Slashdot Mirror
School Uniform To Block Cell Phone Emissions
Foehg writes "ForeignPolicy.com reports, 'A Belarusian textile company has developed a special school uniform that protects kids from electromagnetic radiation emanating from their cellphones. The uniform features a dedicated pocket that can store the phone and make it safe for those who wear it.'" Now someone has to create an oven mitt that can protect you from the harmful radiation given off by your microwave oven.
If it also blocks transmission, then students can keep their cell phone on them without worrying about disrupting class or losing their phone.
"Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
This is great news for all of those students going to schools that permit them to carry cell phones.
Wait, what?
If if protects the kids from phone emissions, then it should block tower signals from getting to the phones.
Turn your phone off? Take the battery out?
Can a teacher not confiscate a cell phone anymore if he catches a student using it?
This is a pretty long string of "ifs", but it might be an idea for that Iowa schools that wants to use technical means to cut down on phone use during class.
Is it me, or is the scientific knowledge of these school officials even worse than the slashdot crowd?
Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
if you're willing to enforce the rule
Hey! This is America! We don't do things like that anymore!
And what about pedophiles trying to kidnap students? Is there less worry for them, since they may not be able to place a call, if their clothes are partially blocking cell phone signals?
If you don't want the students to make/receive calls or text msgs why let 'em have phones with them at all? Wouldn't it be cheaper just order them left in their lockers? Paying for uniforms to block them seems overly complicated and expensive for the very little good it does. This seems more like a scam on the part of a company that wants to feed at the trough of the education bureaucracy. Or so it seems to me.
"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
I am so tired of everyone freaking the fuck out about Manbearpig. Break out the fucking tin foil helmets and duct tape the god damn windows. Can ANYONE cite a case where someone, ANYONE died because of cell phone radiation (cancer patients/ Pete & Pete-esque metal plate in head people don't count).
This protects students from radiation that cell phones emit, they do NOT block calls, text messages, etc. telling by the text of the article.
After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
from moronic U.S. residents: Sock in mouth.
"Give me back my capitalism". "Give me back my 'Merica".
Sorry dudes, your 'Merica fell off the map about 100 years ago.
Yours In Communism,
K. Trout
They're probably still better at math and science than American kids.
http://twitter.com/OLDTELEGRAM
A faraday cage in a pocket; to block cell phone signals from reaching the phone? The phones will just crank their output power to the max in a selfless attempt to communicate, and in turn the battery will probably be dead by lunchtime. It's almost as if cellphones need some sort of onboard switch that allows you to selectively decide when it's ON or OFF... No, that's probably too futuristic for most people to comprehend anyway.
This could be an interesting angle... clothing designed to limit the "damage" from cell phone signals....
So you line the pockets with a metalic mesh.... and as an added benefit... those milimeter wave scanners at the airport should be blinded too.
I was wondering how to market metalic mesh lined pants :)
-Steve
"I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
Looks like the purpose isn't so much to block cell phones, but to stop the electromagnetic radiation.
While most studies show it to be harmless, some studies say that kids might be more susceptible to any damages it might cause.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
Look, why don't we just let people be to what they want to be exposed to. Why would we want clothes to emit something that counteracts something else. Keep clothes pure.
Honestly, why must we keep inventing ways of counteracting what we know exists rather than just fix what exists first?
I'm not trying to troll here, but it seems that we are all for self experimentation.
For example, We have knows cigarettes are a big cause for cancer since the mid 70's or 80's yet we (humans) keep smoking that crap.
We've known for well over a decade that cell phones emit some harmful radiation. We keep buying them, and we haven't demanded that the industry fix itself.
We keep letting ourselves get duped into thinking all is ok. We are as much to blame for what we consume as those that sell us those consumer products.
Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
Powerwatch is a good overview site dealing with health issues surrounding microwave and lower frequency electro-magnetic radiation. It may surprise many of you, but there have been clear-cut studies showing DNA damage on acount of EM fields, even at low frequencies: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1241963
We could do things like enforcing the rules but most teachers or schools can't afford the lawyers to fend off the parents who just know that Johnny is a special little angel who'd never do anything wrong and that he's above average so he obviously shouldn't get any grade less than an A+.
