Slashdot Mirror


Shuttleworth Suggests 1-Way Valve For User Experience Testing

darthcamaro writes "No surprise but Ubuntu's Mark Shuttleworth has come out swinging in favor of the Linux desktop. Speaking at Linuxcon yesterday he detailed the things that he thinks Linux requires in order to win the desktop wars. Those include: co-ordinated software releases, better quality and design, some user experience testing and oh yeah, a dose of 'shut the f*** up' too. During his keynote, he extended an invitation to any open source application to submit their software for testing by user-experience experts. The sessions would be recorded for posterity, and the developer would not be able to interact with the user. "'If the developer is in the room, they have to say nothing. It's the shut the f*** up protocol,' Shuttleworth said. 'You sit and watch someone struggle with the software that you've so lovingly produced.'"

24 of 757 comments (clear)

  1. STFU needs to be heard. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, sounds like a cool idea. I would LOVE the Amarok2.x devs to sit in on that session.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:STFU needs to be heard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Learn gconf-editor.

  2. grawlix fail by Nick+Number · · Score: 5, Funny

    and oh yeah, a dose of 'shut the f*uck up' too.

    Wow, it's a good thing that asterisk was there. Somebody might have seen something profane.

    --
    Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    1. Re:grawlix fail by mctk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somebody might have s*** something profane.

      F***.

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    2. Re:grawlix fail by dwiget001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      >

      1. Calls PETA
      2. Sues SPCA for not preventing god from killing kittens
      3. ...
      4. PROFIT!!!

    3. Re:grawlix fail by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, it worked on me. I'm trying to figure out what word the summary writer was trying to imply. Firetruck maybe?

    4. Re:grawlix fail by Nick+Number · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a wildcard, so there could be an infinite number of letters in there.

      I like your idea though. Living close to a busy street, there are many evenings when I wish somebody would shut the firetruck up.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    5. Re:grawlix fail by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Relax. It's not like someone used "Belgium".

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  3. Re:We are our own problem. by Romancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    What did he just tell you? STFU!

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  4. Re:We are our own problem. by siloko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always employ the 'Shut the fuck up' protocol. Unfortunately for my testing team it is usually me who is shouting it . . .

  5. Re:We don't need another desktop OS. by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ironically, Linux is a far better desktop OS than a Workstation OS. Microsoft is just too far ahead on making it easy to manage thousands of workstations with minimal setup.

    Perhaps, but I don't think botnets really count as an example of superiority over Linux.

  6. Re:Inherrent charateristic of Open Source by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because so many developers develop Open Source applications for personal satisfaction, they tend to focus on scratching their own itches.

    Note to self. Stop shaking hands with Open Source developers...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Re:We don't need another desktop OS. by noundi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, the simple fact is there is no need for another desktop OS. Windows and Mac are fine. I don't know why people think Linux will _ever_ make headway in that space when there's no conceivable way it ever will.

    Instead, how about focusing on being a workstation OS and a server OS?

    Mr. RightSaidFred99, I think it's time for a big dose of, as Mr. Shuttleworth himself so elaborately expressed, shut the fuck up.

    --
    I am the lawn!
  8. Re:Good, I hate cats. by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I happen to like them. But my doctor told me to watch my cholesterol.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Re:We don't need another desktop OS. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah... You don't know a lot about managing Windows, do you. Or Linux for that matter, you'd using something like Cfengine to achieve this, not god damned "gsh". What is this, 1986. Jesus Christ dude.

  10. Re:To be so lucky... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know how many times I've torn my hair out because the 'Help' menu's only item was "About".

    PS - I thought I was the only one. I banged my head on the desk one time and it left a bruise because of that. True story. (I wasn't having a very good day to begin with though)

  11. Re:Not the issue.... by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is easy:

    Step 1- Get two identical rooms. Fill one with computers with your favorite Linux installed, the other with computers with Windows installed.

    Step 2- Put a sign on the door reading "Mac Lab". Use large letters.

    Step 3- Observe resulting behavior. Write paper. Profit!

    (Before anyone gets offended, I think Macs are ok and used them a lot in the past, but think this would be an interesting experiment even though different than the op suggested.)

  12. Re:Kudos to him! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

    RMS?

    Basic personal hygiene, is my guess.

  13. Re:We DO need another desktop OS. by velja27 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well you then continue to use ur XP and have 1 antivirus for 1/4 the internet and another antivirus for 2/4 of the internet and then use some spyware removal program to take care of 3/4 internet and you are safe and when you spit all that money for antiviruses there goes Vista and spit money there and then comes out Win7 then again same thing and around and around we go or you will just buy Win7 cause Vista was such an epic win for M$.

  14. Re:We DO need another desktop OS. by fullfactorial · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows has not intuitiveness.

    The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that it's all learned.
    - Unknown

  15. Re:We DO need another desktop OS. by thethibs · · Score: 4, Funny

    This has to win an award for the longest sentence ever posted on Slashdot, with a special mention for incoherence.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  16. Re:We DO need another desktop OS. by mpeskett · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really doubt that could even come close to being the longest sentence ever posted on Slashdot, although it might possibly be the longest sentence put together without including any punctuation or obvious structure - the trick really to building an excessively, almost absurdly, long sentence is to first ensure that it contains plenty of subclauses to pad out the length, adding extra detail without becoming complete sentences in their own right, which allows you to keep adding words without bringing the sentence to an end, followed by the addition of plenty of un-necessary, redundant and absolutely preposterously worthless adjectives and further extra description, and then the final stage is to replace natural sentence breaks with connective words, commas and semi-colons to paper over the gaps between what would otherwise be separate sentences and keep the run-on flowing so that the sentence can just keep on growing and growing without any real limit or inhibition to further growth, save for the limiting factor of the author's patience with the endeavour.

  17. Re:Kudos to him! by shallot · · Score: 2, Funny

    There will be free Linuxes, like Debian. There will be "pragmatic" Linuxes, like Ubuntu. There will be all sorts of Linuxes in between.

    You do realize that the Debian and Ubuntu are siblings and that their freedom and pragmatism policies don't actually differ all that much, at least not enough for RMS to think either of them is free enough? :)