Slashdot Mirror


Bioreactors Engineer Tissue To Mend Heart Damage

Hugh Pickens writes "Heart attacks usually cause irreversible damage to heart muscle and, because cells lost from the heart do not grow back naturally, leave the organ in a weakened and vulnerable state that may cause another serious condition — called heart failure — if the victim survives. Now a team of scientists led by Tal Dvir from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beer-Sheva has developed a tissue-engineering technique, using the body as a 'bioreactor,' to create a 'patch' made from heart muscle that can be used to fix scarring left over from a heart attack. First, a biodegradable 'scaffold' is seeded with immature cells taken from the hearts of newborn rats. For 48 hours, the scaffold is exposed to a cocktail of growth-promoting chemicals in the laboratory and is then transplanted into a rat's abdomen where it develops a network of blood vessels and muscle fibers. After seven days the patch is removed and grafted onto the animal's heart. A month later the patch has completely integrated itself into the heart, synchronizing its 'beat' with that of the surrounding tissue. 'Using the body as a bioreactor to engineer cardiac tissue with stable and functional blood vessel networks represents a significant improvement in cardiac patch performance over ex vivo (outside the body) methods currently used for patch production,' write the authors. The technique is also being developed for livers and bladders."

46 comments

  1. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it's sad that a monetary incentive is necessary for people to create cool, useful stuff that can better mankind...

  2. Great by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we just need a supply of newborn humans to take heart cells from, and we'll be able to apply the same technique :D

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron. You need newborn rats to make this technique work. Duhhh

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or stem cells.... but they won't let us use those either.

    3. Re:Great by snl2587 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I propose we use the Irish children.

    4. Re:Great by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah yeah, funny. But there's a very serious side to this joke. Where *are* all these cells going to come from? Well, it looks like the answer is just about here - YOU! See, scientists are rapidly unlocking the code behind what is a "stem cell" and are able to reprogram them to be whatever you want them to be.

      In the (near!) future, you may be able to regenerate heart tissue, liver tissue, or (in my case) new teeth, simply by taking a small skin scraping, culturing the cells, reprogramming them into stem cells, or into whatever type of cell is actually needed - teeth, heart, liver, or whatever.

      The resulting tissue could then be surgically implanted with zero risk of rejection, since they are cells from your own body, with your DNA/RNA and so on!

      This is a brave new world that includes (at last!) a cure for Type I Diabetes, Parkinsons, heart disease, bad teeth, and too many other illnesses to name.

      For example, there was a cure for Diabetes YEARS AGO called the Edmonton Protocol that had the unfortunate side effect of requiring hundreds of donor cadavers. I was, for a while, intensely excited (one of my oldest sons is Type 1 Diabetic) but the donor cadavers does present just a *bit* of a problem.

      But suddenly, now, donors aren't a problem. If I need islet cells, I can donate a bit of skin tissue! Or even have a liposuction!

      This isn't big. This isn't huge. This is world-changing.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone hasn't read "A Modest Proposal", I see.

    6. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is this modded troll?

    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be world changing, but it certainly isn't in the near future. It's a scaling problem: any human-useful structure is hundreds of grams of tissue. Even with exponential growth, stem cell labs have trouble producing single digit grams of cells, let alone intact tissues of millimeter thickness.

      This stuff works pretty well in mice and rats - ectopic formation and vascularization of muscle has been known for years - because those animals are small enough that useful tissue can get its initial nutrition by diffusion. Think 100 microns, paper-thin. To generate a human-useful tissue replacement, you'd need to start with a vascularized construct, and that's a long way off. We'll get there, but I think we're as far from stem-cell mediated tissue replacement as the Wright brothers were from the moon.

    8. Re:Great by Dodder · · Score: 1

      Cool. So what's that? About 60-65 years away? Sounds about right. I might make it.

    9. Re:Great by theelectron · · Score: 1

      Because someone hasn't read 'A Modest Proposal', has no sense of humor, and thought the 'politically correct' thing to do would be to mod it troll. Ah, the uneducated/politically correct crowd!

    10. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, over 4 hours later, it still is modded troll. Will no literate person fix the injustice?! Wait... do mods usually have the ability to read?

  3. Re:Just wait by snl2587 · · Score: 1

    ...in Israel?

  4. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really think they get all their funding from the government?

    http://www.soroka.org/about

  5. Re:Just wait by pchan- · · Score: 2, Informative

    This research was done in Israel, a country that has (*gasp*) nationalized health care.

  6. Motown will never be the same by SlappyBastard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Motown will never be the same now that we can answer back to the song "What Becomes of the Broken Hearted?"

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  7. How casually evil by ZackSchil · · Score: 2, Funny

    "First, a biodegradable 'scaffold' is seeded with immature cells taken from the hearts of newborn rats."

    Next, moisten the scaffolding with the tears of orphaned fur seal cubs. Add the growth media consisting of ground up puppy bones and in 3 or 4 weeks, you will see the first growth in your heart patch.

    Unfortunately, this technique seems inadequate to patch my empty heart. No matter how many times I try.

    1. Re:How casually evil by fractoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Unfortunately, this technique seems inadequate to patch my empty heart. No matter how many times I try.

