Slashdot Mirror


Slow Oracle Merger Leads To Outflow of Sun Projects, Coders

An anonymous reader writes "Sun Microsystems might have had a chance if the Oracle merger had gone through quickly, but between the DoJ taking its time and the European Commission, which seems to get off on abusing American firms, just plain dragging its feet, that won't happen now. As Sun twists in the wind, unable to defend itself, and Oracle is unable to do anything until the deal closes, IBM is pretty much tearing Sun to shreds. By the time this deal closes, there won't be much left for Oracle. This is not how a Silicon Valley legend should end."

14 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Two different things by aafiske · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There seem to be two points in the article and summary. The one that makes sense is that the slowness of the merger is murdering Sun's business. The other is that the slowness is causing people to leave. I doubt the latter is true. People do not want to work for Oracle, fast merge or slow merge.

  2. Re:Huh? by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That wouldn't end a sun box

    shutdown -i5 -g0 -y

  3. Re:Huh? by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Normally, silicon valley companies end like this:
    • As the company grows, management makes engineering work on boring projects and support issues
    • The top-tier engineers jump ship to newer, smaller companies for more interesting work
    • The company limps along for a while with second-tier engineering
    • The shell of the former company fades into oblivion and/or is bought out
    • The new, exciting companies everyone went to become larger and more successful than the original

    For example, SGI may have died, but nVidia and Mozilla (to name only two) are doing quite well, thanks.

  4. Re:FUD article by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Over the past year we've been looking at enterprise level database platforms. PostgreSQL served us well in development and initial stages of production. Initial consideration was given to SUN, IBM, and Teradata. But it was clear a year ago that SUN's days were numbered. After they started talks with IBM we didn't give SUN much thought after that. Also they lacked a true enterprise level database (sorry MySQL fans, but NDBCLUSTER is still horribly buggy and what we need goes beyond Master/salve replication) & hardware platform and we wanted both from the same vender. Sorry, but I've been in the "It's a hardware problem, no it's a software problem" disputes between venders too many times.

    I know a lot of other businesses who thought the same way once the talks were underway with IBM. Why buy a platform that you don't the future of 6 months from now?

    Which is sort of sad. I worked around Sun machines 12 years ago. We had a few boxes that were from the 1980's running Solaris 2 (or 3 I can't remember now) that were STILL supported. Something went wrong, they sent in the old grey beards to fix it. Same with applications. We had a certified app that broke in Solaris 8 or 9 and Sun sent a team of engineers to help us fix it.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  5. Re:Blaming the Govt. Strawman by LearnToSpell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fundamental truth of the European Union is this: It's intended to attack the United States' economic dominance.

    lulz. That's true of any union. Go look up "softwood lumber," "corn," and "steel," among many, many (many, many, many) other disputes the US is involved in.

    Americans don't seem to realize what a "global economy" truly entails.

  6. Re:Oracle is OK by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oracle is beginning it's own long slow decline. The large apps on the internet are all moving away from RDBMS and into scalable key value stores. Oracle will only get to remain in the G&A aspects of those business, not in the front line internet customer apps. Read 'The Innovator's Dilemma', it is happening to Oracle. Get out while you can.

  7. Forget about the EU - This is Capitalism! by djnewman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really think it's Capitalism at its best! If Sun had been minding the business store and its marketing plan had been sucessful it would not be being eaten by wolves today. It's not reasonable to blame the EU or IBM either. The EU is looking out for itself (and European citizenry), and IBM is doing its job by killing off the competition.

  8. Re:FUD article by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You discuss hardware and software.

    Perhaps you are unaware that IBM is primarily a services company nowadays?

    The hardware and software is a tool to sell services.

    You know that's where Oracle is aiming for growth too, right?

    For all the advantages you see for Solaris over its competition, IBM's service offering is miles ahead of Oracle right now...

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  9. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We weren't in Silicon Valley, but our company ended like this: By 1999 we had grown to two offices and about 70 employees, had an award winning retail product and an online mall. We we're still private. After about 5 unsuccessful tries at getting VC, a Canadian company who processed credit card payments offered to buy us for ~$43M USD. They wanted our mall, so that they could make money in about 6 different ways from it. When the sale was announced but not complete, my stock was worth about $1.8M at their current stock price :) Unfortunately, they missed the point that our retail software was what generated the stores in the mall. As soon as the sale went through in 2000, they stopped development and sales of the retail product, laid off about 30% of us, and then gave the remaining people really stupid things to do for about a year while they slowly figured out what went wrong. At this point I was worth about $800K. :| For 6 months all I did was get paid >$100K/yr to drink coffee, smoke cigarettes, and surf the web. Eventually there was a meeting at which they admitted that their business and our business (now basically dead) were irreconcilably different, and announced they were shutting down all US operations. I was on the street Jan 1, 2001, and my stock was now worth $1200 :( Incredibly, when a group of us that had worked on the retail product approached them asking if we could retain the source, trademarks, remaining stock, etc., with the intent of reviving it, we were told that they would never allow us to do this because it "would look bad to the stockholders". As if blowing $43M didn't look bad enough? D'oh!!

  10. Re:Really? Got any evidence? by samuraiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google is your friend. In Spanish, pluralized words in an acronym double the letter.

  11. Re:Huh? by vbraga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You should try to read How Software Companies Die by Orson Scott Card. A short essay on the same subject as GP. Really nice.

    --
    English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
  12. Re:Say what? by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My experience working in Sun Services, taking care of Gold and Platinium level customers...

    The ECC fiasco with the Blackbirds and following revisions was the bookcase example of how not to treat your customers. Customers were lied to, then lied to some more, then received defective pulls as replacement after 2 errors on the same CPU, then lied some more. Until the scrubber patch got released, my average customer had 2 CPU swaps per week.

    Receiving defective pulls for customers was the norm rather than the exception... sometimes the customer's own defective parts from the previous intervention, RMA box still sealed but with a "tested OK" sticker magically applied on top of the red "DEFECTIVE" sticker. This applied to disks, memory, CPUs, motherboards... all parts really. Making things worse, the standard procedure was to have the parts delivered directly at the customer... so the engineer didn't get a chance to check for DOAs beforehand.

    In the end, the only trick was to order a batch of replacement parts in the hope of having a working one delivered at the customer. Said trick would of course end up damaging your score for the next evaluation... but so would an unsatisfied customer lodging a complaint for substandard support. I gave up, moved to Professional Services then to Pre-sales before leaving.

  13. Re:So what? by catmistake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but ever since the rise of Linux as a viable alternative to Unix, Sun has been floundering about looking for a viable business model.

    That wasn't it. Sun's failures have less to do with linux and probably more to do with marketing taking over the company and messing with the expensive, but rock solid, hardware their clients came to trust -- and replacing them with cheaper variants. When they did this they gambled their niche for larger margins, and they lost. The "rise of Linux" wouldn't even make it as a footnote in the story of the fall of Sun. Linux may have been on servers 10 years ago, but these installations were a joke compared to AIX and Solaris installations at the time. Only in the last few years has linux even come within striking distance of AIX and Solaris... and no, Linux has not yet surpassed what serious admins have come to expect from AIX and Solaris afa uptimes, i.e. staying up under heavy crushing loads.

  14. logic by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are so many people working in the IT industry who are deficient in basic logic, it should scare you. We don't teach it in schools, it's little wonder so many people are so poor at it. We don't teach the basic logical reasoning fallacies, either. We are paying the price for this educational failure in so many ways.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.