Slashdot Mirror


New Jersey Outshines Most Others In Solar Energy

An anonymous reader points out this CNBC story which says that "New Jersey—known more for its turnpike, shopping malls and industrial sprawl—has become a solar energy powerhouse, outshining sunnier states like Hawaii and Nevada. And it's largely because of incentives that make it cheaper for residents and businesses to buy and install solar power systems."

16 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Not solar panels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that shine is coming from their hair gel.

  2. Carbon emissions sleep with the fishes by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, it would be nice if my state had something like this. The crazy high upfront costs are the only thing keeping me from installing solar panels myself.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Carbon emissions sleep with the fishes by benjamindees · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't understand. It's free money. That's how it works. Free. Money. They print it on big printing presses and everything. You'd better get in line or you'll miss out.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Carbon emissions sleep with the fishes by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the kind of thinking that has gotten this country in the mess it is in. Everyone from the poor to the rich looking for a way to take a swig from the trough and not worrying about putting it back in. Want a new car? Go to the government. Screwed up your bank? Go to the government.

      I think we have abstracted money (which in itself is an abstract concept) to the point that no one gets that resources are not infinite. If a project is not worth doing without government subsidy, then it is economically not viable. Sometimes, gov't should offer subsidies to kick start a program. But solar is far past that point.

      The bottom line is that practically everyone is looking to someone else to pay for their wants, needs and desires. That is no sustainable. I fear that my children will be the first generation to inherit a country that is in worse condition than the one I inherited.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Carbon emissions sleep with the fishes by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For those like me who don't normally read linked articles, here's a summary:

      Obama, Biden, and other executive officers have spent 75% of their time in states that put them into office. i.e. The blue states. AND these trips are publicly funded, according to this Associated Press article. They are solidifying their base in preparation for the next election. (Apparently the red states can go to hell as they get ignored.) Dubya Bush did the same thing, spending a lot of time in red and "purple" states.

      Quote: "The vice president has made five stimulus trips just to Pennsylvania, a must-win state in 2008 that never faded from Obama's political planning meetings. All told, administration officials have been to the Keystone state more than three dozen times since January."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. Re:So it's cheap... by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, I'm kind of wondering what the payoff is. I know that living in one of the cities with the lowest average solar insolation that I would do way more good for the environment by buying one panel for someone in AZ then plastering my entire roof with panels. Of course like Jersey we DO have a large body of water with a significant amount of available wind energy, so why aren't they building large scale wind farms just offshore instead of subsidizing inefficient use of solar panels?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  4. 2% by 2012? by andy1307 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously...WTF is wrong with people...why don't they consider nuclear power?

    1. Re:2% by 2012? by characterZer0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they do not understand it, and people are scared by things they do not understand.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:2% by 2012? by Bandman · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, very technically speaking, solar power IS nuclear power...

    3. Re:2% by 2012? by Unoriginal+Nick · · Score: 4, Informative

      New Jersey already gets 50% of its electricity from nuclear.

    4. Re:2% by 2012? by cryptolemur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because they do not understand it, and people are scared by things they do not understand.

      Or perhaps because they do understand it? Compared to wind energy, the initial cost are twice as much, operating costs thrice as much and fuel costs infinitely more. And that was 6 years ago, wind has come down since, while nuclear remains the energy of the future...
      Oh, and besides high costs and 8-12 years of construction time, nuclear energy has to deal with safety, waste and proliferation. Somehow it's just not what investors are looking for right now.

    5. Re:2% by 2012? by Unoriginal+Nick · · Score: 4, Informative

      Replying to myself because I was still looking for this when I posted. Year-to-date (to June), there have been 16,920 thousand megawatthours of electricity from nuclear out of 29,244 - almost 58%.

  5. Tax dollars by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real question is:

    Would it make more sense to subsidize options like small scale solar in order to encourage homes/businesses to "go greener" and to take some load off the central grid?

    OR

    Does it make more sense to spend that money fixing the current rickety grid and then put all that green capacity in places that actually get a lot of sunlight all year?

  6. No, it's very, very expensive... by tomhath · · Score: 5, Insightful
    FTA:

    The savings is what got New Jerseyans Bob and Mary Keppel to install a 6-kilowatt solar system on the roof of their Cinnaminson, N.J. home this past summer.... The full price of the project, including installation, came to $48,000. Right away, the state sent a subsidy check for $10,500 that the Keppel’s signed over to the contractors to buy supplies. Using computer software, their contractor estimates that they will get a $11,250 federal tax credit this year. That would cut the total cost to $26,250, a 45-percent reduction.

    How do rebates "cut the total cost"? The system cost was $48,000 for a mere 6kw of capacity. It doesn't matter if the homeowners or the taxpayers foot the bill, it's still $48,000, that's not cheap by any measure.

  7. Re:So it's cheap... by NoYob · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Solar panels on roofs is an easier sell than big ugly windmills obscuring people's view of the ocean and lakes.

    Now, ask yourself, who are the people that live on the ocean and lakes? What kind of political power they have?

    Sounds absurd? See "Windmills Ocean Massachusetts Kennedy Martha's Vineyard"

    Big ugly industrial infrastructure that benefits society has a place: near poor people.

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  8. Solar on my NJ house by mydots · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in NJ and have a 7.8kW solar system on my roof. I purchased it through Home Dept/BP Solar. The state rebate covered about 65% of the cost. I only had to pay the other 35% of the cost up front. I applied for the system in 2005 and about 6 months later in April 2006 I had a working system on my roof. I have been extremely happy with its performance especially since my roof faces pretty much directly south. Not only do I save in electricity, I also get Solar Renewable Energy Credits that I can sell to help pay for my cost of the system. An SREC is received for every 1000kWH of electricity generated. My system generates about 9 SREC's per solar year. The solar year begins in June and ends in May. After it was installed I immediately purchased RS485 communcation boards for the two inverters and an RS232 to RS485 converter for a PC and runs the SunnyData software that continuously monitors the system. It reads various data every 8 seconds and I use ssh/rsync to push it to a linux server every minute where I wrote some scripts to parse the data and create almost real time graphs of its performance. For anyone interested, I setup my own domain mysolarenergysystem.com where you can view all the details about the system. I also had the electric company replace my meter with a net meter, so each month on my bill I can see my exact in and out usage. The net meter has what looks like a phone jack that can be used for remote monitoring. I asked them about it because I wanted to connect it to my computer, but unfortunately they didn't give me much of an answer except that its not used, but would have been nice to monitor and graph daily statistics for that as well.