Slashdot Mirror


Is IE Usage Share Collapsing?

je ne sais quoi writes "Net Applications normally releases its statistics for browser and operating system usage share on the first of every month. This month, however, the data has not shown up — only a cryptic message stating they are reviewing the data for inexplicable statistical variations and that it will be available soon. Larry Dignan at ZDNet has a blog post that might explain what is happening: Statcounter has released some data that shows a precipitous drop in IE browser use in North America, to the benefit of Firefox, Safari, and Chrome. At the end of May, StatCounter shows IE usage share (for versions 6, 7, and 8 combined) at around 64%; at the beginning of June it is now about 56% — an astounding 8% drop in one month. We should keep in mind the difficulties in estimating browser usage share: this could very well be a change in how browsers report themselves, or some other statistical anomaly. So it will probably be healthy to remain skeptical until trend this is confirmed by other organizations. Have any of you seen drops in IE usage share for Web-sites you administer?"

30 of 575 comments (clear)

  1. typo in summary by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi there, submitter here. I left a typographical error in the summary. "in the beginning of June" should read "in the beginning of July". Oops, sorry about that.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    1. Re:typo in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No problem, Noone reads the summary.

    2. Re:typo in summary by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who is this Noone fellow?

    3. Re:typo in summary by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:typo in summary by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's a summary now?

      I was making do with the first eight characters of the headlines.

      So, in response to "Is IE Us", I'll have to say no. No it isn't.

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    5. Re:typo in summary by WebManWalking · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must mean Peter Noone of Herman's Hermits. "I'm MSIE the 8th I am. MSIE the 8th I am, I am. I got bested by the browser next door. We've been tryin' 7 times before. And everyone was an MSIE. We wouldn't pass an AcidTest, no ma'am. I'm the User Agent MSIE, MSIE the 8th I am, I am. MSIE the 8th I am."

    6. Re:typo in summary by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 5, Funny

      you read the headlines? I just read the tags and try to guess what headline would have caused them.

      --
      Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    7. Re:typo in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish I had mod points. The parent's post is pretty well on topic. My first reaction to the grandparent's post was that "Noone" was an intentional typo, since it was replying to a post about a typo. Now I'm not so sure.

      OK, now I'm replying to a post about a typo that was in another post about a typo. I hope my post doesn't have any typos...

      I counted 6 including the subject.

    8. Re:typo in summary by nine-times · · Score: 5, Funny

      You read the tags? I just blindly comment without even reading the post I'm replying to.

    9. Re:typo in summary by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 5, Funny

      then how the hell did you know I read the tags? you must be a good guesser

      --
      Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    10. Re:typo in summary by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cousin of Anonymous Cowardon.

    11. Re:typo in summary by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      You read the web page? I just drink a fifth of Jack, bang on the keyboard, and let the moderators sort it out.

    12. Re:typo in summary by w0mprat · · Score: 5, Funny

      You comment? I use a slashdot posting form.

      Slashdot Posting Form v0.1
      Please select all that apply:
      ....
      [ ] IANAL but ____
      [ ] XKCD link : ___
      [ ] Bash quote: ____
      [ ] There, fixed that for you
      [ ] In soviet russia the _____'s YOU
      [ ] sudo _____ > /dev/null
      [ ] Get off my lawn
      ....
      [ ] Cory Doctrow
      [ ] Al gore
      [ ] Natalie Portman
      ....

      a.k.a. checkbox humour

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    13. Re:typo in summary by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always thought that was the name of the guy who built Data. Wasn't it? Dr. Noone Young Sung?

      Doctor Noonien Soong

      Doctor who?

    14. Re:typo in summary by imhennessy · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're putting monkeys out of work!

      ivan

      --
      Like to brew? Want to talk about it? Brattlebrew: groups.yahoo.com/group/brattlebrew
  2. Segment and conquer by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Funny

    More interestingly, you can really see that the new key markets strategy the Spread Firefox campaign has kicked off is really paying off.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  3. Proliferation of mobile browsers... by seramar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...could explain this, at least partially. All things combined and considered I am not suprised that IE is accounting for only 56% of browsers reported. Were we limited to desktop only, that might be different.