      Try using enough small children as cell donors.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:How casually evil by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No, no. You have to 'moisten' the 'scaffolding' with the 'tears' of 'orphaned' 'fur' seal 'cubs.'

    3. Re:How casually evil by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much will take to scientists start to grow entire human organs in a lab...

      It will somewhat simplify these moral questions.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    4. Re:How casually evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a grain of truth in your "casually evil" protocol. The growth media most commonly used in tissue culture labs around the world is supplemented with Fetal Bovine Serum, which is derived from blood collected from unborn calves. So, no ground up puppies, but the blood of almost fully-developed calves isnÂt too far off!

  8. Re:Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... http://www.soroka.org/friends ... you too can be a friend! Just give us the money our government won't!

  9. Re:Just wait by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Wow, about as insightful as the deathpanel nonsense.

    First off...what? Research isn't driven by insurance companies, so I'm having a hard time understanding how that would remove incentives of any type. With nationalized healthcare are people going to still have heart attacks? Yes. Are people going to pay a lot of money for this to recover from a heart attack? Yes. Are people going to fund research like this? Obviously. I'm not seeing anything to suggest that our health insurance industry is responsible for any innovation besides the new ways of denying coverage they find. I realize I'm not an expert in the insurance field, so I'm willing to listen to your evidence as to how researchers in Israel (which APPEARS TO HAVE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE) are funded by our healthcare system.

    You seem to be suffering from the notion that the only reason researchers, doctors, and scientists come up with stuff is to make a boatload of money. That's absurd. That is a motivating factor for some researchers. Definitely not all, and definitely not most. Maybe that's why most medical doctors get into the biz, but as a scientist currently earning less than I would on unemployment... no. Just no. Even if it weren't for the money, there'd still be the accolades (beyond /. of course), the respect, the research grants, the good feeling that comes from coming up with something that saves lives, and the satisfaction that comes from discovery, to drive them on.

    Hell, I'm a grad student, so I am proof the accolades, money, respect, grants, and good feelings of any type are even dispensable: some of us do it because we're masochists.

  10. hooray! by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another new technology! Hope it's not so expensive that my insurance company will deny it to me. Or my government, if that's how the tail swings. In fact, maybe I'll just go sit under a tree and die. It will be more romantic. Romantic in the artistic sense, which is the kind all slashdotters can relate to.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:hooray! by Korbeau · · Score: 0, Troll

      Did you mean romantic in the anal-lube sense?

    2. Re:hooray! by weirdo557 · · Score: 0

      i am very interested in your ideas and would like to subscribe to your blog.

    3. Re:hooray! by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      This being slashdot, and slashdot being what it is, I think you meant autistic.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    4. Re:hooray! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Really, I've been trying to figure out, what exactly would romance be like in the autistic sense?

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:hooray! by Bazer · · Score: 3, Funny

      In fact, maybe I'll just go sit under a tree and die. It will be more romantic. Romantic in the artistic sense, which is the kind all slashdotters can relate to.

      I don't get it. Is it a binary tree?

    6. Re:hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is far more likely that your insurance company would deny it to you because it's an experimental treatment, and they would probably continue to consider it experimental for the next twenty or thirty years.

    7. Re:hooray! by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I'm picturing a lot of drooling, head banging and padding.

      Kind of like my senior year in high school.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  11. Re:Just wait by Moryath · · Score: 4, Informative

    Israel doesn't quite have "Nationalized health care" in the way you're claiming.

    Israel's system is much closer to the Massachusetts system whereby insurance is compulsory, but multiple organizations still compete for members (they each get a percentage of the national fund equal to their registered percentage of population). Organizational differences (most notably, that the free "minimum care" package provided to all Israelis is not nearly as comprehensive as what Massachusetts demands as a minimum-coverage standard, and most Israelis wind up purchasing "supplemental packages" at increased expense) account for why Israel's system is not failing, whereas Massachusetts's model has gone deeply into the red.

  12. Will they mend all broken hearts ? by parallel_prankster · · Score: 0

    What about the hearts broken of geeks by hot blondes all over the world ?

    1. Re:Will they mend all broken hearts ? by Korbeau · · Score: 1

      If your heart is broken by a blonde you're not a geek!

      A real geek's heart breaks when his water-cooling system breaks ...

    2. Re:Will they mend all broken hearts ? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      A blonde broke my water cooling system, you insensitive clod.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  13. Re:Just wait by sonicmerlin · · Score: 0

    Actually it hasn't gone into the red at all. That is entirely false. It is in fact a source of pride for the state that so many people are joining up. They allocated a specific budget based on how many people they thought would sign up for the program. As the popularity of the program grew more people than they expected began to join, and now they are preparing to increase the annual budget to cover the costs.

  14. axlotl tanks, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, just a *bit* further and wars will be fought over 'harvesting women' again, but this time to convert them into axlotl (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_of_the_Dune_universe) tanks...

  15. Say it... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    ...three times fast:
    Tal Dvir from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beer-Sheva
    Tal Dvir from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beer-Sheva
    Tal Dvir from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beer-Sheva

    Blarrrrrurrrurrr. Uck!