DNA damage? Isn't it time kids evolve anyways? How else is the human race gonna move forward?
Wait, protect?
But cellphones are perfectly safe according to official doctrine. What is the problem here? Why do we need protecting from something that is officially safe. If they are unsafe then they should be banned.
Just ban mobile phones from school all together. That way, the kids would be protected from any possibly radiation risk, and there would also be one fewer distraction from their education.
Dr. Carlo did the original studies on cell phone radiation for the cell phone industry.
They did not like what he found and tried to intimidate him and claim he was a nut job.
The information carrying freqs we are exposing our selves to are new to the human body and the effects are not good.
Listen and then laugh about the tin foil crowd.
Keep putting that microwave radiation source right next to your sensitive brain and see what happens...
http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/audio/dr-george-carlo.mp3
http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/audio/dr-george-carlo-dynamic-health-2008-04-23.mp3
http://tinyurl.com/ttotl
http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=resources
should read "Is it I". Evidently, your knowledge of grammar is WORSE than school officials.
"Now someone has to create an oven mitt that can protect you from the harmful radiation given off by your microwave oven."
I've got an oven mitt I'll sell you for $19.95 that is guaranteed to protect you from a 100% of the radiation while the microwave door is open. ... It'll also protect against Snipe.
The long time effects of cellphones hasnt been properly researched yet. The problem is nobody knows if its dangerous yet. In ten-twenty years time we will know for sure and some parents may want to be on the safe side.
HTTP/1.1 400
Unless it's zero tolerance for aspirin or metal spoons.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
This is just another pointless protect our Children BS, why not just suggest every parents should bubble wrap their children before they leave the house
... cause you wouldn't like me when I get angry ...
This is like giving kids paper that can't be written on because kids would use the paper to pass notes to each other.
Note passing, doodling, talking, sleeping, etc. are all just a much of a distraction as cell phones, but schools don't go out and buy expensive gadgets to stop these distractions... instead the teacher uses disciplinary action. Why can't the same be done for cell phones?
One answer is that disciplinary action doesn't generate a profit for the company making this piece of junk.
I see nothing odd in that. I got my first Nokia cellphone when I was on 5th grade, I think. I'm not sure how long elementary school takes in USA but here in Finland it is 9 years and you finish it when you are 15 or 16 years old (assuming you don't have to redo any year or anything like that). Most Finns have already also given up land lines as everyone in the family has cellphone. (Official cell phone penetration rate is apparently at 128% as there are more phones than people. For comparison, the rate for USA is 86% linky)
So a lot of kids at elementary school have cellphones. At that point question is "Should they be allowed in school or not" and thus "Is there any benefit from that?". The answer is, yes there is. At least I remember numerous times that I didn't come home directly from school but instead went to a friend for a while. It was good for me to have my phone with me and I think that my mother was happy knowing that she could contact me if necessary. Of course I used the phone myself, too. Texted friends if they have gotten off the school yet, etc. etc... Once called an ambulance after school when I saw an accident. So the next question is "Is there any harm from allowing them in schools" and I don't believe there is. There was a rule "Don't let it ring during a lesson or a teacher will take it and your parents will have to come and ask it back.". Some teachers were very strict about that, others were not. But practically everyone had a phone and I don't think I heard a phone ring during a lesson more than ten times or so in total. It was never a problem of any sort, not for teachers and not for students.
A lot of posters have implied that not only would cell phones be allowed in schools but it would be a very odd idea to allow them. Is there any logical reasoning behind this?
Wait, THERES MORE. If you buy the cellphone blocking uniforms we will through in:
1 free ionic bracelet with every purchase.
2 harmony chips
1 Philip Stein Teslar Watch "a watch powered by snake oil,"
3 MPion MP3 Players
Call within the next 20 minutes and receive a pair of Dowsing Rods at no extra cost.
*(http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/11/10-awesome-gadg/)
Oh, and don't forget that, if you're one of those sticklers that doesn't want to immigrate, you should invest in one of those lead codpieces. You wouldn't want to devolve into a "special" now would you...
