Slashdot Mirror


Cats "Exploit" Humans By Purring

An anonymous reader notes a BBC report on research recently published in the journal Current Biology, indicating that cats manipulate humans by adding a baby-like cry to their purring. "Cat owners may have suspected as much, but it seems our feline friends have found a way to manipulate us humans. Researchers at the University of Sussex have discovered that cats use a 'soliciting purr' to overpower their owners and garner attention and food. Unlike regular purring, this sound incorporates a 'cry,' with a similar frequency to a human baby's. The team said cats have 'tapped into' a human bias — producing a sound that humans find very difficult to ignore."

15 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Evolution or Intelligent Design? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming that the cats are in fact intelligent creatures, it would make sense that they have learned this behavior. Feral cats do not exhibit this behavior, so it is most likely learned or self-developed.

    However, it could also be that the constant exposure to humans and the direct selection of cats which humans like the most by the owners has led to a selection bias for cats with this behavior.

    I find it hard to believe that this is somehow one of those hokey "100th monkey" behaviors, but I also find it extremely interesting that this behavior is widespread.

    1. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      my dog gives me a series of ruffs and whistling sounds if i don't follow the rules in the morning. likes wise if i throw the ball into a place he doesn't want to go he'll come back ruffing to me to tell me i need to be the one to fix the situation. the more i talk to him the more he does it as well.

      cats and dogs are smarter than we give them credit for, when they look at you, they are thinking about something it's not just a vacant look.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the sound of anger and frustration.

      Any animal would be angry and frustrated to find out that the being in control of their life was a moron.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. More likely micro-evolution by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cats that make the most attractive noise get fed most. Have the most offspring. Eventually dominate. Given what we've done to dogs by selective breeding in just a thousand years or so, this is a simple and believable scenario. Selecting cats for their purr is no more extraordinary than, say, the difference we've created between a spaniel and a Mexican Hairless.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  3. Re:I for one welcome ... by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    New?

    The cats were worshiped as gods in ancient Egypt. They never STOPPED being our overlords.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  4. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is actually a very interesting way to learn to not give in to annoying behaviour.

    This alone tells me that you'll be one of the few parents that raise good kids.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. In other news... by BigMeanBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stuff with brains can learn.

    --
    += E
  6. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Anarchduke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just don't feed the kids once a day out of a food bowl and you're good to go.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  7. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Znork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, cats and babies use what works. If a specific sound is what gets you going, then that's the sound you'll get when they want something. Which is why your approach is perfectly fine; as long as you know there's nothing really wrong, training them to sound like something's horribly amok all the time isn't desirable.

    On the other hand, sometimes it's good to reinforce nice ways of asking for attention. Personally I give in and play a bit when my cats roll over on their backs and purr (just far enough out of reach so I can't pet them), or when they bring their toys to me. Or I'll look what they want if they tug at my elbow. The only annoying sound that will get them something is the plaintive meow accompanied by scratching the floor near the litter box. That one means 'the litterbox is dirty, change it or I'm gonna piss on the floor', and considering they usually have a point and a reasonable tolerance, I'll accept that one.

  8. Re:Self domesticated by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it isn't *that* difficult to train a cat. Most people just don't bother.

  9. "have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    cats have not tapped into anything at any time. it was already their normal attitude. cats psychologically see humans as their mothers. both men, and women alike. it doesnt matter. therefore they do all stuff they do to their mothers, to their human companions. no surprise they also make that sound.

    to 'tap' into such a thing would require a cat to observe a baby, then imitate him/her. yet, how many cats that were in the research have observed a baby crying ? how many cats were raised with a baby ?

    this thing has to be just another instinctive behaviour cats do to their mothers at early age. i wonder why this schmuck didnt research whether baby cats also do that to mother cats.

  10. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're wrong; thay are domesticated, moreso than horeses and almost as much as dogs. They just have different psychologies. I taught my oldest daughter's cat to fall down and play dead when I point my finger at it and say "bang. We had cats when the kids were growing up, and the cats listened better than the kids.

    I care for my oldest daughter's cats, they'll come when called and obey other instructions.

    Cats live *among* humans and coexist more or less peacefully with them, but so do squirrels and houseflies.

    That's bullshit. Try petting a squirrel.

    The biggest difference between dogs and cats is that "nice" dogs are whores, letting anyone pet it. Try petting a mean rottweiler; I've seen dogs bite their own owners.

  11. No. by unity100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a cat, human owner is a mother. they exhibit all behavior they do to their mothers to their human owners.

    1. Re:No. by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      said by someone who never had^H^H^Hlived with a cat. *

      to grown up male cats, humans are a source of food and entertainment. maybe like a brother. to females, humans are more like ofsprings. that's why they bring in dead and half-dead animals home. they want you - the human - to use that carcass/weakened creature as play toys. this teaches usefull hunting and killing skills.

      * humans don't own cats. we live with them in the bast-case scenario. in the worst case, the CAT owns YOU! cue the "in soviet russia" jokes.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    2. Re:No. by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Our male, 20 year old tomcat had the same behavior wrt bringing home "food" for us. Not so long ago he dragged home a large rabbit he'd killed, and deposited it in front of the cupboard in the kitchen where the cookware was housed. Then he sat by it and talked until we noticed.

        We figured that he wanted us to cook it up and eat it. ...

        We lost him a couple months ago. Our lives are bleak without him - he was more intelligent than most humans, and had a very low sense of humor - is humor a mark of intelligence? We miss him terribly.

        Cats are at least as intelligent as humans are. Possibly more so.

        Just because humans have developed technology and the ability to destroy ourselves does not make us more sapient than anything else.

        It's likely a mark against us that we can't recognize the other intelligent species on this planet we live with.

        But that's just my opinion. No, I am not a member of PETA, although I do think they make some good points, mostly wrt we can't consider ourselves civilized until we stop treating even the members of our own species as objects rather than as people.

        Of course it could be that I'm getting old and bitter and pissed off...

        SB

       

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.