Slashdot Mirror


An Electricity-Cost-Aware Internet Routing Scheme

Al writes "Researchers from MIT, Carnegie Mellon and Akamai have developed a network-routing scheme that could save 'internet-scale' companies such as Google, Amazon and Microsoft million of dollars each year by moving data to locations with the best electricity prices for a particular day. The scheme simply considers both the most efficient routing path for data and the potential cost savings of routing it somewhere farther away. The researchers studied price fluctuations at locations across the country and used data from Akamai caching servers to test the idea out. In the best possible scenario — which would require more efficient servers — they estimate that companies could save as much as 40% on the electricity bills (tens of millions each year). Google already operates at least one datacenter that shuts down when temperatures get too high. Is this the next logical step for internet computing?"

5 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. Prior art by An+dochasac · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least this idea was previously published at Research Disclosure, a site intended as an inexpensive way to log prior art. It is the next logical step and I'm glad to see that companies are moving in that direction.

  2. This is just electricty outsourcing. by BlueKitties · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While at first this struck me as an interesting idea, it took me a moment to realize that this is just dynamic (err... at server runtime) outsourcing. So, really, this isn't very amazing. Still, I think this is a good idea for us consumers: it means electricity usages for certain areas can shrink, which could potentially help lower rates for the rest of us. For once, outsourcing might be good for the economy.

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
  3. Re:Who keeps the savings?? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You just don't get it.
    Will the savings be passed on to the customer? Yes because the customer is Google, Microsoft, and maybe Amazon.
    What people don't get is that you and I are not Google's, Facebook's, or even Slashdot's customer.
    We are their product.
    Unless you buy ads on those services you are not their customer.
    Amazon is different but I doubt that this will cause a performance hit that you notice or they will not do it. But really folks get a clue. We are Google's customers like a cow is a dairy farmers customer.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. Low Datacenter Costs by lobiusmoop · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the subject of data center running costs, why are there not more data centers in Iceland? The cold climate (to minimize cooling costs, which can be 50% of the total power drain in hot climates) combined with cheap renewable geothermal electricity would make it ideal I think.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Low Datacenter Costs by bumburumbi · · Score: 5, Informative

      With only two cables connecting Iceland to the Ineternet, companies have not been eager to set up shop here. FARICE-1 is fairly modern (2004), CANTAT-3 is rather old (1994) and a new cable, DANICE is being built. For many companies the risk of one or more of these cables being down is to large to offset the cheap electricity and cool weather.