Slashdot Mirror


Blueprint For a Quantum Electric Motor

TechReviewAl writes "Alexey Ponomarev from the University of Augsburg in Germany and colleagues have revealed the blueprints for an electric motor built with just two atoms. The motor would have one neutral atom and one charged atom trapped in a ring-shaped optical lattice. The atoms jump from one site in the lattice to the next as they travel around the ring and placing this ring in an alternating magnetic field creates the conditions necessary to keep the charged atom moving round the the ring. A team from the University of Glasgow in the UK in fact built one of these quantum motors back in 2007, which they called an optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms. 'The next step, say Ponomarev and co, is to attach the motor to a nanoscopic resonator, such as a spring board or nanomushroom, and make it vibrate. If you can do that, they say, you'd be powering a classical object using a quantum motor.'"

69 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of... by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Can you have zillions of these running in parallel with some kick azz nanotech gearbox to make something more efficient than a 'normal' electric motor to power an electric vehicle or something?

  3. Vibrate? by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    Add some tiny little batteries, and you can make a porno version of Tron.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    1. Re:Vibrate? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      My first reaction was a non-toxic version of the vibrator that could be attached to Panties. One could easily market this feminine product as a "Feel Good Film".

  4. Re:Huh? by omeomi · · Score: 4, Informative

    How exactly is this quantum? Does it spin in both ways at once?

    "In physics, a quantum (plural: quanta) is an indivisible entity of a quantity that has the same units as the Planck constant and is related to both energy and momentum of elementary particles of matter (called fermions) and of photons and other bosons." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum

    What makes you think something has to spin both ways at once to be quantum?

  5. Optical Lattice? by PotatoFarmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what exactly is an optical lattice, and why is it not considered part of the motor itself? Other than the fact that "motor made out of only two atoms!" is clearly a better-sounding story, that is.

    1. Re:Optical Lattice? by virmaior · · Score: 1

      that was my question as well. the motor seems to consist of many atoms. one might fairly say "the piston" is only 2 atoms.

    2. Re:Optical Lattice? by belthize · · Score: 1

      What I don't get is how hooking one up to this http://nanomushroom.com/ will be all that productive.

      What exactly is a nanomushroom other than a really really small mushroom.

    3. Re:Optical Lattice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      An Optical Lattice is a complicated array of lasers that create a egg carton like potential for the atoms (the atoms interact with the lasers via the Stark shift iirc). The idea is that the atoms then get "trapped" in the minima of this potential [well, they are still tunneling and all that].
      Via the wavelength of the lasers and their intensity one can control "depth" of the potential wells and the spacing of the lattice, which is quite nice, because you get essentially a solid state system where you can change those parameters "on the fly", thus enabling studies of insulator-conductor transitions and whatnot.
      And little games like that in TFA, of course.

    4. Re:Optical Lattice? by tenco · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Ok, I'll give you a hint: maybe there's a wikipedia article about what an optical lattice is.

    5. Re:Optical Lattice? by WillCodeForRaisins · · Score: 1

      Ok, then what exactly is a nanomushroom? No wikipedia article on that one, just some lame movie service.

  6. Two atoms? by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect a few more atoms were used for the lasers that generate the optical containment and the device that applies the magnetic field and whatever was used to cool those two atoms to near zero Kelvins. Sounds a bit like a quantum physicists' retelling of stone soup.

    --
    Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
    1. Re:Two atoms? by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They didn't say the whole system was two atoms, they said the motor is two atoms. The motor is the component that turns a non-mechanical energy potential into mechanical motion. The cooling system, the device that produces the magnetic field, etc. are no more part of the motor than the gas tank and radiator are part of the internal combustion engine.

    2. Re:Two atoms? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I suspect a few more atoms were used for the lasers that generate the optical containment and the device that applies the magnetic field and whatever was used to cool those two atoms to near zero Kelvins.

      Well okay, but on the other hand a 4 cylinder engine involves more parts than just those 4 cylinders -- some of those parts even being of a cylindrical nature! "4-cylinder" engine has more than 4 cylinders, wtf?! And while for a liquid-cooled engine the radiator is an essential component, you don't normally include it when talking about 'the engine'.

      So sure from one point of view "two atoms" is poppycock. From another viewpoint you can say that much like the pistons in an ICE, its these two atoms what convert some other source of energy into motive force, thus "two atom motor". I think it's rather obvious which view they were speaking from -- the one that is correct. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Two atoms? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      What about the spark plugs (lasers)?

    4. Re:Two atoms? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      My home town nearly went to zero Kevins back in 1978.

      It was a particularly cold winter, and we were already down to 3 Kevins (due to their low popularity at the time).

