Slashdot Mirror


New DVDs For 1,000-Year Digital Storage

anonymous cowpie sends word of a Utah startup that is about to introduce technology for writing DVDs that can be read for 1,000 years after being stored at room temperature. (Ordinary DVDs last anywhere from 3 to 12 years, on average.) The company, Millenniata, is said to be in the final stages of negotiation with Phillips over patent licensing and plans to begin manufacture in September. 1,000-year "M-ARC Discs" are expected to retail for $25-$30 at first, with the price coming down with volume. "Dubbed the Millennial Disk, it looks virtually identical to a regular DVD, but it's special. Layers of hard, 'persistent' materials (the exact composition is a trade secret) are laid down on a plastic carrier, and digital information is literally carved in with an enhanced laser using the company's Millennial Writer, a sort of beefed-up DVD burner. Once cut, the disk can be read by an ordinary DVD reader on your computer."

50 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Posting.... by c00rdb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Posting to prevent accidental mod.

  2. How do we KNOW that.. by NervousNerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How do we KNOW that they'll REALLY last 1,000 years?

    1. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know. But it's interesting to think that people watching the DVDs 1000 years from now will probably find our speech as odd and different as we find Beowulf now...

    2. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lifetime estimation study would be done.
      Extended incubation tests, at ~ 80ÂC, 85%RH ect.
      Accelerated ageing should give the user some idea, not that many of us will get to ask for a 'return' for faulty goods.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know. But it's interesting to think that people watching the DVDs 1000 years from now will probably find our speech as odd and different as we find Beowulf now...

      Yeh, they'll find it odd how we call it Christmas instead of XMas. How we saw Ask instead of Aks. And these rain forests we keep talking about.

    4. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      John Titor told us.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by notseamus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded.

      --
      I dreamed of Freud: What does this mean?
    6. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do we KNOW that they'll REALLY last 1,000 years?

      People from the future told us. They also told us to bury more porn.

    7. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is, after we've evolved several generations, our porn won't be nearly as enticing to future generations as it is to us. They'll be wondering where the extra pair of titties is? ;-)

    8. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by Krneki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ask Philip J. Fry.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    9. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by msormune · · Score: 3, Funny

      The rain what now?

    10. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good god, I hadn't thought of that.

      I'm sure the multi-endowed tentaclebeasted transfurry lolirape stuff that comes out of Japan and /b/ is _nothing_ compared to the unfathomable transdimensional Lovecraftian virtual Horror-Porn that our descendants will be fapping to in .

    11. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by CarpetShark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      rain forests

      Rain?

      For rests?

      Fascinating. Just 2,000 years ago, rain was a torture method. And just 1,000 years later, it seems to have developed into some the much-mentioned but never seen "rest and relaxation". So much of our past is yet to be discovered.

    12. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by MindKata · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Talking about 1000 and 2000 years in the past, I prefer to think about what it could be like when we are seen as the distant past.

      It seems very likely the changes in the next 1000 years are going to be much bigger than the changes in the previous 1000 years simply as we have so many better tools today, including far better information tools which helps to accelerate creating new technology.

      I hope in 1000 years from now they will look back at us as if we are some kind of very early version of what they see as their technological dark ages. Although I would like to hope in 2000 years from now, the people then would be able to ask some of their oldest friends what it was like 1000 years ago.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    13. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just thinking of how old porn collections will be used in medical classes.

      1,000 years ago, women had only two breasts...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    14. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, at the moment it seems like people will be telling sagas of M'kell J'ackson in at least a thousand years time. How I came down from heaven and wrestled small evil dwarfs that attacked him in bed and so on. Rather like Beowulf.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    15. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by bertoelcon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just thinking of how old porn collections will be used in medical classes.

      1,000 years ago, women had only two breasts...

      And the larger males had breasts on their backs.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    16. Re:How do we KNOW that.. by polymeris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From what I have heard they were able to make cd's like that. The only reason they didn't (in a time where recordable cd's were just a consumer's wet dream and cd's were only used for music) was that the replacement market would disappear for the music industry. [...] Maybe for very specialised purposes for high prices, but not in any ordinary shop.

      Low cost CDs take long enough to degrade as it is. You don't want millions of 1000-year-lasting CDs or DVDs piling up in the garbage dumps. It's ok if they are available for a higher price (10x at least) to archivists, people will think twice what they put on them.

  3. Larger Disks by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dubbed the Millennial Disk, it looks virtually identical to a regular DVD, but it's special.

    These new non-degradable disks are larger, black, and made out of vinyl.

    1. Re:Larger Disks by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      +1 for Interracial Chubby Bondage reference.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As if DVD players will be around for 1000 years?

    1. Re:players? by RDW · · Score: 3, Informative

      'As if DVD players will be around for 1000 years?'

      Or even 20 years:

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/mar/03/research.elearning

      The situation won't be as extreme as it was with this proprietary system, of course (the number of number of DVD readers in circulation is very large, and the software that interacts with them is well documented), but in the long run the only thing that really makes sense is to make multiple copies that are shifted to new storage media as they become available.

    2. Re:players? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No problem. Store them in a vault with 10 plates of instructions for building a DVD player and 100 plates showing how to crack the various layers of annoying DRM that have been added by the Hollywood studios.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:players? by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. If it was rocket science, you'd reuse or lose the media, and we'd have to hope somebody found copies in Australia or something.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Carved in by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks to the fact the data is literally "carved in", these discs are playable by a wide range of easily obtainable readers. Not only can you put them in a DVD player - in fact, it's possible simply to put a needle in the grooves of the disc, which gives detailed instructions on how to make a DVD player.

  6. Disc Lifespan by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Ordinary DVDs last anywhere from 3 to 12 years, on average.)

    For those of you really concerned about optical media in your possession, check out NIST's "Care and Handling of CDs and DVDs - A Guide for Librarians and Archivists" [1.24 MB PDF warning]. That guide is extremely thorough.

    While it is a longer span for pressed DVDs, I'm sure the RIAA/MPAA know that the media we purchase songs and movies on has a limited lifespan that may very well be shorter than the consumer's remaining years. And it kind of upsets me that creating backups for your own personal use of DVDs or CDs is illegal (although not typically prosecuted unless copyright infringement ensues). Personally, I rip all my CDs and some DVDs upon purchase and simply never use the disc again. It goes into storage and I create digital backups and hard copy backups of the discs. It's a bit pricier and not as instant as other ways of purchasing media but it ensures I'll always have it. When I purchased the latest Cloud Cult album, I bought the CDs and was able to download unencrypted MP3s immediately after purchase. When I purchased the vinyl record of She & Him, I was e-mailed a voucher to download the MP3s. I wish the big distributors would follow what the little guys are doing and offer you the whole package up front. Saves me a lot of work.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Disc Lifespan by tgd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't have to violate the DMCA to copy a DVD. Just copy the files to a blank disk.

      CSS is about player licensing, not copy protection. (Which there are a lot of people that *still* don't get...)

      You can't play a DVD back on a player that isn't licensed by the DVD consortium. Thats what CSS prevents. (And thus, you can't format shift.)

      Making a backup works just fine, and is perfectly legal. In fact, you can make a backup to a harddrive and it'll work just fine as long as the program playing it on your computer is a licensed DVD player. No decryption needed, no DCMA violation, no breaking of copyright.

  7. Sure. 1000 years. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Interesting
    And this assumes that in 1000 years there will be:

    1. a player to play the damn thing
    2. the resources to build a player to play the damn thing.
    3. a screen to view it on
    4. the resources to build a screen to view it on
    5. the cultural interest in such behaviour (sitting and watching a screen)
    6. the cultural capacity to decode and understand what the hell they're watching even if they do decide to watch it, assuming they have the ability to do so. For an extreme example, there is a non-zero probability that in 1000 years, the notion of "fiction" may well not exist, in which case an episode of "Friends" or "Seinfeld" become biographical portraits of stupid foolish people, as one needs to have the fictive distance to decode what is happening.
    7. that anyone will give a rat's ass about us in a 1000 years. They may well be pissing on our graves for having ruined the planet, and these disks may simply be destroyed as examples of the evil Evil EVIL petroleum age.
    8. Reverse engineering NTSC (SD or HD - just getting 29.97fps with rectangular pixels is fucked up enough) from a disc filled with microscopic pits strikes me as impossible and or pointless.

    I can list many more reasons why a 1000 year disk is a waste of time, those are just a few off the top of my head.

    Frankly, I think we are the civilisation that in 1000 years will be a great and tantalizing mystery. Their world will be filled with our garbage, telling them how we lived (like wasteful pigs at the trough) but they won't really know that much about what we think (because it was all digital and the technology disappeared in the die-off).

