Slashdot Mirror


Wii Update 4.2 Tries (and Fails) To Block Homebrew

marcansoft writes "On September 28, Nintendo released a Wii update, titled 4.2. This update was targeted squarely at homebrew, performing sweeping changes throughout the system. It hardly achieved that goal, though, because just two days later a new version of the HackMii installer was released that brings full homebrew capabilities back to all Wii consoles, including unmodified consoles running 4.2. However, as part of their attempt to annoy homebrew users, Nintendo updated the lowest level updateable component of the Wii software stack: boot2 (part of the system bootloader chain). Homebrew users have been using BootMii to patch boot2 in order to gain low level system access and recovery functions (running Linux natively, fixing bricks, etc). The update hasn't hindered this, as users can simply reinstall BootMii after updating (it is compatible with the update). But there's a much bigger problem: Nintendo's boot2 update code is buggy." Read on for more details. "Boot2 had never been updated in retail consoles until now. During BootMii's development, its authors noticed that Nintendo's code had critical bugs and could sometimes permanently brick a console by writing incorrect or unchecked data to flash memory, so they decided to write their own, much safer flashing code. Now, Nintendo has pushed a boot2 update to all Wii users, and the results are what was expected: users are reporting bricks after installing 4.2 on unmodified consoles. Nintendo is currently attempting to censor posts and remove references to homebrew. It is worth noting that the new boot2 does not attempt to block anything or offer any additional protection or functionality. Its sole purpose is to simply replace current versions which may or may not have been modified with BootMii. Another interesting tidbit is that Nintendo is not believed to have any method to repair this kind of brick at a factory, short of replacing the entire motherboard."

27 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. Why is that legal? by Tei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have buy a machine, not a license. If you want to open it, and mod it on any way you want. Is just a tiny mountain of chips and transistors. You could break it in pieces and use it to fix your refrigerator. Any law that let the creator of the machine perpetuate this locking trough anti-user changes sould get a fine, and any law that help then do that, sould be reverted, and the legislators of these laws be kicked in the ass with a boot.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Why is that legal? by Techmeology · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's legal because the same people who invented the DMCA invented other laws too.

      --
      Excuse for why is your room always messy?
    2. Re:Why is that legal? by selven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First, we should kick out the laws that fine the CONSUMER for daring to mess around with his own legally-bought electronics.

    3. Re:Why is that legal? by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can already sue if your house gets blown up because of your neighbor. But modding Wii consoles harms nobody.

    4. Re:Why is that legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You've overlooked a few things:

      1) The Wii is not sold at a loss.

      2) An awful lot of engineering design time is spent by console makers trying to lock down hardware. This time costs money, and is wasted since the hardware will inevitably be cracked.

      3) Most people that buy the Wii have no idea how to hack the hardware, nor do they have an interest in learning to do so. Indulging a tiny fraction of the Wii user community that likes to tinker is NOT going to sink the entire product. In fact, if Nintendo would help them out by opening up the schematic and the firmware, they might actually sell MORE units...

    5. Re:Why is that legal? by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whether or not you sell my an item at a loss has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that I now own that item, and am free to do whatever I want with it, so long as my use causes no direct physical harm to others. Modding a Wii does not cause any physical harm to anyone, so it should be OK. Or at least it would, if copyright/patent trolls didn't have the ear of legislatures.

      If Nintendo sold Wiis at a loss (which they don't, IIRC) and discovered that everyone is now using them only for homebrew, they would jack up the price so they can remain profitable. I'm sure the other console makers would do the same.

      --
      SSC
    6. Re:Why is that legal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What you're telling people to do is fraud, which is a felony. The serials won't match, so the switch can be detected trivially. Congratulations, you've incited people to easily-detectable crimes. Not very smart.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Why is that legal? by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>fraud, which is a felony.

      Yes turning people's consoles into bricks IS fraud, and both the U.S. and EU governments should drag Nintendo into court and rape them for millions of dollars in punishment. BUT until that happens (if ever), we the people have a right to replace the consoles that Nintendo turned into trash, just the same as you have a right to shoot someone who stabs you in the stomach. It's called self-defense - protecting yourself from getting screwed.

      Yes, but Nintendo has a defense that Average Joe Sixpack doesn't have -- a large team of attorneys and enough money to throw around to shut up anybody attacking them.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    8. Re:Why is that legal? by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad it turns out the people with guns are the ones that are the most happy to hand over their rights, just so long as they get to keep their guns.

    9. Re:Why is that legal? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>Your conjectures are nice, but they're purely theoretical

      Not at all. I don't know about your country but in the U.S. the "people are at the top" principle is the foundation of this society. To say otherwise is to believe the lies of the politicians, and thereby make yourself a serf and them the ultimate masters. Don't just voluntarily become a serf.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:Why is that legal? by cwrinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever considered asking Nintendo? "Hey, I updated to 4.2 and my Wii won't boot... No, I don't have a mod chip... No, I don't have any homebrew.... So, can you help me?" Consider for a moment how customer friendly Nintendo was when Wii Remotes were being thrown at TV screens. Not only did they replace the Wii Remotes, but they replaced the TVs and reimbursed for some medical costs as well. And then they quickly released "fixes", for free, in the form of reinforced wrist-bands and protective coverings for the remotes.

      --
      Here's a cookie... *psst* it's MAGIC
    11. Re:Why is that legal? by EtherMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually your proposal is even dumber because you defrauded a store *in your own state* and *without the protection of Visa/Mastercard* to back you up, plus your standing *in their territory* where a security guard can grab you and drag you into a backroom for interrogation.

      [blah blah blah]

      Escalating the dumbness scale:

      - interstate lines

      That makes you guilty of Interstate Wire Fraud under 18 U.S.C. Â 1343, a crime investigated by the FBI and prosecuted in a United States Federal Court. Not a trivial offense.

      - U.S. post office delivery confirmation ("Yes we returned the console")

      Congratulates, you've now committed Mail Fraud, which is the parent of Interstate Wire Fraud, and carries the same penalties.

      - the law itself which states - if the consumer can provide proof-of-return, then the business must refund the money

      What specific law are you referring to? There's no law I'm aware of that requires a business (or any other entity) to refund your money for the return of something other than what they sold you. Furthermore, a business is able to stipulate terms limiting or forbidding the return of merchandise, impose penalties and fees or other conditions.

      There is no legal right to a refund.

      - The credit card company

      That is the federal crime of Bank Fraud, also described in U.S.C.Title 18. A credit card company will not just accept your word for a dispute. They will also contact the merchant and decide on the information and evidence provided by the difference parties, and always with respect to the law. If the merchant responds that you returned a used, out-of-warranty, non-functional item in place of the new item you received, they will very likely rule in favor of the merchant.

      And if you used Paypal to make the credit card payment, then that's yet another layer of protection between you and the megacorp.

      PayPal protection only applies for items purchased from eBay. Otherwise, PayPal doesn't want to get involved.

      And now, if anyone participating in this discussion actually takes your advice, you are both also guilt of conspiracy to commit fraud.

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    12. Re:Why is that legal? by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is zero chance of that passing muster in a courtroom. They just slapped that on there to discourage people from prying.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  2. When will they learn? by Mr0bvious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It costs them a lot of money to try and stop modding etc, when they will fail every time.

    Waste of time, money and reputation.

    --
    Never happened. True story.
    1. Re:When will they learn? by sopssa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well they dont really fail. Sure, someone finds a way around it. But it gets harder to get the homebrew working again. I updated to 4.0 before and didn't know you couldn't get all the homebrew working again. I tried to downgrade a few times, but it failed always (and I followed the guides closely). Then I just forgot about it and didn't try again.

      So in that case they won. And I'm pretty computer knowledgeable person myself, it would be even worse for someone who isn't.

  3. Re:Also why are they doing it? by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They want to enforce region locking, or they wouldn't have implemented it to start with...

    Region locking hurts legitimate users, and is used to screw them out of more money... Region locking should be illegal. It does absolutely NOTHING to benefit the consumer.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. Re:Also why are they doing it? by Eraesr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a preposterous comparison. If I wanted to import a crate of Coca Cola from the US, then I'm damn well able to open the bottle _and_ drink it's contents. I don't see how region locking protects the average user either. Technically speaking, there doesn't have to be a difference between a NTSC-U or PAL release. It's also a "problem" that PC games or even Nintendo DS games never had to deal with. There's no region locking on either platform. So why would it be necessary for the Wii? If Nintendo is truly worried about me putting an NTSC disc in my PAL Wii, then at most they could show a message telling me that I'm attempting to play an NTSC disc and that it may differ from a PAL release of the same game. "Do you wish to continue? Yes or No?" The only real advantages to region locking are for the producer of the product. They can put up different price points for different markets and prevent consumers from tapping into a different market (region).

  5. Re:Also why are they doing it? by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I grew up in Texas. There are a lot of Mexicans there. One thing that some Mexicans missed is Coke with sugar. Despite the television adds to the contrary, it corn syrup isn't indistinguishable from sugar. So I've been in markets that sold the Mexican Coke next to the American one. There was no confusion. If there was, you read the ingredients and you'd know the difference. Coke may sell different stuff in differnt places for regional taste, but they don't (and can't) sue people that resell it. But for some reason, you think doing that with software makes sense?

  6. Sitting on the fence by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We (Parallel Realities) have written a bunch of games and I was recently looking into porting these onto the DS and Wii via Homebrew, because I think people would enjoy playing them (on the move in the DS's case), so I'm all for Homebrew.

    What I am against though is modding your games machine just so you can download the games off the web without having to pay for them, which I think is what Nintendo is actually annoyed about.

    However, getting around region locking does mean that one can play games only released in Japan (or the US if you live in Europe). In this instance I could understand a gamer's frustration and why they might download it off the web (because they can't a company willing to ship overseas).

    1. Re:Sitting on the fence by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just that either - I go on holiday to various places around the planet. Sometimes I go into a music or games shop whilst I'm there and buy one or two things to take home.

      Why should I not be able to play them when I get home?

      And yes, some games (the original Katamari Damacy, for instance) are not released in some markets and as a result are hard to get hold of, even if you've soft-modded the console to play other regions.

      It often seems to me that the benefits of a global economy are reaped by companies by employing labour and sourcing materials where they like, but they try their damnedest to stop consumers doing the same.

  7. Re:Dear Nintendo, by Arimus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So was Azrael and look where he ended up...

    Think while MS and Sony are demons, Apple, Nintendo, Google are all well along the path to being fallen angels.

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  8. Re:Also why are they doing it? by Urza9814 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not just a Texas thing - you can find the Mexican Coke in some standard supermarkets (specifically, Wegmans) even up here in central Pennsylvania. I bought some not too long ago - it was good stuff. And it's not just people who are used to having that kind who buy it. Clearly people are willing to pay a premium for it, and buy enough of it that it's worth keeping in stock. I'd imagine people would be willing to pay a premium for video games from other regions as well if it was possible to play them....

  9. Re:They can probably recover at the repair depot by Burpmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can flash chips without removing them from the board if the board designer was thinking intelligently. In my company's HW dev labs they re-flash bricked system boards all the time

    Those boards weren't designed to prevent modding. No, I bet Nintendo has to replace the whole circuit board containing the flash chip due to their own paranoia.

  10. Re:Arbitrary code? by marcansoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they don't like it, they're idiots. They make a profit on Wiimotes, why would they be against using them on computers?

  11. Region locking can help consumers by langelgjm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only real advantages to region locking are for the producer of the product. They can put up different price points for different markets and prevent consumers from tapping into a different market (region).

    Depends on how you look at it. If the manufacturer can't price discriminate between different market segments, they will price the product beyond the reach of a lot of people who might want it. In that case, region locking can actually help the (poorer) consumer, since they will be able to purchase a product that otherwise would have been too expensive for them. Meanwhile the manufacturer avoids the risk of arbitrage.

    At least, that is how it's supposed to work in theory. In reality region locking is used for a lot more than price discrimination, and it's just pointless and annoying when the product isn't even sold in multiple regions.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  12. Re:Wii vs. Mac mini? by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Umm, it's far, far cheaper and I already have one set up under the tv.

    I don't want to go spending more money when I already have something with a tv output, an optical drive and wireless networking. It doesn't do it better. It does it at the same time as being a wii and for no more money.

  13. Re:Wii without the discs by marcansoft · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Although there have been endless debates about the true effect of piracy on sales, they're all irrelevant. Reality doesn't mater, coporate opinion matters, and coporate opinion is (of course) that piracy harms sales, and that piracy must be eliminated. Blatantly associating homebrew with piracy is a great way to get targeted more often. We're not out to help Nintendo or hurt them, we just want to do our thing and we don't want to have anything to do with warez.

    Nevermind that the people behind piracy tools are freeloading idiots who love to violate source licenses and produce tools of incredibly poor quality. I wouldn't touch their tools with a 10 foot pole, and I certainly don't want to be associated with them.