      Kevin Thomas had flown out to be with his son's family for a wedding and got stuck in Boston for a whole week due to the weather. 2 Kevins left.

      Kevin Lemmer was rushed to the hospital during my shift. I still remember the call from the EMTs as the ambulance was rushing toward us. "It's Lemmer. He's in bad shape. Drove right into the fucking ditch." We called the time of death at 6:15 PM.

      At 6:16, all eyes turned to room 2217. Kevin Spencer was 82 and on his death bed with leukemia. His family being Catholic, he had already been given his last rights. If he couldn't hold out until Kevin Thomas returned, we would be at zero Kevins. Sure, we had 4 perfectly healthy Calvins, but they're just not the same.

      It was 7:15 when Carla Brooks and her husband James burst through the main entrance. "She's not due for 2 weeks!", James exclaimed. As the staff bustled around getting the Brookses settled, they exchanged darting glances with each other. This was their first child, and they wanted to keep the baby's sex a secret. Of course, in a small town, secrets don't get kept. Nearly all of the hospital staff new that the child about to rip open Mrs. Brooks was indeed a boy.

      The delivery was routine, and Kevin Brooks was born healthy, if a tad underweight, at 10:52 PM. Kevin Spencer was pronounced dead at 10:54.

      It was, as they say, a close one. Kevin Thomas arrived two days later, the weather having finally cleared up. To this day, we still rib him about it.

      Cedar Falls is currently at 5 Kevins.

    5. Re:Two atoms? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      The lasers aren't the spark plugs; they're more like the walls surrounding the piston.

    6. Re:Two atoms? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Figured that, but I wanted something that could make a spark for my car analogy.

    7. Re:Two atoms? by Laxitive · · Score: 1

      I suspect an oil rig, a refinery, a transport truck, and a highway system to deliver the oil, and an oil distribution infrastructure were all part of your car motor too. Because without those it's just a hunk of twisted metal.

      -Laxitive

  7. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not really, it would be both running and not running at any given point in time, until you look at it...that can't be good for the calculations.

    --
    Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  8. just begging to be taken out of context? by argent · · Score: 1

    at what point did a vibrating nanomushroom become a classical object?

    Well, if you don't call it "classical" people are going to think it's porn!

  9. Cold Atom? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Pardon me the ignorance here, but what is 'cold atom'?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:Cold Atom? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Now I understand why people were not at all excited when the Cold War broke out.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Cold Atom? by Tanman · · Score: 1

      IT ARE AN ATOM THAT IS KOOLER THAN THE HOT ATOMZ.

      *cough*antiyellfilterdefeater*cough*

      i should note -- ianap(hysicist)

  10. Suck it cops! by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope this one day scales up to car size. The cops would be able to tell I was speeding on the freeway, but have no idea where I was. Or they would know exactly where I was, but have no idea if I was speeding. HUP FTW!

    I'll show myself out....

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Suck it cops! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's all well and good, Mr. Quantum Speeding Ticket Avoider Man, but remeber that the same principle applies to your car keys.

      And what happens when you get into an accident? You'll be both dead and alive until someone opens the car door! (Is this how the zombie apocalypse starts?)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Suck it cops! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      You'll be both dead and alive until someone opens the car door!

      Isn't that true now? ("Schrödinger's car"?)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Suck it cops! by tenco · · Score: 1

      And what happens when you get into an accident? You'll be both dead and alive until someone opens the car door! (Is this how the zombie apocalypse starts?)

      Due to my expertise regarding zombies *cough*from movies*cough* I doubt this. Because i never saw a zombie crumble to dust if someone looked at them.

  11. Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

    Some day, when technology has advanced to the point of optimizing machines to use every last atom to maximum efficiency, tricks like this will be neat.

    Thing is, our post-singularity successors won't be amused by this "two atom" claim - you have to use up lots of atoms to hold everything in place and create the conditions necessary. If the "lattice" weren't there, the atoms wouldn't act like a motor. The fields from the lattice atoms are what create the necessary conditions.

    1. Re:Well by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's not "how atom-efficient can you make the system" -- after all, individual atoms are inconceivably cheap -- it's "how minimal of a motor can you create". (Although if it's using a quantum-mechanical effect, the fewer the atoms involved, the easier.)

    2. Re:Well by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Atoms? Cheap? There is a hidden cost, my friend!

            Benefits? Perqs? A green cookie on Saint Patrick's Day?
            -- Monty Burns reads the proposed union contract, ``Last Exit to Springfield''

        Burns flashes back to simpler days. Springfield, 1909, back when
        people smashed atoms by hand. Grandfather Burns catches one of his
        employees trying to steal some atoms and has him taken away.