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

      And finally and most importantly, Congress would *never* consider extending the copyright term to 1000 years

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can list many more reasons why a 1000 year disk is a waste of time

      I think you are missing the point.

      Let's say you are an engineer working for DiskCorp, and your boss tells you to develop a compound that will last for 100 years to sell to people worried about archival. In the persuit of 100-year life, you happen to come up with something that lasts 1000 years.

      Do you: (a) decide that you failed and go back to the drawing board, or (b) tell marketing they can run with the 1000-year life?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by Locklin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a psychological trick. No one will take their word for it that their disks last 1000 years. Instead, people will assume they are exaggerating, but anchor their estimate of the "real" lifetime of the disks to the 1000 year number (even though it's obviously fictitious). Half, a third, even a tenth of the advertised lifetime is still longer than a human lifetime -so people will buy it.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    4. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. a player to play the damn thing

      Just stick it in the molecular scanner. This is 1000 years into the future, isn't it?

      2. the resources to build a player to play the damn thing.

      3. a screen to view it on
      4. the resources to build a screen to view it on

      Oh, you want to full old-school experience? I'm sure you can replicate a player, then. Or incorporate the molecular scan from 1. in a holodeck program that simulates a player and a screen.

      5. the cultural interest in such behaviour (sitting and watching a screen)

      Maybe you're interested in ancient history? Or maybe that's several orders of magnitude more exciting than what people usually do in their spare time 1000 years from now?

    5. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Informative

      8. Reverse engineering NTSC (SD or HD - just getting 29.97fps with rectangular pixels is fucked up enough) from a disc filled with microscopic pits strikes me as impossible and or pointless.

      If Things Fall Apart, it'll be impossible and pointless, because people probably won't even be able to discern that there are pits. A DVD will just be another piece of godtrash, desirable because it makes pretty rainbows, but with only legends about its function.

      If This Goes On, it'll be trivial, whether or not players still exist. I'm pretty sure that with a consumer digicam, ImageJ, a simple audio package and some ambition, I could recover an Edison cylinder recording without any sort of physical "player"; doing the same for a vinyl disc would be a stretch at present, but probably not ten years from now. A physical artifact with gross topographic features (as opposed to subtle patterns of charge or spin) just won't be able to retain that much mystery. The software it represents can be a bit more mysterious, but I don't think the ability to analyze a digital video stream is likely to be lost unless we lose most everything else.

      Of course, if the RIAA and its minions come up with truly strong encryption and DRM, information could be lost irretrievably. But gods have always had demons to contend with.

    6. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't give them any ideas.

    7. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 2, Informative

      We have archeologists who dig up the most mundane objects from more than 1000 years ago and make a big deal out of it. I'm sure the guy who wrote his diary on stone tablets back in the day didn't worry about us being interested in his day, or having a way to read it. And yet we do.

      As for your other predictions of the future, I'm sure they have about the same level of accuracy as that of a man living 1000 years ago.

    8. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I agree with the technical criticisms, I cant agree with the attitude of "future people will be so rational and alien to us they wont understand fiction or care about history." Humanity has always cared about stories, its where we learn things as children and as children we demand stories. We have also always have cared deeply about our roots and our understanding of history.

      Even in some uber-technological future the tools that make us smart in engineering are the same tools that make us curious. Curious and smart go hand in hand, and we will always be curious about the past.

      Just because the future is unpredictable doesnt mean we should care about preserving the culture and history of the present.

      >>They may well be pissing on our graves for having ruined the planet, and these disks may simply be destroyed as examples of the evil Evil EVIL petroleum age

      Wow, angsty much? Are modern people sitting and seething in anger over the dodo bird and other species hunted to extinction? No, we're interested in the motivations and history of the period.

      >>the cultural interest in such behaviour (sitting and watching a screen)

      How old is the collection of christian myths? People are still interested in reading it and usually in the form of a book!

    9. Re:Sure. 1000 years. by xigxag · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point of a "thousand year DVD" is not to archive something for literally one thousand years. Very few if any companies would have any possible business need for such a thing. The point is that if you have a 'large enough' number of DVDs with a 50 year MTTF, some of them will fail well within the time frame that they might be called into use, whereas a 1,000 year DVD is much less likely to have a catastrophic failure within its useful lifespan. Theoretically.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  8. Should there be date stamps on movie DVDs? by slo5oh · · Score: 3, Informative

    If this is true then shouldn't new movies come with a date stamp on the case so you know you're buying a "fresh" copy? Sounds strange to me. I've got data and music CD's I made over 10 years ago that still work. Can't say I've been burning DVDs that long though.

