Slashdot Mirror
US Agency Blocked Cellphone / Driving Safety Study
By now you've probably seen the NY Times's long piece on distracted driving — about how most drivers and most legislators willfully ignore the evidence of the dangers of talking on a cellphone, texting, and other electronic distractions while behind the wheel. According to this article, cellphone use while driving causes over 1,000 fatalities a year in the US. Another shoe has now dropped: it seems that the US National Highway Safety Administration blocked a proposed definitive study of the risks. The NHSA now cites concerns about angering Congress. Two consumer safety groups had filed a FOIA request for documents about the aborted study, and the Times has now made the documents public — including the research behind the request for a study of 10,000 drivers.
*SCREEEECH* *KABOOM*
How can we expect to remain the most powerful country in the world if we turn into a bunch of big pussies, trying to stop anyone from taking any type of risk? I am much more productive if I can talk on my cellphone and respond to e-mails during my commute. Sometimes there is an accident; such is life. Eggs must be broken to make omelets. What happened to the can-do, damn-the-torpedoes attitude that got us to the moon?
Heh, I can drink an iced coffee, roll a cigarette,
and smoke pot at the same time whilst driving. Would that count as multi tasking?
"I can drink an iced coffee, roll a cigarette, and smoke pot at the same time whilst driving."
Tobacco is bad for you.
in the year 2009 the majority of earths then human population began the struggle to implement true multithreading.
Quack, quack.
I was shocked and dismayed as I read this article on my iPhone while headed into work on the turnpike this morning.
Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
Driving while arguing with a woman is also dangerous. I ran 2 stop-signs because of such. Are they going to ban that too?
Table-ized A.I.
Closed captioning sponsored by Apple.
In my lifeguardin' days, the policy for when and how to clear the pool in anticipation of lightning wasn't based on concern for anyone being shocked, it was based on preventing a panicked stampede.
Electrocuting the cattle was a very minor consideration, but herding them was a huge one.
Mod lives in parents' basement
I don't care why you're posting AC
o kmiw jidt wjst u mesn
This message was sent from my iPhone.
Wah, wah, wah, the nanny state won't let me use my heavily-subsidized three-ton piece of heavy machinery without basic safety precautions, and just because it's a leading cause of early death and injuries. WHERE IS MY FREEDOM?
What we need are portable MRIs for driving, to determine if people are paying attention. Once a baseline for people is established, it should be easy to determine if they're drunk, too tired, zoned out, or otherwise impaired.
If this was already in use, I know some people who would never be given a license. Some people suck at driving, even without distractions.
On the plus side, some people are going to be better at driving with impairments than others. So, if somebody can truely handle smoking, drinking, eating or talking while driving, then they could go right ahead.
So all we need to do is replace all the drivers out there with professional racecar drivers! Brilliant!
Your discussion reminds me of the registers at JCPenney. The old machines were from the 1980s and they were slow as heck, but predictable so you could type 1 - scan - TOTAL - 1 - 1 - $100.00 - ENTER and just wait for the machine to catch-up (the cash drawer would pop open about 60 seconds later).
The new 2005-era registers are "smart" and try to predict what you desire, and most of the time they guess wrong. So instead of a fast automatic interface, everything operates more slowly as the clerk has to type one key at a time, and then doublecheck to make sure the machine did the right thing.
Instead of a fast 1-2 minute transaction, now it drags-on for 10 minutes.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall