Slashdot Mirror


On-Body Circuits Create New Sense Organ

destinyland writes "In 'My New Sense Organ,' a science writer tests 'a new sense' — the ability to always know true north — by strapping a circuit board to her ankle. It's connected to an electronic compass and an ankle band with eight skin buzzers. The result? 'I had wrong assumptions I didn't know about ... I returned home to Washington DC to find that, far worse than my old haunt San Francisco, my mental map of DC swapped north for west. I started getting more lost than ever as the two spatial concepts of DC did battle in my head.' The device also detects 'the specific places where infrastructure interferes with the earth's magnetic fields.'

24 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Much more practical... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    A bracelet! Much more practical than the haptic compass belt, then.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  2. What qualifies for new sensory organ? by Bicx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this really a new sensory organ if it just relies on buzzers rather than direct neural connections? Maybe I've just been spoiled by all the awesome research done in computer-brain interfaces.

    1. Re:What qualifies for new sensory organ? by jbeaupre · · Score: 3, Funny

      It has little teeny tiny pipes, bellows, keyboard, and guy in a cape with a mask over half his face.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:What qualifies for new sensory organ? by joocemann · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The body is an amazing thing. The brain, too. I was recently reading about a camera device that sends signal data to a 'lollipop' that is placed on the tongue of blind people. In short time, the people's brains began to interpret the signals (which are not the same as optical signals at all) as to what it truly was --- and the patients began to see. http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/08/22/2035256

      It really amazes me at the ability of the brain to start with some from of stimulus (beit natural or induced) and decipher its relevance.

      The difference in what qualifies 'sensory organ' may well be semantics; or maybe we need new definitions to describe these novel apparatus.

      In contrast, neurons are not in direct connection, either; neurotransmitters span a space between them called the synaptic cleft. Those neurotransmitters are chemical stimuli; these 'buzzers' are electronic stimuli. There are some differences and none are very clearly understood, but as far as I know we might accomplish the same by 'buzzing' with small and rapid doses of neurotransmitters instead of buzzing.

    3. Re:What qualifies for new sensory organ? by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 3, Informative

      I heard about the magnets in fingers, too. You can hear it in the NPR archives.

      --
      I welcome our new 99% overlords.
  3. I found that by simply moving the buzzers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...from my ankle to a more "centrally located area" and I stopped caring about getting lost.

    In fact, turning in circles became quite pleasurable.

    Does anyone have any kleenex handy?

  4. This is the future... by ohsmeguk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've heard of people implanting tiny rare earth magnets in their fingers so they can sense current flowing through wires and magnetic fields. I would like to try it when I can be certain they won't break when they're under my skin... :P

    1. Re:This is the future... by lattyware · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like a bad idea on the basis they will eventually corrode inside you, and if you ever need an MRI you'll need to have them out before you can have it.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:This is the future... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

      The MRI itself will take them out automatically.

  5. True North??? by Cassini2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    the ability to always know true north ... electronic compass

    I've been to Northern Canada. A compass points to MAGNETIC North. True North is at the North pole, the point on which the earth spins. At true north, the sun never sets, and sometimes never rises for days on end. In summer, it has the longest days in the world. In winter, the longest nights. Magnetic north is not the same place at all ...

    Magnetic North has some interesting properties too. Amongst others, the Magnetic south and north poles move around, periodically flip, and do not pass through the center of the earth.

    1. Re:True North??? by JWyner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only person to ever mention "true" north is the Slashdot poster. TFA never describes true north, and actually specifically states that they are using magnetic north. I am not entirely sure *why* they went out of their way to add the "true" and make the description *untrue*, but thought it worth giving credit to the actual science writer for understanding the difference...

      --
      "Owning a computer is like having your very own TV -- with a built in radio!" - Ed Helms
    2. Re:True North??? by ebuck · · Score: 3, Funny

      At true north, the sun never sets, and sometimes never rises for days on end.

      I personally would like to see a Sun that never sets and yet only rarely rises.

  6. Re:Mental maps... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...buy one of those $5 compass globes and stick it in the car...

    Or Forehead.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Re:Mental maps... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Men, on the other hand, rarely use anything but a map. If I changed a street sign outside my apartment, my male friends probably wouldn't be able to find the place anymore."

    Maybe I'm an exception, but I don't think that's true at all. I navigate entirely by landmarks. I don't even know the names of half the streets I travel on regularly. Furthermore, my mental map of the city is framed by our light rail system, major bus lines, and bike throughfares, not by the major roads carrying automobile traffic.

  8. Don't need electronics for that by Haxamanish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was a teen, I always consciously kept track where the North was. Every time I made a turn, I would adjust my imaginary compass - yeah I was some kind of freak. I would also make note of the orientation of some landmarks in every city. After a while, it became an automatism, now (over 20 yrs later) I often amaze people by pointing where the North is with very good accuracy without using a compass. It always works, but if I have been a passenger in a car (or other transport) it takes about half an hour after arriving before I know where the North is. Extra bonus: if the sun is visible, I can read the time of day from its position. I guess everybody can train it with a little bit of effort.

    1. Re:Don't need electronics for that by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Why can't you just look up at the sky and see where the sun is"

      Maybe he lives in Seattle?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  9. Re:Mental maps... by Evildonald · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How to write an "Insightful" comment

    1) Find a quote from the article, and claim you've always known it, and what is more everybody already knows it.
    2) Make AWESOME generalisations about "how, like, men and women are different, yeah?"

    Really insightful. Can we remove the current judges and get new ones?

  10. North Paw by EricBoyd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some friends and I are the creator of the North Paw compass anklet. You can check out our website at sensebridge, or read all of our hack notes on the noisebridge wiki: compass vibro anket. You can purchase North Paw kits from us for $95, and then you don't have to take Quinn's word for what it's like to wear one :-)

    --
    augment your senses: http://sensebridge.net/
    1. Re:North Paw by joeyblades · · Score: 3, Funny

      This should complement my House Arrest Ankle Bracelet quite nicely...

  11. Re:Mental maps... by joeyblades · · Score: 3, Funny

    Men, on the other hand, rarely use anything but a map.

    I think it's cultural.

    I lived in Scotland for a while and whenever I asked for directions the men would always say something like: drive down this road a piece until you get to the Crooked Horseshoe Pub, take a right and drive to the second roundabout after the Dog and Monkey Pub. Take the third right and drive to the Old Tennents Pub. Go right at the next roundabout and drive about 3 miles. If you reach the Goose Bridge Pub you've gone too far... Stop and have a cold one, then go back about a mile or so.

    Show them a map and they look at you like you just asked them to diagram a sentence in Latin... and you're likely to hear some quaint Scottish expressions...

  12. Re:Mental maps... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Compass On
    Apply directly to the forehead.

  13. Re:Mental maps... by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not that I'm surprised -- women will navigate first by landmarks and familiarity, and if that fails they fall back on maps. Men, on the other hand, rarely use anything but a map.

    [Citation needed]

    Like most men, I suck at giving directions because I can't remember the actual names of most of the streets used. Just like women, men navigate by running a sequence of events in a specific order, navigating by waypoints (landmarks) rather than absolute position. I suck at estimating the distance between landmarks, too, to the point where sometimes I get discouraged and turn around before I reach one, thinking I've already gone past it. And... (checking below belt buckle...) I'm definitely male.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  14. Re:Mental maps... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I object to this inaccurate stereotype. Where's the stop at the chip shop for a deep-fried Mars bar?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Re:Mental maps... by onkelonkel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are likely an exception. My wife uses landmarks to navigate, I prefer addresses. She'll tell me to pick up my daughter at Suzy's house, assuming that I know exactly where that is because I was there once a year ago. If I ask where is that, she'll say "it's on the street by the golf course in the green house on the same side as where Bob and Judy used to live", which still hasn't conveyed any useful information to me. What I want to hear is "1234 Trent Avenue" which uniquely identifies the house. That way I'm not standing there like a dumbass in front of the wrong green house.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.