  9. Only 7-12 years by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have DVD's in my collection now older than 12 years old and they work fine. Maybe they mean recordable discs?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Only 7-12 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have CDRs in my collection that are now more than 14 years old, and DVDRs more than 8 years old - all working fine.

      Through observing friends' and foes' constant problems with burnt discs going bad after months, weeks, days - and sometimes even hours (yes, for real) - I found that they all had one thing in common: they all burnt their discs at the fastest speed the media allowed. I have never burnt a disc faster than half its maximum speed, and so far not a single (again: not a single) disc has gone bad with time, not even discs made with the cheapest Ritek dyes.

    2. Re:Only 7-12 years by jgardner100 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have 13 year old recordable cd's in my collection (I can date them based on the birth of my daughter) and dvds that aren't that much younger. The article doesn't specify where is got that time scale from so I have to put it down to they made it up.

  10. Mod parent Funny, not Flamebait by bheer · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a quote from Idiocracy, not flamebait.

    1. Re:Mod parent Funny, not Flamebait by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He was moded flamebait because he talks like a fag, and his shit's all retarded.

  11. Re:Wondering by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You mean fewer.

    From the musical Big River*

    She's got one big breast in the middle of her chest
    And an eye in the middle of her nose
    So says I, if you look her in the eye
    You're better off looking up her nose

    (* This post is for cultural research only. No sales of Hulu(tm) ads have been created out of contract by this post. This does not constitute a song.)

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  12. Re:At least make some sense! by DutchUncle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (And exactly what are you going to be archiving that you think will still be relevant or usable in a thousand years?)

    We still read classic books, watch classic movies, view the originals of artwork. We still reference old records, particularly census and immigration and other genealogical information. We build whole societies around books that are hundreds, or thousands, of years old.

    True, anything in constant contemporaneous use will be moved to updated media on an ongoing basis (like those books); but it's always good to check with the originals for authenticity. Imagine if we could see what various famous authors ACTUALLY WROTE instead of what succeeding generations chose to copy.

  13. One of my professors from BYU by pmaccabe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is behind this technology, I remember hearing and talking a little to him about the research he was doing. It has been a few years since I graduated now. It is pretty cool to see something coming to fruition. The Information Technology program at BYU was the perfect place for a person like me and largely because of the amazing professors who were putting it together when I was there. Of course this technology may not last 1000 years but if it doesn't it will be able to do so because something better came along, not because the media went bad. I haven't read up on the details of their recent developments yet but I can't think of anyone more likely to figure a tricky problem like this out than this professor. He was one of the toughest and sharpest minds I had the pleasure to learn from at BYU.

  14. Consider the Rosetta Stone by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm always confused as to why people get hung on this point so often. Why would someone in 1000 years (barring some apocalyptic situation), or even 20 years need a specific player to read a DVD, floppy disk, hard disk, or anything? All of these can be examined with more generic laboratory inspection equipment now, why is it unrealistic that 10 years from now you might have an optical disk scanner that reads just about anything? Even the encoding that the disks use isn't very complicated, we crack much more difficult codes all the time.

    There is precedent. Hieroglyphs written 2000 years ago were undecipherable until the 1799 discovery of the Rosetta Stone and its subsequent study in the following decades. Reading technology was available the entire time (the paintings, writings and carvings were all visible to the unaided eye). Hieroglyphic writings weren't encrypted in any way -- other than being in a coding scheme (language) that fell out of use. The only real apocalypse that occurred over the ensuing eons was the cumulative effects of time. Nations and empires came and went, but we never had to rebuild the totality of the human population and civilization from scratch.

    And in 1000 years, before you decode a disk, you've got no idea whether it contains Chinatown, Quadrophenia or some guy's backup of qdata.dat.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  15. Re:1000-year frisbee by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have 8 floppy drives on my desk if you want to make a long term investment!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  16. Re:At least make some sense! by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Forgetting that they didn't have carmeras... If someone popped up with a bunch of photos from little Octavius's birthday party from the height of the Roman Empire, TONS of people would be interested in seeing it. From the way they were dressed, to the kinds of gifts they gave, to the way they had their home decorated. Many people really are intersted in the past, and the past is often lost because only extrodinary situation get recorded for the ages. Day to day life is much harder to get a view of.

  17. Re:WTF? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;