Slashdot Mirror


Rupert Murdoch Says Google Is Stealing His Content

Hugh Pickens writes Weston Kosova writes in Newsweek that Rupert Murdoch gave an impassioned speech to media executives in Beijing decrying that search engines — in particular Google — are stealing from him, because Google links to his stories but doesn't pay News Corp. to do so. 'The aggregators and plagiarists will soon have to pay a price for the co-opting of our content,' Murdoch says. 'But if we do not take advantage of the current movement toward paid content, it will be the content creators — the people in this hall — who will pay the ultimate price and the content kleptomaniacs who triumph.' But if Murdoch really thinks Google is stealing from him, and if he really wants Google to stop driving all those readers to his Web sites at no charge, he can simply stop Google from linking to their news stories by going to his Web site's robot.txt file and adding 'Disallow.'"

14 of 504 comments (clear)

  1. I feel so sorry for poor little Ruppy by onionman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Must be absolutely horrible having all those evil search engines actually index his pages! I guess his robots files aren't working or something.

  2. Rupert Murdoch is something else. by Cytlid · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet he thinks the dewey decimal system "steals" content from libraries by classifying and categorizing books.

    --
    FLR
  3. Re:How can someone be so rich and stupid by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, Murdoch's really stupid... like a Fox.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  4. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    You have to look at it from his perspective.

    Basically his perspective is "Someone else has money. I want it." ...

    Not the best perspective by my standards, but he has many times more money than I do, so who am I to say he's a F*#@#ing idiot.

  5. Ronald Reagan put it best by russotto · · Score: 2, Funny

    "There you go again".

  6. Re:Read between the lines ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not only that, but the one on foxnews.com provides Google sitemaps.

    That's too bad. Google's spider really has better things to do than index Fox News ... for example, my great aunt Betty's second cousin's daughter's wedding photos.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  7. Re:movement toward paid content? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    The entirety of his business model, it seems, is to come up with something and go on about how big a deal it is, until it actually becomes a semi-big deal.

    It's called "The Big Lie". Repeat something often enough, and eventually it becomes the truth. For example, we've been told repeatedly for almost forty years how we put men on the Moon, and now everybody is convinced it really happened. Oh sure, there are the conspiracy nuts that think we actually went to the Moon and back, and that the government is trying to cover up all those successful Apollo missions, but nobody takes them seriously.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  8. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

    We should celebrate the senile and powerful they make the last foolish stand for each generation before they are laughed to death. It is like macabre performance art.

  9. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, he just wants to run things his way and have the search companies pay him. If he blocks Google et al. from indexing his sites, there's no money in that for him. So it's better for him to pretend robots.txt etc. don't exist at all and instead make a case for a very different kind of web - one that allows him to get more money.

  10. Re:A simple solution by damburger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looking at those girls, the first word that comes to mind is not 'expensive'...

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  11. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Funny

    The issue here is that if you are charging for something that someone else is giving away for free, your'e not going to survive. The point of this meeting, and of Murdoch's speech is that the "content providers" have to join together and demand payment for all "quality" content, and they have to join together to aggressively defend their IP.

    I love the smell of a price fixing cartel in the morning.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  12. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    My insane step-brother calls his ditto-head insane conservative blog authors "analysts", but that particular filter has "proved" Obama is a non-citizen Muslim gay communist murderer, who never wrote a book.

    Well, Obama is certainly communist and Muslim. The non-citizen issue is still to be adequately proved, but I'm hopeful. I haven't heard about gay or murderer. Writing a book is arguably trivial, so I won't argue there.

    Your step-brother might not be all that wrong. Care to post a link to his sight?

  13. Re:Dear Mr Murdoch by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sad? Sad? Dude, this is Rupert Fucking Murdoch we're talking about. The most evil man alive. Every second his foul influence remains on the earth is a second too long.

  14. Re:Maybe he doesn't know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So what you're saying is that in Contemporary Australia, WE export our criminals to YOU?