Slashdot Mirror


New Nano-Laser Created

Many sources are reporting that researchers have created the world's smallest laser since the inception of lasers almost a half-century ago. Dubbed "spasers," as an acronym for "surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation," their incredibly tiny size could become a critical component for future technologies like "nanophotonic" circuitry. "Such circuits will require a laser-light source, but current lasers can't be made small enough to integrate them into electronic chips. Now researchers have overcome this obstacle, harnessing clouds of electrons called 'surface plasmons,' instead of the photons that make up light, to create the tiny spasers."

32 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. And in other news by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... geneticists are now working feverishly to develop the world's first nano-shark.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    1. Re:And in other news by tonyreadsnews · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I was thinking more like, frickin plankton with frickin lasers...
      Once heralded as the solution to world hunger, now could be the solution for population control.

  2. Nano-photonic circuitry!!?!?! by AtomicDevice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awesome! I can finally get this mobile emitter working again so I can get the hell out of sick bay.

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
  3. Optical Hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Optical Writeable Readable Hard drives that are Giga-giga-bakillion-kazakcipaloo-bytes and are random access/seeking - they're coming.

    All this technology and Slashdot's scripts still suck.

  4. Spaser, huh? by Millennium · · Score: 4, Funny

    So do they split into three parallel beams, thus covering a wider area than a single beam could along? And do they do the whole sinusoidal-oscillation thing if combined with a Wave Beam?

    1. Re:Spaser, huh? by Ironchew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah, this existed back in 1994. Problem is, it was mostly useless because you couldn't combine it with a Plasma Beam.
      Useless, I say!

    2. Re:Spaser, huh? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, that's a safety measure as the combination of the Spazer and the Plasma Beam can corrupt the entire universe if used in a room of improper size.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  5. Well, that's nice by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I think I'll wait for the Laser Shuffle.

  6. insead of cirtuit trace? by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet fiber optic would make good connections between multiple chips and/or other similarly capable hardware

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:insead of cirtuit trace? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Naturally, to get to the dimensions of current electronics, you'd have to come up with a way to put down an optical fiber using some form of deposition effect, and then figure out how to couple your wave efficiently into the fiber, and convert it back at the destination. Followed by the problem of still being limited by light speed which lets your signal propagate about 6 cm per cycle on a 5 GHz chip. What quickly brings you back to a high speed fiber optical network to transmit large amounts of data, but not to a faster chip which has to rapidly exchange small strings of data preferable in a symmetric fashion.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:insead of cirtuit trace? by tenco · · Score: 3, Informative

      Couldn't read the articles because i don't have an account there. But the abstracts look interesting: http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-30-13-1710 http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/440892722-27397378/content~content=a911227137~db=all~jumptype=rss http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/EUM0000000004246 and there seem to be already patents on manufacturing these integrated optic curcuits: http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4400052/claims.html

  7. Wake me when they have something in production. by BlueKitties · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see about three revolutionary breakthroughs per day, three of which never go anywhere because of cost or something. This reminds me of those "water on mars," articles -- we've been "getting new compelling evidence for water on mars" for decades. So, really, I've started to lose interest. I'll be excited when it finally goes somewhere. Really, what gets my blood pumping is what I can see coming down the pipe -- 128gb flash drives, C++0xA, etc.

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    1. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And without the "R," the "D" has nothing to do.

      The kind of thing TFA is talking about is a lot more than "just a nice thought." The researchers have done some very difficult, impressive work. Will it ultimately become a usable product? We have no way of knowing. But they've contributed to the sum of human knowledge in a meaningful way. This is pretty much how the relationship between science and technology works.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nicely said, although it's sad that you have to explain that on Slashdot, of all places.

    3. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks. And yeah, I was thinking that when I made the original post.

