Slashdot Mirror


Is the Kindle DX Worth the Money?

An anonymous reader writes "Now that some little time has passed, and the hype has died down a bit, I'm wondering if anyone has taken the $500 plunge and gotten a Kindle DX. From the academic-paper-reading-geek perspective, is it worth the money? How well does it work with PDFs, and is it easy to get them on and off? I haven't been able to find any good reviews on the interweb that address its usability as I would like to use it."

48 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Skip until cheaper/better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not really - the screen is only a bit bigger than the regular Kindle, doesn't handle PDF's very well (i.e. keeps all of the white space around the edge of docs) and offers no ability to annotate. I am waiting for ePaper products to get considerably cheaper and get something with specs similar to the iRex Digital Reader 1000S. I also find that for just fiction reading, I tend to do better with a smaller, narrower screen rather than a large screen with small font.

    1. Re:Skip until cheaper/better by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about the iNone? Until they figure out a way to KEEP the library of books that I apparently only "license" (for quite a pretty penny). For example, if I buy the Kindle now and "buy" some books - then in two years say Sony (OK, maybe not Sony, but someone) makes a better one and I want to upgrade - how do I transfer my books? Oh, that's right - they aren't "mine"; it's more like the VHS to DVD thing where you either stay on the old stuff (carry the Kindle as it slowly wears out AND your new reader) or buy everything again.

      Simple.. Only use DRM free books. Then you can format shift to your heart's content. And there is definitely no shortage of books out there. Check out Mobileread.org for links to e-book stockists, public domain and creative commons stuff, as well as the authors who sometimes drop in and give free first parts to their series, or advertise the DRM free stuff they do.

      Simple truth is that if you hand money over for DRM infected media, you do not own it. You rent it until such time as the owner decides you have had it long enough.

      Eventually the two sides of the e-book reader concept will meet in the middle, and you will be able to buy DRM free freshly released books by major authors. But for now, we are at the "plays for sure and napster trial" stage.

      I guess this is a non-issue for the folks who read something once and then are done with it (for example those that read a physical book then take it to the used bookstore). However, I read things over and over and I don't want one of these devices until I can be assured of having my "purchased" material through vendor changes, vendor going out of business, format shits, etc.

      Agreed. I'm the same. I have 30 year old books that I got in my teens that I still read again. And just because it is electronic does not mean that I intend to have to buy the same thing twice.

      All the current readers have at least one DRM free format, and once you have a DRM free file, you have a universal file.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  2. See new screens from OLPC's Mary Lou by dowdle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you seen the videos on oplc.tv of the new screen technology coming? Much cheaper and better... no special materials or new manufacturing facilities needed.

    --
    Scott Dowdle
    www.MontanaLinux.Org
    1. Re:See new screens from OLPC's Mary Lou by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you mean olpc.tv.

      I don't think that device is coming any time soon, unfortunately.

  3. Re:Dumbfuck Mods by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it just me, or does nonsensical bullshit get modded up, while the truth gets modded down.

    Slashdot is a circlejerk of bullshit, with retarded moderators modding up garbage, and modding down reality.

    Is it just me, or are random nonsensical first-posts getting more randomly nonsensical?

  4. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got a kindle DX as a gift, and i absolutely love it. PDFs can be transferred to/from it extremely easy, just plug it in via usb and drag and drop. My biggest gripe about the PDF support is that you have no control over the font size, as you do with the books you purchase through Amazon, nor can you use the search function or the inline dictionary. But PDFs are still easy to read on the device, and I much prefer it to reading them on my computer screen.

    I am a poor college student though, so if it weren't a gift I probably would have bought a netbook and saved myself some money.

    1. Re:Maybe by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "nor can you use the search function"

      That's really bad if you want to keep a library in your backpack. Indexing and search should be the first thing to be implemented after rendering.

  5. Why not a laptop? by yog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, a wifi-equipped laptop can be had for less than $400, and with a 15" screen and decent storage, why would someone want a limited, single-purpose crippled laptop such as a Kindle?

    The Kindle would make sense if it were under $100; it would fall into the nice Christmas gift or Father's Day gadget category for someone who has everything. But for $500? That's a lot of books.

    You could buy a laptop and download thousands of free books from Gutenberg.org or wherever, and spend the rest on used books and have more than you can ever hope to read.

    Alternatively, you can spend $350-$500 on one of these Amazon gadgets and then have to pay to read books on it.

