Slashdot Mirror


Universal "Death Stench" Repels Bugs of All Types

Hugh Pickens writes "Wired reports that scientists have discovered that insects from cockroaches to caterpillars all emit the same stinky blend of fatty acids when they die and that the death mix may represent a universal, ancient warning signal to avoid their dead or injured. 'Recognizing and avoiding the dead could reduce the chances of catching the disease,' says Biologist David Rollo of McMaster University 'or allow you to get away with just enough exposure to activate your immunity.' Researchers isolated unsaturated fatty acids containing oleic and linoleic acids from the corpses of dead cockroaches and found that their concoction repelled not just cockroaches, but ants and caterpillars. 'It was amazing to find that the cockroaches avoided places treated with these extracts like the plague,' says Rollo. Even crustaceans like woodlice and pillbugs, which diverged from insects 400 million years ago, were repelled leading scientists to think the death mix represents a universal warning signal. Scientists hope the right concoction of death smells might protect crops. Thankfully, human noses can't detect the fatty acid extracts. 'I've tried smelling papers treated with them and don't smell anything strong and certainly not repellent,' writes Rollo in an e-mail. 'Not like the rotting of corpses that occurs later and is detectable from great distances.'"

64 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. This is nonsense by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

    1. Re:This is nonsense by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

      Well, to be fair, your observations are from cockroaches that have lived in close quarters with humans and not those in nature. Notice that in the article, it's only Wired who suggests this would protect you from an infestation. The scientists say this may protect crops--which are in a more natural setting. And I think you would see a much higher success rate on cockroaches or wood beetles that live in the wild versus those in your home. Many animals behave very differently in their natural environment.

      Whatever the case, I'm really excited to see fatty acid extracts used instead of chemical compounds on the food that I eat. Especially for people that have small gardens of tomatoes and vegetables. I'd personally pay a small premium on my produce for crops grown and repelling insects with this technology.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:This is nonsense by nameer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But fatty acid extracts are chemical compounds. And lets be clear, if they figure this out to the point that it works reliably, the next step is bring in the chemists and chemical engineers to figure out how to scale this up to industrial proportions. That will mean building the compounds in bulk, not extracting them from cockroaches. Which to be fair, is better for the roaches.

      --
      "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
    3. Re:This is nonsense by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      half an hour later, new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses. Quite interesting.

      Joe? Are you alright? Joe? JOE?

    4. Re:This is nonsense by MrMr · · Score: 3, Funny

      new flies are examining the dead fly carcasses
      And not the pizza's?
      Quite interesting.

    5. Re:This is nonsense by quadrox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are completely wrong. Go read dawkins books, e.g. the blind watchmaker.

    6. Re:This is nonsense by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doesn't work for me either! My car's windshield and hood are plastered with dead insects. You would think that would warn other insects to stay away but no, after every road trip, there are just MORE bugs splattered on my car. I call BS.

    7. Re:This is nonsense by martas · · Score: 4, Funny

      it's Steve, you insensitive clod!

    8. Re:This is nonsense by Follier · · Score: 5, Funny

      A friend of mine would kill one roach, and stick it on a toothpick (or a "pike" as he called it) and stood it up on a bottle-cork at the entrance to a hole -- as an "example to the others!" He swore it worked.

      I just thought he was crazy. Apparently he was on to something.

    9. Re:This is nonsense by Jeffrey_Walsh+VA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Roaches have lived among humans for long enough that their natural eviroment is our home.

    10. Re:This is nonsense by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution.

      Dear Sir,

      We are writing to you in relation to views and opinions that you articulated in Slashdot post #29465417 on 18th September last. Saids view on the mechanics of evolution were found by the committee to be grossly nescient and incorrect, and moreover demonstrating of a grievously lack of creative and logical thinking on your part. In the words of one committee member, and I quote: "WTF?!".

      Following arbitration on the matter, the committee deeply regrets to inform you that your Geek Credentials and subsequent privileges have been placed in probation pending a completed review by yourself on the basics of the theory of evolution and its predictions. We regret to inform you that until such time as this review has been filed your access to association slide rules and soldering kits will be suspended and you will be restricted to playing only those table top games which restrict themselves to six sided dice. Moreover, while you may still retain them, use of association anti-wedgie underwear is also prohibited during this time.

      Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the latest popular science volume The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution by Richard Dawkins. It is hoped that your review can be swiftly completed by a enlightening study of this book and its replete examples. I await your reply and subsequent readmission to full membership with hopeful anticipation.

      Yours sincerely

      Dexter Cuthbert
      Chairman
      Membership Review Committee
      International Geek and Nerd Association

      P.S. We mean it about the underwear.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    11. Re:This is nonsense by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your understanding of evolution is incorrect. Evolution isn't something an animal "does" or even something nature "does". It's just the simple fact that ANYTHING that leads to better reproductive success will lead to more offspring and gradually replace animals that don't have that SOMETHING.
      Evolution is not hard to understand, it's just common sense once you understand it.

      Imagine two valleys separated by a hard to cross mountain ridge. In one valley some animals develop a random mutation that gives off a strong "death stench" when they die. Over time the other animals in the valley learn or evolve an aversion to this smell because staying away from things that kill you is an advantage.

      The animals in this valley will avoid certain contagious or dangerous deaths because of this aversion. They will prosper slightly more than the animals in the next valley that don't have this combination. Over a long period of time the population in this valley grows enough that they start migrating into the other valley and over a long time they dominate and replace the animals in the next valley because of their ability.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    12. Re:This is nonsense by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It also seems to not jive with the currently understood mechanics of evolution. DETECTING such a stench would lead to a survival advantage, but actually emitting it is something done after death - so there is no natural selection at work to lead to the unification of a "death scent" to evolve towards.

      I don't know any more than you do, but here's a possible scenario: when bugs died, they emitted a slight odor as an accidental part of the decomposition process. Insect X is born with a gene that makes him dislike that odor, so he and his offspring avoid diseased corpses and are slightly less likely to die. But it's not foolproof, because the odor is slight.

      Later, one of those insects develops a "be extra stinky when you die" gene. Maybe it means he has more of a certain chemical in his exoskeleton, which bacteria like. It doesn't really help him survive, but it doesn't hurt him either. He has some offspring, and later dies. All his offspring avoid his corpse like crazy, and start doing the same for each other's corpses. Now that whole population is less likely than before to catch disease, and that particular gene keeps getting passed on.

      Think of the gene itself as an organism, with the actual insect being just a host. Would those organisms help either other reproduce? I think so.

    13. Re:This is nonsense by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think bulk breeding and crushing of roaches would likely be a fairly effective means of building these compounds in bulk (assuming, of course, that roaches have a decent amount of these chemicals in them). Paraphrasing and condensing from Wikipedia: In favorable conditions, one female roach can, in her one year lifespan, produce 300-400 offspring, and she only needs to be impregnated once to do so (though the eggs are only laid in groups of ~40 at a time). Aside from one or two commonly available nutrients, their gut bacteria synthesize all other nutrients required to live from whatever they eat, from wood to postage stamp glue to corn oil, so you can feed them otherwise worthless semi-edible plant matter as a form of accelerated composting.

      Besides, I think we can safely say that no matter how much of a threat we pose to the survival of other species (say, most of the world's fish stock), we're in no danger of running out of roaches. And aside from PETA, not a whole lot of people are going to protest a roach crushing facility that enables them to repel roaches. Just don't build it too close to people, or you'll get a whole NIMBY movement going.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    14. Re:This is nonsense by tuxedobob · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you take your Cheerios with extra piss this morning?

      I found his comment pretty entertaining. Just wish I'd read it before moving out of my old apartment.

    15. Re:This is nonsense by NikLinna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bugs killed by violent crushing and bugs that die of starvation or age probably emit different chemicals. A few months back I read about how bees carry their dead out of the hive, and identify them by similar chemical markers. If the researcher dabbed a live bee with the chemical, its sisters would drag it "kicking and screaming" out of the hive and would not let it back in. :-)

    16. Re:This is nonsense by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know I'm being pedantic, but am I the only person on /. that knows the word is "jibe", not "jive"?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    17. Re:This is nonsense by Ajaxamander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But fatty acid extracts are chemical compounds.

      Please tell this to as many people as possible... substitute "wood" "air" "table salt" and "sugar" as needed. I'm getting really tired of this anti-"chemicals" attitude that's sneaking into everyone's mindset.

    18. Re:This is nonsense by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn hippies.

    19. Re:This is nonsense by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like the cut of your jib, sir!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  2. if you build it by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

    we will come! :) We don't care if other people build it either

    -Mister cockroach.

  3. Smelling death by spgass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article says humans cannot detect the fatty acid extracts, but I wonder if this theory expands to mammals. After getting a couple of squirrels with my tube trap, squirrels now seem afraid to enter. My wife thought they might "smell death"

    1. Re:Smelling death by confused+one · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bob the squirrel saw his cousin Sammy go in there. He saw what happened to Sammy. Bob does not want to end up like Sammy.

      As an added reminder, essence of Sammy remains in the trap. Sammy juice. Yuck.

  4. Sharks, too by Das+Auge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The same thing works on sharks. I watched a Discovery show where they got the sharks into a feeding frenzy, dropped some of the repellent (dead shark material) into the water, and all of the sharks took off in seconds.

    Thinking about it, I doubt very much that humans millennia ago smelled dead human and though, "Hey, I wonder what killed him. I'm going to go see."

    1. Re:Sharks, too by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. It takes a lot of practice to overcome revulsion of the dead. There is nothing that smells quite as bad like a dead person, even a fresh one has a smell that will tie your stomach in a knot. My fiance is a mortician and it took her quite some time to get over the smell. It still creeps me out when I end up having to wait on her at the funeral home.

    2. Re:Sharks, too by smoker2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It still creeps me out when I end up having to wait on her at the funeral home.

      Anything good on the winelist ?

  5. The only good bug is a dead bug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Join the Mobile Infantry and save the Galaxy. Service guarantees citizenship. Would you like to know more?

  6. Bring out your dead ! by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your anecdote does nothing to invalidate the article's data.

    It makes sense for any animal to avoid a site where its own are dead.

    It's the same category of reflex that makes us want to throw up when someone pukes (being social animals we often eat together), that makes us universally find some smells offensive (pretty much always originally attached to something potentially toxic), etc.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
    1. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Rooked_One · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah I see your analogy about the puking part... I won't go anywhere someone has puked unless i'm really messed up... so given all the chemicals that i've sprayed in my garage, good chance they are probably tripping their antennae off.

    2. Re:Bring out your dead ! by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have ants where I live, and I've experimented by killing and collecting dead ants, then crushing them and spreading the juices around.

      The ants don't care about their own dead, apparently. I find trails of ants all the time where dead ants are scattered along the trail. It doesn't deter them one bit...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    3. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have ants where I live

      I would hope so, unless you are posting from the ISS ;)

      The ants don't care about their own dead, apparently

      Actually a lot of ants will collect their dead. It's really quite amazing to watch too.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, that convinces me. The anecdote that you're not quite sure you've recalled correctly sure outweighs this report from scientists. Kudos!

    5. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've lived places without ants. Despite its name, I've never seen an ant in Antarctica.

    6. Re:Bring out your dead ! by Alcoholist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's what I do for ants, works better than any of those nerve agent poisons. Plain old diatomaceous earth (diatomite, silica powder, kisselgur, etc...) Some farmers use it to protect grain and stuff, but it works on ants and other crawly pests too. You put it in places where ants like to run around, like say, the base of a door, along a foundation or on top of an anthill. It kills some of them, injures others but they seem to hate it so much eventually the colony gives up and moves away from your house.

      --
      Bibo Ergo Sum.
  7. Folklore by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several gardening experts claimed that grinding up bugs and spraying them on crops would repel bugs, but field tests have shown no special results. Perhaps this only works in confined spaces like were cockroaches live.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Folklore by BeardedChimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By sprinkling the bugs over a large area you will quickly dilute the fatty acids. It's very possible that if they take the compound and produce it in large quantities that this approach would work.

  8. Re:Perfect bug repellent? by danking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well I think you would have to leave it around for it to start rotting, I assume most people clean up the squashed roach after they squash it.

  9. Crops by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:Crops by T+Murphy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It creates a niche market for bee gas masks. Brilliant business strategy, I say.

    2. Re:Crops by Gorath99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

      Still useful (if it really works) for protecting fruit though. Once the blossom is gone and the fruit starts to develop, pollination is no longer an issue.