Rules of Conduct:
#1 - The DM is always right.
#2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
For those dismissing this as paranoia - which it may be, I don't know - it may help to understand that Belarus has suffered considerably from the Chernobyl fallout.
If I were them, I'd be paranoid, too.
if it blocks the radiation effectively enough to prevent reception sufficiently
I would not wear even if it did do that.
Reason: when phone is about to lose (or loses) contact with BTS the phone will increase TX power in order to avoid that. This can easily make situation (radiation dose) even worse.
One immediate use that springs to mind is shoplifting - at least assuming that it blocks RFID tags. Although hopefully those kids smart enough to figure that out would also be smart enough not to shop lift. Of course a more positive use for the rest of us would be a passport pocket to block remote reading of your biometric data.
Who were often exposed to massive EMFs.
There were many who were stationed in Greenland who would stand in front of the antenna to get warm.
No increased cancer rate!
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
With all of the money wasted on protecting kids from JUNK SCIENCE...we could be improving their health, providing meals to kids who aren't getting proper nutrition, immunization....geeze...our priorities are all screwed up.
It's almost as if cellphones need some sort of onboard switch that allows you to selectively decide when it's ON or OFF... No, that's probably too futuristic for most people to comprehend anyway.
Why would you want to turn your phone off and render its tracking signal unreadable by your friendly government? Are you a terrorist or something?
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Schools are putting out bids for cat 5e cable knit sweaters and kneesocks
Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.
Not just school systems. What ever happened to life without parole actually being life without parole? Bleeding heart progressives have made it politically incorrect to punish criminals, going so far as to many times punish the victims for defending themselves.
/rantover
In the past few months I've seen several articles about pizza delivery men getting attacked, defending themselves with a legally concealed weapon, then facing either criminal charges or loss of employment for doing so. Then there was the bank teller who got fired for apprehending a bank robber.
Ya I know. Offtopic.
This IMHO doesn't work well because the next thing the phone does when it finds it impossible to transmit is to ramp up its transmission power to the set maximum => hot pockets
Hey don't blame me, IANAB
Technological solutions shouldn't be used to solve social problems.
Fear of cell phone radiation isn't a technological problem. It's a social one. Namely, unfamiliarity with basic science, and being quick to blame Big Corporations for every little sniffle and sneeze.
Oh, and the phone-use-during-class thing too, have the teacher confiscate the phones.
Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
Oven mitts *do protect* you from the harmful INFRARED radiation given off by your oven.
OK, perhaps not for microwave oven, but seriously, who wares mitts for microwave oven?
(And, yes yes, oven mitts also protect you from thermal conduction when you touch the hot pan inside the oven, so it's only "half the whole point," but that doesn't make a great title.)
Got your hand in the microwave oven while it's running, do you?
...text someone when your cell phone is in your pocket?
Really, all mobiles should be banned in schools and the above technology is not a solution to the problem. My friend a recently retired Deputy Head Master of 38 years in teaching, has seen the mobile phone arrive over the years and how it has affected his pupils. He told me, if it were not for mobile phones, there would be less crime in schools, less bullying, plus if Pupils came to school without mobile phones, they would be more attentive to the extent we could virtually scrap the amount of "Home Work" issued. He also blamed parents for being "too soft" and said these children, would have far more social time, better exam results, virtually no home work, if they came to school without them. I must say, I have to concur.
All cows eat grass!
"Protect kids from EMF ..." - this is more unscientific panic - a load of crap, in other words. There are only three mechanisms for damage to cells: induced electrical currents in the body, tissue heating and ionization. The first can occur only below about 3 kHz. Tissue heating happens when the tissue absorbs enough energy in the 30 MHz to 300 GHz range - to raise the cellular temperature enough to cause damage requires substantial power. Ionizing radiation is from wavelengths in the ultraviolet and below (X-rays and gamma rays). All this has been studied at length and tens of thousands of papers written over the past thirty years. The clear conclusion is that cell phones simply do not have the power to cause any kind of damage to cells in the vicinity of their antenna. See www.emfandhealth.com for complete coverage of the subject.