Slashdot Mirror


Slow Oracle Merger Leads To Outflow of Sun Projects, Coders

An anonymous reader writes "Sun Microsystems might have had a chance if the Oracle merger had gone through quickly, but between the DoJ taking its time and the European Commission, which seems to get off on abusing American firms, just plain dragging its feet, that won't happen now. As Sun twists in the wind, unable to defend itself, and Oracle is unable to do anything until the deal closes, IBM is pretty much tearing Sun to shreds. By the time this deal closes, there won't be much left for Oracle. This is not how a Silicon Valley legend should end."

28 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. FUD article by hexghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stupid article - so three coders (JRuby team) quit, and Sun's losing in sales to IBM (which they were doing anyway before the merger).

    1. Re:FUD article by MaerD · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It isn't AIX from IBM that's burying Solaris, it's Linux.

      At the fortune 100 companies I've worked with, AIX was legacy and stagnant, and being retired as quickly as possible. Solaris was losing servers to Linux starting with the web/application servers and moving into the Database space (replacing Oracle and DB2, in some cases with Mysql for smaller databases). Applications that could be run on virtualization were the next big thing to move to Linux. If they could replace large sun boxes (and expensive sun hardware/software service contracts) with a bunch of 1Us or Blades connected to a SAN, it was done.

      At one financial institution it was even mandated that Linux be tested before any other Unix because of the cost savings.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    2. Re:FUD article by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm confused. You're looking for an enterprise database, but you're ignoring the company that makes the best platform for running the most successful enterprise database... because it is in the process of being bought by the company that makes the most successful enterprise database? I sincerely hope I never have to work with anyone who makes decisions based on the same logic as you.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Not news, is it? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When a company is taken over, the corporate "feel" usually suffers. I have seen a few companies that were taken over from the inside (I experienced the take-over itself in one occasion), and the employers were never happy with it. And as always, the best people have the best chances, so they leave first...

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  3. Re:European Commission SUCKS by bhima · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps, it's just that the European Commission is just slightly less beholden to corporations than their counterparts in the US.

    As far as I can tell their slowness to sign on to other corporatist things coming from the US has been a pretty good thing.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  4. Huh? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not how a Silicon Valley legend should end.

    How should they end?

    Spectacular bankruptcy like Enron?

    Seems like most in silicon valley do a slow fade into oblivion and are eventually acquired for peanuts and never heard from again. 3DO, Transmeta, Borland, Quarterdeck, SGI, etc...

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Huh? by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points today because this is one of the most insightful and simple things I have seen posted on Slashdot.
      Engineers need interesting work and great colleagues. Without those things, the great engineers will bail and a vicious downward spiral will begin. This is why I am never surprised when government sponsored information system re-writes spend millions of dollars and never finish (California DMV).

  5. Blaming the Govt. Strawman by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The summary places a lot of blame on regulators. But in fact, the article quotes IBM claiming the announcement of the acquisition is what drove people to IBM; that obviously has nothing to do with subsequent delays. As for talent leaving, the article provides one example of 3 employees who left because they were unsure of Oracle's commitment to their work. However, there is no reason to assume the EU or DOJ have anything to do with this. Oracle could have reassured them at any time, if they knew, and cared, which isn't a very realistic expectation for a small team in a big merger. What is motivating the story submitter to put so much unwarranted blame at the feet of the EU and DOJ?

    1. Re:Blaming the Govt. Strawman by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government comes into play because they're taking an enormously long time to approve the merger. This allows IBM and its ilk more time than they normally would have to poach customers before Oracle can step in and engage in concrete action to stop the bleeding. So, the government delays do play a role. Yes, Oracle could try (and has tried) to reassure everyone that it will be business as usual with the hardware segment, but until they're able to actually take control of that segment and do something concrete to convince people, the uncertainty remains. Where uncertainty exists, other companies can come in and exploit it.

      As for the talent leaving, that happens in any merger because, once again, people hate uncertainty. If someone is facing a lot of uncertainty in his job, and has the ability to go elsewhere, he will probably do so. Ironically, the people most likely to move on are often the ones that would have been the most likely to be kept by the new company anyway, since they tend to be the top talent.

    2. Re:Blaming the Govt. Strawman by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oracle could have reassured them at any time, if they knew, and cared, which isn't a very realistic expectation for a small team in a big merger.

      But anyone in that position knows that those assurances aren't worth the air breathed to utter them.

      Given today's job market, if you're in an uncertain position, and you get a good offer elsewhere that seems more certain -- you take it.

      What happens if the regulators deny the merger application? If you've stuck around, now you're in a lame-duck company and you can see your employer has lost a large portion of your customer base to IBM.

      What happens if the merger is accepted? At least now you've got a chance of your employer taking advantage of Oracle's sales & marketing force, etc. That is, if you're not let go as a result of the merger.

      In short, employees are leaving Sun because they don't like uncertainty. Never mind the customers leaving Sun for the same reason (amongst other reasons).

      The length of time it's taking for the review process is definitely a factor.

