Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Verizon Sued After Tech Punches Customer In Face

Posted by samzenpus on from the can-you-hit-me-now dept.

suraj.sun writes "A Verizon customer filed a lawsuit after the tech the company sent out got a little punchy. Instead of fixing the customer's problem, the tech allegedly hit him in the face. The New York Post says the tech attacked the customer after he asked to see some ID before allowing access to the apartment. From the article, '"You want to know my name? Here's my name," Benjamin snarled, slapping his ID card into Isakson's face, according to Isakson's account of the December 2008 confrontation. "The guy essentially snapped. He cold-cocked me, hit me two or three solid shots to the head while my hands were down," said Isakson, a limo driver. He said the pounding bloodied his face and broke his glasses. But things got uglier, Isakson said, when Benjamin squeezed him around the neck and pressed him up against the wall. "He's prepared to kill me," Isakson said. "That's all I could think of." The customer broke free and ran away. The Verizon tech then chased the customer until he was subdued by a neighbor who was an off-duty cop.'"

36 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. Dude by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    You got beat up by an IT guy. Either he is a paraplegic, elderly or both.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Dude by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Funny

      Calling Verizon techs IT guys is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? That's like calling a Comcast tech a "network engineer."

      --
      512 MB RAM, 20 GB disk, 200 GB transfer, five datacenters. $19.95/month.
    2. Re:Dude by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's better then most of the names we want to call them.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:Dude by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly. Ive seen some really dumb thugs doing this kind of work. To say they lacked customer service skills is something of an understatement.

      Recently, we upgraded my dad's directv service to HDTV and the guy they sent over was somewhat rude, but I didnt care as log as he got the job done. Turns out the job was harder than he thought so he said he was going to his van, left the dish in the snow, and never came back. Yep, he just said "fuck it" and went home. I doubt he got fired.

      A little while after that I got Dish network at my place and was talking with the installer. I told him Ive put up dishes before at old places. He looked surprised. he said that they have guys with 5 weeks training that cant even up a dish.

      5 WEEKS to mount and point a dish? Wow. These arent the brightest bulbs.

    4. Re:Dude by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, "lefty-loosey, righty-tighty" takes time to master.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    5. Re:Dude by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Our DirecTV guy pointed the dish to full signal strength by eye. He could find the satellite by memory.

    6. Re:Dude by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Our DirecTV guy pointed the dish to full signal strength by eye.

      That's what you think.

      Pointing a dish by eye where you start picking up the signal is not too hard if you do it often. Even an amateur only needs a compass, a level and the software which calculates the elevation and bearing for your approximate position.

      Centering the dish with no tools to evaluate signal strength and no reference landmarks except the position of the sun? Buddy, you got taken by a lazy joker who figured out that you can't tell the difference.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    7. Re:Dude by jbuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've never used a compass and signal meter to install an air filter... Then again, I'm a bit of a cowboy when it comes to air filters. Like to shoot from the hip. Ya know.

      --
      -whoa, I'm jones'ing for a sig right about now...
    8. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know who that other guy is, but here's a few... *wink*

      *cracks nuckles*

      First, the common mistakes:

      You've got the classic case of fall/winter installations, where the tech doesn't take into account the fact that the dish they just installed is pointing through the branches of a (currently) leafless tree. Come spring, the customer calls in with no signal, and claims damage for holes in their wall, where they should not have been.

      Technicians also seem to be fond of drilling holes into carpet, without cutting it first. This is especially fun with Berber, when the entire carpet is one long, braided strand. Yeah for whole-room carpet replacement!

      Techs also don't always seem to check for a good line of sight when they should. I had many, many claims where a tech tried mounting the dish in 3, 4, 5, or more spots on a roof, without finding a good signal. That wouldn't be a problem, if they didn't drill holes each time...

      Ok, some exceptional stories:

      Technician finished a job, no problems, got in the van to leave, and backed through the customers fence.

      Technician, weighing ~285lbs, stood on top of customer's washing machine while running cable. Dented the lid badly enough that it wouldn't open.

      Technician, doing an installation at an apartment complex, removed 5 DirecTV dishes from the roof. Apparently he didn't realize that Dish's new customer wasn't the only person living there...

      Technician, when grounding the system he had just installed, soldered the wire directly to the hot water pipe leading to a shower. It took the customer a month to figure out why they were feeling mild electric shocks when showering.

      (And, just to prove customers can be bad, too, this one actually turned out to be the customer's fault...) A customer called in, extremely irate. He claimed that the tech, while installing a box in the master bedroom, went through his wife's underwear drawer, and then urinated in the bedroom. Of course, a claim was opened, the tech almost instantly lost his job, and it seemed that was that.
      Well, doing due diligence, the facts of the situation came out. It turns out that the customer hadn't moved necessary furniture away from the walls, as is requested. So the tech, needing access to a coax outlet behind a dresser, opened the top drawer, in order to use the inside of the lid as a handle to pull the furniture out. Right then, the customer came in, assumed the tech was after panties, and pushed the tech into the corner, holding him by the neck and yelling. The tech, terrified, peed his pants.


      I really should have blogged these when I still had that job, but I was worried about getting fired.

  2. So.... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you !(*^&%$%^$#-ing hear me NOW????

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:So.... by netruner · · Score: 5, Funny

      The previous post was brought to you by AT&T
      - Our service may suck, but our techs won't beat you up.

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    2. Re:So.... by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you !(*^&%$%^$#-ing hear me NOW????

      When reading this, did anybody else have the voice of Samuel L. Jackson going through their heads?

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:So.... by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "WHo is in the picture? The tech or the allegdely attacked customer?"

      That's what I was wondering. I'm looking at that photo thinking "why is that photo there? He can't be the tech, he looks mean as hell, like he just got out on parole, is that the customer?" Then I click to read the article and sure enough, that photo is the technician. If he showed up and said "I'm a Verizon Technician" I think I would have asked for ID too.

      "Benjamin was arrested and charged with assault"

      That's good. But FTFA....

      "But prosecutors offered to dismiss the case if Benjamin agreed to stay out of trouble for six months -- despite assuring Isakson there would be no deal, Isakson alleged. "According to what I was told, there was an error by the DA's staff," Isakson said. "They're giving this guy carte blanche to do this every six months."'

      Employee snaps and starts beating customers and gets a free pass? Wow, that's just wrong. And this is worse:

      "Verizon spokesman Rich Young said the company has "zero tolerance for any sort of unethical or illegal behavior" and noted Benjamin was not convicted of any crime. "In the months since this incident, his conduct has been blameless. As a result, we will not take further action," Young said."

      W....T....F....? "Well he hasn't beat any other customers so we're not going to do anything" Verizon said. Are you frickin' kidding me? Not only did this guy get no jail or even a fine, but he kept his job?

      Hey Verizon, are you hiring? Cuz apparently I have to kill at least 2 or more customers before I'd be fired.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    4. Re:So.... by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you !(*^&%$%^$#-ing hear me NOW????

      When reading this, did anybody else have the voice of Samuel L. Jackson going through their heads?

      I sure did! Then I heard him shout "VERIZON MOTHA-FUCKA! DO YOU USE IT?!"

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:So.... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But good job jumping to the conclusion the paper wanted you to jump to, all black men are thugs who just finished doing a bid.

      You're an asshole for assuming this is about race. If you look at that picture and the only thing you notice about it is his skin color, then you're far more racist than the GP. Either your first reaction was "black guy! Run!" and you're defending him out of guilt, or you thought "black guy's being oppressed!" and you're defending him against some giant (nonexistent) racist conspiracy.

      Yea, I cant really defend his actions, but that customer was probably the 15th straight guy who saw a black guy come to his door and ask for ID.