    I think Amazon should move to the inkjet approach of giving away the initial hardware and then making money on the refills. I wouldn't mind paying $5-$10 for a new bestseller (as long as it didn't crash/timeout and disappear on me) but the initial investment is rather daunting.

    Plus, physical books are kinda cool; they don't need to be recharged, you can drop them from amazing heights and they still work, they're infinitely reusable and lendable, and they effortlessly multitask--leave one in the bathroom, one on the nightstand, one in the car, etc.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    1. Re:Why not a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Laptops don't have e-ink displays and are cumbersome. Laptop batteries are measured in hours, the average being 2-3 hours for a brand new battery, whereas ebook readers have a battery life measured in weeks or even months (try reading a 500 or even 300 page book in 2 hours). Breaking out a small ebook reader while cozied up in a chair is much easier than breaking out the laptop and trying to hold it in one hand.

      Books take a lot of physical space and the contents are not quickly accessible. You can fit the contents of an entire bookstore on an ebook reader and you can perform text searches upon those ebooks with results returned in seconds. If I want to lend someone an ebook I simply email it to them. This means I can lend any book to anyone I know, anywhere in the world within seconds.

    2. Re:Why not a laptop? by JamesTheBoilermaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could buy a laptop and download thousands of free books from Gutenberg.org or wherever, and spend the rest on used books and have more than you can ever hope to read.

      Alternatively, you can spend $350-$500 on one of these Amazon gadgets and then have to pay to read books on it.

      Or, you can buy a Kindle and download thousands of free books from Gutenberg.org or wherever. The Kindle doesn't lock you in to only reading Amazon books. I've probably read about as many project Gutenberg books on my Kindle as I have books I bought from Amazon.

    3. Re:Why not a laptop? by MBoffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not a laptop, you ask?

      Because a laptop battery doesn't last for two weeks.
      Because a laptop screen can't be read from any angle.
      Because a laptop is much heavier than a Kindle.
      Because a laptop doesn't have always-on, free Internet access.

      Because a laptop is not a book reader.

    4. Re:Why not a laptop? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer: I own a KindleDX and am incredibly happy with it.

      you have a lot of good points, but there are some things that you fail to recognize:

      For one, the size and weight of books. For a casual reader, the KindleDX is overkill. It's large, expensive and the benefits don't outweigh the hassles (recharging, fragility, etc). For those of us that have large libraries of tech books, the KindleDX allows us to store our entire bookshelf on a single device that takes up less room and weighs significantly less than a single book.

      This brings me to my second point: The Kindles (an ebook readers in general) have better displays for reading large quantities of text. It's easier on the eyes than a laptop. Also, for those of us that use mass transit to commute and don't always have a seat, a laptop is not an option. Have you ever tried to stand up in a crowded subway and use a laptop? Even sitting down and using the laptop is a pain. Laptop battery life is also significantly worse than the Kindle's--my kindle hasn't needed to be charged a single time since I got it nearly 3 weeks ago. It also beats out the laptop because you can travel light with it; you don't need to carry a laptop bag. All you need is the device, and since it doesn't require frequent charging, you don't even need to bring the charger (USB cable) with it.

      Third point: When using ebooks for reference (or following a tutorial in the book) while you're doing work on the laptop, it's nice to have a separate device. This was one reason why I stuck to buying physical books rather than purchasing PDFs exclusively.

      So, while $700 (KindleDX + tax + shipping + 2 year warranty + sleeve) is quite a steep price to pay, for those of us that will use it a lot, it's worth the price. If I wasn't in such need for the solution, I would have held off a year or so and waited for it to come down in price or for a cheaper solution to be released.

      My coworker picked up the Sony PRS-700 a couple months ago and he's mostly very satisfied. It was around $375 + tax, but has a significantly smaller screen. Although it's got a touchscreen, the touchiness is kinda flakey and it's got some weird glare because of the touch surface. Also, PDF support in the thing is mediocre--the zoom sucks and it really needs a larger screen.

      I was going to hold out for the PlasticLogic (http://www.plasticlogic.com/) but I was hoping for something that I could get real books on, too. Since I really liked the Kindle (my dad picked one up last year) and the features that come with it (cellular websurfing/wikipedia/wireless book delivery and books that you can buy FROM the device), I opted for the DX.

