Slashdot Mirror


NASA Has the Lost Tapes

The Shuttle launch may have been delayed by two days, but NASA has better news to report. caffiend666 writes "As speculated a few weeks ago, NASA has found and is starting to restore the lost Apollo 11 tapes. A Briefing will be held July 16th at the Newseum in Washington to 'release greatly improved video imagery from the July 1969 live broadcast of the Apollo 11 moonwalk... The original signals were recorded on high quality slow-scan TV (SSTV) tapes. What was released to the TV networks was reduced to lower quality commercial TV standards.'"

28 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, what's the big deal? Just set up the studio and make the tapes again!

  2. Cool, any UFOs? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1, Funny

    Excellent! I wonder if there's any evidence of UFOs. Glad they were able to grab the images off the tape, and I look forward to looking at it, and meeting our new alien overlords.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Cool, any UFOs? by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do you think we are of an concern to them? Allegedy - Allegedy - the UFO just sat there at the edge of the crater for a while, then moved off once the astronauts came out. The aliens are not the ones concerned. So why would they be concerned about our ability to use chemical-based engines to reach our first orbital body if the travel between stars?

      As for our government control, that Russian hacker who got arrested for breaking tin to NASA computers allegedly had recovered images with alien craft. Now finally the astronauts have started to acknoledge alien contact

      Alien moon base

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Cool, any UFOs? by dzfoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, these are just the "Special Edition" version of the faked moon landing tapes. It was "produced" by Lucas Films, in collaboration with NASA, and contain newly added footage and CGI-enhanced visuals.

      They look great, but some have already complained that the new tapes show Buzz Aldrin touching the surface first, which completely changes the character and motivation of the scene.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    3. Re:Cool, any UFOs? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      They look great, but some have already complained that the new tapes show Buzz Aldrin touching the surface first, which completely changes the character and motivation of the scene.

      I can accept that, but what really ruined the tapes for me was the new extended musical sequence.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:Can we.... by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes we can, however our parents will shout down the stairs for us to shut up.

    --
    sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  4. Headline by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Initially I thought the headline read "Nasa Has Lost the Tapes", and I almost believed it. "What? Already? They lost them again? Those idiots! ... oh wait."

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    1. Re:Headline by C18H27NO3+ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interesting, I read it that way and thought they lost them again, as well. Dang, we must have tumors.

    2. Re:Headline by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, now it's time for the Waterboard tapes to become lost. *hides*

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  5. Re:Can we.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We should have a -1 - Lives with parents mod.

  6. Lost Tapes by retech · · Score: 5, Funny

    After the 2nd season, I found it boring. And honestly NASA, tapes? Use a dvr if you're going to record Lost.

  7. Moonwalk? by phunster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly the first moonwalk was done by Michael Jackson, we saw it live on television

  8. Re:Greatly improved quality? by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 3, Funny

    the truth is that they had the tapes all along... its just that the technology finally exists to remove all the alien spacecraft from the footage. Now they can show it to us in the alien free form god intended

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
  9. Decade of the remakes? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now even this great movie of fiction gets a remake? Or will it just be a weak director's cut, to prepare for the lauch of the sequel "Mars mission"?

    I hope it will have better props this time. They were pretty unrealistic, and clearly retouched (or 'shopped in 2009 speak) in that old movie.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  10. NASA intentionally delayed ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... release of the high resolution version until the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD format issue was settled.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Don't fall for it by Palestrina · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait six months and they'll have the special director's edition EVD with 10 extra minutes and a "making of" featurette.

  12. Paradox alert by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA doesn't have any lost tapes. If they have found them, they are by definition not lost anymore. I bet there are dozens of tapes that are lost because nobody knows their location but these tapes are not one of them. Correct headline would be "NASA has the found tapes". Sounds redundant? In the human mind that may be the case but if you think about it long enough, you can only come to this conclusion. Being lost is quite a fleeting and interesting feature and has no doubt been studied by filosophers around the ages.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Paradox alert by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      for such a highly pedantic post, you shouldn't have ended it by misspelling philosophers.

      But the misspelling made you think, and that's what philosophers like to due.

    2. Re:Paradox alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You've both lost me...

  13. Re:Greatly improved quality? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's higher quality because the broadcast version was converted to standard TV by pointing a video camera at a screen showing the transmitted version.

    I knew it! Those NASA bastards exploited the analog hole. Quick, get the MPAA on the phone and have somebody distract NewYorkCountryLawyer so he can't interfere. We finally have NASA right where we want them.....

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  14. Typographical error. by Larryish · · Score: 1, Funny

    As speculated a few weeks ago, NASA has found and is starting to redact the lost Apollo 11 tapes.

    There, fixed that for ya.

  15. Re:Future preservation plans? by rdoger6424 · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  16. Re:In answer to your question by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, we definitely landed on the moon, just not when NASA claimed.

    Apollo 13 was the only mission to actually get there.

  17. Re:Future preservation plans? by Spacejock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hiding it in the basement of a university in the most remote capital city on the planet seems to work. Unless the Vogons turn up.

  18. Re:I said all along by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Check in the Ark next to the dead alien in the jar.

    But, you see, I found Abby Normal's brain more fascinating.
         

  19. Re:Can we.... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Already exists - called the Karma bonus

  20. Re:Anonymous Coward by pengipengi · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah,

    And to make it really convincing, shoot it in color, and 1080p.

    With that quality, everyone can se the details of the moon, and be convinced they actually was there.

  21. Re:Anonymous Coward by JamesP · · Score: 2, Funny

    They can't reshoot it without Michael Jackson

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?