      I'd ask for ID if I saw Eminem rolling up on my sidewalk. You're pretty much an idiot if you don't ID everyone who shows up at your door asking to come inside, whether black or white, young or old, rich or poor. That you want to paint this as a race issue says a lot more about you than it does the person you were replying to.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  3. Did the tech at least fix the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If not, the customer is going to have to wait another month for a new appointment.

  4. More to the Story? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's possible the tech just snapped and went apeshit on the guy (after all, there are violent headcases out there...), why do I get the feeling that there's a whole lot more to the story than we're getting from the victim?...

    1. Re:More to the Story? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It honestly really doesn't matter -- unless this Isakson character physically assaulted the tech first, it makes no difference how obnoxious or belligerent he was being -- the tech had no right to assault him (even if he totally deserved it). What seems to have happened here is that a somewhat hot-headed tech who was already having a bad day went out to a house, just trying to do his job, and had some smartass give him all sorts of attitude for no reason and get in the way of him trying to get his job done. I have been in many similar situations before and can certainly see how someone of a violent temperament could snap and hit someone, but it certainly does not make it defensible.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    2. Re:More to the Story? by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The man obviously made an affront to the tech's honor which the tech was obliged to address. It once was these incidences were decided by a brush of a glove across one's cheek and a dawn meeting, grim and immutable. To merely be bloodied about the nose describes a situation where the homeowner got off lightly. How far we've fallen from the civilized world of yore.

      Carry on then. Cheerio.

    3. Re:More to the Story? by mrsquid0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having made your post, if you now shoot a Verizon technician it would probably be interpreted as premeditated.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    4. Re:More to the Story? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like the customer consenting to getting beat up, right?

      It's probably right there in the Verizon contract fine print.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    5. Re:More to the Story? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What seems to have happened here is that a somewhat hot-headed tech who was already having a bad day went out to a house, just trying to do his job, and had some smartass give him all sorts of attitude for no reason and get in the way of him trying to get his job done.

      Nope. Much as I've wanted to punch certain customers when I worked tech support, there's no way this is the victim's fault. If I saw that particular crackhead look-a-like sauntering up to my door, I'd also ask to see his ID before letting him in. How much could the victim possibly have egged him on considering the tech hadn't even made it in the front door yet?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:More to the Story? by Carik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't just attack random strangers, there is always a reason.

      You're right. I mean, sometimes the reason is that they were drunk, or they were dumb, or they were having a bad day, or the magic pixies told them to, but there's always a reason.

      Very few of those reasons are ones I would consider valid.

    7. Re:More to the Story? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, there wouldn't be any charges filed against me because I feared for my life in my own home.

      There could be, depending on where your home is.

      On the other hand if you were lucky the judge presiding might also be a Verizon customer.

    8. Re:More to the Story? by amplt1337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The effectiveness of guns, like that of any means of self-defense, is highly situationally specific. I guarantee you this guy had a self-defense tool that's that's part of every New York apartment -- the chain lock -- that, if used, could've prevented this from happening, just as surely as a gun could've. But few people use chain locks before opening their doors. Just the same, your gun would've done you no good if it were in the bedroom closet while the guy was wailing on you. Unless you were hoping to escape from him, then run to your bedroom, get the gun, load it, and manage to shoot the guy before he's on top of you again.

      Or do you load a couple rounds and have your gun in hand every time the doorbell rings? Really? Do you leave your gun with bullets in it, lying around where your toddler can grab it readily? Of course you don't, but then there goes its self-defense effectiveness.
      And if you wear your gun when you answer the door, and the guy on the other side means you harm, you'd better hope you can get the shot off before he's on you, because when he sees that gun he is not going to back down while you're conscious enough to shoot him in the back.

      I don't think guns are evil. I believe everyone should know how to shoot and how to handle a firearm, and I absolutely would want a gun in an obviously threatening situation where the firearm is ready and the violence is foreseeable (say, a riot down the street, or a war zone). I just understand that guns are far less effective in realistic self-defense situations than hoplomaniacs believe.