      Like I said, the DX isn't for everyone. It's pretty big and it's expensive, but I feel that I'm definitely getting my money's worth.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    5. Re:Why not a laptop? by Tuidjy · · Score: 2, Informative

      For years now I have been reading Gutenberg/Baen Library/what-have-you books
      on my Samsung I730 (PPC/phone), and while the screen is small, landscape mode
      is perfectly usable. Now this requires both a tiny bit of technical knowledge
      (converting files, installing Cyrilics) and it may be a strain for some people's
      eyes, but on the other hand, the phone's with me everywhere, and the battery has
      easily lasted through a dozen of trans-Atlantic flights. And when I fail to
      properly prepare for a trip, I can still seek&download a .txt file from the Internet.

      If I were to look for a more user-friendly alternative, or seek to impress those
      around me with a polished device, I would splurge for the Kindle. A laptop, as far
      as I concerned, is too middle of the road. Almost as uncool as my Samsung , and
      almost as expensive as the Kindle (the phone is more expensive, but I carry it anyway)

      By the way my sister recently bought some Sony/Ericson phone/PocketPC with a much nicer
      screen, and on that one, even .pdf look damn good. What can I say, I believe in
      multifunctional devices and in keeping DRM off them.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    6. Re:Why not a laptop? by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Funny

      The RIAA do not approve your use of the word lend in that sentence. Clearly you meant aiding and abetting first degree piracy against the crown in an act of sedition.

      Seriously though. Is 'lending' as easy as you say while using legit sources? I'm sure with torrented books it will be wonderful. However, it does sound like a great way to store all books ever written in your living room.

    7. Re:Why not a laptop? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Books are quickly accessible - you can flick to any page instantly and browse through at speed. You can't do that on a Kindle because a page turn takes 2 seconds.

      You can't just email books to your friends if you buy them from Amazon, thanks to DRM.

      The Kindle is pretty good for reading novels. It's almost useless for technical books and PDFs due to the slow screen update.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Why not a laptop? by nitroamos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      on the other hand.... perhaps a better question is whether it's a good idea to get a kindle, ASSUMING you already have a laptop. which is, i think, a quite likely scenario.

      so are the conveniences of a kindle worth 500$ to me? my answer is no.

      1) I have my own way of sorting & storing .pdf of academic papers on my laptop.
      2) My laptop already does everything i need, including markup, searching, cross-linking to the internet, VPN to my school so I can access more papers.
      3) All the tools I like to have (like energy unit converters) are easy access on my laptop, so if I'm reading a paper, I can quickly convert to my preferred units.
      4) It doesn't bother me to read on a laptop screen (macbook bought last year), although i don't typically read the entire thing.
      5) I don't need to read in random places or from random angles. Any places I might go, e.g. coffee shops, my laptop is not an inconvenience. They'll have an outlet for me to plug in, + wifi + coffee.
      6) I spend just about as much time searching for more papers online as I do actually reading them...

      so a kindle feels like a step down in terms of capability, that it doesn't make up for in convenience.

      at some price point, or in some possible life circumstances, maybe the balance would change, but for me right now, I'm not going to buy one.

    9. Re:Why not a laptop? by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mark my words; as soon as ebooks are the norm, they will cost "full price" no matter what the reader costs. The cost savings are never passsed on to the consumer, it will be taken as profit once they can. eBook readers are case of "oooh, it's digital" "coolness" more than anything else for the user, for the publishers it's a way of delivering less so that they can increase their profit margins.

    10. Re:Why not a laptop? by SetupWeasel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the Kindle were actually like that, it would be wonderful, but I'm pretty sure you can't email your books around. E-ink is great, but the Kindle is too expensive, its books are too expensive, and I'm not going to deal with a company that puts limits on what I purchase.

      I am waiting to see what Google does. I think that they are the only possible company that has the inclination and sheer might to give us an e-book reader and content that is reader friendly.

    11. Re:Why not a laptop? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

      it does sound like a great way to store all books ever written in your living room.

      How many books have you written in your living room?

    12. Re:Why not a laptop? by iocat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Read the sentence again, please. They could have been written by *anyone* in his living room, not just him!

      My issue with the DX is that you can download newspapers, but not as an image of the front page -- just as a list of files. If I wanted to do that, I'd use a web browser. When I can d/l a paper and read it like a paper -- lots of stories per page, ability to scan quickly over it all -- I'll buy one in a heartbeat. I woudl guess that's a few years away though.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    13. Re:Why not a laptop? by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Books also don't mysteriously vanish when the publisher goes out of business.

      But if Amazon's DRM servers ever go down, all your eBooks go with it!