    3. Re:Crops by Inda · · Score: 2, Informative

      That not what self pollinating means though. Pollen still needs to be transfered from one flower to another. It's just that the flowers can be on the same plant.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    4. Re:Crops by Kirijini · · Score: 4, Informative

      How are they going to use this for protecting crops? If ants are repelled, wasps and bees will be, too, and there goes your pollination.

      Corn is pollinated by wind. I'm not going to bother to find sources for each kind of corn, but here's links for maize (American corn), wheat (European corn), and barley barley. (I guess that link only indicates that Barley self-pollinates, not pollinates by wind. whatever.) Rice is also wind-pollinated.

      Potatoes don't need to be pollinated at all.

      Therefore, if a product is developed from cockroach juice, it might be most useful for these kinds of crops. Note that "cereals" and "roots and tubers" are the 1st and 3rd most produced type of crop.

  10. Great... by Gage+With+Union · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the solution to live cockroaches on my floor is dead cockroaches?

    As someone living in a gentrifying neighborhood, any chance this works on hipsters?... (some ground up Converse All-Stars and stovepipe jeans?)

    1. Re:Great... by secretcurse · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, the one nice thing about hipsters is that they have some level of reasoning. Just nail one to the front door with a sign that reads "no Pabst" and you shouldn't have to deal with any others.

      --
      I'm using all of my mod points to mod ancient memes down. Please join me.
    2. Re:Great... by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you would actually have to grind up the hipster.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Great... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find your ideas fascinating, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  11. Slashdotters stench by MaGGuN · · Score: 2, Funny

    What sort of stench does slashdotters emit that predominantly serve as a warning signal to females? And why is there no research on it?

    1. Re:Slashdotters stench by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rotting pizza and the smell of coding for 36 hours in a hot room without a bath, maybe?

  12. Re:Prolly not going to work. by icebrain · · Score: 2, Informative

    It doesn't surprise me that penicillin (an antibiotic) doesn't work too well against a virus. That's not a mutation.

    Perhaps you meant bacteria that are immune to penicillin (which, in many cases, are the result of stupid people insisting on trying to treat viral infections with antibiotics).

    --
    The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  13. RAID's days may be numbered by Elwar123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this why there's an article today that RAID's days may be numbered?

  14. Is this new? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A few decades ago, Edward O. Wilson proved that ants mark their trails with scent by removing their organs individually and smearing them around. Eventually he found one that would cause them to follow the trail, and would demonstrate his discovery by writing his name in ants.

    I heard a recorded lecture where he told this story, and he also mentioned that they discovered the "dead ant" smell that would signal the colony that "this one is dead, go put it on the pile." When they put the scent on a live ant, the other ants would carry it off to the pile, ignoring the fact that it was squirming the whole way there. And until the stinky ant cleaned itself off enough, they would keep putting it back every time it left the pile.

    1. Re:Is this new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      [...] And until the stinky ant cleaned itself off enough, they would keep putting it back every time it left the pile.

      That's awesome. I can use ants to keep any insect a prisoner?
      Muhahahaha! Mosquitoes, the day of reckoning has come!!

    2. Re:Is this new? by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...they discovered the "dead ant" smell that would signal the colony that "this one is dead, go put it on the pile." When they put the scent on a live ant, the other ants would carry it off to the pile, ignoring the fact that it was squirming the whole way there...

      Later made into a major motion picture.

    3. Re:Is this new? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

      A few decades ago, Edward O. Wilson proved that ants mark their trails with scent by removing their organs individually and smearing them around.

      Damn, those are some masochistic ants.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  15. Less nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe for some bugs, but for those nasty caca roches, I get a bowl, wipe the top 4 inches around inside with vegtable oil then put whatever inside... coffee grounds, bananas... whatever... There are tons of dead ones in there but that doesn't stop more from coming. Also, cockroaches are cannibals.

    Got a roach problem? Cheap boric acid, sold in plastic bottles everywhere. Don't dump it, pour it, spoon it. Don't waste time preparing mixtures of food and boric acid. Snip the top off of the plastic top. Tip the bottle a little bit, and squeeze. Practice until you can create clouds of fine particles floating in the air. Globs and clumps of white powder do you no good at all - you want a very fine cloud to float out, so that it can settle and coat everything.

    Get rid of kids and pets for a couple days - some people say this stuff is bad for them.

    Proceed to walk all around the house, puffing powder into every corner, nook, crevice, and cranny. Don't forget to crawl under the sink, behind the toilet, behind doors - everywhere. Get the cracks between window frames, behind mirrors, closets, every where! Got a crawlspace under the house? Get down there and puff away. Don't forget the attic, if you have one. Powder the water heater, and the cubby hole that it stands in. (gas heater? this stuff isn't flammable, but for safety sake, you might turn the gas off for a few hours) Get under and behind appliances like microwaves, refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers and dishwashers.

    Perhaps most importantly, puff this stuff into all cracks between baseboards, paneling, corners of rooms, door frames. If you can get a tool behind a baseboard or panel, pry it out slightly to puff dust behind it.

    I've cleaned out unbelievable infestations in repossessed mobile homes. They don't come back! Three or four of those 1 pound bottles will take care of the largest single wide mobile home, I've used six in doublewides.

    If no one is actually living in the home, there's no need to "clean up" right away. Leave everything like it is, so that if you've missed anyplace, those cannibal roaches come out to consume the dead.

    When it is time to clean up - just sweep and mop floors. There's no need to vacuum the dust from inaccessible places. Just leave it to aid in prevention of future infestations.

    For ten dollars or less, you can accomplish what the high dollar pest control companies cannot.

    NOTE: Dusting for roaches may be less effective in the moist basements inhabited by geeks.

    1. Re:Less nonsense by CityZen · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Get rid of kids and pets for a couple days

      At first I thought you were talking about another useful side-effect of the boric acid.

  16. Call me a skeptic by daveywest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems like bunk to me. I've cleaned some very nasty rentals, and I've removed roach grave yards by the pound. Every roach I've ever seen doesn't bat an eye at eating their departed comrades.

  17. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

    The very high degree of conservation of this trait across species suggests that there are already strong selective pressures to maintain it. Selective use of this stuff is not likely to counter that. Also most evolution happens through frequency shifts of alleles already present in the population, not through creation of new alleles by mutation. Given the long evolutionary history, there may not be many non-functioning alleles for this trait to promote. Mutations are random and infrequent, and most are lethal. It could be many, many years before a suitable mutation arises.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  18. Re:Prolly not going to work. by Creedo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dry Land?

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  19. Geeks are insect experts by millwall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't it cute to note that so many /. geeks are now also apparently insect experts

  20. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by inviolet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem here is capitalism doesn't care -- only protecting high value targets would be the sensible precaution, but why only do that when can make millions, even billions, for a few years until the resistance is developed? And nevermind the ethical implications of short-circuiting a natural defense mechanism -- we might give cockroaches and other insects, that make up a significant amount of the biomass, the ability to spread diseases on a massive scale, since they aren't afraid of their dead anymore.

    That may be the very thing that prevents the bug population from ever developing a resistance to this. Any group that does, will be exposed to the perils that they were once protected from (via their aversion to the smell).

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  21. Trouble with crustaceans by pHalec · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, finally there's a way to get these damn lobsters off my crops!

  22. Re:Bad plan, darlings. by Novae+D'Arx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, this actually might work out: 1) Use the repellent for X seasons, until no longer effective due to the bugs losing their fear of dead bugs. 2) Spread a known (bug-only!) disease the next Y seasons, until no longer effective due to the bugs regaining their fear of dead bugs. 3) See 1) Actually, the same would theoretically work with antibiotics - have the FDA remove all, say, penicillin-based antibiotics from the market (except special cases, like where someone is allergic to every other antibiotic, or the only thing a specific bacteria is susceptible to is penicillin-based drugs) for a few years. Studies show that bacteria quickly lose resistance to antibiotics (at least in the lab) when no longer routinely exposed - it takes more energy to produce the resistant proteins/plasmids, and the resistant bacteria are quickly outcompeted. Cycle in/out 1-2 major groups like this every few years, and the "superbugs" that have people so freaked out will be susceptible again. There, I solved that problem - 1 billion dollars, please. I'll take local checks. Really, it's simple. Use evolutionary genetic patterns to our advantage - it's like hacking for the biosphere! ...Cue: "what could possibly go wrong" here...

  23. Across species? by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    The scent of a dead cockroach might repel other cockroaches. But throw a dead hooker in a ditch and see how fast the bugs congregate.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.