            You can't treat the working man this way. One day, we'll form a union
            and get the fair and equitable treatment we deserve! Then we'll go
            too far, and get corrupt and shiftless, and the Japanese will eat us alive!

    3. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      There are a finite number of atoms in our solar system. Getting much more mass than what is already here will be incredibly difficult (unless wormholes are possible). So some day technology will be advanced to where every atom needs to be in the right place doing the right thing.

  12. Re:Huh? by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Blueprint of two atoms? What, two fuzzy dots next to each other? How many arrangements can you have with two dot like parts? Without RTF, I'm assuming other atoms are involved, despite what the summary indicates?

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  13. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    only in Boston.

  14. Re:Huh? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    Without RTF

    Huh?

    Raising the floor?
    Roasting the fatty?
    Retarding the forum?
    Rampaging through France?
    Regurgitating the fruit?
    Reconstituting the fluid?
    Raping the flowers?

    Help me out here, I'm struggle-ugle-ing*

    *thanks, Joe Namath!

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  15. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen an article, where authors said that it is possible to encode quantum information in "holes" in photon flow. For example when you have steady stream of photons, each emitted exactly after the same period, you can actually encode information in photons which should be sent in some cycles, but they need not be really sent. They stated at the end that quantum physics is so strange that a quantum computer which doesn't really work is the best one: it completes calculations and returns real results but because it doesn't work - it doesn't make errors.

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  16. Re:Huh? by buswolley · · Score: 1

    ha. RTFA

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  17. Re:Huh? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Rich Text Format. The article wasn't written in WordPad.

  18. Keep people in their own cars by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Developments like this are why I think emphasis on conservation at the expense of research into cheap and clean power generation is misguided. I hear a lot of talk from environmentalists about getting people out of their cars. The real effect of those policies will be to get poor people out of their cars while rich people will continue to enjoy the material advantages that personal transportation offers.

    I'd rather research cheap and clean power sources and keep poor people in their cars. That's social justice.

    1. Re:Keep people in their own cars by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      Very big of you, but why do you think cars are a good place to be ? Your last sentence can be read from the other aspect too. Let's keep the poor people in their cars while the rich get better transport arrangements.

      I have a hate thing with cars at the moment. It seems they are more addictive than heroin, and kill more people. Yet if you try talking to a car owner you rarely get any sense if it means restricting their rights to drive. I've heard arguments from people suggesting that the best thing for the city is to allow more cars in, and let them basically race around without regard for pedestrians. Parking should be a god given right, free of course, and if there isn't space, rip down a few buildings and build car parks. Shortly after a story about out of town supermarkets being forced to charge for parking in order to help the city centre traders (where everybody defended clogging the streets to get to these places), a new supermarket opened and people from the other side of town drove across to get their shopping. But then they claim the city centre is dead and suggest letting more cars in. I rarely see more than 1 person per car, they sit in queues for great lengths of time and pay through the nose for the privilege. Cars are an insidious menace.
      A guy was trying to jump off a bridge a few weeks ago. It's the bridge over the Severn to Wales. The N-S traffic tailback was 20 miles long while the police tried unsuccessfully to get him down. It blocked the entire N-S, and E-W motorway for 5 hours, and it isn't actually that near the N-S road. How can we keep doing this shit ? There must have been at least 30,000 people stuck in that jam - how efficient is that ? This country is having constant coronaries.
      Now one car manufacturing union is demanding half a billion quid to bail out the firm and keep it working. Let it go. The people are going to have to find a new job pretty soon anyway, may as well make a start. You can pay welfare for 40,000 people for less than 500 million. The South Island of New Zealand has about the right car density, any more and the point kind of goes away.

    2. Re:Keep people in their own cars by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      smoker2,

      Can't is just be a matter of individual choice?

      You don't like cars, so you structure your life to avoid them.

      I like cars so I am free to decide to make them a part of my life.

      Each of us is free and not coerced in this decision. Is there anything wrong with that?

    3. Re:Keep people in their own cars by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      I'm a visionary. Clean and plentiful personal energy production could begin with a breakthrough like this. Apparently some others agree with me because my post is modded up.

    4. Re:Keep people in their own cars by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I'd rather research cheap and clean power sources and keep poor people in their cars.

      What's wrong with low income housing? Are you seriously suggesting that poor people shouldn't have access to running water, decent sized beds or even a toilet?!?

      </joke>

  19. Superposition by sexybomber · · Score: 1

    I'd love to try some quantum nanomushrooms. Would they simultaneously do nothing and cause me to trip my face off?

  20. for more of an insight by KingPin27 · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to the paper that discusses this. It's an interesting read for anyone who cares about physics and theoretical motors. Article here
    Happy physics reading. PS: The links are in the top right.

    --
    "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
  21. Re:Huh? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    You're right, having opposite characteristics of one quality doesn't make it quantum, but more correctly, if you can divide it (or rather, break it apart, or split it), its not a quantum. Since atoms can clearly be split, ipso-facto, buppity buppity boo. This is an "atomic-sized" motor, I guess. Still pretty cool.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  22. Quantum Perpetual Motion machine.... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    How long before some lab hack claims to have made a nano scale "free energy" machine.....

    Of course if you could find some way to make nano machine that could turn latent heat energy into electricity you could theoretically make a device that could make cold air and electricity out of warm air......

    Build a couple hundred million of these and we could keep the arctic region cold as ice and supply the tropics with plentiful electrical energy....

    Assuming you could tweak the laws of thermodynamics to work this way.....

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  23. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Soon we will be ablr to have Quantum Hard drives

    1. Re:wow by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Mod parent funny, and yourselves as dumb.
      http://i37.tinypic.com/14npvtk.jpg

      Maxtor (< Quantum, Seagate (< Maxtor.
      (< is the buyout (Pac Man) symbol.
      (<>) is for mergers.

    2. Re:wow by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Looks like yours is corrupt already. :)

    3. Re:wow by dissy · · Score: 1

      That what happens when you read the data back in without a cat present.

  24. Emily Litella? by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 1

    Gilda Radner: "What is all this fuss about Cedar Rapids reaching zero Kevins?"

    Chevy Chase: "Emily that unit of temperature is Kelvin, not Kevin."

    Gilda: "Oh. Never mind, b****.

    I suppose one of the lost Kevins was the physics teacher at Cedar Falls High?

    --
    Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
    1. Re:Emily Litella? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Whoooooooooooooooooooooooosh

  25. Only two atoms? I don't think so. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    What are those lattices made of? What is the magnetic field generator made of?

    I can make a motor of zero atoms too. I just have to wrap it in a traditional electric motor. :P

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  26. Wake me up when they make a real version by feranick · · Score: 1

    As I said before on similar occasions, those are only calculations on the feasibility of making the atomic motor. As much as these calculations can be difficult, the actual experimental realization is even more complicated. Think for example in the challenges in making the ring shaped optical lattice with atomic precision, while maintaining the atoms cold enough (usually with laser pumps). Only at that point I will be really impressed, and actually start thinking on how to integrate it with more complex molecular machines.

  27. optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    Best band name...ever!

  28. Simulation != real by feranick · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind this is a simulation paper (i.e. pretty much a proof of concept). There isn't any device made yet, only in a oversimplified model within a simulation.

    1. Re:Simulation != real by net28573 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "it turns out that a team from the University of Glasgow in the UK actually built one of these quantum motors back in 2007, which they called an optical ferris wheel for ultracold atoms." Yes there is a device according to the article! note the word "built".

      --
      RIP TRICERATOPS, YOU NEVER EXISTED
  29. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by wonmon · · Score: 1

    It is probably hella close to being an ideal machine.

  30. Re:Just because it moves, doesn't mean it's a moto by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    So you didn't even read TFS. Good job.
    Do the words "alternating magnetic field" mean anything to you ? or "to keep the atom in constant motion" ?

  31. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A vibrating dildo for a protozoan?

  32. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by mrops · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I should mark this Funny or Interesting

  33. but why? by Altreus · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to be flippant but I can't think of any practical application for this motor that isn't somewhat confounded by the requirement for the lasers and the magnetic field generator... TFA seems fairly proud that they've come up with this thing but doesn't really tell us what good it does.

    I mean, does it have some massively superb output per unit size? Is the amount of motive energy it creates so great that it massively outweighs the amount of energy put *in* to the system by running the lasers and the magnetic field generator? This all assuming that they succeed in harnessing it, of course.

    --
    74.117.115.116 32.97.110.111 116.104.101.114 32.80.101.114 108.32.104.97 99.107.101.114
  34. Aren't they all? by gordguide · · Score: 1

    Okay, call me crazy, but can't EVERY atom-level structure with atoms circling other atoms a "motor"? I'm calling "Patent Troll" !!

  35. Yo dawg by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    We heard like you liked paradoxes so we put quantum superposition in your classical scale universe so you can not spin while you spin.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  36. Re:So the real problem rears its head by tenco · · Score: 1

    By measuring it's power or energy output?

  37. Re:So.. what is the efficiency of this motor? by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

    Link!?!?

  38. Re:Huh? by Nora1701D · · Score: 1

    Well, one can spin up and one can spin down... but you'll never know until you see if the cat is dead.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion