I never get used to these constant resurrections
  8. Re:First uncensored post by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, the embargo does not cover that. European companies like Nokia and Siemens are bound by Council Regulation 423/2007, which forbids the export of the following things:
    - Military goods of any kind
    - Services relating to maintenance, preparation, production or use of military goods
    - Just about anything related to nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles

    I just read through the damn thing (151 pages in the German version) and software is only covered where it is used for the design, operation or maintenance of nuclear enrichment facilities or military weapons, especially guided missiles. Unless I overlooked something (unlikely as the appendices are simple tables) or the embargo is covered by an additional regulation I am not aware of Nokia and Siemens did not violate the embargo.

    The morality of providing filtering technology to Iran aside, I just can't see what the States are trying to accomplish here. They try to punish companies from other countries for something that wasn't illegal at the time. In the best case we have an ex post facto situation with jurisdictional issues, in the worst case we have "screw the rules, we want your money".

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)