Slashdot Mirror


Orbit Your Own Satellite For $8,000

RobGoldsmith sends word of Interorbital's TubeSat Personal Satellite Kit, which allows anyone to send a half-pound payload to low-earth orbit for $8,000. Your satellite will fly to orbit from Tonga atop an Interorbital Systems NEPTUNE 30 rocket along with 31 other TubeSats. It will function for several weeks, then its orbit will decay and it will burn up in the atmosphere. Interorbital plans to send up a load of 32 TubeSats every month. If you pay in full in advance, you get slotted onto a particular scheduled launch. Here are Interorbital's product page and brochure (PDF).

19 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. I forsee by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A big new trend for "burials in space".

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I forsee by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its orbit will decay and it will burn up in the atmosphere

      That's just a ridiculously elaborate cremation.

    2. Re:I forsee by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

      fine, then you get to chop up the body into half-pound chunks.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  2. Pirates in Space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Low earth orbit is above the law, literally, isn't it? Send up a few gigabytes of flash memory and a transmitter. Torrents from space!

    1. Re:Pirates in Space! by Dan541 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What?

      You honestly expect that to stop the RIAA?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Pirates in Space! by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Low earth orbit is above the law, literally, isn't it?

      Yes, I think I can safely assure you that your pirate satellite will not be arrested. This may be small consolation to the people who build and launch it, who themselves will inconveniently not be in LEO.

  3. Commercial applications by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sign that a technology has really matured enough to be taken seriously is when it starts to have commercial applications. Moreover, the presence of businesses like this will help provide further incentive for the improvement of space related technologies.

    However, it isn't clear to me who would use a half-pound satellite that can only last a few weeks. TFA lists the following possible applications:

    Earth-from-space video imaging. Earth magnetic field measurement. Satellite orientation detection (horizon sensor, gyros, accelerometers, etc.). Orbital environment measurements (temperature, pressure, radiation, etc.). On-orbit hardware and software component testing (microprocessors, etc.). Tracking migratory animals from orbit. Testing satellite stabilization methods. Biological experiments. On-orbit advertising. Private e-mail

    Honestly, I don't see much use of most of those as a general use. Certainly scientists will benefit from this sort of technology but I doubt anyone would try to use this for private e-mail systems. You would just use the internet and encrypt your stuff. The idea of using this sort of thing for low cost climate and weather data gathering is interesting. I suspect that as with many technologies, new uses will be developed that we cannot easily anticipate now that the technology is still young.

    1. Re:Commercial applications by TorKlingberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Satellite technology has had commercial applications for decades.

  4. Re:Will falling space debris be a problem? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Half pound chunks that burn up on reentry aren't going to hurt anything.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  5. Re:Tonga vs. the atmosphere by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A couple of rockets is piss compared to the millions of cars, factories, and volcanoes in the world. "Straw that breaks the camel's back" is just a strawman (pun not intended :/) argument used by ludites that have something against cool technologies for some reason.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  6. Re:Will falling space debris be a problem? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Funny

    /me hides half-pound ball of nickel-cobalt cement reinforced with titantium carbide behind his back

    What was that?

  7. Re:Ashes in space business by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think there are people who can get you that high for even less per gram. Well, for your first hit anyway.

  8. I Call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    32 satellites at $8K each is only $256,000. Subtract the cost of the materials used to build the satellites. (I'm assuming they're not using class S parts, but solar panels, etc still ain't cheap.) They're seriously planning to deploy a working delivery system to space for that kind of money?

    1. Re:I Call BS by Hadlock · · Score: 5, Informative

      You didn't RTFA. For $8,000 this comes with a turnkey satellite + satellite development software environment,
       

      • Casing, Endplates, and Mounting Hardware
      • A Transceiver
      • A Battery Pack
      • Solar Cells
      • A Power Management Control System (PMCS)
      • Microcomputer
      • Software
      • Antennas
      • Safety Switches
      • Complete Instructions

       
      with equipment that's already gone through R&D, and warrantied against failure during the trip into space, with space for additional cargo of up to 0.2kg. I'm sure they'd sell you the empty casing plus space on the rocket for less than $8 large (maybe as low as 4K? judging from their pricing model, it looks like the 4K is for the actual propellant/overhead costs), but it's going to cost a business a whole lot more than 8K to develop space-worthy electronics + software to put in the canister.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re: I Call BS by abushga · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not BS. Last I checked you could put 1 KG into LEO for $25K. http://www.cubesatkit.com/

      Cubesats typically hitch a ride with larger projects for cost efficiency.

      http://cubesat.ece.uiuc.edu/
      http://mtech.dk/thomsen/space/cubesat.php
      http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/satellites/cubesats.php

  9. Re:Will falling space debris be a problem? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not really. Our best plan for artificial weaponized meteors is telephone-pole-to-crowbar sized rods of tungsten. Somehow I doubt that much tungsten weighs less than 0.5 pounds.

  10. Cheaper "Memorable" Options by Narnie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmm... I think there's some cheaper "memorable" options out there.

    Option 1 (Daddy is Forever)
    ~1000USD to be cremated and then ~8,000USD** to be pressed into a half-carat loose diamond.

    Option 2 (Daddy was an Astronaut-Burnt-Up-on-Reentry)
    ~1000USD to be cremated and then ~8000USD to be shot into space.

    **ashes to diamonds

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  11. Re:Do I... by Narnie · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...get to chose where it comes down? I really don't know, but I wonder if one could design a .5 pound satellite with the express intention of surviving re-entry, like a 1/2 pound slug of lead in the shape of a dart or a sphere.

    That's one heck of a way to commit suicide.

    --
    greed@All_Evils:~#
  12. Re:CO2 cartridges to break earth's orbit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, no. 2.9kJ is nothing. It's less than the biochemical energy in 0.1g of fat, only enough energy to lift 1kg 300m against gravity.

    2.9kJ is certainly not sufficient for accelerating 1kg from 8km/s (LEO orbit) to 11km/s (escape velocity) or even just about 10km/s (geostationary transfer orbit perigee).

    1J=1Nm=(1kg*m/s^2)*1m=1kg*(m/s)^2

    Kinetic energy of 1kg at 8km/s: 0.5*1kg*(8000m/s)^2=32MJ

    Kinetic energy of 1kg at 10km/s:
    0.5*1kg*(10000m/s)^2=50MJ

    That's a difference of 18MJ to get 1kg from LEO to a geostationary transfer orbit (and some more to turn that into a geostationary orbit).