Slashdot Mirror


Laser Ignition May Replace the Spark Plug

dusty writes "Laser Focus World has a story on researchers from Ford, GSI, and The University of Liverpool and their success in using near-infrared lasers instead of spark plugs in automobile engines. The laser pulses are delivered to the combustion chamber one of two ways. One, the laser energy is transmitted through free space and into an optical plug. Two, the other more challenging method uses fiber optics. Attempts so far to put the second method into play have met some challenges. The researchers are confident that the fiber-optic laser cables' technical challenges (such as a 20% parasitic loss, and vibration issues) will soon be overcome. Both delivery schemes drastically reduce harmful emissions and increase performance over the use of spark plugs. So the spark plug could soon join the fax machine in the pantheon of antiquated technologies that will never completely disappear. The news release from The University of Liverpool has pictures of the freakin' internal combustion lasers."

38 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Flashing lights by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it makes cool red lights flash under the hood like KITT, I'm all for it.

    --
    Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
    1. Re:Flashing lights by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've seen those installed. Be assured - An adult driving a car with a red swooshing light thing does not look nearly as cool as we all remember KITT and Michael to be.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Flashing lights by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was the 1980s. Between the feathered hair, the parachute pants and the Members Only jackets, nothing could save you from looking like a complete jackass.

    3. Re:Flashing lights by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait wait wait, two things
      1. You're saying Members Only jackets are out of style and have been so since the 80s?
      2. Who are you calling a jackass?

    4. Re:Flashing lights by neonsignal · · Score: 5, Funny

      David Hasselhoff doesn't look nearly as cool as we remember him to be either...

    5. Re:Flashing lights by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 5, Funny
    6. Re:Flashing lights by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

      OMG, that's worse than a rickroll.

      What is seen can not be unseen. Don't click that link!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Flashing lights by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seems like a good way to get a ticket for impersonating an emergency vehicle.

      Indeed. Though it depends on your state, there are restrictions on what lights you can put on a car and in what colors. Many restrict red lights to the back of the car, and some don't allow any light colors than red, white, and yellow on the back of a car (e.g. no neon purple illuminated plate frames). I heard a story from a police officer who pulled someone over just as he left the dealer's lot for having too many high deer lights on his brand new truck; the guy was pissed they'd sold him a car in an illegal configuration.

      And just because something is legal in the state in which your car is licensed doesn't mean you won't get ticketed when you cross into another state. Permanent window tinting is another per-state restriction; you may have to drive with your windows open to stay legal, which will suck in states that experience Winter.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. So what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When the vehicle gets to be a few years old, and the rings start letting extra oil past. Soon the lenses are covered with soot. Sparks can still jump through a moderate layer of soot, can the laser?

    1. Re:So what happens by cptdondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We're not talking gigahertz, 0.00001% error rate stuff. We're talking honking big pipe firing a few hundred times a second.

      My first thought was, 20% loss? Who cares!??? Just stick a bigger laser on the other end!

      Seriously, this is one of those things where power is good, and more power is better. Early ignition was pretty pitiful. Now electronic ignition is pretty much bullet proof.

      I expect this to be like fuel injection, going from expensive trouble prone disaster to rock reliable. Once they figure it out, it'l be like injectors - maybe 200,000 mile service.

      Honestly, I can't wait. I expect reciprocating engines will be with us a long, long time, burning some sort of liquid fuel.

    2. Re:So what happens by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not worried about the amount of energy getting to the cylinder, that can just be brute forced as you note. I'm more concerned about what the energy that doesn't make it will do. Fiber fuse could be fairly dramatic in such a system. Video of fiber fuse propagating.

      I don't doubt that they'll work it out in the end, engineers have a long history of being clever like that; but it is going to take a giant pile of tweaks on top of the naive implementation.

    3. Re:So what happens by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly.
      What is the point?

      Obscure claims of increased fuel efficiency and reduced emissions, based on what? A spark is a better combustion source than a laser.

      This looks like a solution in search of a problem if you ask me.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:So what happens by hardburn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The laser can be focused to a specific point more easily, allowing it to ignite a stratified charge better. This makes it better at igniting a leaner mixture. Coupled with Direct Injection and maybe some octane boost trickery, this could make gas engines get the same compression ratio as a diesel while still reving over 3k.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    5. Re:So what happens by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You may be right, in that a spark makes a better ignition source. But, do we KNOW that, or do we just assume so? I won't argue the point, but I will point to explosives, and note that a spark is often not the best source of ignition. Naval guns use electricity to detonate primers. C4 and other explosives use a carefully controlled combination of pressure and temperature. In fact, those explosives can be set alight, and used to cook dinner, because the spark isn't what detonates them.