      That said, I think the review is important, and I hope it's taking so long because of thoroughness, not because of some stupid attempt to hamstring American companies.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  6. Re:European Commission SUCKS by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nah, if it were just that, they'd have said yes or no by now. It seems they really do like abusing american corps.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  7. Really? Got any evidence? by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Evidence in the form of the number of actions taken against American firms, as opposed to actions taken against European firms would really help make your case. For bonus points, show that American firms don't actually deserve the 'abuse' by committing more crimes than their European counterparts. Without some sort of evidence, your post is simply pro-American, anti-European jingoism. Probably boiling down to either 'Capitalism GOOD, socialism BAD!' or simple flag waving nationalism, rather than any kind of logical thought process.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Really? Got any evidence? by xaxa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But $1.5B is in proportion to the fines given to some European companies. (And EU companies are fined by the EU, but it doesn't make the news in the USA.)

      (PS Post in ~4 hours when all us Europeans are asleep, and the Americans will mod you up.)

    2. Re:Really? Got any evidence? by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. Shipping WMP with Windows was a crime, as was not providing a browser choice tool. Anti-competitive actions taken by a monopoly are a crime in most jurisdictions. The EU has gone after plenty of European companies for the same things.

      Your post is yet more fact free jingoism.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Really? Got any evidence? by spun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are trying to make your case by presenting one side. You've shown absolutely nothing to prove that the EU does not do the same thing to EU companies. You have also not shown that the US companies did not deserve the criminal and civil sanctions they received.

      Oh, and Boeing doesn't need Airbus flight software, Boeing's is better. Yet we don't see Boeing getting hit by the EU.

      Just out of curiosity, your citations are so one sided, where are you getting your data from? Does Fox News have a Two Minute Hate spot on the nasty socialist EU nowadays?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  8. Re:Meh. by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, are you saying American businesses are too stupid to avoid bad business situations? You make it sound as if you think of Europe as our enemy, rather than our staunchest allies. I mean, how DARE they provide better health care for less money than we do and make our capitalist health care system look bad? How DARE they get 32 hour work weeks with minimum one month of vacation. Here we are, working our asses off, and we aren't any happier than them for it. The bottom 80% of our society aren't any richer for it, either. That's just not fair, and obviously, they are evil for not fellating their owning class like we do. Why, if they aren't stopped, our peasantry might just get uppity ideas on their heads and start thinking they should get a share in our increase in GDP.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  9. relevance by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Both dTrace and ZFS represent substantial contributions to the state of the art in the operating system world.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  10. So what? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Silicon Valley legend"? Sun made it's fortune by taking BSD Unix and commercializing it, selling it pre-installed on boxes. Sure, most of the enhancements made to PCs over the years appeared years earlier on Sun workstations (e.g. CD-ROM drives, sound cards, and Ethernet), but ever since the rise of Linux as a viable alternative to Unix, Sun has been floundering about looking for a viable business model. Spark CPUs? Give me a break; no matter how good the initial design was, if you don't have the several billion dollars a year Intel is putting into R&D to improve the chips, you're fighting a losing battle. Java? Great idea, but you give it away for free, and never have figured out how to make money off of it. Now they can't compete in hardware with off-the-shelf X86 boxes, and they can't compete in software with Linux (being supported by their rival IBM). In short, they have no real business model and no real reason to continue existence. Oracle is doing them a favor by offering to buy them out. Oracle has been trying for years to sell a database appliance with Oracle preinstalled, but they keep running up against that "can't compete with off-the-shelf X86 boxes" barrier too. Sure, Sun invokes fond nostalgia for many, many Unix nerds, but face it -- it's dead, Jim.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  11. Re:Oracle is OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The large apps on the internet are all moving away from RDBMS and into scalable key value stores.

    And when those who've migrated discover in a few years that they can no longer manage their data in any meaningful fashion, they'll re-invent the wheel, give it a shiny new name, and waste cubic miles of breath denying that this is what they've done.

  12. Re:Meh. by malelder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    US health care system is fine. The US health insurance system sucks balls though.

    --


    Yuma, AZ...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
  13. Re:Oracle is OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem isn't being an Oracle employee, it's being an Oracle customer. That seems to be a seriously negative experience for a lot of people.

  14. Re:Oracle is OK by hibiki_r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever try to do GIS in a key-value store? Statistical analysis? Data mining? Billing?

    Key value stores are great for high throughput applications that have very simple and predictable access modes. But for anything else, you are much better of with a RDBMS.

    The front line customer apps is not where the money is. It never was, and it never will.

  15. Re:What's EC got to do with it? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can the European Commission block the merger of two US firms?

    The short answer is that they can't. The companies are free to go ahead and merge without receiving EU permission. They are also free to not sell anything in the EU or be fined heavily if they attempt to do so. I doubt that Oracle wants to give up this lucrative market.