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
    1. Re:Proliferation of mobile browsers... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The perception of myself (and finally! lately!) my non-technical friends...

      is that using IE
      a) has a ton of obnoxious ads- some are loud- some take over the screen.
      b) is like walking around with a huge "kick me" sign on.
      c) is frustrating because of the lack of many useful plugins (where would I get all these glorious HD Videos-- FINALLY "Blues Travellor" without firefox).
      d) is frustrating because "they" own your browser-- not you. It's behavior serves "them", not you.

      But mainly the virus/kick me thing.

      After my bud clicked on a link (just a frikkin link!) on the yahoo message boards, he had to reinstall his entire computer!?!?!

      With Firefox, Flashblock and Noscript- you are pretty darn safe.

      Chrome got a lot of press- and to be honest, I've been looking at Safari myself. (once you break yourself of IE, you ask-- okay, but is there something else EVEN better than this?)

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    2. Re:Proliferation of mobile browsers... by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 5, Informative

      You think that's something? I host a SpongeBob fansite, and even it has 40.38% for Firefox and 47.90% for IE from June 6th to July 6th.

      Looking at the data for the same period in previous years, I'm seeing:
      2008: 63.26% IE and 31.49% Firefox
      2007: 72.85% IE and 23.22% Firefox
      2006: 77.60% IE and 17.77% Firefox

      That's with 20,000+ visits in each period, so it's more than just noise.

    3. Re:Proliferation of mobile browsers... by joeflies · · Score: 5, Funny

      You host what??

  4. No drop off here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We've seen no major drop off, just a steady and slow decline. We track over 15 million users a day across the sites we manage here in the UK (mainly council properties).

  5. hmm.... it's summer? by timtux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Couldn't it just be that all the geeks are running firefox/opera/chrome and everyone else is outside in the nice weather?

    1. Re:hmm.... it's summer? by asa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, summertime is the worst time for Firefox usage. Firefox is a much larger percentage of European usage than U.S. usage and so when Europe goes on summer vacation for a few months, Firefox's global share falls measurably.

    2. Re:hmm.... it's summer? by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny

      In the US, you tend to get your two weeks and that's about it.

      It's OK, we make up for it by being hideously inefficient most of the rest of the time.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  6. Re:In utter disarray? by Endo13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did it loose 73% of its core developer?

    I dunno, but what I'm interested in is what they did with the other 27% of him.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  7. Looking from multiple angles by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the longterm trends reported by Net Applcations, something that StatCounter doesn't offer, it's hard to conclude that anything dramatic has just happened.

    http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2009/06/historical_view.html

    These longer trends are steady and smooth and there's nothing that's happened in the last couple of months that would cause IE to fall off the cliff.

    That being said, there is a lot of churn in the various browser versions. IE is really a collection of browsers with measurable share, IE 6, IE 7, and IE 8. Looking at these versions, it's clear that a lot is happening.

    http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/2009/07/a_browser_prediction.html

    It's likely that IE 7 and IE 6 will fall to under 10% global share by the end of this year and that IE 8 will grow to approximately 40%. That would give IE 60% overall, Firefox about 25%, Safari about 10%, and "other" would hold the remaining 5%.

  8. Re:It was to be expected by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I noticed is a dramatic shift in the listening to your IT guy lately.

    People actually listen now instead of blowing me off and going right back to their porn surfing with IE.

    The bad economy makes people actually listen when the IT guy says "I'll be back in 30 days to collect another $250.00 if you dont change your internet habits."

    I love a bad economy, it forces people to be less stupid.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. Re:It's because IE 6 support was droped on some si by DriedClexler · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fairness, Slashdot displays things badly in Firefox 3.0. And Safari. And Opera. And Chrome. And probably Mosaic if you gave it a spin.

    Please, just give me back the old site.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  10. Re:Slashdot browser shares?? by selven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet Explorer: 0.37%
    Firefox: 13.45%
    Safari: 4.23%
    Chrome: 6.97%
    Lynx: 22.43%
    Self-created web browser: 23.12%
    No browser - reading HTML directly: 14.22%
    No browser - interpreting modem signals directly: 15.21%

  11. Re:In utter disarray? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the difference between Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and a Female Programmer ?

    There's no difference. None of them come while you are awake.

    Zing!

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai