Slashdot Mirror


Oracle Fined For Benchmark Claims

pickens writes "Information Week reports that the Transaction Processing Council, which sets benchmarks for measuring database performance, has fined Oracle $10,000 for Oracle's ads published August 27 and September 3 on the front page of the Wall Street Journal which violate the 'fair use' rules that govern TPC members by 'comparing an existing TPC result to something that does not exist.' The ads said to expect a product announcement on October 14 that would demonstrate that some sort of hybrid Oracle-Sun setup would offer two-digit performance on the TPC-C online transaction processing test compared to IBM's 6 million transaction per minute result on its Power 595 running AIX and DB2. The TPC Council serves as a neutral forum where benchmark results are aired and compared. 'At the time of publication, they didn't have anything' submitted to the council says Michael Majdalany, administrator of the council adding that that Oracle is free to use TPC numbers once it submits an audited result for the Sun-Oracle system. Fines by the TPC are infrequent, with the last action — a $5,000 fine — levied against Microsoft in 2005 for unsupported claims about SQL Server. 'It takes a fairly serious violation to warrant a member being fined,' says Majdalany."

10 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. $10k? That's nothing. by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if Oracle knew they would be fined $10,000 it was probably still well worth the cost of the fine + the cost of the ad. Not to mention that receiving the fine has gotten them the front page of Slashdot and probably lots of other tech sites as well.

    Value for money, 10 Grand was a steal.

  2. Re:I am almost certain ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The five posters below you seem to have all said the same thing, but I'll reply to you:

    The $10K isn't important. The $10K is there so that when a customer asks an IBM (or Microsoft or whoever) representative about Oracle's ad claiming that they can beat IBM's numbers, the IBM sales rep can say 'they were fined for publishing misleading and unsupported numbers. They don't actually have a machine that gives those numbers' and move on.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  3. Re:$10k? That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jesus, since when is commenting that some company got value out of the they paid for a fine make someone a troll?

    It's not like I said "oooh, ouch, $10k will really put the hurt on Oracle" like the other 12 people who posted in the first two minutes.

    (Yeah, that's my comment that I'm replying to as AC... just in case people are still blowing mod points by marking everything in sight as Troll).

  4. It's not the fine, it's the publicity... by Seakip18 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The $10k fine isn't what Oracle is really being hit with. Depending on how serious the TPC is taken by customers or after MS or IBM run their market-o-tron speak on the actual news, this is an easy to use market strategy against Oracle.

    A-queue-the-show....

    PHB: Why should I go with IBM over other solutions like Oracle?
    Marketing guy: Wait, you're serious? Oracle? The company that can't even get benchmarks right, let alone compare them?
    PHB: What are you talking about?
    Marketing guy: Heh. Oracle's benchmarks are being decried by the industry*. You can't trust those snakes that pose as reputable sellers of database products.
    PHB: Oh teh noes! I hate snakes! Let me buy snake repellent from you now!
    *market-o-tron recommends not giving specifics but make broad generalizations.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
  5. Re:I am almost certain ... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ding! This is like a $1 fine to normal people, the important part for all the other vendors is they can now say this ad was bogus.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  6. Re:$10k? That's nothing. by Nyall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I stopped taking the moderation here seriously a long time ago. Its not worth the brain cells.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
  7. Re:$10k? That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm tempted to mod you insightful.

  8. Re:$10k? That's nothing. by HaZardman27 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks like somebody beat you to it ^_^

    --
    Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
  9. Re:Simple fix by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MySQL is a "fix" in roughly the same way that what the vet to my cat's balls was a "fix".

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  10. Re:$10k is a marketing expense... not a penalty. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but that all their competitors will be able to market by saying "Oracle got fined for lying about benchmark claims"? That's priceless.