      There does seem to be a contingent on Slashdot that sees science as kind of irrelevant. Scientists are ivory-tower eggheads with their heads in the clouds who waste their time on airy-fairy ideas, engineers are tough gritty workin' men with dirt under their fingernails who really make things happen ... that kind of thing. It's bullshit, of course, but it's very appealing bullshit to people who don't actually know that much about how science or engineering actually works, but think they do.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And without the "D" producing a product that sells, there is rarely money for "R". Unfortunately it is not the academic minded handing out the research grants, it is the bean counters. (Otherwise all of our world problems would be likely solved by now.) This is pretty much how the relationship between science and reality works.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    5. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by hansraj · · Score: 3, Informative

      damn it! I mistakenly modded you redundant (I was going for insightful). Replying to undo the mod and to earn some off-topic mods probably :(

    6. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except here we have researchers at Purdue, a university with a history of a particularly strong and fruitful connection between science and engineering, doing solid scientific research which may well (or may not, of course) lead to useful commercial development. Believe me, I agree with you entirely about the "bean counters," and I would very much like to see more money directed toward pure research. (Part of this is pure self-interest, since I'm an academic scientist, but I felt this way back when I was doing corporate DBA work too.) The point is that while it may not happen enough, it does happen ... and "who cares" attitudes, like the one displayed in the OP which I replied to, are a major obstacle to it happening more.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    7. Re:Wake me when they have something in production. by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The rest of us see what does not exist, and think, why not?

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  8. Re:Words by MadAnalyst · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is a widely accepted term in the field, well known to certain physicists/chemists. But Google might help you learn something new.

  9. perhaps by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    someone can use this to further the idea/technologies of creating an artificial brain; use the spaser as an artificial receptors.

  10. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Enter the following in the console:

    apt-get sharkswithfreakinglasers
    make laser
    sudo intalllaser

    At this point you will get a number of incomprehensible error messages.

    Spend 18 hours of time searching google discovering that though there are many different instructions out there, nothing works.

  11. Re:Words by FrankSchwab · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, they are; and writing bogus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmon Wikipedia entries about them. /frank

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  12. how will we be able to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The tiny "pew pew pew" sounds? Hardly sounds fun to me.

  13. Re:Linux by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Drivers are only available for minix

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  14. VCSELs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "but current lasers can't be made small enough to integrate them into electronic chips."

    Yeah, except VCSELs have been around since the 80s. They are definitely small enough to integrate into an electronic chip, and they have been for quite some time.

  15. Re:Words by johannesg · · Score: 2, Funny

    "surface plasmons"

    Really? Plasmons? Are they just making words up now?

    Yeah. It's stupid: we already had the perfectly functional phrase "plasmid" to describe those.

    Personally I'm holding out for them perfecting the electricity plasmid.

  16. USELESS TECHNOLOGY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have NO nano cats to use it with!

  17. Too bad for you . . . by Tanman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Horton Hears the Pew!

  18. Re:Words by MadUndergrad · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the Wikipedia article:

    "For plasmon-based electronics to be useful, an analog to the transistor, called a plasmonster, must be invented."

    It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a plasmonster.

  19. Parses and functions fine for me. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many sources are reporting that researchers have created the world's smallest laser since the inception of lasers almost a half-century ago.

    How necessary is the end of that statement? Were they worried someone might assume a smaller laser had been created before the inception of lasers?

    That formulation parses and functions for me.

    It's a compact way of saying:
      - Lasers were invented almost a century ago.
      - Since then there has been a continuing series of inventions of progressively smaller lasers.
      - And with each of these inventions the inventor and/or the media went into a hype frenzy about the latest "world's smallest laser"
      - But there's something special about this one ...

    And there is: It's the first one where the resonator (a size-limiting component) is MUCH smaller than a quarter-wavelength of the resonant frequency light.

    And, as somebody who worked in a laser lab back in the late '60s and with cutting-edge semiconductors these days, I can attest that this little device is a BIG DEAL (TM).

    I expect the next step - an electrically-pumped version - in a year or less. Followed by one that can be grown epitaxially on a wafer and hooked to a waveguide that's also built by stock chip manufacturing techniques. And that's the point where you switch to optics - first for getting signals on and off the chip (a BIG power eater), eventually maybe for getting signals around the chip.

    Unless something BETTER comes along before then. (Which is the REAL reason most of these breakthroughs never make production.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  20. Re:Linux by tenco · · Score: 2, Funny

    and there's an iPhone app floating around that does all the lasering for you for $.99

    Unfortunately it was deleted from Apple Store