Slashdot Mirror


NVIDIA Predicts 570x GPU Performance Boost

Gianna Borgnine writes "NVIDIA is predicting that GPU performance is going to increase a whopping 570-fold in the next six years. According to TG Daily, NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang made the prediction at this year's Hot Chips symposium. Huang claimed that while the performance of GPU silicon is heading for a monumental increase in the next six years — making it 570 times faster than the products available today — CPU technology will find itself lagging behind, increasing to a mere 3 times current performance levels. 'Huang also discussed a number of "real-world" GPU applications, including energy exploration, interactive ray tracing and CGI simulations.'"

15 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then we can use our GPUs as our CPUs!

    1. Re:Goody! by MarkRose · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yo dawg, I herd you like CPUs, so I put a CPU in your GPU so you can still get work done in vi while emacs is loading!

      --
      Be relentless!
  2. So... by XPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have to wait six years to play Crysis?

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
  3. Re:Arbitrary number? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    The marketing guys originally wanted to say 1000x, but when they ran it past the engineers, the engineers couldn't stop laughing at such a ridiculous assertion. The marketing guys kept lowering the number, but the engineers just couldn't stop laughing. 570x is how low they got before the engineers passed out from laughing so much, which the marketing guys interpreted as agreement.

  4. The big question is. by Dyinobal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will I need a separate power supply or two to run these new video cards? or will they include their own fission reactors?

  5. 570x is not that far by gravos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep in mind that is only ~3x per year because 3^6 = 729. If Moore's law holds with a 2x every 18 months that would be 16x in 6 years 570/16 = 35.652. The sixth root of 35 is 1.8. So they only have to improve the architecture by ~2x every year and ride Moore's law.

  6. Nope! by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then we can use our GPUs as our CPUs!

    No No. GPU's only become CPU's when they are 570.34567 times faster. You will note that he precisely said only 570 times faster. That is he did not say an even 600 or 1000 or 500, but precisely 570, so we can assume he knew it was not 570.34567.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  7. Re:But how? by santiago · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you crazy? Why would I buy a GPU now if they're going to be 570 times faster in just a few years? I'd just be wasting my money!

  8. Bitchin' fast! 3D by Mursk · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
  9. Re:Predictions of the future by C18H27NO3+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll obviously need a Turbo button on it set in the off position until such time that the CPUs catch up.

  10. Re:% VS Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So a 100% increase would be 1.0X faster?

  11. Re:Arbitrary number? by Zen-Mind · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everybody knows that 73% of people will believe anything you say when you state numbers in your claims and it rises to 91.7% when you add decimals... :P

  12. Re:Predictions of the future by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

    Either

    • your post contains a false dichotomy, or
    • Angelina Jolie is giving me a blowjob right now

    Neither seem highly unlikely.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  13. Re:Predictions of the future by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

    If graphics card development in the last 10 years is anything to go by, nVidia's plan is that the GPU will become 570 times larger, draw 570 times more power and the fan will spin 570 times faster

    At that point, it would effectively become a helicopter, no?

  14. Re:Predictions of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm pretty sure it's the first one. Even Angelina Jolie can't be in two places at the same time.