Slashdot Mirror


School System Considers Jamming Students' Phones

An anonymous reader writes "The St. Ansgar, Iowa school system is considering buying cell-phone jamming equipment for up to $5000 if it is deemed legal. The use of the equipment would be suspended in the case of an emergency, but one has to wonder if they would be quick enough to shut it down should an emergency arise. 'A Federal Communications Commission notice issued in 2005 says the sale and use of transmitters that jam cellular or personal communications services is unlawful.'"

12 of 785 comments (clear)

  1. back in my day by loafula · · Score: 5, Insightful

    we didn't have cell phones. beepers were just starting to appear when i graduated high-school. we never had any problems alerting in the event of an emergency. we had fire alarms, PA system, and ye olde fashioned telephones in every classroom.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    1. Re:back in my day by loafula · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think it's so much a social stigma as it is a distraction from the learning environment.

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    2. Re:back in my day by QuantumRiff · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have no idea the growing levitation power of the new, modern, helicopter parent. They would scream if you even thought of proposing that maybe, just maybe, the kids should leave the burning building BEFORE calling them. (So they can immediately schedule a meeting with the principal and teacher about the lack of fireproofing in the school, and how it affects their childs chances of getting into a good college) For once, think of the parents, not the children. If they can't reach/see their children every minute of every day, then obviously, child molesters are trying to kidnap them...

      the last few years, I have started feeling very, very sorry for teachers..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:back in my day by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's the texting that's the big issue. My wife teaches middle-school math, and she is constantly interrupting her classes to tell her students to put their not-allowed-on-campus phones away.

      30 years ago, it was passing notes in class. Now it's texting. 30 years from now it'll brain-melding in class or something...

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    4. Re:back in my day by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 5, Funny

      So are vocal chords

      Aw Christ... a chorus of crazy characters might use a corps of vocal cords to sing a chronicle of chromatic chords, but it's still spelled vocal "cords", not "chords".

    5. Re:back in my day by WED+Fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thank you for telling me what my child needs and where.

      Thank you for foisting your ill-behaved little offspring on the rest of the world. If you had taught your children how to operate in a polite society, then society wouldn't be looking at a way to enforce good behaviour.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    6. Re:back in my day by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right, and you're wrong.

      You're right, in that there is NO cure for boring Teachers (Bueller? Anyone?).

      However, your wrong if you have ADDITIONAL distractions available. I don't care how "interesting" things are especially if some girl is texting naked pictures of herself to her boyfriend.

      On a scale of "interesting", the most entertaining and engaging teacher cannot compete with all sorts of other "interesting" options.

      There is NO need for a cell phone in a K-12 classroom. Especially when you consider that every classroom HAS a phone in it! NONE!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:back in my day by Londovir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are partially joking in your response, but you are more correct than, perhaps, you even realize.

      I've been a public school teacher at a high school for 4 years now, and to be honest, cell phones are an utter nightmare. The cheating of students using texting to get answers is rampant, well beyond anything that, as teachers, we were never warned about. Students have become masters of texting "under the table", and it has gotten bad enough that I now feel the need to make 12 different versions of a test for the 6 classes I teach a day - versions A and B for each period. I know that if I don't, by the end of 1st period, all of my students in periods 2-7 will have the questions (and answers) by the time I get to them. The "rookie" teachers who haven't learned that realize it awfully quick when the grade distributions go steeply upwards by the end of the day. Even then, with the prevalence of iPhones and Blackberry phones, cheating is becoming even more widespread since students can easily websurf to the answers for test questions. I have to hawk around my room constantly looking for phones under desks. It's amazing.

      As a county, we've tried everything to penalize the use of cell phones, to no avail. We've tried detentions (students never serve them), we've tried suspensions ("Oh, a day that I don't have to go to school, great!"), no deterrents worked.

      Then we tried getting "tougher". We tried to take the cell phone away from the student until the end of the school day. That lasted about 2 weeks, until we were told we couldn't do that any longer because a parent decided to get a jazzy lawyer and sue the district. They, apparently, were convinced that we were endangering their student by taking away their ability to call for help in an emergency. Rather than fight it out in court (and risk losing, as these things tend to go), the county settled and changed the policy. Now, supposedly, the plan is to confiscate the battery, but let the student keep the phone. Of course, students now carry spare batteries, so it doesn't matter.

