Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Awarded Patent For Peer-To-Peer DRM

An anonymous reader writes "Music DRM might not be as dead as previously thought. InformationWeek reports that Microsoft has been awarded a digital-rights management patent for a distributed DRM system that works over peer-to-peer networks and uses encrypted public and private keys as the licensing mechanism. The author claims that patent number 7,594,275, entitled simply 'Digital rights management system,' is significant because, while centralized music stores like iTunes don't use DRM anymore, the Microsoft patent makes it possible that peer-to-peer networks could reemerge in the future as a viable, albeit protected, source of content."

5 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. So let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Up until this point I have two ways of downloading content: Quick and easy from a dedicated server, but DRMed, or slowly and unreliably from peer-to-peer networks, but DRM-free.

    So now Microsoft kindly offers me a service that has all the slowness and unreliability that peer-to-peer networks, while keeping all the restrictions of DRM? Brilliant!

  2. Simple question by dascandy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want me to have the content or not?

    If you want me to have the content, you can't make me unhave the content.
    If you don't want me to have the content, *just sod off already*.

    There's no place for DRM in the world. It's fundamentally flawed at its principles.

  3. I thought the customers had spoken already? by miffo.swe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believed the customers had spoken out clearly enough about DRM. All sites i have seen lately that sells music are totally into mp3.

    I dont think people will take it up the shute any more willingly just because its movies thats DRM tainted. Especially not now when movies is getting into all sorts of gadgets like mobile phones, media players, netbooks and game devices etc.

    DRM only do one thing from the paying customer perspective, severely limits the portability of paid content. It does not bring any benefits whatsoever. It also makes pirated/cracked content better than bought content and thats really not a good selling point. My kid really hates Microsoft because of how bad the DRM in GTA4 was and how many hoops he had to jump through to get it installed and working. He actually d/l a pirated version even if he has a legit copy, just to avoid the DRM stuff. I have a really hard time explaining to him why he should pay for his games after stuff like this.

    The reason Microsoft is so into this is pretty obvious. They want to be the gatekeeper between people and their content so that any content will demand Microsoft licenses to be usable.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  4. Re:Question by tsa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never heard of anyone ending a friendship over an operating system. I'm glad I don't have you as a friend.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  5. Look on the bright side of it... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be the first to say:
    This sucks donkey balls!

    On a more optimistic note, if this patent is enforced, nobody (except Microsoft) can make DRM'ed peer-to-peer networks---that is, you'll get less DRM.

    Right? ;-)