      Gasoline? Internal combustion engines? They are terribly wasteful of both fuel, and energy. Even a very efficient gas burning engine pumps fuel out the tail pipe, which is the reason catalytic converters are required on vehicles in the US. If a laser can set off a more thorough, more efficient ignition, that burns ALL of the gasoline in the cylinder, fuel mileage will increase, for certain. Polluting emissions will probably be reduced. Is it worth the cost? Only time will tell.

      And, THAT is the reason for research. Very few people will purchase these things if they add $10,000 to the cost of a vehicle - but if the cost is brought down to $50 per cylinder, they never have to be replaced, AND they increase fuel mileage even a little bit, people will buy them.

      Let them research. If/when they have a product ready for market, I'll probably test it.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:So what happens by nmos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Gasoline? Internal combustion engines? They are terribly wasteful of both fuel, and energy. Even a very efficient gas burning engine pumps fuel out the tail pipe, which is the reason catalytic converters are required on vehicles in the US. If a laser can set off a more thorough, more efficient ignition, that burns ALL of the gasoline in the cylinder, fuel mileage will increase, for certain.

      Modern gasoline engines already burn something like 95%+ of the fuel that is pumped in so there really isn't that much room for improvement. I suppose any improvement is better than none at all but don't expect any miracles. FWIW this is one of the reasons those gasoline additives that claim to improve efficiency are mostly BS, even if they did cause the fuel to burn 100% it would be hard to even measure the difference in mpg.

    7. Re:So what happens by haifastudent · · Score: 5, Funny

      You ever had a car with Lucas electrics?

      Two. One for the road and one for the mechanic.

      --
      Thank for reading to the sig. You may stop reading now. It is safe. There is no more content. Why are you still reading?
    8. Re:So what happens by shiftless · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When it comes to ignition, compression is never a problem these days. What compression does do is increase *heat*. So unless your running gasoline with a higher octane rating, you will get detonation and pre-ignition the higher your compression ration is. ....and what happens when you use a laser to ignite a large portion of the fuel/air mixture at once, rather than using a spark plug to ignite a small flame kernel and waiting for it to propagate? The fuel mixture burns much more rapidly, allowing you to run less ignition advance. The result is more power, fewer emissions, and the engine is LESS prone to detonation. So then you can jack up the compression ratio and gain even more power.

  3. In most likeliness by east+coast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This will probably arrive as a viable and reliable technology right about the same time the internal combustion engine is on it's way out.

    Don't think fax machine, think FD Trinitron.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:In most likeliness by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would imagine that such a technology could be adapted to other fuel sources like hydrogen. In fact, I suspect that hydrogen engines might actually benefit greatly from this.

      I'm not so sure of that. Granted, you can use hydrogen fuel in an IC engine, but storing it is a big PITA. At sea level pressure, gaseous hydrogen has abysmal energy density per volume, and any solution for reducing that volume would have to be adapted for every car on the road. Meaning liquid hydrogen is a non-starter, pressurized hydrogen needs to be stored in a collision-rated tank, and hydrogen dissolved in or bonded with something else needs a cost-effective carrier of limited weight per fuel (else the energy density per weight or price per tank becomes a problem).

      If we've got the hydrogen storage problem licked, and with all the R&D focusing on precisely that we very well might someday in the not too far future, then why use an IC engine over a fuel cell? In a FC + electric motor configuration, the engine makes very little noise, there are fewer moving parts than an IC engine, no need for a separate (and heavy) alternator + battery to power the electronics, and probably other advantages I've overlooked. The one downside is cost, which can probably be substantially reduced via mass production - the cost per cell is high now, but we aren't making them for every car on the road.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:In most likeliness by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, the hydrogen storage and delivery problem has been licked long ago. If you combine hydrogen with carbon and form long chain molecules, it becomes a liquid at normal atmospheric pressure and temperature. This allows it to burn efficiently in modern vehicles without any modifications required...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  4. PETA by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it one shark per cylinder?

    Yeah, they're gonna be pissed.

    1. Re:PETA by minvaren · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. And the only way to start the car will be to jump it.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
  5. Re:misreading by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd go trade mark that name quick if I were you... "SharkPlugs"

  6. Re:bs science as usual- and a waste of time/effort by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is typical insane engineering- if this succeeds then a mechanic would need to be an expert in light theory and frickin laser beams to work on your car.

    Only as much as they need to be an expert in fluid dynamics to change your oil.

    this is not the way to make cars more efficient- spark plugs work great and im sure these lasers cant give any more power - the spark plug ignites the gas already, and it BURNS- how much more combustion could you get?

    It is a good question as to how this would work any better but if you've ever spent any time under the hood you know it doesn't take much in the way of fouling or plug wire degradation to change fuel efficiency. If this system can avoid those kinds of issues it would make certain aspects of tune ups obsolete and would also increase fuel efficiency over a period when traditional plugs and wires would degrade but not to the point of seemingly needing replaced.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  7. Re:bs science as usual- and a waste of time/effort by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the spark plug ignites the gas already, and it BURNS- how much more combustion could you get?

    It's not so much getting more combustion, but making the combustion behave how we want it to. And there's a long way that can be gone.

    But whether this has any real point compared to other fuels, such as diesel that have a big leg up on gasoline to start with, is up for debate.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  8. IC engine by zymano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    inefficient. Adding a laser is not going to do much.

    1. Re:IC engine by pintpusher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it's potentially enough. ISTM part of the reason the ICE has lasted so long is the continued incremental improvements that make it just good enough to stick with. Continued incremental improvements in fuel economy, at a rate roughly equivalent to the inverse of the rise in fuel prices will keep the modern gasoline powered ICE a viable alternative for a long time.

      This kind of improvement, along with better optimized hybrids and other "transitional" technologies effectively allow us to maintain the status quo.

      IMVHO, only two things will pitch ICE's off the top of the pile: 1) a radical, cheap, viable, ready-to-go, drop-in-now replacement, or 2) time, a long time.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  9. Re:Stupid question by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gasoline will auto-ignite just fine, it's just much trickier to control when it ignites than with spark ignition or diesel ignition.

    Mercades has a engine in development called the diesotto that does this.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  10. Great... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great, the laser pulses will probably be DRM encoded so that only authorized chips are used and vendors that insert the appropriate smart card can perform service on them...

    The advent of CPU-enhanced cars is a great one, but this is one place where the govt really needs to step in an open things up. For standard engine codes, things aren't too bad; but Lord help you if you want to read an ABS or airbag code from a GM vehicle (for example). They're locked down. I have some decent PC-based code reader hardware and software, but in order to read the ABS error that my two vehicles are both showing (GM, learn to design ABS, will ya!), I need to spend hundreds or thousands on their own software/hardware to simply find out which of my four ABS sensors is faulty.

    The more they get into specialized things like this, including laser ignition, the more I worry that I won't be able to be a backyard mechanic any more.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Great... by Xenna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's why I'm putting an open source engine management system in mine:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MegaSquirt

  11. Re:bs science as usual- and a waste of time/effort by Bobnova · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've spent entirely too much time under the hood of a car(21 year auto mechanic), and you are entirely incorrect.
    Degrading plug wires either cause a misfire, which is blindingly obvious and kills mileage horribly, or doesn't. There is no middle ground. Plug wire misfires happen maybe once or twice in the 300,000 mile life of a (japanese...) car.
    Modern electronic ignition systems are fairly immune to spark plug wear until extreme circumstances, such as missing three tuneups in a row with standard plugs. Then you will sometimes get drivibility issues and lose 1mpg, tops.

    Back in the days of points it was different, plug wear and point wear (mostly point wear) had huge effects on mileage between tuneups. These days, the effects are minimal at most.

  12. Re:Stupid question by confused+one · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those aren't spark plugs, they're glow plugs. different animal altogether. No spark, just a hot wire...

  13. Has other applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's another obvious application for this - detonating nuclear bombs.

    Nuclear weapons require that all the charges be detonated simultaneously, within nanoseconds, so that the implosion squeeze is precisely symmetrical. (OK, A-bomb geeks, I'm ignoring asymmetrical designs and flying-plate systems here.) If the timing is even a few nanoseconds off, the core won't be compressed; it will just blow out on one side, and a "fizzle" yield will result.

    The usual trick for this is to use an "exploding wire" detonator. Unlike regular detonators, which have an intermediate explosive to start the main explosive, exploding wire detonators do it in one step, by discharging a capacitor bank through a resistance buried in the explosive. This takes a very fast high-voltage high-current switch, and the traditional solution is a krytron, a gas-discharge vacuum tube from the thyatron family. There have been big flaps over the years about various countries trying to acquire krytrons, which aren't classified but are export-controlled.

    Krytrons are 1940s technology. This laser ignition system could be its replacement. One big laser pulse pumped through fibers of equal length to each detonation point should do the job. And it's off the shelf dual-use technology.

  14. Only problem I see here is... by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sparkplugs cost like, uhm, a dollar.

  15. Lifetime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with putting lasers in your engine is that it gets hot in there, and laser lifetime plunges drastically when you run them at elevated temperatures. I'm sure the dealers will love us having to replace our laser-plugs every two months, but no one else will.
    (And if you're thinking thermo-electric cooling is the answer, that's going to use a whole lot of juice; don't know how feasible it is.)

  16. Laser-initiated ordnance systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    We used a similar system starting back in the late 1990s for initiating ordnance systems. The primary explosive would be doped with a small amount of carbon black to enhance absorption. One advantage was that specific equipment was required for proper initiation, which (in theory) made it safer.

    Dynamite and a laser beam indeed.

  17. Re:Stupid Memes by anagama · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget that, I'm still waiting for a car analogy even after scrolling by 90% of the posts.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  18. Why not use microwaves? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's probably a good reason, but why not use microwaves? Wouldn't that be better to ensure even burn?