      We were the school a few years back that had the lockdown that made CNN news, when a deputy sheriff and his police dog were both shot and killed less than 2000 feet from our school. It was a massive manhunt that made national news. We were locked down for about 9 hours, with about (literally) 200 police with assault rifles and body armor, with armored vehicles, and eventually they bussed us out of the school under very heavy armed guard. During that time, the cell phones became a fiasco. Every student with a phone was calling their parents, and every parent was coming to the school to try and get their darling children out, despite the reality that a gunman with 2 automatics who had already killed a cop was anywhere around. The police were stretched thin trying to keep the roadblocks up to keep the idiot parents away. Insanity.

      It gets worse then that, of course. I've had cases where I pass back a test at 8am to a 2nd period class, and I get an email from our secretary at 8:30am saying that the students parent called and wants to talk to me about the grade their daughter got on the test. Last year the newest craze was students getting "disposable" cell phones and using them to call in bomb threats to the school. Of course, any time a threat comes in you have to go through the evacuation drill, just in case, and according to our resource officer it can be difficult for them to trace the "disposable" cell phones. Plus, as before, any time some drill does come in, it's only a matter for 15 minutes before a bunch of parents show up ready to check their kids out of school.

      I couldn't be happier as a teacher than if they blocked every last cell phone on campus. I don't have a phone in my classroom (very few of us in our high school have one in the room), but we each have intercoms we can use to reach the main office, and we had no communication problems during the dangerous lockdown. I don't need to use a cell phone during the school day, at least not once in the 4 years I've been there.

      --
      Londovir
  2. I might be too old... by anomnomnomymous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But what happened to good ol' telling them not to use their mobiles, and if they -do- use it, apply punishment?
    I obviously didn't RTA, but what a waste of money... (if not the possible consequences)

    --
    When you shoot a mime, do you use a silencer?
    1. Re:I might be too old... by knarfling · · Score: 5, Informative

      BULL! There may be teachers that are like that, but to say "most" is a gross miss-representation.

      My father-in-law is a Jr. High School teacher, so I can tell you some of the restraints that are on the teachers.
      They are not allowed to discipline students. (I am not talking physical discipline here. Teachers are not to scold a student for bad behaviour. At most they can send them to the principle's office, which means the kids gets out of class that day.)
      If a teacher gives a student a bad grade, they are often yelled at by a parent, claiming that if the teacher has it in for the child, sometimes even calling the teacher racist. (That happened to my father-in-law.)
      Teachers are not allowed to confiscate knives, cell-phones, distracting toys or video games without being accused of stealing, but make sure each student pays attention.
      Teachers are given conflicting instructions on teaching. (leave no child behind, but teach to the highest level. Don't teach just so they pass tests, but you need to cram 1.5 years of test stuff plus the stuff beyond the tests into 9 months.)
      Oh, and by the way, we are cutting salary again because we don't have the budget, but we need to attract the best and brightest teachers.
      While we are at it, we know that you have been teaching students for 10 years and have some of the highest test scores in the state, but this charter school that has only 3 students per class has a new method of teaching so we want you to start using it in your class of 35.
      If the teacher can't keep the class in line, sometimes it is because they are not allowed to, not because they can't be bothered.

      With the way teachers are treated these days, I would never recommend a teaching profession to anyone.

      --
      Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
  3. What if.... by RingDev · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What if instead of jamming phones, the school put up their own cell antena. They could work with the other local providers to tweek the handoff rules such that phones in side the school are significantly more likely to stay on the school's tower.

    Once you have all of those phones on the school's tower it would be simple to shut down texting and internet access while still allowing access to 911 and emergency numbers listed in the student's records.

    Sure, it'll cost more than $5000 to get up and maintain, but it is much more likely to pass muster.

    Personally though, I'm all for the confiscate and return rule. It's cheaper AND it reinforces lessons in personal responsibility.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  4. Re:WTF? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Students should be -encouraged- to collaborate because the real world is built on collaboration and research.

    Yes, because I'm sure the problem is that students are just *dying* to collaborate over their cell phones, and those nasty teachers are too backwards to understand it. :rollseyes:

    Sorry buddy, this is the kind of thing that's being communicated between students during times when they should be working:

    "OMG did u c wat ashleys waring 2day???"
    "OMG I no wat a hore!"
    "LOL!!!"