      If anything would've kept the victim safer, it'd be having a big dog. Doesn't have to be a particularly vicious breed, just faithful and over fifty pounds. I can only chuckle at what would've happened if this goon had tried to pull a stunt like this near my stepmother's Lab.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  5. Why does he need ID? by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He shouldn't need to show identification. All Verizon guys walk around with an entourage of hundreds of jumpsuited, smiling techs and assistants. You really can't miss them.

    1. Re:Why does he need ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He shouldn't need to show identification. All Verizon guys walk around with an entourage of hundreds of jumpsuited, smiling techs and assistants. You really can't miss them.

      Yea right, My wife had a PGW worker ( Gas Works) knock on the door saying that he needed to check for a possible leak
      He was wearing PGW garb but when she asked for ID he said it was in the truck and would be right back. He never did come back.
      We called PGW asking and they said that no one was scheduled for our address. ALLWAYS ask for ID before letting someone into your house.

  6. This tech still has a job with Verizon by Caffeinated+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact the Verizon tech still has a job is interesting.
    "In the months since this incident, his conduct has been blameless. As a result, we will not take further action," Young said.
    The lesson here is if you work for Verizon you get to punch the customers as long as you only do it every now and then.

    1. Re:This tech still has a job with Verizon by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well its a bad situation. The guy should have been fired for committing assault on the customer. More to the point though is this is a cry for money when verizon is not the person who snapped. He should be going after the tech guy for any damages.

      Bullshit. Verizon not only didn't do a background check and hired this guy and sent him to the customer's home (when it turns out they didn't need to even send him in the first place); when the guy beats the crap out of the customer they don't apologize -- in fact they call him "blameless" -- and they don't even fire the guy, practically guaranteeing this will happen again.

  7. And he's still running service! by Tsar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Verizon spokesman Rich Young said the company has "zero tolerance for any sort of unethical or illegal behavior" and noted Benjamin was not convicted of any crime. "In the months since this incident, his conduct has been blameless. As a result, we will not take further action," Young said.

    Wow, they've gotten no complaints from the HUNDREDS of homes they've sent this guy into since "this incident." Makes you feel warm and trusting all over, doesn't it?

    Apparently "zero tolerance" doesn't mean the same thing to Verizon that it does where I work. Do they at least give their service techs "___ Days without Attacking a Customer" buttons?

  8. I'd much rather read this... by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In "The Armed Citizen" in American Rifleman than on Slashdot.

    1. Re:I'd much rather read this... by rainer_d · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It also doesn't happen a lot here in Switzerland, where all the adult male natives have assault riffles and ammunition at home (in case the country gets invaded).
      If the society is shit, banning guns is useless. Just ask the stabbed teenagers in the UK.
      That said, I don't really want to own a weapon (other than my exquisite collection of kitchen knives).
      Most of the problems the western world has (drugs, violence) are only symptoms of the decay of a society that has no direction, no leadership, no common consensus, no purpose other than monetary gains.
      While societies need regulation, laws, the sheer existence of laws (and even strict enforcement) doesn't automatically make those societies safer per-se.
      Politicians want to make us believe the opposite, though.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  9. Think Twice by CodeInspired · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is so damn funny. If we all start punching people in the face when they ask stupid questions, I'm guessing they will start RTFM. I'm off to the gym to start training.

  10. Percussive Maintenance by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Funny

    NO CARRIER

  11. Re:Yay, lets sue the company he works for! by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The company didn't fire him, and the DA declined to press charges. So yeah, he's really pissed off that all he wanted was proof that the guy claiming to be a phone tech really was a phone tech, and he got punched 3 times in the face, strangled, and chased down the stairs. And Verizon is just like "Well he wasn't convinced, we can't punish him, have a nice day sir." Lolsuit is his only option left.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  12. People don't just attack random strangers(?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "People don't just attack random strangers, there is always a reason."

    You're kidding, right? Have you ever worked a job that dealt with the public? Have you ever walked down the street in a major city? Have you ever visited a bar? I've seen plenty of one-sided situations and I suspect a lot of people on Slashdot have also.