Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Attacks Linux With Retail-Training Talking Points

DesiVideoGamer writes "Over at Overclock.net, a user has posted screen-shots from Microsoft's 'ExpertZone' training course entitled 'Linux vs. Windows 7.' This course is available to BestBuy employees and will make them eligible for a $10 copy of Windows 7 upon completion." The screenshots linked show at least some creative interpretations of the state of Linux vs. Windows on a wide range of things, from media playback and video conferencing to ease of updates to (of all things) keeping your PCs "safer." Most of the claims, though, aren't concrete enough to be perfectly refuted. Writes DesiVideoGamer, "I think I now know why, when I enter BestBuy, the employees say the odd lies that they do."

40 of 681 comments (clear)

  1. Sign me up... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

    This course is available to BestBuy employees and will make them eligible for a $10 copy of Windows 7 upon completion.

    I'll take the damn course if it'll get me a $10 copy of Win 7.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Sign me up... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can get a free copy of windows 7 and I don't have to take any bullshit propaganda course.

      It's completely unethical for bestbuy to go along with microsoft on pushing this course onto their employees. Though I can't say I'm surprised.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    2. Re:Sign me up... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Kickbacks" is a dirty word. The Microsoft world prefers "back-end rebates" and "spiffs".

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    3. Re:Sign me up... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why is parent modded troll? If this were the Catholic Church, or the Church of Mormon proselytizing for members, Americans would go after them for violating our freedom of religion laws. If this were a Democratic maneuver for market share, the Republicans would be up in arms. But, it's alright for MS to recruit people to lie to consumers. Parent should be applauded for exercising restraint when he uses the word "unethical".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Sign me up... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Informative

      More expensive doesn't always mean higher margins. That's only the same if the markup is proportional to the cost, which it often isn't.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    5. Re:Sign me up... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I noticed several mild comments in this thread hit with -1, Troll. I think the MS astroturfers have mod points. The joke is on them; if they use up their points now, there will be nothing left later when the really nasty anti-MS stuff comes out.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    6. Re:Sign me up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like Windows 8...

    7. Re:Sign me up... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why hasn't anybody come up with the Linux equivalent of the .dmg file?

      Linux had disk images for long before OS X did, and it's a terrible way of distributing software.

      Seriously, I think you've been brainwashed a bit by the Apple flashiness. Think about what's going on here:

      1. Click download link
      2. Open DMG file
      3. Drag app from DMG to Applications
      4. Drag DMG drive to trash
      5. Drag DMG file to trash
      6. Empty trash

      Every non-technical Mac user I know never gets to step 3. They get to step 2, say "Oh, there's my app!" and double-click it. Which means they run Firefox out of a disk image for years at a time, and never upgrade, because the DMG is read-only and Firefox won't auto-update itself.

      Compare to:

      1. Click the apt-url link
      2. Follow the instructions
      3. There is no step 3, nor any files to clean up.

      In other words, the reason there isn't the "Linux equivalent to the DMG file" is because what we have actually is better, and easier to use, when it works.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    8. Re:Sign me up... by cp.tar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At any rate, does anyone think Microsoft is giving Linux too much publicity? There's people out there that wouldn't dream of running linux, and when they're asking questions wouldn't it be easier to say "I don't know, never heard of it" then have some tech person jump all over them with a barrage of answers?

      They tried that.
      First they ignored Linux. Kept saying it wasn't a threat.
      Then they ridiculed it.
      Now they are fighting it.

      You know what the next step is, right? (It's not PROFIT!, but it's not far either.)

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    9. Re:Sign me up... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Wait until you have a problem with a library when you're making/installing an app, and it's a library that generally needs to be an older version (why wasn't it backwards compatible? who knows?), which is impossible because you have other apps that require the newer version."

      I'm not about to wait until hell freezes over. You see, in Linux, it is entirely common to have multiple different versions of shared libraries and they all coexist just fine. Every single point you made in every post in this thread was blatantly wrong, and shows that you are either a complete moron, haven't tried to use a decent Linux distribution in years, or are a straight M$ shill. Since you are offering up blatant lies about both Linux and Windows, and they all favor the virusOS, I'm betting on the latter.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:Sign me up... by pohl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your response is either obtuse or ignorant. The post you're responding to is clearly not seeking an ABI that is merely stable for him, but rather an ABI that is consistent and stable for the entire platform. Suggesting that he sticks to one particular version for himself does nothing to enable him to walk into a store and know that any arbitrary piece of software would work on his system.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    11. Re:Sign me up... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This will probably get me modded to hell by the FLOSSies, but what the hell, I got karma up the wazoo.

      And this is where I stop reading. Saying things to this effect just so you look like a martyr and get modded up is about as old as sliced bread.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    12. Re:Sign me up... by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Go into a shop, but a webcam, take it home and find that the drivers don't work with the customer's version of Linux they run. You have no idea which one they run, it'll probably be Ubuntu but even then, which version?

      Things don't work like that in Linux.

      You don't insert a CD with webcam software. If webcam is already supported by the kernel, then you plug it in, and it works without any extra messing with stuff. The "if" is of course the problem, but if there's no driver in a recent distro then it's quite likely none exists at all. Fortunately webcam support is very good these days and I've never heard of a webcam that didn't work.

      Regading "which version", it doesn't matter. Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu all support the same hardware. Other distributions of a similar date are unlikely to show any significant differences. You can often see Linux logos on network cards, because the driver is in the kernel, so all distributions get it from there.

      Linux does things differently here, and frankly I prefer the Linux way.

      The Windows way is: The manufacturer provides their own software and driver, possibly for hardware that's not really their own. Manufacturers like Logitech often sell cameras not only by their technical specs but by the software included with them. For instance, the more expensive Logitech cameras have software that will let you stick a beard on your webcam image in Mr. Potato head style, even though the ability has nothing to do with the webcam itself.

      The Linux way is: The chip manufacturer's (hopefully) provides specs. Kernel supports the chip, supporting at once both the Logitech and the Creative webcams using the same hardware, possibly covering 10 different webcams with the same driver. This means that the users of all of those get unified, and if Logitech contributes a bug fix, Creative users get it too. The kernel provides the same interface for all webcams, so that so long it works, the software doesn't care what you have. If you want to stick a beard on yourself, you look for a program that will do that on Linux (haven't looked), which will work both with the most expensive and the cheapest USB1 webcam you can find.

      And that's what I like about the Linux way: The webcam is just hardware and works and such. It doesn't come with some gaudy and buggy piece of software to change settings. Every webcam works with the system in exactly the same way.

    13. Re:Sign me up... by Bralkein · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't really agree with what you're saying, but you make a fair point so that's fine. However:

      So please FLOSSies, quit with the "it a M$ conspiracy!" crap

      Even if what you said is correct, if MS are being a bunch of underhanded arseholes then I think Linux/Free software people have the right to blast them for it. If Microsoft have concocted a scheme to feed lies to people trying to make an informed purchasing decision (and some of the things they say are patent lies) then it doesn't matter if Linux has no stable ABI or even if Linux kills your pet dog, MS are in the wrong and people can reasonably call them out on it if they want to.

    14. Re:Sign me up... by strangedays · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think the poster has a significant point.

      I have been a linux user for many years, various distros; I recently decided to get myself an up to date Ubuntu capable laptop, that would run wifi, etc without 4 hours of installing ndiswrapper or other weird stuff from odd sites.

      Clearly I can order a box from a specialized builder, but I was curious to see of that could be bypassed, apparently not.

      So far I estimate I have spent at least 4 hours trying to identify a laptop I can simply walk in and buy from Sams Club, or any major store, and expect it to run Ubuntu and have the devices work.

      This is not something Jo Internet should even attempt, or be expected to figure out.

      Hardware compatibility lists are basically obscure and useless, and often outdated. The detail is way inadequate.

      I like many HP laptop boxes (price quality choice mix is good), but there are so many variants and so little detail on the installed chipsets, no sane person should try to figure it out. Both dell and HP seem to have recently (quietly) walked away from providing ready to go linux on their sites.

      So what does the linux community expect Jo Internet to do, randomly buy a laptop and hope it works, until an update breaks it silently?

      My Girlfriend (yes, really) recently had a working laptop (HP Pavilion) with working wifi connection (probably the most critical item for most laptop users) which was silently broken by an Ubuntu upgrade. It took me several hours to find the necessary changes, download stuff and fix the driver, security is unavailable. Not acceptable and not someting Jo Internet will do.

      I agree with the posters comment that the purist view of open source is impractical in the real business workld of patents and hostile trolls.

      If there there was a usable and stable binary interface, and the distro's included the install of closed source drivers, then rational self interest will take over and the hardware manufacturers will release drivers, to enable increased sales of their gadgets.

      Clearly there will be anticompetitive actions, which will probably be quietly ignored by our open source hostile and arguably incompetent/corrupt DOJ, (the ludicrous never ending failure of the war on drugs shows the DOJ has no idea what supply and demand even means). Supply and demand always wins in the end. Anticompetitive actions don't really matter in the long run, unless we choose to think they do.

      The problem is not linux, or any distro, or the boot, or the desktop, or Gnome vs KD; The problem is that the wise and ancient Self Appointed Benevolent Dictators For Life have slowly become Self Appointed Barriers to Success.

      This is a common problem in any form of endeavour, when successful it can grow far beyond the capabilites of the original inventors;

      Dear SABDFL's, you have won, the future is going to be open, so take the bows, polish up your egos, do the lecture circuit, write books, FOSS is here to stay, many thanks; now, please let the rest of us do business in the real world.

      Please don't misunderstand me, I am not saying we give up the ideals of open source software and the real freedoms and security it provides.

      Is enabling closed (redistributable) device drivers a slippery slope?

      Not really, it is a necessary evil, so lets not get paranoid, just allow it carefully in the legal licensing and Distros.

      I agree with parent post that we need to provide a hybrid? closed source + open source license structure and a usable Binary Interface, so hardware manufactureres have the business incentives to provide working

      We all want Jo Internet to walk into a store, look for the fat penguin on the box and know the gadget will just work.

      Eventually, there will have been so many boxes sold because of the fat penguin, that business folks may be willing to open source drivers, if that really even matters, (it does not matter to Jo Internet); but until that bright shiny morning arrives, we should simply make it a no brainer for the device driver manufacturers to release working drivers, because it increases their profits.

      --
      There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
    15. Re:Sign me up... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see. "Stable ABI" is the new "Gimp doesn't support CMYK".

      Both false, of course -- CMYK is supported by each and every color printer driver, plus color separation plugins, Linux ABI is stable enough that Quake 3 runs on any current x86 Linux box, neither has even a slightest degree of relevance for users.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    16. Re:Sign me up... by rnaiguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fortunately webcam support is very good these days and I've never heard of a webcam that didn't work.

      HAHAHAHAHA!

      I spent ~3 months trying to get my philips webcam working in Ubuntu 9.04. By the end of it, I had only managed to get it to show an image that looks like the output of an infrared camera, and a blank screen in skype. In the end I had to go back to my older webcam, which still requires me to run skype with a script to preload some v4l component.

      The webcam support is getting better, but it sure as hell needs work.

      Lets not even start on the hell i went through this last week getting my tv tuner working, which was "supported" according to linuxtv.org.

      I still prefer linux, but every time i go through something like this, a part of me wishes I had gone for dual-booting with windows.

      These are the kinds of things I think people will want to do more and more with their computers in the future, and if the linux setup experience is not easy, people won't want to deal with it and retailers sure as hell won't want to deal with all the complaints and tech support.

    17. Re:Sign me up... by DavidTC · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have no idea how 'Linux drivers' even slightly work, do you?

      No piece of hardware ever comes with Linux drivers. Maybe a few barely-supported things a decade ago, but not any recent stuff.

      This is because, unlike Windows, Linux doesn't expect hardware manufacturers to make their own shitty drivers that crash all the time because they're a hardware company and don't know how to write software.

      Something like 90% of Windows blue screens post-Windows 98 are because of third-party hardware drivers. XP onwards stopped applications from being able to crash Windows, but there's not a damn thing it can do about shitty drivers. Now they have this 'certification' thing that works somewhat, but hardware companies are not software companies, and still cannot write good software.

      This is why Linux drivers come with the kernel, and why kernel developers write them. Of course, the company is free to write their own and submit it to the kernel devs, but that's the distribution point, not some driver CD.

      There is nothing stopping hardware manufacturers from saying, in the requirements, 'Linux kernel 2.6.4 or greater', and many, of course, actually do.

      In fact, Linux is basically the only OS that you can be sure hardware devices that worked on a version of it in 2000 still work on modern version, which makes your entire premise absurdly idiotic. Linux may sometimes suffer by not having the absolutely newest hardware support, but it has about 10x the backwards compatibility that Windows has. The devices that used to be supported under Linux but are not anymore are probably countable on two hands, whereas there's plenty of XP stuff out there that will never get signed Vista drivers, just like there was plenty of stuff under 98 that never got XP drivers.

      This is because the company is in charge of updating them, and they don't give a flying fuck about supporting hardware they don't sell anymore. In fact, they'd rather that old hardware didn't work, because they've got some new stuff to sell you. Whereas with Linux, the kernel people are in charge of keeping the driver updated, and hardware will only stop working if some kernel APIs change enough to break it and no one bothers fix it so it gets removed. (Recently, Linux lost the ability, as it redid its entire IDE/PATA/SATA/SCSI support to be in one unified driver, to read MFM hard drives. Aka, pre-IDE. No one seemed to mind.)

      It's somewhat hilarious to hear anyone talk about a 'kernel ABI' on Linux. Man, the Windows kernel ABI and API changes every release, making all hardware manufacturers update, or not, their drivers. Whereas 99% of Linux drivers are already in the kernel, and just change along with it and keep working. It's only the companies that insist on releasing their own drivers that have problems.

      Now, WRT to software ABI, there's a valid concern. Or, at least, it was. A long time ago. Nowadays it's trivially easy to release commercial software for Linux that works fine. You put an install script on a CD, you have that either use the package manager (either dpkg or rpm, you can include both on the CD and use whichever one the OS is) or you don't bother with that and just put it in it's own /opt/ directory. Then you stick icons in the right place for Gnome and KDE to pick them up.

      If the libaries it needs aren't found, you can install your own, either compat libs for the entire OS, or just in your own directory.

      Anyone who can't package software for Linux and have it work on any full-fledged Linux distro made in the last five years shouldn't be writing software.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Sign me up... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know what'd be funnier: Microsoft actually paying people to spend time on Slashdot, or people like you who believe this is even a plausible story. It makes Slashdot appear very important, I know. But it isn't.

      They in fact do pay a PR firm (Waggener Edstrom) handsome amounts of money to do lots of stuff, including recruiting shills to "independently" review and blog favorably about their products, including conducting pro-MS Twitter campaigns, and the list goes on. Microsoft's history of astroturfing various forums in an attempt to influence opinion (directly or through PR lackeys) is well-known. The idea that they wouldn't deign to waste their time on slashdot is either deceitful, disingenuous, or naive. We may not be as big or important as Microsoft, but yeah, they've heard of us.

      Based on years of reading/posting here, I'd say the above-mentioned mods were out of the norm. They might be just statistical noise, or quite likely enthusiastic MS fanbois, but there is a reasonable chance that MS or their flunkys had something to do with it. There isn't much difference between a fanboi and an astroturfer anyway.

      Slashdot stories and commenters have screamed MS is going down for years, and they're doing better than ever now.

      Better than ever? Their flagship desktop OS is a flop and losing ground to competitors on all sides; their profitable Office offerings are under attack from several entities such as Sun, Google, and what may be a patent troll lawsuit; their merger/takeover attempt with Yahoo was repeatedly spurned; the EU's ankle-biting has gotten fiercer as of late; their browser, despite a recent and belated decision to properly support industry standards, is steadily losing marketshare; in a booming world of online music distribution their music service failed miserably; and their overhyped mobile platforms aren't gaining much traction.

      They may still be the 800 pound gorilla, but that doesn't mean they are a healthy gorilla

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  2. Ask Jack Schofield! by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm thinking of buying a netbook as a second machine for net access and mobile broadband. Should I get one with XP or can I run Linux?
    M Shuttleworth

    Linux has an apparently friendly front end, but is very demanding if you go any deeper. Linux is like the Mooncup: a nice idea, but messy and not for the squeamish. In fact, Linux can be likened to a Mooncup-using redhaired hippie girlfriend who lives in a house in the country she built herself from twigs and has very strong ideas on how everything should be and has all her original body hair. The sex is fantastic, but only if she thinks the astrological conditions are perfect. The house has a hand-dug latrine, so she's propped a toilet bowl on top and thinks that's "user friendliness."

    No, no. You would far prefer Windows. That's like a nice normal bottle-blonde girlfriend who has a proper office job and dresses cleanly from Primark and has a sweet smile and lives in a proper bedsit and knows everyone and how to act normally and is accepted in society. She gets headaches a lot and fits of rage where she smashes everything and there's an odd smell of decaying human flesh coming from the drains and the toilet backs up every now and then filling the entire block with sewage and bits of bodies, but this is entirely normal and nothing to worry about.

    My four-year-old PowerBook G4 is putting itself into sleep mode and refusing to wake up. It gives a very unfriendly beep and a black screen when it is turned on. Taking out and replacing the memory will eventually bring it to life.
    S Jobs

    This is a known fault in the Macintosh line, where the keyboards were dipped in vats of herpes virus before being shipped. Mac OS X is well known to induce symptoms similar to tertiary syphilis in long-term users -- ask anyone with Mac-using friends. The G4 has an old PowerPC chip, and is obsolete because Apple has long since moved to Intel chips. So at least you can run a proper operating system like Vista on the new ones.

    I have a PC bought from Dell, a proper computer company, and am running Microsoft(tm) Windows(tm) Vista(tm) Service Pack 1(tm). It's the best operating system ever in the entire universe and I can do anything those annoying Mac users and Linux nerds can. And Windows 7(tm) will be even better! I don't have a problem, I just wanted to tell you this to piss off those annoying anti-Microsoft trolls who keep commenting on your Guardian column.
    J Schofield

    This is an excellent start to a perfect computing experience. Make sure you have only genuine Microsoft software on the system, and donâ(TM)t ever use Firefox in case your penis shrinks -- Internet Explorer 8 guarantees you will get many useful email offers for a greatly increased penis with incredible sperm production capability. Also, Google will invade your privacy and put pictures of you masturbating on Google StreetView, so only use Bing. Happy surfing!

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  3. Sales Sales Sales Sales by lukas84 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sales and Marketing people have always been people incapable of coherent thought or doing honest work. They'll do whatever they can to get more money. The only thing worse than them are Executives.

    But that's just how the world works, there's no use in lamenting this. It's certainly interesting to see this, but there's no need to act like this was some big surprise. Every company acts like this. A society composed of only honest people doing honest work probably wouldn't work - nobody has tried yet, though.

  4. Re:And.... by wumpus188 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think Slashdot pretty much qualifies, no?

  5. Software Freedom Day at Best Buy by Statecraftsman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If anyone's interested in going to a local Best Buy on 9/19/09 with CDs and flyers and encouraging people to try gnu/linux on their laptops before they buy, visit http://trygnulinux.com/sfd09

    If Microsoft thinks it's a worthy battleground, perhaps we should as well.

    1. Re:Software Freedom Day at Best Buy by cwgmpls · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice idea. But your "Software Freedom Day" is two weeks away, and you don't even have a proper website? That is why Windows and Mac will always win over Linux, they both have some concept of marketing. Linux struggles with marketing. Not that marketing has anything to do with the quality of software. But marketing has everything to do with people knowing about it.

  6. Re:And.... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "That is what a software company SHOULD do."

    No, a company should not slander their competitors to do more business. Propaganda results in an overall decline of the happiness of almost all consumers.

    Consumers that are too ignorant to know any better will believe the ridiculous claims of "windows is safer than Linux" and "Linux is hard to update". (apt-get upgrade <-- 10 times simpler than windows bullshit update system). These consumers buy the product, have a bad experience with it (sales guy: Yeah, win vista will run fine on this laptop with POS specs!) then are forced to take the advice of these companies as complete lies and do their own research.

    Consumers that know enough about this nonsense in the first place walk into the store with the (unfortunately correct) idea that everyone is lying to them and thus all advice needs to be disregarded.

    Now, this means that if a consumer wants to buy some product and walks into the store and sees another similar product with a similar price they must then leave the store, research it, and then decide which to buy. It would help both the consumers and the store if the sales people could HONESTLY and ACCURATELY answer "what's the difference between these two products". Instead of "Well, this one is more expensive, so I get a larger commission, so you have to buy this one."

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  7. That was a good example. by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I liked this one:

    Linux is safer than windows

    The Real Facts:

    • There's no guarantee that when security vulnerabilities are discovered, an update will be created. Users are on their own
    • There is no ability to set parental restrictions

    Are they talking about Linux or Windows? I thought it was quite clever that they could be referring to either, while implying that linux is the inferior one.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  8. Re:Linux? by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in the financial market....

    I called Microsoft a Zombie corporation (and warned several months ago that MSFT earnings would suck even though most traders were optimistic) and have a neutral rating on them. BTW I am not making this stuff up. I happened to have started in the tech industry (still write quant code to this day), but moved to quant/algo trader/junior trader.

    The real problem with Microsoft is that its operating system division is dragging down the entire corporation. Windows 7 is not great. I upgraded a Vista machine (HP tablet) and have to say, not bad, but I only upgraded because Vista was so bad. Would I upgrade my XP machines? NOT A CHANCE!!!

    I also use Linux and have to say I am very impressed. Perfect? Nope, but very usable. I actually now prefer the Ubuntu fonts to read. Quite nice.

    Apple, and Linux are going to devour Microsoft. The cycle has truly started. And once Chrome gets rolling Microsoft is going to have its hands full.

    Look at the reality:

    1) IIS cannot and has not beat Apache (even after a complete decade). The fact that a product can beat Microsoft is not widely talked about by Microsoft. Notice how Microsoft stopped talking about its IIS?

    2) IE is getting stomped! You cannot deny it, but IE is getting beat by Firefox, Chrome (my preferred) and somewhat Safari.

    3) Microsoft has completely lost the mobile business and is getting pulverized by the likes of Apple, Palm, and RIMM. Even Nokia has smelt the direction of the wind with the new N900. They know what is happening and are positioning themselves.

    4) Java is STILL around. It used to be Microsoft could come out with a development language or environment and the world would bow to Microsoft. Java is still kicking and arguably is doing very well standing its own ground.

    Microsoft has some major issues and Windows 7 will show that things will not work...

    When the stock market sniffs the lack of Windows 7 follow through MSFT is going down! Right now the market is divided hence its stock price just keeps rolling around treading water. But when that balance sheet keeps grinding down MSFT is done! I am thinking you will probably be able to pick MSFT shares around the low teens next year.

    Normally it would be a bit higher, but the selling will be relentless as people will want to get out of their positions (incl the MSFT employees)

    How do you solve this?

    1) Fire Ballmer and top management
    2) Make a base Windows OS open source (no frills). Not for Linux trumping purposes, but if the Windows OS horse dies the entire corporation goes down...

    Windows has become a yolk for the entire Microsoft corporation... In the past it was a blessing, now its a curse...

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  9. This is why I don't shop at BestBuy by DaveM753 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's great that BestBuy wants to make money and that one of the ways they can make money is to "partner" with companies, like Microsoft, that will pay them to lie. That's Capitalism for you.

    It's also a prominent reason that I, and most of my friends, don't shop at BestBuy. We all know we'll be lied to from BestBuy. It'd be great to go up to a salesperson and feel confident that any questions will receive carefully considered, honest responses. But, what we get are push-products-sold-by-Company-X-because-they're-our-partner responses. So, unlike 1999 when I went to BestBuy once a week, now I go there maybe once every year. I just don't like their B.S.

    Well, that and their policy to DEMAND I listen to their spiel about extended warranties, with no regard to whether or not I, the customer, want to hear that crap.

  10. Re:And.... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux vendors would do exactly the same thing

    Except that they don't. Not like this.

    Who is to say which OS is safer for example? It entirely depends on what metric you use to measure it

    Like, say, which is more prone to being part of a trojan-infected zombie botnet scamming info for identity fraud and/or spreading spam?

    I don't blame Microsoft for selling their products. That is what a software company SHOULD do.

    If they can't sell their product without bullshitting (or at least keeping it to a tasteful minimum), isn't that a condemnation of their own product?

    The only reason these are "stories" is because people [incorrectly] feel Linux is a community effort ...

    Actually, they are stories because this is an attempt to bullshit people, and people hate being bullshitted. People on slashdot especially hate seeing people who might not know any better being bullshitted by a cynical, self-serving marketing group. I don't mean to absolve other tech companies (most, if not all, do the same or similar), but Microsoft has long occupied a special place in tech history as one of the most blatant bullshit-marketing organizations ever. I personally have been involved in tech distribution for about 15 years, and no other vendor comes close to their level of arrogance or deceit. I've been to an RSA conference where Microsoft astroturfed a whole session that was promoted as a balanced and impartial hack-off, but instead was a scripted Windows lovefest. I've seen Microsoft flat-out lie to peoples' faces. I've seen them ship free product to people who didn't order it to inflate their "install base" of a particular item.

    These are stories because in an industry saturated with kool-aid and known for marketing gross exaggerations and lies, Microsoft stands out as the worst.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  11. Reading selectively by MaizeMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm sorry, all I got from your post something about linux and:

    redhaired hippie girlfriend ...The sex is fantastic

  12. My problem by Mascot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't have much of an issue with the list itself. Obviously it's heavily biased, but I see nothing on there that can be called an outright lie.

    My problem is the purpose of BestBuy sending staff to a presentation like that. It's specifically intended to give staff arguments to persuade customers to buy Windows. When the real goal of the staff should be to identify each customer's needs and guide them based on that.

    It's one thing to make mention of a more expensive product to see if there's a chance of an upsale, it's quite another to be as one-sided as this presentation is. Whether the staff will recite that presentation to any and all customers, or simply use it as input for any customer that asks for examples of why to pick one over the other, remains to be seen. But I have a feeling....

  13. The sad state of electronics retail... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that this course is offered to BestBuy employees - and apparently only BestBuy employees - says something about consumer electronics retail in 2009 in the US. When I worked at CompUSA (pre - 2000) I frequently went to vendor-sponsored "classes" where they would give us food, beer, free hardware/software, etc, for listening to their pitch. We generally went there and found that there were also BestBuy, CircuitCity, and even OfficeMax or OfficeDepot employees, depending on what was being sold. Now of those five retailers (including CompUSA) only BestBuy remains a significant factor in consumer elecrtonics sales.

    I'm surprised that Microsoft apparently didn't even think highly enough of Microcenter to invite them. I guess they are still rather small fish (in terms of market presence) at the moment.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  14. Microsoft must be desparate or by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they don't believe in their own product.

    Why do I say that? Because you don't see BMW giving free training videos to car salesmen comparing their cars to say GM or Chrysler or Ford, do you? BMW lives or dies by the quality and reputation of their products; they don't need to "educate" salesmen about their products. This smells of a desperation move where Microsoft must believe their Windows 7 doesn't compare favorably with Linux on netbooks, so they have to try to convince the Best Buy personnel, who let's face it, don't know as much about hardware and software as they know about marketing products, to push the Windows 7 stuff onto customers.

    There have been some studies of performance of Windows 7 beta vs. Linux on netbooks which either have not have been clear win for Windows 7 or worse, have shown Windows 7 in an unflattering light. As for citations, the web sites that I can recall are Phoronix.com, and OSNews.com.

    I mean trying to "educate" Best Buy sales people and having Windows 7 "House Parties" sounds a little pathetic don't you think? Did Microsoft do something similar when XP came out or even Vista?

    1. Re:Microsoft must be desparate or by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about that, but I do know when my brother was working at a Ford dealership, after about three months he was 100% convinced that Ford cars were the best cars out there. On every level. The Ford GT was better than a Corvette. A Ford Focus was better than a Toyota Corolla. The Mustang was better than any other muscle car in the world. He still didn't have much good to say about the T-bird.

      A few years after he left, he is now willing to consider other cars, like the Mazda speed-3. So I don't know what they do in dealerships, but it's sure working.

      --
      Qxe4
  15. Re:Linux? by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, I will not upgrade my XP... At least right now the odds are against it.

    Let me tell you about something we did...

    We used to run Windows 2000 server. And then one day we needed to install it on new hardware. Did not work. So I got the idea and said, why not create a VMWare partition and install Windows 2000 on it and run exclusively Linux servers...

    That was 3 years ago! And we still run Windows 2000 server. Recently they tried to install Windows 2008 Server as a virtualized server OS and it sucks completely... But the positive experience with the desktop making us to think about shifting to Linux on the desktop.

    Right now the traders have 2 Windows machines and 1 Linux desktop machine. Thus far no problems...

    But what we do know right now is that whatever desktops they need, if it involves a native Windows installation it will be the cheapest version with the work horse being Linux.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  16. when is Windows... by Locutus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When is Windows not like Windows?
    When Microsoft ships a new version.

    When is Windows just like Windows?
    When Microsoft ships a new version.

    You all know that Windows 7 is not like any kind of Windows most people are running but as you should have seen if you RTFA, Microsoft's army of marketing droids still likes to tell people that it's Windows so you know it.

    Besides this telling the world+dog that Microsoft is fighting Linux, look at the first mention of netbooks and Linux. The page title is about netbooks but the bullets are on PCs. They are being real careful to not allow the netbook to be labeled a special device or market segment and want it to be considered a limited function PC. The reason why is because if people think of the netbook as another device like say, an iPhone, they know that all the smoke and mirror tricks claiming having Windows is better goes out the windows. Peg the netbook as a little computer and people will think that having Windows on it is a good thing to do and if you put anything else on it, you'll have less functionality. The reality is, these resource constrained devices do more with Linux because Linux and OSS does better and can do more in these small devices. Think about it, you don't see Window XP, Vista, or Windows 7 on smartphones or MIDs devices.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  17. RIM jobs by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, BlackBerry users are the ones who wish for a RIM job.

  18. Re:And.... by cwgmpls · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm tired of this attitude of "It's okay to lie because the other guy is lying too. In fact, I can lie louder than him". That is exactly what has our government so polarized and dysfunctional. We've gotten to the point of saying nothing is true, there is two sides to everything, and we need to hear both sides, no matter how untrue their arguments are. Telling the truth doesn't seem to count for anything anymore.

    Some of these items Microsoft are just flat lies. Selling a netbook as a gaming machine. Saying Windows is easier to upgrade (I can upgrade ALL of my applications on Ubuntu with one click, for a price of $0.00). They are lies and we should call them out as lies. And if you see a Linux vendor lying, we'll call them out for their lies too. But saying all points of view are equally valid and it is okay to lie because the other side lies is morally and intellectually bankrupt.

  19. 32bit to 64bit transition by janwedekind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eric Raymond has an interesting article (2006) where he argues that big changes on the software market can only occur when there is an industry-wide switch in the hardware. According to Eric Raymond the window of opportunity created by the transition to 64bit platforms closes (has closed) in 2008. However I still see Windows Vista PCs on sale with 3GByte of memory because 64bit Windows lacks driver support and 32bit Windows can only address 4GByte of memory (minus 1GByte to address the graphics card AFAIK).

  20. good sign by jipn4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good sign. The fact that Microsoft feels it necessary to attack Linux at the retail level shows that Linux is becoming more and more of a factor in the computing mainstream as well. Thanks, Microsoft, for supporting Linux.