Slashdot Mirror


Garlic Farmer Wards Off High-Speed Internet

DocVM writes "A Nova Scotia farmer is opposing the construction of a microwave tower for fear it will eventually mutate his organic garlic crop. Lenny Levine, who has been planting and harvesting garlic by hand on his Annapolis Valley land since the 1970s, is afraid his organic crop could be irradiated if EastLink builds a microwave tower for wireless high-speed internet access a few hundred meters from his farm."

39 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Idiots by Covalent · · Score: 5, Informative

    His crop is already being irradiated...BY THE SUN. Idiots. Sheesh.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:Idiots by Z34107 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed!

      On top of it, the radiation is 60,000 times less than the the allowed limit for organic farms. (Wasn't even aware there was such a thing.)

      Until the farmer loses, that town is stuck on dial-up. Now, that's a travesty.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    2. Re:Idiots by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      His crop is already being irradiated...BY THE SUN. Idiots. Sheesh.

      Yeah, and that radiation makes his crops grow to many times their original size! Exactly as 60s sci-fi predicts! So now who's the idiot, huh?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Idiots by Apollo_11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just taking the wacky green agenda to its extreme boundary. If anything vegatables and milk should be intentionally irradated as is commonly done in Europe to: A > Reduce food borne illness B > Save enormous amounts of money on chilling food at the grocery store Planet saved and less medical costs, illnesses, don't tell Washington DC they are now expendable !

    4. Re:Idiots by joebok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He didn't say he didn't want any radiation of any kind - he just didn't want any MORE radiation that the tower would surely bring. I don't think that is idiotic.

      Where I question his judgment is looking at the amount of radiation that the tower would introduce - the article says 60,000 x lower than the legal limit for organic food. Seems he is a bit more careful that I am. But I'm not sure that makes him an idiot.

    5. Re:Idiots by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tasty, garlicky overlords. I welcome them roasted and spread with a bit of olive oil on a baguette.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Idiots by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the expense of an alternative form of high speed, based upon the fact that his objections are pure bullshit.

      You'd file a civil suit over this? I don't see how you would win. Maybe the Canadian legal system is different (which is where he lives), but I'm pretty sure it would go nowhere.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    7. Re:Idiots by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Informative

      If anything vegatables and milk should be intentionally irradated as is commonly done in Europe to:

      ...reduce their vitamin content, add toxic radiolytic products like 2-ACBs, and attempt to compensate for unsafe food handling practice that shouldn't have been allowed in the first place? Not to mention increasing the availability of radioisotopes that are perfect for a "dirty bomb"?

      Yes, there are ignorant folks out there who think that irradiation makes food radioactive, which is plainly wrong. That does not mean that irradiation does not have deleterious effects.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    8. Re:Idiots by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article is full of the sort of howlers [...]. Where do we start? "Shakes up the molecules" - clearly the phrasing of a person well versed in the concept of ionizing radiation! I'll use wi-fi all day and you can sit next to some cobalt 58 and we'll see what person's molecules get "shaken up" more.

      We are talking about microwave radiation. Microwave radiation cooks food by "shaking" the molecules (of water). Of course that isn't going to cause genetic mutation. Yes the guy is an idiot, but if you're going to get into name calling, try to get your own facts right.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    9. Re:Idiots by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two things: the irradiation you are talking about is done after harvest, right? (Not that this farmer isn't being silly, the amount of radiation will be mostly harmless, and since the main reproductive and sustenance parts of garlic are under ground, his crop will have some shielding).

      You can't irradiate something with a microwave tower. This guy's a nutter.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Idiots by jeffasselin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lactose is only undigestible if you lack the protein to do so. Most people of Indo-European descent have this gene, which comes from a mutation that occurred something like 10-15k years ago.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    11. Re:Idiots by Kymermosst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The technology has also been proven dangerous, why do you think microwave ovens have switches built in to turn the oven off when the door is opened? Would you step in a human scaled one and let someone turn it on?

      Two words: power density.

      An average consumer microwave oven has at least 600W of microwave power confined inside a tiny box. If you open the door, you are likely standing in front of it which would give you a fair amount of microwave exposure.

      The microwave transmitter referred to in the TFA is likely to only transmit at up to a few watts using a directional antenna in the open air, and you are not likely to ever be standing right in front of it.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  2. He should be so lucky by Verteiron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Scientists and corporations around the world would buy his crop at many times market value, in order to both prove and disprove that the mutations were a result of the tower. What a disappointment it will be for him when the tower is built and his crop turns out just fine.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:He should be so lucky by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reminds me of http://german-bash.org/101161.

      Short and translated version: the Telekom had built a cell phone mast in a village, and a lot of villagers started to complain about sleep problems and whatnot because of it. The comment of the Telekom was, "how bad must it get, when we actually turn it on" :p

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  3. Wrong kind of radiation by fishnuts · · Score: 5, Informative

    He should stick to farming and leave the radio vs radiation science up to the smart people.

    Someone go point him to the definitions of "Microwave Radiation" and "Ionizing Radiation"

  4. No rationality required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I think over a period of time it will change the DNA of the garlic because it shakes up the molecules."

    I wonder why he's concerned about the garlic DNA, but not his own? In other news, I objected to a wind farm cos I was worried about the flying saucers crashing into it...

    1. Re:No rationality required? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, I objected to a wind farm cos I was worried about the flying saucers crashing into it...

      Oh geeze, not this FUD again... Look, yes, flying saucer crashes were a problem with some older, ill-conceived wind farms. But with a little planning, and modern designs, this is essentially a non-issue for the wind farms of today. The most important thing is not to put cattle, sheep, or drunken hillbillies underneath the windfarms so the aliens aren't attracted to them. Next is the design itself. The old scaffolding ones didn't look like anything important to the aliens. The new single-pole ones were designed to look like an alien arm raised up. And a raised arm with all three digits spinning in a circle is a very rude gesture and it's traditional to ignore the offender. So the problem solves itself.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  5. Scientific ignorance by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Scientific ignorance from the organic produce industry? Really? That's just so shocking.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Scientific ignorance by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You've hit on one of my pet peeves man. Hell, DIAMONDS are oraganic, and so is pencil lead. They way these people use the term incorrectly drives me nuts.

      Seriously.

      I have a steering wheel attached to my belt now because of it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Scientific ignorance by oyenstikker · · Score: 4, Funny

      A conversation I had at an organic food shop:

      Me: Do you have any pure mint extract?
      Employee: Yeah man, we've got some right over here.
      Me: This is the cosmetics aisle. It says "Not for human consumption." right on the bottle.
      Employee: Oh. But its organic man, its okay.
      Me: So are rhubarb leaves.
      Employee: Oh. Man. I dunno man.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    3. Re:Scientific ignorance by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've hit on one of my pet peeves man. Hell, DIAMONDS are oraganic, and so is pencil lead. They way these people use the term incorrectly drives me nuts.

      Seriously.

      I have a steering wheel attached to my belt now because of it.

      Right on! And the people who use "pencil lead" instead of "graphite." I mean, lead was never used in pencils. It's just that those idiots who discovered graphite thought it really was lead. The audacity...

  6. The Dangers of Wi-Fi by moj0e · · Score: 5, Funny

    I totally agree with the farmer! From my research, it even has dangerous effects
    on humans!

    Here are some of the symptoms that it causes:

    1. Carpal tunnel
    2. Distaste for light
    3. A tendency to shout out: "First Post"
    4. Loss/Gain of gold pieces
    5. Disturbing images of cats
    6. Lots of accidents that subsequently end up online.
    7. Bad writing.

    Can anyone think of other symptoms?

    1. Re:The Dangers of Wi-Fi by Serenissima · · Score: 5, Funny

      8. Sarcastic lists! :D

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:The Dangers of Wi-Fi by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      9) ???
      10) Profit!!!!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. On behalf of myself and other Nova Scotians by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please regard this man as a non-representative sample.

    --
    This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
  8. Re:Where's the proof? by xSauronx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    oh they dont need to know how and why. when my aunt was diagnosed with breast cancer she decided to look into radical natural diet and exercise changes to try and avoid chemo and a mastectomy. growth halted in the tumors for well over a year, she lost weight, felt better than ever before.

    good for her. she also got rid of her microwave oven. while she wont come right out and say it to most of the family, she believe the radiation can mutate food in the microwave and cause her body harm. wow.

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  9. Re:Side note by Demonantis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Found it. Thought some people might be interested

    Organic Food

  10. Re:Where's the proof? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not possible. Only ionizing radiation can alter DNA.

    Microwaves are not ionizing radiation. Not even remotely close, they're on the complete opposite side of the visible portion of the spectrum in fact.

    From visible, you go to IR and then to RF (including microwaves)
    To get to the wavelengths capable of altering DNA, you need to go the other way, through violet to UV (DNA damage), X-rays (more DNA damage!) and gamma (lots of DNA damage).

    There's only one way I can describe this guy - fucking ignorant dumbass. The most likely thing to do DNA damage to his crops is the very sunlight his crops depend on to grow.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  11. it's non-ionizing radiation by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're looking for something that will mutate cells, then try the UV rays from the Sun. Perhaps he should grow mushrooms if he is so paranoid about exposing vegetables to radiation?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  12. Meanwhile a farmer in Gilroy California by grapeape · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere in Gilroy a Garlic farmer is dialing Sprint to beg for a tower so he can make monster garlic.

  13. Oh no by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are times when I wonder what the world might have been like if we hadn't pushed high speed microwave-based internet access in Nova Scotia. It's not like there weren't other solutions -- satellite, possibly. Cabling if they could have found someone to foot the bill. But there was a rush to make it happen, as usual with big business looking for their next tax haven. Who would have thought the entire world would pay for that bit of greed? Who would have thought we'd never dare look at the sun again.

    The end can't be too far away. There aren't many of us left, down here in the caves. All the moss has been eaten. The water may last awhile longer, but without food....No one who's left the caves to search for food, no matter how desperate or self-assured, has ever come back. Perhaps our greatest fear, moreso than even starvation, is that the Garlics will be able to trace one of those people back to our hideout. We've taken precautions, of course, by choosing a tunnel system with a downdraft. At least that way, we can smell them coming.

  14. Speaking of idiots... by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His crop is already being irradiated...BY THE SUN. Idiots. Sheesh.

    You know, I wish people using that argument (or variants thereof) actually knew what they're talking about. No offense.

    The Earth's atmosphere and ionosphere are only really transparent to a very narrow band of frequencies. As you go up in the UV range or lower into IR, actually less and less of it gets to ground level.

    And let's put it this way: If enough microwave radiation from the Sun got to the Earth to be comparable to a cell phone tower, you couldn't actually use a cell phone. Because the white noise from the sun would not only give the tower a crap signal-to-noise ratio, but would be hundreds of decibels stronger than the milliwatts emitted by the phone itself or received by it in some places.

    So no, it's not. Not in the same frequencies and/or not as much.

    Yes, the "OMG, the crops will mutate" scare is incredibly stupid anyway. But countering it with the equally bogus "OMG, the sun already does the same", doesn't really debunk it.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Speaking of idiots... by Sandbags · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, actually, the microwave internet system is a Line-of-sight point to point beam, so the amount getting to his crops in the ground is actually a number approaching zero. The microwave in his KITCHEN probaly puts more energy into his field than that tower would, not to mention the dozens of sattelites beaming down microwave radiation as well.

      Also, if the atmosphere was THAT good at shielding that radiation, then why would Microwave solar orbital power even be a consideration? If the atmosphere only blocks 30% of visible light, but far more microwave was blocked, then how would that system be a net gain?

      Of course, Microwave radiation is not ionizing radiation anyway, so the argument is completely moot... Mutation from microwave exposure would require rediculous doses of concentrated radiation, far, far more than it would take to cook the garlic outright.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    2. Re:Speaking of idiots... by Rary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From the article: "...is afraid his organic crop could be irradiated..." That's not the same as "is afraid microwave radiation will be increased above acceptable levels". The statement suggests that he is worried about radiation in general (not this specific kind of radiation).

      The statement you quoted was made by the writer of the article, not by the farmer. The only direct quotes from him are: "I think over a period of time it will change the DNA of the garlic because it shakes up the molecules" and "I view it with dread, fear and panic. I don't want to grow food under those conditions", neither of which indicate he's afraid of radiation in general.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  15. Re:My guess is... by catbertscousin · · Score: 5, Funny

    But if they put a wi-fi tower next to him, the vampires are going to congregate there to check their MySpace pages and the next thing you know they'll develop an immunity to garlic. This dangerous cycle must be stopped!

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  16. Re:Side note by Entropius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't an American problem exclusively. Related to this is the scare about "zomg genetically modified organisms!", which is much worse in Europe.

    I helped gather data for a study, incidentally, comparing GM and ordinary cotton. The GM cotton had a gene expressing the BT toxin in it, a protein that fucks up caterpillars who eat it rather royally but is harmless to pretty much everything else. The farmers were told to not do anything special with their fields, to use pesticides as normal, etc. (This meant more use of pesticide on the non-GM cotton, obviously.)

    Then I wander through the fields and sample the insect population by species. The conventional cotton was something of a wasteland -- here's a lonely little spider, looking for dinner; there are a few ants; here are a shitload of aphids, which are resistant to insecticide.

    The GM cotton had a whole pile of bugs, all running around happily eating each other.

    GM crops can be *better* for the environment. After all, the BT gene is just a way of putting a pesticide only harmful to a narrow range of insects *into* the crop, so only pests that actually eat it will die. This is a whole lot more targeted than crop-dusting the field with something that'll kill anything that moves with more than four legs. Monsanto's abuse of the patent system is another matter altogether, of course.

  17. "Radiation"... by Entropius · · Score: 4, Informative

    The scientific and engineering community doesn't mean the same thing by this word that you mean -- namely, that shit that makes your ass glow green, or whatever.

    I propose that people not be allowed to rant and rave about this stuff until they:

    --Learn the basics of the electromagnetic spectrum and the sources and engineering uses of radiation at each point along it.
    --Learn the basics of nuclear radiation, and understand its effects and where it comes from
    --Leave a Geiger counter near a nuclear power station and take one on a plane across the country at 40,000 feet, and compare the counts

    I teach physics labs to premeds at the university. They come in and I'm munching peanuts off of a pretty bright orange tray, and offer them some; some of them accept.

    A little later I'm showing them how to use a Geiger counter, and show them radiation from a few sources we have in the room -- lookie, radioactive rocks! Lookie there, a bit of caesium! Oh, wait ... where'd these radioactive peanuts come from?

    The students freaked out. (For those who don't know, the bright orange glaze on old Fiestaware was made from uranium oxide. It's safe, unless maybe you eat the plate, in which case you have a .01% risk of cancer and a 10% risk of a perforated bowel.)

  18. Re:Where's the proof? by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Getting rid of the microwave, while not stopping the cancerous growth, may very well have served as a placebo for helping with her overall health. Sometimes results are more important than the method, and if she thinks this is helping her, more power to her.

  19. Stupidity or Ignorance? How about Jackass by kenp2002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No one is exempt from stupidity and certainly not ignorance. No man can know all things let he be a God among men.

    I've met the brightest that Harvard graduated and they thought you could get the swine flu from eating pork.

    I work with a Yale man that couldn't replace his air filter in his car.

    I've worked with two former NASA engineers and a Ballistic Warhead designer from UDLP that couldn't install an electrical outlet in thier home.

    Ignorance is relative people. How many of you know when to harvest garlic? When you put down your fertilizer? How many days do you let alfalfa dry between cutting and baling? Know how to shoe a horse? How about stitch a wound? At what rate should you run the reverse rehometer to prevent scaling on a polymer test?

    There is a difference between stupidity and ignorance. You can mock stupidity till you are blue in the face; just make damn sure you know the difference between the two or all you will accomplish is proving how big of a jackass you are.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-