Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

A GNU/Linux Distro Needing Windows To Install?

Posted by kdawson on from the for-some-values-of-instant dept.

dgun writes "I recently put together a new PC. When I purchased the motherboard, I noticed that it came with an instant-on OS, a small GNU/Linux distro called Splashtop. I assumed that the OS was on a ROM chip on the motherboard. To my great annoyance, when I tried to boot to this OS, a message said that it was not installed. It turns out that motherboard comes with an install disk for this GNU/Linux OS — that you can only run from Windows, to install Splashtop on the hard drive. First of all, doesn't installing it on the hard drive defeat the point of having an instant-on OS? If I wanted to dual-boot a small GNU/Linux OS, there are plenty that I could choose from. Second, if distributing GPL'ed software by means that completely preclude it from being used without Windows is not a violation of the GPL, should it not be?"

15 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. give me a break by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Second, if distributing GPL'ed software by means that completely preclude it from being used without Windows is not a violation of the GPL, should it not be?

    No. Stop being absurd. There are plenty examples of GPLd programs meant only for windows. While this might be a little silly in this case there is nothing "wrong" with it and you need to stop getting so upset about it.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    1. Re:give me a break by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking not to give them any ideas for GPLv4.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    2. Re:give me a break by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, this is a program that is *distributed* on CD- (or DVD-) ROM.
      You can only install it using Windows, but as has been mentioned above, there's nothing in the GPL, and there never should be, anything about having software that only runs under Windows.

      --
      Specialist Mac support for creative pros, Melbourne
    3. Re:give me a break by dgun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So I overreacted. But still, this is a little different than just downloading and installing some FOSS software on Windows. Part of the software is on the BIOS, or rather there must be some instructions in the BIOS to look for Splashtop, which ASUS calls Express Gate. And what of the setup program? Does the source for the setup program have to be provided? True the setup is probably just copying files, but it would be nice to know exactly where and what the BIOS is looking for to determine whether or not Express Gate is installed.

      Anyway, I was just pissed off because the way the thing was distributed, and I find it a little more than ironic that Asus is marketing an instant-on Linux distro as a feature to sell their motherboards, yet requires Windows to run it.

      byw, I have read on Ubuntu forums that Express Gate source is available on ASUS' website, but as yet have been unable to find it.

      --
      FAQs are evil.
    4. Re:give me a break by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Informative

      byw, I have read on Ubuntu forums that Express Gate source is available on ASUS' website, but as yet have been unable to find it.

      That's 'cause these folks make Splashtop, not ASUS. You can find the sourcecode at their page here...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  2. Gimmic; but not sinister by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Splashtop is available in ROM(well, almost certainly flash, not actual ROM) on certain motherboards; but that involves actual components, and raises the cost. Presumably, the maker of the motherboards has some sort of bulk licence with the Splashtop guys, so providing the HDD version is virtually free, and adds a bullet point. Pretty useless; but you can see why that happens.

  3. Port the code then by eggman9713 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure quickly enough someone will port it to be installable without Windows. I'm sure it was meant to be for the typical user who has windows installed first, and just wants the instant on one for when they just need the browser quickly and the computer is not on. Someone, anti-MS or not, will port it, I'm sure. Isn't open source great?

    1. Re:Port the code then by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Informative

      kano from kanotix has made some nice scripts for customizing it.

      http://techgage.com/news/splashtop_hacked_functions_on_non-asus_motherboards/

  4. Bad Article. Poster didn't bother to RTFA. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Informative

    The poster of the story didn't even bother to read the link he provided... You can install it from a USB drive from the source. Asus simply doesn't provide that installer on their install CD.

    This is a non-story. The distro doesn't need windows to install. The distributor was just being cheap.

  5. I don't really think so by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Second, if distributing GPL'ed software by means that completely preclude it from being used without Windows is not a violation of the GPL, should it not be?

    Is that a trick question? The GPL says nothing about Windows, it just says that if they're distributing GPL'd binaries, you should be able to get the source code from them. Just because you don't like something does not mean it should be illegal.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  6. I got a motherboard for this "feature" as well by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fortunately, I read the customer reviews at newegg so I was expecting it.

    I installed windows then splashtop. Splashtop is pretty but was not worth the time for the installation of windows.

    I was hoping I would at least be able to update my bios through it.

    It can't update the bios and cannot read any of my partitions.

    I changed my bios setting pretty quick to skip it from asking me to load splashtop.

  7. Re:Bad Article. Poster didn't bother to RTFA. by Ryvar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, the original post is terrible. If he was *really* trying to get people to needlessly hyperventilate he should have titled it "A GNU/Linux distro needing BSD to install?!?!"

  8. The GPL Angle by Bob9113 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second, if distributing GPL'ed software by means that completely preclude it from being used without Windows is not a violation of the GPL, should it not be?

    I don't think so. GPL is mostly about granting access and rights to the source, under certain conditions, so you can modify the code to work on your system, not about requiring the author to make it work on your system. If it only runs on Windows, so be it, as long as the source code is Freely available so it can be fixed.

    Now, if they're not making the source available through reasonable means, well, that's another problem, and is a violation of the GPL. But the "requires Windows as distributed" thing is the same as lots of GPL software.

    --
    Stop-Prism.org: Opt Out of Surveillance
  9. it's kdawson special by timmarhy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    dawson take this stupid bullshit off the frontpage - it's crappy even for slashdot.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  10. Re:Yep.. nothing new. by countach · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in my pre-Mac days when I could be bothered with all this stuff, I always assumed as my starting point that nothing works with Linux, until proven otherwise with sufficient research on the internet. Like it or not, the computer parts industry is still basically a Windows world. Nothing works outside Windows unless proven otherwise.