    Why do so many of my fellow Americans have trouble understanding this? Are you dense? Governments do this sort of thing. They actually want to have a say about what gets sold in their countries and by whom. And, frankly, what you think of the practice is irrelevant, unless you can get enough people to agree to convince our government to negotiate a treaty or declare war, since you have no voice in any government but that of the US. Suck it up...

    --
    That is all.
  16. Nice bit of jingoism there... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..the European Commission, which seems to get off on abusing American firms...

    Oh, horseshit. I've worked in American companies with European offices for years and have seen no such thing. Europeans are just as happy to take American dollars as anyone else. The EC countries do, however, have rather more stringent antitrust laws than the United States (and more consumer protections, more privacy laws, and so on). If you do business in a country, you have to respect their laws, just as European countries doing business in the US have to respect our laws (or our lawlessness in many matters). That Microsoft and Oracle -- two companies that are hardly well-loved here -- have had trouble in Europe hardly constitutes a pattern of "abusing American firms".

    It may be that the real issue here is that Oracle, like Microsoft, gets off on anti-competitive practices, and as a result often finds itself up against laws against the same, in Europe as well as the US.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  17. Re:Meh. by Atario · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you think the US health care system is legitimately "the best", tell me by which measure.

    By massive corporate profits, of course.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  18. IBM tearing Sun to shreds by jwhitener · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read the 'tearing sun to shreds' article and it sure was exaggerated.

    The article title is "Defections Batter Sun Micro.".....whatever. Three jruby developers left, and they didn't go to IBM.

    Next the article talks about 170 sun customers going to IBM. And then mentions that none of Sun's big customers have switched to IBM. I wasn't able to find the total Sun customer count...but I'll take a guess and say that 170 is less than 1% of their total.

    I know that Sungard.com's Luminis portal for higher ed is mostly installed on Solaris, and there are 75+ installations of that one application alone. One app (Luminis), for one business type (Edu), is nearly half of this "massive exodus" away from Sun.... give me a break hehe.

  19. Re:Meh. by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a nice analysis of the study, thanks.

    However flawed, having lived in both France and the USA (as well as other countries) I have an opinion of course. I can attest that the level of care in France is pretty good (choice of doctor and general quality of care) as well as easily and cheaply accessible for all. I have a good friend being treated for cancer right now in France, and she is treated completely for free, with the best treatment available in the literature for her condition as far as I have been able to research, even though she is actually not French and currently unemployed. She will continue to get free care until she is cured (which, thank God, looks likely). That is pretty good in my book. This is not a isolated case, this is a policy.

    Now in the US I have another friend who went through childbirth in a hospital L.A., a throroughly normal birth took place with zero complication, she spent 3 days in hospital with her baby, and was billed $15k by the hospital and $5k by her gynecologist. Her husband being currently not unemployed, her insurance took most of the bill but she still had a few hundred US$ to pay.

    I'm sure everyone have their favourite horror story but here is another one on the US health care. Yet another friend of mine came back to college in Texas (A&M Uni.) from Ivory Coast sick with malaria. The college hospital did not find what was wrong with her. After a few days of very high temperature, she was transfered to Austin, where they suspected everything wrongly and were putting her on the list for liver transplant, until her parents turned up and told the doctors what her condition most likely was. After a few days of a quinine or equivalent regimen she was basically fine again and sent home. However her prolonged stay in hospital blew the ceiling on her insurance and she was left with a debt of many 10s of thousands of US$. With no other rescourse, she went to the TAMU lawyer and sued both hospitals for malpractice. This was settled out of court, and my friend eventually paid nothing, the lawyer worked pro-bono.

    OK, these are perhaps anecdotal, but a bit more than that I think. My wife has had two kids in two different countries, neither being the US, and we never had anything to pay for childbirth. I'm pretty sure that if my malaria-affected friend had been treated in most western countries the doctors would have perhaps apologised for their incompetence and certainly refrained from sending her such an outrageous bill. I'm also pretty sure that you have to look far and wide in the US for a hospital that will give you top-level cancer care for free.

    There you have in a nutshell why the US health system is poorly ranked. Having the best level of care in the world means nothing if one can't afford it, and if public health policies are driven by greed.

    The US people deserve and can afford better.

     

  20. Solaris v Linux, and the role of SPARC by omb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SUN's problem was that they could not figure out What_to_Do, the reason for that was that the founders, Shah, Joy & Bechtalsheim all left and the stars of the second level of management were never sucessfully engaged, and the paren is exactly right, SUN, largely founded by those who jumped ship from DEC faithfully repeated DEC's most significant mistakes,

    the Cult of the CEO, Olsen & McNealy

    transfer control from Engineering to Marketing

    getting into, and spending lots of money on, fights that are Just not Worth Winning, JAVA

    SUN grew, and outpaced Apollo (domain) HP and the when HP bought Apollo's market share, both again.

    But it did not take long for in-fighting and huberis to set in and bring SUN to where they are today,
    so that Oracle is today's Compaq.

    Oracle will kill both the SPARC and Java track as they exist today as neither can be monetized. It will be
    very intersting if Java can succeeed on its merits, I hope not, Python is a far nicer language.