      I know, I know... "What are the chances of Amazon going down?" ... well, slim to nil. But what are the chances of them deciding to shut off their DRM servers to save money, in 15 years? I bet those odds are much higher.

      PlaysForSure? Uh huh! Burn me once and I'll learn!

    14. Re:Why not a laptop? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on where. For example, online e-book stores are a booming market in Russia - virtually all titles on the market are available in dozens of formats, from open TXT, RTF, PDF and FB2, to reader-specific formats such as LIT and LRF. No DRM at all. And even a new release generally costs no more than 50% than a paper book, and older books are 3x-4x cheaper - overall it's $1.5-$2 for a typical fiction book. A lot of ways to pay, from CC and direct debit to pay terminals and pay-by-SMS.

      This isn't like AllOfMP3, either - no legal loopholes used, they work directly with authors and publishers (who set the prices). Quite a few authors have direct contracts, bypassing the publishers entirely. Thankfully, those people understand that setting the prices too high will only result in more piracy.

      Coupled with any eInk-based reader (mine is Sony, but it's more a matter of taste), it's really great - a convenient pocket library at very affordable prices.

      You could have that in U.S., too (with prices adjusted for your standard of living). What, you don't? Well, maybe your free market ain't so free...

  6. Math PDFs by Elote · · Score: 5, Informative

    It worked beautifully for the 2-3 higher mathematics PDFs I tried it with. All ot the little set theory symbols were displayed crystal clear. I don't think the screen is as readable as the PRS505's, however it's still good.

    1. Re:Math PDFs by bwalling · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The PRS-505 and the PRS-700 are both current models. The 700 has a touchscreen, which increases usability at the expense of screen clarity. The touchscreen is an overlay to the e-Ink screen, so you're viewing it through another material. The 505 is a nice device and handles PDF just fine. I picked one up a few weeks ago when Borders had it on sale for $199.

  7. Kindle review by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Informative

    I trust David Pogue, and he reviewed it this week

    This question sounds like it deserves the LMGTFY treatment though.

  8. Reviewed by Linux Journal by rm_-fr_* · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. Depends by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the textbooks you require are available at Amazon, you can save money (ebooks cost less than paper)... if you need to buy lots of them then you might even save enough to offset the Kindle purchase price.

    If not, there are other readers that handle PDF better (*ony makes one)

  10. What is the Kindle like? by kawabago · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the Kindle like? It's like a book with ink that can vanish permanently at any moment.

  11. Not an anti-DRM Nazi.... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...by any means here, but I'd never buy a Kindle unless I can borrow or lend a Kindle book like a dead tree book. Serialize it to the purchaser, and have the mothership ensure it's only on one device at any one time. To me, that's a reasonable compromise. The way it is now SUCKS and should be avoided at all costs (pun intended....)

  12. Kindle DX and PDFs by proxima · · Score: 5, Informative

    I seriously considered getting a Kindle DX, but after a little digging I found that it's not quite there yet for my use. So while I don't have personal experience with one, I did spend some time looking into it.

    I'd love to eliminate the need to print PDF documents (like journal articles) for comfortable reading away from my computer. Once I heard that the Kindle DX supports PDF natively and has a large screen, I thought it might be perfect. Before prices were announced, I actually expected it to launch for $600 (comparable to the iRex Iliad). To my surprise, the price was cheaper.

    As an added bonus, the free Whispernet (Sprint network) Wikipedia access has been expanded to include a rudimentary web browser. It would be unwise to buy a Kindle expecting this feature to remain free, though.

    What's not made clear is that the PDF support has drawbacks. It cannot zoom, except to turn the device into landscape mode, which provides a small magnification. Fortunately, the software does automatically eliminate margins, making the screen about the right size for most documents. What's worse is that all of the annotation features available for ebooks and other documents do not work with PDFs; no highlighting, no note-taking, etc. I think it supports bookmarking, but that's it. For me, this is a deal breaker (at least until the price drops much further). I'm hoping that since this is a software limitation, it might be fixed with an update. I've learned not to count on feature additions in firmware until I see them, though, so I'm holding off on the purchase. Hopefully the price will drop before the end of the year anyway.

    More strange is the method of firmware update. Apparently the Kindle 2 gets an update automatically if you leave Whispernet on long enough (usually overnight). I realize Amazon is doing this because they don't want users to need a computer and want to make things as simple as possible, but I would still strongly prefer user pull to Amazon push of content like software updates. Perhaps this behavior is configurable, I'm not sure.

