Slashdot Mirror


PS3-Compatible Phone Coming In October

SpuriousLogic sends along this quote from CVG: 'You may remember reports of Sony's flashy Aino phone earlier this year which can, among other things, connect to a PS3 via Remote Play, giving you full access to your XMB through its tiny screen. Well, Sony's revealed that the Aino is now just weeks away from release in October, and spewed all the details prospective buyers need to know about the device. ... Remote Play with Aino lets you turn your PS3 on and off, browse and control the XMB and access the internet browser from anywhere in the world. Remote Play also lets you control and access the hard drive's media content on the PS3 using the built-in WiFi or 3G connections via Aino. You can also access the PlayStation Store via Remote Play or chat with friends via the PlayStation Network. It is also possible to buy and download a new game from the Store via Aino so it is ready and waiting for you when you get home.'

12 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. Headline could have been phrased better by joeflies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    such as "Phone with PS3 Remote Control Coming in October". Saying it's PS3-compatible would lead one to think that it runs PS3 software.

    1. Re:Headline could have been phrased better by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Compatible" arguably means different things by context.

      As you say, "iPhone compatible headphones" does not imply "headphones that can run stuff from the app store". This is because headphones never run applications(pedants may argue that the DSP baked in to high end noise cancellation headphones counts; but not really) and nobody expects them to. By contrast "IBM compatible PC" is (when the vendor wasn't lying) precisely a statement about a device's ability to run a particular class of software; because the context, that of computers, implies that that is what "compatible" means.

      Given that the use of phones to run applications enjoys a higher profile than the use of phones as remote controls(and, even in those cases where they are used as remotes, this is generally done through an application), it isn't wildly unreasonable to assume that "compatible" means "software compatible, at least in some sense".

      Given history, I suspect that the headline could be more accurately rewritten to say "Sony-Ericcson releases high-end dumbphone defined by a couple of genuinely interesting features and a lot of mediocrity(just like all the other times they've done that), also functions as a bluetooth remote for one specific home theatre device".

    2. Re:Headline could have been phrased better by iknowcss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but the ambiguity instils curiosity, and curiosity brings clicks.

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    3. Re:Headline could have been phrased better by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your post was WAAAY too intelligent and informative of a reply to the OP's idiotic comment... so I'll dumb down the thread with the same quote I always use when Sony comes up with something non-standardized/useless/absurd:

      "Sony - some motherfuckers always trying to ice skate uphill..."

  2. nice marketing by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's sounds a little.. whats the word... pointless!

    --
    Gone!
  3. Could be nice for the target audience by Lorienthin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though I am not really one to be sitting on the couch texting/talking on the phone, I can see that the targeted audience would actually quite enjoy this. Personally, my coffee table is pretty pack as it is, and having one less remote/controller there could indeed be a boon. One feature I think would be nice, and maybe it is not too far off in the future, would be to have your send button on your cell phone tieable to the pause button on the remote. This way, if someone calls, you could just answer the phone, and your movie would pause.

  4. I'd rather have... by popo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather have a phone that plays PS1 games than a phone that talks to my PS3.

    You'd think someone would realize that there's an instant bestseller with any handheld version of a past (non-handheld) console ...

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:I'd rather have... by Fallen+Seraph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ummm, I hate to break it to you, but your derision of it for running through an emulator is kind of absurd, since there's no real alternative to that when you're moving to such massively different scales in size, and are using an entirely different media. you want the PSP to be CD player sized to accommodate your old discs so they won't be "ripped and converted"? That aside, the PS3's RemotePlay of PS1 games technically runs the original disc, on the original PS1 chip, and just streams it over the network to the PSP... So no ripping, conversion, or even emulation (well, depending on which PS3 you have. Some of them do have to emulate it, but I happen to have one of the models which doesn't). Though coming back to the ripped, converted, or emulated PS1 games, what are you expecting from backward compatibility? The 360 can't play the entire Xbox library either, and the Wii's virtual console is essentially nothing more than a bunch of licensed emulators and ROMs. So... what was your complaint again?

  5. Does everything except what you want to do by Kainaw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Remote "play" is a misnomer. You cannot "play". The same thing already exists with the PSP. You can poke around your PS3 remotely, but can't play games (and you can't even watch a DVD or BluRay movie). If Sony wants to push this, they need to turn Remote Play into Remote PLAY, not Remote Browse. Then, they have a market. You still working on Ziamat on FFXII and need to take a bathroom break? Grab your phone (or PSP) and continue playing remotely. No problem.

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
  6. Slashvertisment by kalayq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Need I say more?

  7. A better alternative by StreetStealth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a feature that could indeed be convenient, but will it sell a phone? There's a vast number of criteria on which to base a phone choice, and a nice-but-not-life-changing feature like this seems like an extremely tough sell by itself.

    Here's what I think Sony should have done (and could still do): instead of building a phone with this feature, build a protocol with the feature. License it out to third parties, and watch as various ecosystems pick it up. Build, or license someone to build, something on Symbian, BREW, WinMo, or how about the obvious: an iPhone app?

    A protocol would open the doors to a bona-fide advancement in Sony's gaming platform. A single phone is just an interesting sideshow.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  8. Not for North America by olsmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is for the UK only.