Slashdot Mirror


EU May Allow US To Keep Snooping On European Bank Data

zaphod2 alerts us to a storm brewing in Europe over access by US intelligence agencies to EU banking data. There is considerable opposition in Europe to extending this access. The submitter adds, "I wonder how long it takes until gambling, online games, or non-RIAA-approved music shops are considered supporters of terrorism." "US anti-terror officials want to be able to continue examining Europeans' financial transactions, and it appears likely that the European Union is going to comply. ... The US has been examining transactions handled by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Transactions (SWIFT) since the 9/11 attacks... However, SWIFT, which is located in Belgium, is planning to move its servers and database — which is currently located in the US — to Europe. With data privacy laws far stricter in Europe, the US would then need permission from the EU before it could gain access to this sensitive information."

25 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Its OK though by Gravedigger3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    because it is absolutely necessary in order to fight the terrorists!! If we don't police the world then WHO WILL!?

    --
    All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be. -PF
    1. Re:Its OK though by delt0r · · Score: 3, Funny

      We are Team America, &*%$ yeah!

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    2. Re:Its OK though by Hammer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And who decides what is terrorist acts?
      I for one would not want US government to access my financial activity. Not because I am a terrorist but simply because I do not want a foreign government to breach my privacy. A court order that allows MY government agencies to snoop is OK though.
      And as the post says. how long before US considers perfectly legal and reasonable acts to be terrorist acts?? Or for that matter simple petty crime to be terrorist acts.
      Furthermore... I am not so sure I want America to police the world unrestrained. Considering that it could easily be argued that US is not democratic (remember that GWB was appointed by a court that ordered the counting of votes stopped). Considering that it is a country that kills it's citizens. Considering that it holds prisoners without due court proceedings.

    3. Re:Its OK though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, America is all about freedom, anyway; Freedom to spy foreign citizens & businesses; freedom to bear arms; freedom of markets; freedom to initiate preemptive wars; freedom to sue and be sued over petty annoyances; freedom to lobby... Lots of freedom.

    4. Re:Its OK though by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alas, let's not neglect freedom to torture.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    5. Re:Its OK though by daem0n1x · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny that they have so much vigilance, but they can't stop billions of euros illegally leaving the US and European economies towards fiscal havens where they pay no taxes and there's no accountability whatsoever. Want to fight terrorism? End the fiscal havens.

      Fiscal havens played a very important part in creating the current economical crisis. Yet, the chicken shit governments of G8 and the world financial institutions haven't done shit to end this, besides a few cosmetic tricks.

      This is like people in a small town protesting against the local brothel, but they all go there on Saturday night.

      If I don't pay my taxes, the IRS will make my life miserable, they will come to my house and take my furniture, my car, etc. But Joe the CEO can transfer his savings to the Conga Bonga Islands through book manipulation and happily wait for retirement without paying a dime in taxes. And his money can be invested in drugs or weapons, there's no way to trace it.

    6. Re:Its OK though by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>how long before US considers perfectly legal and reasonable acts to be terrorist acts??

      If we deposit $10,000 or more in an account, the government makes a note of it and investigates. One local fellow was depositing $9900, $9500, $9600 in cash in order to avoid that requirement, but a suspicious Nazi... er, teller reported him anyway because he was "close enough". Then the stormtroopers... er, FBI arrested him for trying to avoid the $10,000 legel requirement.

      This is the kind of society that the scared American people have created. "Any who would give up Essential liberty for temporary security deserves neither." - Benjamin Franklin. All these problems would disappear if we simply enforced the Constitution as written. No warrant; no search of people or their effects (papers/bank accounts).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Its OK though by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually America, as conceived, is not about freedom. It's about the individual and protection of his rights from overarching, overbearing politicians sick with power. That's why these individual rights (ownership of self, right to self-protection, right to privacy, et cetera) are encoded into the U.S. and 50 State Constitutions - to block the government and keep it under control, so the individual can live a life without being hassled at every turn.

      Unfortunately in their rush to control everything like petit-dictators, the Congresscritters have decided to ignore the Supreme Laws. The phrase "shall be secure in their persons and papers" means nothing if Congress can look at your bnk account whenever they feel like it. "The two worst diseases are avarice and ambition - love of money and love of power. Leaders suffer from both." - Benjamin Franklin

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    8. Re:Its OK though by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the Founding Fathers could see what became of their country, they'd probably sigh and grab their guns with a "ok, boys, time to start over".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. Terrorism has fully achieved its objective by ami.one · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think terrorism has fully achieved its objective. Majority of citizens in almost every country now face innumerable problems due to the 'anti terrorist' agenda of their governments. How worse can it be ? Success beyond Osama's wildest dreams !

  3. We protect the rights of our citizens... by tacarat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... but those other people? We'll spy on them like crazy to protect your rights. Terrorists and all that, you know? Oh, we may or may not be letting them spy on you. And don't ask if we'll be swapping notes with them behind closed doors. Only terrorist lovers ask questions like that.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:We protect the rights of our citizens... by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We protect the rights of our citizens...

      No we don't.

      FISA - Wiretapping. No longer was probable cause criminal wrongdoing suspicion, had to show special court that person was maybe foreign agent. Originally made so that evidence collected was not used in criminal prosecutions.
      Right to Financial Privacy Act (1978) - Transfers the ownership of financial records from person to the bank.
      National Security Letter (1978) - Self-written search warrant (no judge). Allows government to go to financial institutions, ie bank to get the records the bank now "owns". Also put a gag order on bank from telling you (although that was overturned in Doe vs Ashcroft in 2008). May have been circumvented by now (shrugs). Carter ordered it may not be used in criminal prosecution.
      US Patriot Act - Changes definition of Financial Institution to include Post Office, your lawyer, your doctor, etc. Anybody served a national security letter put under gag order.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Financial_Privacy_Act
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2659761702659115038&ei=tMZuSp_4CJXnlQffprFu&q=napolitano&hl=en

  4. Re:As long as someone does it. by pacinpm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is already a police in EU countries, you know. Unfortunately direct access to EU financial data can be used for industry espionage by US companies. And it is far more likely than next terrorists attacks in US.

  5. The EU is a totalitarian government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The sad thing is, things that invade our privacy and violate our basic rights are passed in a non-democratic way. The part of the EU government that is actually elected by the people, has absolutely no say in these matters. They are outraged but powerless.

    The EU is a "great" tool for oppression and more powerful governments. Basically everything that no national government would be able to put into a law, can be done in the EU. There is no such a thing as this annoying democratic process.

    1. Re:The EU is a totalitarian government by tronicum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are true about the current situation. There is a sign for hope though, if the Treaty of Lisbon will be accepted by Ireland et al, EP will have the power to rule on security matters, too. It is a shame though that we just elected an parlament which voted against this snoop hole, which is ignored by the EU commision (that actually has the EU power at the moment).

    2. Re:The EU is a totalitarian government by silanea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The European Constitution is as anti-democratic as can be, both in the way it was drafted and unsuccessfully attempted to be imposed on its supposed subjects, and in its most central terms. So no, it is not ironic.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
  6. Re:As long as someone does it. by sproot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You'd be thinking of this

  7. U.S. government invades and bombs for profit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We are Team America..."

    There is no "we". The violence of the U.S. government has not benefited U.S. citizens. If you got in the way of the controlling groups, they would kill you, delt0r, and your family.

    "US anti-terror officials"

    The "anti-terror" is only a smokescreen. The U.S. government spends more money on surveillance and war than any country in the history of the world. That taxpayer money partly helps some people profit, for example: House of Bush, House of Saud, and hurts U.S. taxpayers.

    The U.S. government has invaded or bombed 25 countries since the 2nd world war. Most or all of the interference was for profit. Quote: '... although nearly all the post-World War II interventions were carried out in the name of "freedom" and "democracy," nearly all of them in fact defended dictatorships controlled by pro-U.S. elites' The dictators pay the corrupters, of course.

    U.S. citizens don't want to believe that their government is as corrupt as it is, even though the recent financial corruption has made many of them poor.

    1. Re:U.S. government invades and bombs for profit. by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whatever the US did earlier, which is interesting in itself, something does not compute right now.
      When 9/11 attacks happened, the US let terrorists profit from the future they had subscribed in abnormal quantity. Then US come to EU monitoring our activity? Medice, cura te ipsum.
      We are monitoring ordinary citizens and let corporations make business in fiscal paradises. This is a joke.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:U.S. government invades and bombs for profit. by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someday U.S. taxpayers will have to pay-off that enormous debt, which is now the equivalent of $105,000 hanging over every home.

      It would be nice if our politicians would grow-up, stop acting like teenagers with credit cards, and reduce spending. But no, instead they want to saddle us with a giant Uncle Sam healthcare program that we can not afford. By the end of Obama's term, that debt will have risen to ~$150,000 per home.

      Pretty soon the entire U.S. will be like bankrupt California.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:U.S. government invades and bombs for profit. by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 3, Insightful
      $11 trillion right now is real debt with projections of that doubling in a decade. We have a deficit 3-4x worse than Bush's worst deficit this year and are projecting deficits as bad as Bush's worst one for the rest of Obama's possible terms.

      On top of that, add in another $75-90 trillion is in owed obligations for Medicare and Social Security. Unless you're willing to cut either, that's real debt too. Just because it isn't due today doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It starts coming due in 7 years (2016 for Medicare, 2017 for Social Security). So, the reality is, right now, every PERSON owes about $280k in outstanding debt and obligations on behalf of the governent... or more than $1 million for a family of 4.

      Medicare is hemmoraging money left and right, yet we're told how efficient it is. The same people that provide you hospitals like Walter Reed are now going to guarantee your health care. The same people that tap your phone lines now want to control your medical history and what treatments you can receive. As an added bonus, it's only going to cost us trillions more.

      You can try to minimize the debt all you want. Government exists to protect our rights, not to be used as a lever to take something away from someone else for the benefit of another. You may have no problem bankrupting your great grandkids for your own selfish needs, but maybe your grandkids should have a say over what they're saddled with.

      Way back in January 1776, Thomas Paine wrote:

      The authority of Great Britain over this continent, is a form of government, which sooner or later must have an end: And a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful and positive conviction, that what he calls "the present constitution" is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And by a plain method of argument, as we are running the generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it, otherwise we use them meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty rightly, we should take our children in hand, and fix our station a few years farther into life; that eminence will present a prospect, which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our sight.

      Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions: Interested men, who are not to be trusted; weak men who cannot see; prejudiced men, who will not see; and a certain set of moderate men, who think better of the European world than it deserves; and this last class, by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent than all the other three.

      PS - while you complain about people scare-mongering about health care rationing (which WILL happen), you're busy scare-mongering about how the current system is guaranteed to bankrupt everyone to get a bandaid. It doesn't... yes, it does bankrupt some people, but we're talking about a fraction of 1% of the people that have their lives ruined by the system. Under ObamaCare, it isn't your wealth that limits your health, it's a faceless bureaucrat that you will never meet that will decide whether or not you're worth enough to society to save. I'm not sure why you think that's any better.

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
  8. Re:Misleading by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're letting another country snoop on their citizen's financial transactions. Sounds like they're being subordinated to me.

  9. Re:RIAA? Eh? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, the RIAA doesn't exist in Europe... (Guess what the last A in RIAA means) However, pretty much every Nation has its own equivalent institution. I don't know them all, but in Belgium it's SABAM, in France it's SACEM. I'm sure there are others.

  10. Re:The US wants their tax money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yup - most offshore jurisdictions currently shun US citizens due to their rulers tendency to demand full access, and control of their subjects assets. Offshore jurisdictions only deal with customers from authoritarian regimes if they happen to be relatively powerless on the world stage.

    I regard the latest developments as merely a marketing push by the US of their offshore jurisdiction - Delaware - and a way to use political might in order to squash competition within the finance segment.
    Delaware is one of the very few jurisdictions that are still able to offer completely anonymous banking/corporate services (through use of bearer shares), a service that cannot be obtained in Switzerland, Luxembourg or any of the offshore jurisdictions in Europe.

    Macao also offers true anonymous banking and as they are now a part of China (who also wants to compete in the offshore segment and therefore refuses to allow the G20 to put Macao on any of its grey or black lists). Other jurisdictions that can be interesting for US tax subjects are Singapore, Dubai, Panama, the Seychelles, Mauritius and a bunch of other ones.

    I personally think that we are beginning to see a "new financial Berlin wall" that is starting to separate the former powerhouses of the "old" economies from that of the "new" economies (BRIC and Africa ).

    The behaviour displayed by the US in this matter has caused me and many of my colleagues to abandon any forms of business that in any way touch US based companies or individuals.

    - As we're basically forced to choose between investments into EU/US (who are currently seeing their economies shrink) and the rest of the world (where we see strong economic growth) - we have basically chosen to abandon the US and US persons in our business dealings (We're in the business of making money - not propping up irresponsible governments).

    Posting this anonymously due to the political sensitivity of these issues... I have very little faith in the rule of law once large sums of money are involved.

  11. Could we please stop spreading this myth? by SoVeryTired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, the whole point behind those attacks was not to destroy the West, or wipe us off the map, or any of that rubbish.

    The main demands the Al Quaida originally made were that US forces withdraw from Saudi Arabia, and for Palestine to be recognised and given equal support to Israel. That was before every fundamentalist nutjob in Islam was invoking the name Al Quaida though ( PDF here, for reference).

    I'm sorry to say, no matter what the media would have you believe, these guys aren't SPECTRE. They just want to be left alone. Throw rocks at a wasps' nest, and what do you expect to happen?

    --
    Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.