    I found it interesting that (at least some) newspaper subscriptions were made cheaper with the DX. If you save $4/mo on two subscriptions each, in about 18 months that will pay for the price difference between the Kindle 2 and Kindle DX. Since neither unit is sold retail, I don't have a very good sense of how comfortable they are to read from, or how annoying I would find the screen wipes (as the eink screens refresh the content). The good news is that the return policy from Amazon seems pretty reasonable, and you can return an opened unit within a few weeks for a full refund. If it supported annotations (and zooming might be important on some documents), that's how I would try it out. Until that's supported, or the price drops substantially, I'll just wait.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Kindle DX and PDFs by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It cannot zoom, except to turn the device into landscape mode, which provides a small magnification. Fortunately, the software does automatically eliminate margins, making the screen about the right size for most documents. What's worse is that all of the annotation features available for ebooks and other documents do not work with PDFs; no highlighting, no note-taking, etc. I think it supports bookmarking, but that's it.

      Yeah, those are my only issues with it so far (I've had it for almost 3 weeks).

      I haven't had a need to zoom on any PDF yet, but the feature would be welcome. It supports bookmarks, but all you can do is 'dog-ear' the page. You can't leave a note about the bookmark.

      hopefully they'll remedy this with an update in the near future.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:Kindle DX and PDFs by Doofus · · Score: 2, Informative

      A couple of comments, from a "pleased DX owner" -

      1) Amazon indicates that the Whispernet service is free. You make a good point that Amazon or Sprint may at some time in the future choose to charge for web browsing, but using the service to buy/sync/transfer documents will remain free. Nothing I've seen from Amazon indicates that they *will* charge for browsing, though.

      2) In reading other posters' comments, it appears that PDFs - even those of the technical genus - render quite nicely. There are PDF capabilities missing from the DX that are standard on a computer - as you and others have pointed out, a software update may enhance these.

      3) The DX is comfortable for *me* to read with. The screen "wipes" are no more disorienting than turning a page in a dead-tree book or changing pages in a web-based document, and in my experience take less than half a second. Reading e-ink is far more pleasant an experience than reading text on an LCD screen, and the bulk of one's time is spent reading, not refreshing, the screen.

      If you know anyone with a Kindle (2 or DX), ask them if you can play with it for a short while. You may be surprised at how thoroughly you enjoy the reading experience.

      --
      If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  13. Definitely pricey, but enjoying it so far by esw · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure if it's worth the money for most, but I've been really enjoying mine so far.

    The PDF reader works great for things like academic papers as long as moderately small fonts aren't a problem. Large PDF books don't work quite as well because links don't work on PDF in the current version. Some PDF slide decks work well, depending on the formatting - colored text on black background doesn't render well.

    The built-in browser is OK. It's a nice novelty to be able to read wikipedia on this form factor of device.

  14. Re:Nokia n810? by Albanach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's cheaper, smaller, and it's pretty much a full Linux based computer... oh and it has a colour screen too!

    Given he is asking about the larger Kindle, the DX, I hardly think a smaller screen would be considered a plus. The point of the DX is that you can view an entire page, just like having a textbook in front of you. For that the N810 - while an awesome tool is hardly a substitute.

    The N810 also misses the mark, because it has a standard screen, not an e-ink one. That's great for reading a web page, but really strains your eyes if you want to read extensively.

    My own thoughts are that the DX still lacks decent annotating and that's a big flaw. There are several schools trialing them at the moment as a substitute for 1st year text books, and I'm sure this will be pointed out. Either Amazon will release a new model with decent annotating (either make a decent keyboard or get very good at handwriting recognition) or Sony will beat them to it in an attempt to recapture the market.

  15. Kindle DX by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...after a little digging I found that it's not quite there yet for my use. Yeah, greyscale sucks for porn, doesn't it...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  16. Pleased DX Owner by Doofus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I own a DX - my mom and wife went in together on a Kindle 2 for my birthday, several days later Amazon announced the DX. Returned the K2 and got the DX a couple of weeks back. I have used it every day since receiving it, and have thoroughly enjoyed using it. Excellent reading device and experience. The DX simply allows me to read, without getting in the way.

    Loading PDFs using USB is trivially easy; once, too rushed to plug the DX into my work laptop, I emailed a work-related PDF document to my kindle email address; $0.15 saved me a few minutes. Amazon will convert some documents to Kindle format via email if you cannot convert to PDF on your own. One downside on PDFs: have not figured out how to magnify other than rotating the DX. I cannot testify to complicated graphics, as I have not loaded any technical PDFs on my DX.

    A few technical reviews I've found that you may find helpful:

    http://www.matthewdavidwilliams.com/2009/06/12/technical-document-pdfs-on-the-kindle-dx/

    CNET Review

    Gizmodo Review

    Hope this helps. There are other reviews out there.

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  17. $500 is way too much no matter how good it is by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If I'm paying full whack for an e-reader I expect it to support all of the common book formats without prejudice. If the firmware integrates a store or a proprietary format as an extra then fine. This after all is how the iPod sold so well. Apple wisely ensured it played unencrypted MP3s and AACs first and foremost, complete with ripping software. The result was iPods sold through the roof and Apple coined it from integrated iTMS support.

    I just don't understand who is stupid enough to buy a Kindle at full price considering how crippled it is. The device should be subsidized to reflect its proprietary nature or the software should be opened up to make it more useful. FFS even Sony (a company not exactly known for embracing standards) has a more open reader that costs less.

    Even less fathomable is why publishers are letting the ebook market degenerate into competing formats, proprietary readers and possible market dominance by Amazon. One would think it is in their interest to come up with and dictate a single book format, one which all readers can implement, one which all stores can sell books with. It sounds obvious but a single format would level the playing field and catapult ebooks into the mainstream.

    1. Re:$500 is way too much no matter how good it is by N7DR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even less fathomable is why publishers are letting the ebook market degenerate into competing formats, proprietary readers and possible market dominance by Amazon. One would think it is in their interest to come up with and dictate a single book format, one which all readers can implement, one which all stores can sell books with. It sounds obvious but a single format would level the playing field and catapult ebooks into the mainstream.

      While one hears a lot about the Kindle (most US people who are even aware of the existence of e-book readers generally believe that the Kindle is the only one on the market), but once one digs through the hype to try to see what's actually happening in the industry, the situation is very different.

      All the entities with interests in the classical publishing industry (meaning, mostly, authors, agents, and "classical" publishers) are thoroughly unsure how best to prepare for the tidal wave that is now in its early stages. There are lots of ways it could go, and most of the players are trying to cover as many possible outcomes as possible; no one that I know of is betting the farm on any particular outcome. So you'll see entities supporting the Kindle (if they're willing to agree to Amazon's (draconian, IMHO) contract) but they are generally aware of the dangers of turning Amazon into a monopoly; so you'll also see support for other readers (personally, I'm a fan of the Sony so far, but if they implement some kind of "publishers must pay to list a book on our store" policy, they will struggle to be more than a bit player eventually).

      There are plenty of other possibilities too. Maybe we'll see more publishers creating their own online stores. Maybe more authors will do the same thing (depending on what contracts the authors are willing to sign anent digital rights). Maybe e-books will simply not take off (unlikely, I suspect, at least for some kinds of books). The whole "how does the author get paid if the marginal cost to generate a copy is zero" issue is the elephant in the room. Again, there are several possible answers, but which one(s) will prevail is anyone's guess at the moment.

      In short, it's all in huge flux, and everyone right now is just trying to survive until things begin to be a bit clearer.

      Just my opinion, of course. But I am a writer and publisher. On the other hand, I inhabit slashdot, so you know how much that means my opinion is worth.

      Sorry I wandered a bit off topic.

    2. Re:$500 is way too much no matter how good it is by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Kindle 2 supports a large number of e-book formats and it is possible to convert some more to the pretty common .mobi format. I have run a .LIT (Sony) to .mobi format conversion myself (free program) and the results were very good. The DX supports the same formats, plus PDF in a limited way.

      The problem wtih PDF is that it is a page description langauge where the page layout has already been determined. OK, so how do you transform a generic PDF to a different page format? Short answer is, you do not. If the PDF consists of nothing but text, you might be able to extract the text and throw everything else away, but this works for such a limited number of PDFs that the Kindle developers chose not to even try.

      So, the common on the DX is that if the PDF page fits on the screen and is readable like that, wonderful. Otherwise, it isn't going to be very pretty. A significantly better approach for the Kindle 2 is to convert the PDF to .mobi form and allow the device to display the text and illustrations as best it can, with text scaling and full reformatting. Does this work for all PDFs? No. PDF was designed as a page description language, not a e-book format and it does a very poor job of being an e-book format.

    3. Re:$500 is way too much no matter how good it is by demachina · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Even less fathomable is why publishers are letting the ebook market degenerate into competing formats, proprietary readers and possible market dominance by Amazon."

