NASA's Cashflow Problem Puts Moon Trip In Doubt

krou writes "According to the Guardian, the Augustine panel is going to declare that there is simply no money to go back to the moon, and the next-generation Ares I rocket is likely to be scrapped unless there is more funding. The $81B Constellation Program's long-term goal of putting a human on Mars is almost certainly not going to be possible by the middle of the century. The options outlined by the panel for the future of NASA 'are to extend the working life of the aging space shuttle fleet beyond next year's scheduled retirement until 2015, while developing a cheaper transport to the moon; pressing ahead with Constellation as quickly as existing funding allows; or creating a new, larger rocket that would allow exploration of the solar system while bypassing the moon.' All of this means that NASA won't be back on the moon before the end of the next decade as hoped, 'or even leaving lower Earth orbit for at least another two decades.' Another result of the monetary black hole is that they don't have the '$300m to expand a network of telescopes and meet the government's target of identifying, by 2020, at least 90% of the giant space rocks that pose a threat to Earth.'"

Comments

Cash flow problem...

[girlintraining]

We're in the middle of a recession that's one of the longest on record. They're projecting that the budget they have now will be the same fifty years from now, and everyone panics over this? Oh please. Just wait until the Chinese start firing rockets into space with people on them and design their own Apollo program. I bet legislators will look between the couch cushions then and find the spare cash they need to one-up them. I've never credited Congress with an abundance of brains, but pride? Oh, they got that in spades.

Re:How can the federal deficit be blamed?

[girlintraining]

Because it certainly has not had any impact on the orgy of irresponsible spending of President Obama and his fellow Democrats.

Context failure on line 1: Orgies not related to root topic "Moon Trip".
Parsing failure on line 1: "President Obama" is not inherited from the class "Democrats".

Face it, it isn't because we "DON'T" have the money its because NASA != votes.

Illegal operand on line 3: !=; Class "Organization" cannot be compared with class "Citizen".
Compiler warning: All caps statement does not need added quotations for emphasis.
I/O: /projects/moon_trip/John_F_Kennedy.h include file missing.

Please don't toss out "Iraq". That old throw away line was childish during Bush's years and just as tired now. Iraq had no bearing either.

Compiler warning: Iraq.h included but not used.
Compiler warning: George_Bush.h included but not used.

It is no more difficult than that. There is no conspiracy.

Compiler warning: Illuminati.h contains errors and was not included.

This not because of Iraq/Afghanistan. This is not because of a bloated defense budget.

Compiler warning: Iraq.h alread declared.
File I/O error: Afghanistan.h not found.
File I/O error: Function bloat() included multiple times in budget/defense.h
Compiler warning: budget/defense.h required for NASA.c

It simply is because NASA does not generate votes or control and as such does not qualify for a President or Congress not interested in science.

Parsing failure on line 9: "Control" declared without operand.
Parsing failure on line 9: if/then branch always returns false.
Parsing failure on line 9: Class "NASA" not inherited from "Voter".

Please don't confuse a President who TALKS about being for science, just understand the science politicians support is the science that polls well.

Parsing failure on line 10: "President" cannot be confused by members of the class "Voter."
Parsing failure on line 10: "science politicians" is ambiguous. Add an apostrophe to politicians or prefix statement with a linking verb.
Parsing failure on line 10: "polls well" is ambiguous. Did you mean "does well in the polls" ?