Slashdot Mirror


California's Revised Pay-As-You-Drive Insurance Draws Continued Objections

The EFF has restated many of their original privacy objections about California's latest revision to the Pay-As-You-Drive auto insurance proposal. Admitting that the amended bill is an improvement, privacy advocates are still uneasy about the surveillance implications of this program. "The proposal centers on a simple idea: infrequent drivers are less of an insurance risk. By pricing policies according to the mileage driven, insurance companies can offer discounts to lower-risk infrequent drivers, and put an appropriate cost penalty on heavy drivers. The state estimates that 30% adoption of PAYD insurance nationwide would reduce miles driven by at least 10% among subscribers, and save 55 million tons of CO2 over the next ten years. The benefits of such a system could be quite dramatic, as California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner is sure to emphasize. Such insurance plans first became available in 2004, and are now available as a limited option in 30 US states from insurance companies like Progressive and Liberty Mutual."

2 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bell curve??? by plague3106 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    However, all things are not equal.

    How do you get better at doing anything? You do it. You'd be a much better driver, having had more experiences on the road, been in more different areas, and conditioned daily to the rigors of driving. And that's the problem; there's no way to measure one's experience to offset the amount of miles driven when there should be.

  2. Re:Bell curve??? by maxume · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Country folk who mostly only drove to town for church on Sundays.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.