Slashdot Mirror


Futurama Voices Could Be Recast

Svippy writes "According to reports surfacing on the Internet, Futurama may be recast. The animated series is due to return next year on Comedy Central, but may not be the same as we once knew it. 'As part of the announcement, the show's producers said stars including West, Sagal and DiMaggio had all signed on to return. Turns out that wasn't true. The stars had all expressed interest in returning. But with the budget for Futurama dramatically slashed, the salary offers came in well below what the thesps were asking.' Phil LaMarr posted 20th Century Fox's request for auditions on his Facebook page. However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors."

32 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. ob by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bite my shiny metal ass!

    1. Re:ob by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Informative

      I love how the 'goodnewseveryone' tag is being negated - and replaced by 'badnewseveryone' - by people who obviously don't understand that the phrase is supposed to be ironic and prescient of bad news.

      Hand your nerd cards in at the door, please. You know who you are.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:ob by flydude18 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you sure that wasn't "Bad news, nobody"? Why even say anything and risk your nerd card?

    3. Re:ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is what Slashdot is all about, two comic book store guys battling it out :D

    4. Re:ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares what the tags say? Are you serious? Tags in general have debatable utility, but around here, what good are they?

      Take a look at the "tags" around here. Assume I could click on them to find more stories with those tags -- oh, I can't. I click on them and NOTHING HAPPENS.

      But let's assume I could. Typical tags are "haha", "whocares", "ohno", or crap like "badidea", "goodidea", and so forth. Who the HELL actually says, "Gee, I want to read more stories on the subject of 'haha', I'll just click on that... there we go..."

      Forget tags. They are useless in general, and slashdot's implentation of them is doubly useless.

    5. Re:ob by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, the tags here serve one useful purpose: they provide a quick indicator of most Slashdotters' opinions related to the article. After all, a time-honored tradition around here is not R'ing TFA. With tags, now you don't have to read the comments, either.

  2. Other articles worthy of reading by Svippy · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Clicked pie.
  3. Not watching without original cast. by Gudeldar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I absolutely will NOT watch it without the original cast. I can't imagine anyone other than Billy West voicing Fry.

  4. Why not just make them sound the same? by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, when a new voice appears on an old show playing an existing character (memory escapes me at this moment for an example, but I know this has happened), I always wonder why folks generally don't just make the new voice sound like the old voice. This happened to at least a couple childhood cartoons of mine - the voice suddenly changed and ... WTF?

    Let's hope they decide to bring in folks that sound the same (or very similar) if they do recast. Having different voices would be pretty lame.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  5. voices by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

    In just about every anime, cartoon series, and live-action where they've tried to swap one actor's voice for another, the series usually tanks not long after the switch is made. The only thing worse for a series is to get someone pregnant, involve a baby, or suddenly tack on a female lead or support role when one previously wasn't present. Or a consult with Joss Whedon.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:voices by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyway, although it does seem that [Joss Whedon's] involvement, while not lowering quality imho, does seem to doom some shows. Why is that?

      If you listen to what fans are saying about Dollhouse, a lot of people think the first few episodes were pretty mediocre - one fan said the first five episodes were like five different pilots. But then things started to improve, and by the end of the season the show was absolutely great. Alan Tudyk's performance in the last two episodes was brilliant.

      Now look at the ratings. The first few episodes did pretty well, but then the numbers start going downhill, and the final episode got the worst ratings of the season.

      If Joss' involvement dooms a show, it's not because he lowers the quality. It's because the majority of the audience would rather be watching Friends reruns.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. Re:Comentary by Svippy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not to mention that Billy West - especially - and John DiMaggio have mentioned in numerous interviews how much they care for that show. Billy West once stated it was "the best gig he ever had".

    Would they really risk the entire show for some money, when they care so much for it? Of course not. I am personally beginning to suspect this is not a trade negotiation issue, but a publicity stunt to get Futurama on everyone's lips again.

    It also puts a lot more real to Comic-Con 2009's Futurama description:

    1:00-1:45 Futurama: Life or Death?!" Be a part of sci-fi history! Join executive producers Matt Groening and David X. Cohen, and stars Billy West, Katey Sagal, John DiMaggio, and Maurice LaMarche for high-stakes thrills as a top-ranking FOX executive decides live, on stage, whether Futurama will make yet another triumphant return or whether it is gone forever! The very fate of Futurama hangs in the balance! Paramedics will be standing by in case the intense excitement causes any panelists to collapse. Raucous celebration or abject despair to follow the news. Ballroom 20

    --
    Clicked pie.
  7. Good news everybody! by dancingmad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait, this isn't good news at all.

    Seriously, the voice actors in Futurama gave their characters heart and soul. It's not just that the actors are good (they are, of course) but the characters have grown along with the actors, such that in my mind, and in the mind of many fans I am sure, the two are inseparable.

    Without the original cast, I won't be watching, simple as that.
    It's going to cost more money in the long run to produce an abject failure than to put more money into the show from the start and hoping the fanbase comes back.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:Good news everybody! by carlzum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference is they're recasting the characters, not creating a new story line with new characters. Actually, I'd prefer if they did the later. Like Star Trek, Futurama's premise could work if told from a different perspective. Imagine the original Star Trek was recast rather than creating the Next Generation? Futurama's intelligent approach to parody is what makes it great. I'd miss Bender and Fry, but not enough to suffer through other actors mimicking their voices.

      It could even breath some life into the series, the last two DVD releases felt like the current story-lines were running out of gas (Leela-Fry relationship, Nibbler's true identity, etc). Bender's Game really seemed like the writers out of ideas.

  8. Re:Idea by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not very? If you want the cast to stay on, either the cast needs to be appealed to, or the source of the money (Comedy Central) does. Not the production crew.

  9. Re:if someone knows the amount by Svippy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    20th Century Fox Television claims the voice actors wanted 75,000 dollars per episode. Which is apparently close to ten times as much as usual.

    This seems extremely unlikely by these people, who love and worship the show, that they would risk its stability for their own greed.

    My assumption is that 20th Century Fox Television is either making stuff up or playing some gag.

    --
    Clicked pie.
  10. Obviously... by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously the executives didn't take the Torgo's Executive Powder jokes all that well...

  11. Good news everyone! by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've invented a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!

    Which is a good thing because you won't actually be hearing my voice while you watch the show! Better turn subtitles on, mwa?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Good news everyone! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, I've read it, and it works! Why not just make the show mute with subtitles and imagine the voices? Can't beat this with any recast, I guess.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  12. Casting notice by HumanEmulator · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in the business and I saw a casting notice for this go out yesterday. Right now (if you're a member) you can see the notice on a site called Actor's Access here and the sides are up on Showfax.

    Casting notices for shows like this almost never appear on a site like that (it's a step above Craigslist), so my best guess this is a negotiation tactic to convince the cast to accept contracts that pay less, in line with the reduced budget for the show.

  13. Re:Speech-to-text by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Hello... Smithers... You're. quite. good. at. turning. me. on."

    I'll give you a hint. If that were in any way possible, we'd be seeing it now. At least for some show like "Pokemon" where the dialog tend to be extremely simple.

    We'll see truly convincing computer-generated people long before we'll be hearing them.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  14. Re:Speech-to-text by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    It worked real well for South Park with Isaac Hayes.

  15. Re:Comentary by KeithJM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would they really risk the entire show for some money, when they care so much for it?

    I've had some jobs I really enjoyed. The products were good, the people were great, and I loved my time there. If they called me right now and offered me less money than they used to pay me, I wouldn't go back.

  16. Re:Comentary by ShinmaWa · · Score: 4, Informative

    With very rare exception, television shows are renewed in public and cancelled in private. Since this is a VERY public thing at Comic-Con, the conclusion is foregone. If the cast were fired live on stage, agents would be filing lawsuits on behalf of their humiliated clients within seconds and the executive would be lynched in the hallway. The audience, who would obviously be ticked off, would resent FOX. Why send an executive on a PR mission to intentionally piss off your viewers and draw the ire of the SAG?

    So, here's the result: Everyone makes nice, and the show is renewed with the original cast. There might even be a movie deal to up the ante. If there was any doubt about this, there would be no Comic-Con thing at all.

    Nothing to see here. Publicity Stunt. Move along.

    --
    The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
  17. Re:if someone knows the amount by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    20th Century Fox Television claims the voice actors wanted 75,000 dollars per episode. Which is apparently close to ten times as much as usual.

    According to whom? The Simpsons actors reportedly earn $400,000 per episode. Sure, $75,000 might be ten times what a voice actor earns for an episode of an afternoon kids' cartoon, but we're talking about a prime time show.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  18. Severely-reduced pay by keyboarderror · · Score: 3, Funny

    Farnsworth: Well, it looks like I'll be needing my heroic bureaucrat back. At severely-reduced pay, of course. [The staff cheer.] LaBarbara: It's better than nothing. Fry: What about me? Can I come back at severely-reduced pay? Hermes: You got it, mon! In fact, severely-reduced pay all around!

  19. Tall Tell Sign by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    However, some are skeptical about whether it's a real casting call or purely a stunt to reduce the salaries of the voice actors."

    If they all have East Indian accents, then the question is answered.
         

  20. So how are they going to explain the new voices by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    on the show? The crew gets into a horrible accident that requires them to get voice box transplants, and Bender's voice gets erased and he is programmed with a different one.

    This is almost as bad in a TV series when an actor or actress is replaced with a different one, and it usually happens to Soap Operas and really Cheesy TV shows. The only TV show to do this on a regular basis and still survive was Saturday Night Live, who kept reinventing themselves with new comedians.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:So how are they going to explain the new voices by Nethead · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bewitched switched "Darrin Stephens" from Dick York (1964-1969) to Dick Sargent (1969-1972) and did well. Even spun off a few shows and cartoons.

      Man, am I dating myself.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  21. Opportunity for improvement by absoluteflatness · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe this (or the more normal work schedule of a normal series rather than the "movies"), will get some of the voice actors to return to their original form.

    I think that some of the actors (particuarly Phil LaMarr, interestingly) never quite got the hang of their old characters again.

    Losing the old cast would still be a death blow to the show, though.

  22. Re:Speech-to-text by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it is Season 10, Episode 1 (The Return of Chef). http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/1001/

    This was after Isaac Hayes quit in a huff over SP's treatment of Scientology. The SP boys made a fairly nice "send-off" episode, but since Hayes had already quit, they used the library of his voice clips to do this episode. It is hilarious!

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  23. Meep by Beardydog · · Score: 3, Funny

    They only paid me to say it once, then they doubled it up on the soundtrack. Cheap bastards