Slashdot Mirror


Start-up Claims SSD Achieves 180,000 IOPS

Lucas123 writes "Three-year-old start-up Pliant Technology today announced the general availability of a new class of enterprise SAS solid state disk drives that it claims without using any cache can achieve up to 180,000 IOPS for sustained read/write rates of 500MB/sec and 320MB/sec, respectively. The company also claims an unlimited number of daily writes to its new flash drives, guaranteeing 5 years of service with no slowdown. 'Pliant's SSD controller architecture is not vastly different from those of other high-end SSD manufacturers. It has twelve independent I/O channels to interleaved single level cell (SLC) NAND flash chips from Samsung Corp. The drives are configured as RAID 0 for increased performance.'"

5 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. "The company refused to release [...] retail price by ibsteve2u · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're fishing for a price point? Quick, everybody make a comment to the effect that such a drive is only worth about $10...

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  2. I've used pre-production versions. They are FAST. by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used pre-production versions of these. I tested them with Terabytes of test data in random write tests. They are amazing, and can saturate a 1Gb FC connection with random writes. They are very resilient. We put these in my company's demo boxes to show that our architecture can compete with EMC. Kind of cheating, but we told them that it was a special drive that enables us to show the limits of our storage management architecture in a small, 1U box, instead of just showing you the limits of physical hard drives.

    We beat their 8Us of EMC hard drives by 34% with just one of these 2.5" drives, and we had bottlenecks all over the place in our small demo box. And they did the testing, not us.

    The thing about these drives is that they are more expensive ($/GB) even than registered ECC DDR2/3 RAM, which obviously is going to be even faster.

  3. Re:Congrats by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can claim that I have confirmed it if you like.

  4. Re:"The company refused to release [...] retail pr by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only worth about 10$? You're crazy, I'd pay up to 20$ for such a drive!

  5. Re:SAS not SATA by Anpheus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Due to the 8/10 encoding on SATA, SAS, and a few other serial technologies, it's really easy to convert between megabits/gigabits of total bandwidth and megabits/gigabits of encoded bandwidth. For SATA/SAS 3Gib/s, it's 300MiB/s. For 6Gib/s, it's 600MiB/s.