      Even less fathomable is why you need "publishers" once you fully reach the ebook era. The only necessary roll they play in the system is to publish books on dead trees. Good authors could easily start going direct to ebooks and completely cut publishers out of the system as long as they are willing to go without a dead tree version of their books.

      Publishers play a roll in filtering out the crap but they also filter out stuff none of them like but at least a niche audience might find interesting. They play a roll in promotion which may still be necessary but in the Internet era probably isn't as importance as it once was.

      Publishers are about as useful in the digital age as record companies.

      --
      @de_machina
  18. Re:Interweb. by freeweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are your thoughts on the term "irony"?

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  19. Re:Nokia n810? by JohnBailey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's cheaper, smaller, and it's pretty much a full Linux based computer... oh and it has a colour screen too!

    I'm sorry, but at $500 you can buy any of a number of laptops, netbooks or PDAs that all do much more than the Kindle does. Their price point is definitely in the wrong place for such a limited device.

    And it fails on the second property you mentioned. For PDF, a netbook is about the smallest practical display. Not to mention the fairly short battery life of the N series web tablets. I have an N800, and I agree. they are great for the proper tasks. But reading PDFs is not one of them. I know. I tried with my N800, and the screen size was only one of the drawbacks. Loading time was the worst.

    I'm a keen e-book reader. Got myself an e-ink based reader last year, and I love it. For it's intended task, it's fantastic. That task being reading fiction. NOTHING ELSE

    But I have a grand total of zero PDF files on it. Because when it comes to using PDF files, the current range of readers are all basically crap. Including the Kindle DX. The screen updates far too slowly. so paging back and forth is irritating. Search if it works, is slow. looking up the index is also slow, and usually set over several pages if it even has links..

    If you want to read fiction, great. You will get onto the habit of pressing the next page button mid way in the last sentence of the current page, so you don't even notice the page refresh blink after a few chapters. And as fiction is read one page after the other, it is perfectly suited to this. Graphic novels may be ok. A bit small on a 6 inch screen, but the bigger Kindle screen might work out ok. These too are page by page, not random access.

    But if you need to read a few paragraphs here, look in the index, and read a few pages somewhere else.. All common tasks with manuals.. Forget it. Get a netbook for portability or a tablet for functionality. Both great choices for manuals and text books. Do yourself a favour. Avoid e-ink displays unless the primary function is fiction reading. No matter how big the screen. You will either be disappointed, or worse.. end up justifying the extra cost of a 9 inch book reader that only works for manuals in the same way an iPhone works as a camera.

    There are supposed to be a few new displays coming out that are better suited to fast access, but you are realistically looking at several years before they are on sale anywhere. The current generation are a dead loss for PDF files.

    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  20. three words: flat file system by stevenj · · Score: 4, Informative

    As pointed out in this review:

    You can move whole directories but the Kindle flattens them out listing every file (by file name) separately on the main home page.

    You can't organize PDFs into directories on the Kindle, which makes accessing a large number of PDFs a serious problem. It's like 1984.

    (The lack of PDF annotation capability is also a headache.)

    --
    If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if it is only owned & not shared. S. Augustine
  21. I am happy with the DX, but it isn't for everyone by volsung · · Score: 5, Informative

    I picked up the Kindle DX on release day (much to my amazement, as I figured the initial stock would go entirely to preorders) and then took it on a 2 week trip. I'm quite pleased with it, although I definitely believe that it will only appeal to a narrow market.

    Pros:

