Slashdot Mirror


Network Neutrality Back In Congress For 3rd Time

suraj.sun writes "Ed Markey has introduced his plan to legislate network neutrality into a third consecutive Congress, and he has a message for ISPs: upgrade your infrastructure and don't even think about blocking or degrading traffic. The war over network neutrality has been fought in the last two Congresses, and last week's introduction of the 'Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2009' [PDF] means that legislators will duke it out a third time. Should the bill pass, Internet service providers will not be able to 'block, interfere with, discriminate against, impair, or degrade' access to any lawful content from any lawful application or device. Rulemaking and enforcement of network neutrality would be given to the Federal Communications Commission, which would also be given the unenviable job of hashing out what constitutes 'reasonable network management' — something explicitly allowed by the bill. Neutrality would also not apply to the access and transfer of unlawful information, including 'theft of content,' so a mythical deep packet inspection device that could block illegal P2P transfers with 100 percent accuracy would still be allowed. If enacted, the bill would allow any US Internet user to file a neutrality complaint with the FCC and receive a ruling within 90 days."

2 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This will kill P2P by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your signature cites FOX NEWS. What...the...heck. I'm sorry, but that automatically disqualifies you from ever offering a political-related opinion ever again.

  2. Re:This will kill P2P by BlueStrat · · Score: 1, Troll

    Your signature cites FOX NEWS. What...the...heck. I'm sorry, but that automatically disqualifies you from ever offering a political-related opinion ever again.

    I'm sorry, but your automatic knee-jerk reaction, showing that you've bought into the "Fox News is teh Ebil!!!1ONE" bias without bothering to determine whether a reported fact may or may not be true in a particular instance simply because of the source disqualifies YOU from ever being taken seriously in ANY discussion on ANY topic.

    Good DAY Sir!

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.