Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Security Essentials Released; Rivals Mock It

Bimal writes "After a short three-month beta program, Microsoft is officially releasing Microsoft Security Essentials, its free, real-time consumer anti-malware solution for fighting viruses, spyware, rootkits, and Trojans. MSE is available for Windows XP 32-bit, Windows Vista/7 32-bit, and Windows Vista/7 64-bit. 'Ars puts MSE through its paces and finds an unobtrusive app with a clean interface that protected us in the dark corners of the Internet.' The software received positive notes when in beta, including a nod from the independent testing group AV-Test." But reader CWmike notes that Symantec is trash-talking Microsoft's free offering. Jens Meggers, Symantec's vice president of engineering, dismissed MSE as a "poor product" that will "never be up to snuff." Meggers added, "Microsoft has a really bad track record in security." The GM of Trend Micro's consumer division sniffed, "It's better to use something than to use nothing, but you get what you pay for."

16 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. When pressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    When Pressed, Symantec admitted they were actually describing their own products, burst into tears, and chugged the rest of the bottle of whiskey.

    1. Re:When pressed... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, you _really_ missed the point of my post to an impressive degree. Congratulations. If you think I was saying or implying that MSE is a great product, you're driving on the wrong side of the road.

      You probably don't remember when Microsoft came out with their own antivirus package as part of DOS 6, do you?

      Nope, I was an OS/2 user at the time. Having just come off the Amiga platform (and the Apple 2 platform before that), I was ready for a new doomed-to-market-failure OS. :)

  2. Symantec shouldn't talk by toastee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Around the computer shop's i've worked at we joke that we'd rather have a virus than norton on our machines, at least the virus won't charge you a fee to mess up your OS.

    --
    - Better to speak your mind than to remain silent, or someone may speak for you.
  3. Re:Symantec is a bunch of crap by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Symantec operates on the TSA theory of security:

    If you aren't being harassed by a mouth-breathing subnormal, you aren't secure.

  4. Re:Symantec is a bunch of crap by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Funny

    My father, also in IT, has the theory that Symantec's goal is to consume your computer's resources to the point where a virus would give up and realize that your computer isn't worth being used in a botnet or for extortion.

  5. Re:It's working great for me by HAKdragon · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
  6. Re:Unbiased review? by Kronik+Gamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    You must be... Oh wait.

  7. Huh? by XanC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now correct me if I'm incorrect, but was I told it's untrue that people in Springfield have no faith? Was I not misinformed?

  8. Re:Unbiased review? by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's kdawson, if Microsoft somehow cured the common cold his headline would be "Microsoft technology responsible for deaths of trillions of living organisms".

  9. Leave it to Symantec by WiiVault · · Score: 5, Funny

    to make everybody on Slashdot rush to defend MS.

  10. Re:Microsoft about to kill another industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If Microsoft kills Symantec, I will personally buy nineteen copies of Windows 7 Ultimate Edition to thank them.

  11. Re:It's working great for me by MrKaos · · Score: 1, Funny

    The thing about MS is that we know that they buy up the best talent in the business and still deliver garbage...Their products always start bad and end up mediocre.

    Priceless.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  12. Re:It's working great for me by rich_r · · Score: 2, Funny
    And that is wrong :(

    Free the files!

  13. Re:It's working great for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hell, I never understood that either. Why should anyone who just forked out $xxx for a brand-new OS then be forced to pay yearly "protection money" as well? Sounds like a racket to me.

    A racket? Don't be stupid. It's not like they put the bugs and exploits used by malware into the Operating system.

  14. Re:[citation needed?] Re:It's working great for me by M-RES · · Score: 2, Funny

    Installed without approval or authorization.
    Not removable by normal, non-invasive means.
    Reduces performance and functionality of the infected PC. Sounds like Malware to me.

    That sounds like a description of a pre-installed copy of Windows to be honest! ;)

  15. Paradigm shift! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I scanned my Fedora ISO with MSE and it didn't find any threat! Is Microsoft changing attitude towards Linux?