    • The e-ink display really needs to be seen to understand the benefit. Over time, more and more of my reading material has become electronic, and I had not appreciated how much reading long documents on my backlit laptop LCD was leading to eye-fatigue. The result was that I tended to read on my laptop in short bursts, taking frequent breaks and losing focus. With a passive display like this, I find that I naturally read for longer intervals. Contrast is not as good as paper, but being able to read in direct light really changes your reading behavior.
    • The form factor is perfect for full page document reading. A netbook or small laptop, while useful for other things, is a horrible document reader. The clamshell form factor is the wrong orientation for reading pages, and if you try to turn it to read in portrait mode, you have a keyboard sticking out the side for no reason. I tried reading with a sideways 12" laptop on the bus as a graduate student, and it was pretty annoying. Anyone suggesting a real computer as an alternative to the Kindle DX should at least begin with a tablet PC.
    • As a reader, the software mostly gets out of your way. The power switch just puts the system to sleep, so you can pick up the DX and be reading where you were last in about 4 seconds. Your last location is remembered in all documents, as you would expect. More sophisticated controls would be nice, but aren't a deal-breaker.
    • The built-in cellular data link is not spectacular, but gets the job done. I really enjoy being able to read something, then if I encounter an unfamiliar concept, I can just start typing a phrase and hit "wikipedia". xkcd's comment about the Kindle being our manifestation of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is very true.
    • The browser is definitely limited, but very convenient when you are traveling. I don't have a fancy phone, so this is the only device I own which provides nearly universal Internet access. (Yeah, I'm late to the party.) Not having a stupid cell contract to use the web browser is a huge plus.
    • Battery life and weight are good. I tend to leave the wireless radio on, but even with that extra drain, I normally have to recharge every few days. At 1 lb., it is the weight of a thin hardback. You won't read it for long periods by holding it out in front of your face (see "gorilla arms"), but it doesn't take much support to a corner or an elbow to comfortably hold it.
    • Being able to read the first chapter of books free is kind of neat. I don't usually buy books for the Kindle with the store, because I consider DRM-crippled data to be disposable. It is a great way to find new books to buy in dead-tree format, though.
    • PDF rendering works fine. I have encountered one image in one PDF that rendered strange, but otherwise viewing PDFs has met my expectations.

    Cons:

    • Some people say other readers have a better e-ink display. This is my first e-ink device, so I can't comment on that.
    • If you are used to reading on an LCD, it will take you a little bit to adjust. The first thing I noticed when I got the DX is that I have very poor lighting in my apartment for reading. With a backlit display, I never noticed. However, the DX needs external light, just like paper. :)
    • This is not a speedy device, nor a speedy internet connection. The browser is very slow, especially on complex websites.
    • The economics of the cellular link are worrying. Since it is effectively pre-paid in the cost of the device itself, Amazon does not have a strong financial incentive to improve the built-in browser. More web use means more money they have to pay to Sprint on your behalf. You see the effects of this in o
  22. I have 801 tchnical PDFs on my DX by Doug+Jensen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have several thousand technical documents ranging from hundreds of pages to a dozen pages. I have been carrying them around with me on a 500GB portable USB hard drive, connecting that to my laptop or a public computer. I got 801 of them on my DX before it filled up, so now I am in the process of triaging all my PDFs to get the most important ones on the DX. I have no problems at all reading them, even the mathematics-intensive ones. Something I thought of after I bought the DX: hey, now I can easily have with me the PDFs of all (a couple hundred) of the journal and conference papers I have published. One obvious use is for employment interviews (I'm just saying) without having to tote my laptop -- the show-and-tell experience is totally different and cool. Well worth the price for my purposes.

    --
    Doug Jensen
  23. Simple answer: No (I returned mine) by erleellis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From one academic-paper-reading-geek to another: Don't waste your time with the Kindle DX. I am a professor and did order one- with very high hopes of going beyond paper! To warn others, I also posted a review of my experience with the Kindle DX on my blog: http://ecotope.org/blogs/post/Kindle-DX-Not-ready-for-Academic-users.aspx But there was no way to really use the thing the way you need to if you are an academic-paper-reading-geek! I returned it after about a week. Maybe next year there will be a machine with the right stuff! I hope so!

  24. Re:No, it's not worth the money by jdhowe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the exception of point 1 and 4, most of what you are writing is patently false. 2. You can load a book on up to six Kindle devices. You can send an issue of a newspaper or magazine to any of the devices and they will be readable on each of them, ï 3. Your book purchases do not depend on having an active Amazon account. 5. You can return any ebook purchase to Amazon within 7 days for a full refund. 6. That is a problem with your library system and with the publishers, not the Kindle. The Kindle can read many, many book formats. You can also purchase download free books from many sources. There is nothing to stop library systems from creating subscription or time-limited access to books, other than the book publishers and author associations. I would say that you are the one who should get cracking and write some letters!

  25. Re:No, it's not worth the money by melted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    #2: http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/22/device-limits-fuzzy-on-downloads-for-kindle-books-if-so-should-the-ftc-investigate/

    And a Kindle wielding friend of mine was complaining that newspaper subscription he uses is limited to one device, too. Which is insane.

    #3: http://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44350&highlight=amazon+banning

    This dude now has a $350 door stop.

    #5: Yes, my bad.

    #6: That still doesn't change the fact that until this problem is addressed (and Amazon has enormous leverage here, while I personally don't), Kindle will not be able to replace books for me.